Ready for some fake job numbers? Trump installs his Yes-Man in BLS

[BackAgain]

Thats right, you pulled it out of your ass and are now all upset you got called on your bullshit.

Again, **** yourself, Antionette. Look down to post 199 and the link to the shitbag’s post from 2023.

You’re a simpleton. And, like fake conservative, you have no willingness to be honest.

 

[BackAgain]

Thats right, you pulled it out of your ass and are now all upset you got called on your bullshit.

Nah. I’ve now proved it. And you’re a lost cause, Auntie.

Hey, speaking of losers, do you still believe that Biden the Potato was “sharp?” You gullible ass rash.

 

[AntonToo]

Again, **** yourself, Antionette. Look down to post 199 and the link to the shitbag’s post from 2023.

Nothing there about him denying BLS numbers under Trump's first administration.

What to try again dummy?

 

[Mac1958]

It's no miracle, they are just emotionally invested in NOT understanding even most basic, common sense economics.

I've said many times, NOTHING illustrates the Dunning-Kruger Effect more accurately than a Trumpster lecturing others on macroeconomics. 100% arrogant confidence, 0% knowledge and understanding.

 

[Winco]

I’ve now proved it.

You sure DID.
Well Done.
Here are the numbers.

Summary Table​

Metric	Value at Start (Jan 2017)	Value at End (Jan 2021)	Net Change
Unemployment Rate (official)	4.7%	~6.4%–6.3%	+1.7 percentage points
Net Jobs (nonfarm payroll)	—	—	–2.7 million jobs

 

[Cellblock2429]

What ass did you get "few %" from? Estimates are routinely MANY % of total job growth reported in initial release and they are ESPECIALLY off during times of economic volatility like during covid...or huge new across the board tariffs.

Maybe you didn't "gloss over" and can tell what fault specially BLS statisticians commited.

Comeon stop fronting, we both know you know nothing about any estimating and are just repeating White House propaganda.

/----/ You still haven't refuted the White House claims.
What about MSN?
MSN
https://www.msn.com › en-us › money › markets › revise…

Revised Data Exposes “Overstated” Job Creation …​

Revised figures reveal a significant overstatement in the Harris-Biden administration's job creation claims, with 818,000 fewer jobs than initially …

 

[BackAgain]

Nothing there about him denying BLS numbers under Trump's first administration.

What to try again dummy?

No. I supported my position — you dishonest retard. And I wrecked yours, which comes as no surprise ever.

 

[AntonToo]

No. I supported my position — you dishonest retard. And I wrecked yours, which comes as no surprise ever.

You didn't support anything, your claim that he only liked numbers from Democrat administration is bs.

 

[BackAgain]

You didn't support anything, your claim that he only liked numbers from Democrat administration is bs.

If you’re going to quote me, maybe try a a copy and paste.

And I stand by what I posted and my clear refutation of your nonsense.

You got refuted.

We both know it.

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

When did the woman he fired get it right? Show us just ONE month that wasn't revised.

I’m confused. You asked me if she had made errors, and then she asked you switched to revisions instead of errors.

are you banking on people equating revisions with errors?

 

[kyzr]

LOL....and Americans will be paying that $300b out of their own pocket.
You don't even believe the stupid MAGA bullshit that you post.

Not true. Tariffs are shared by the importer, the merchant, and possibly the consumer.
If the consumers paid 100% of the tariff, they'd probably buy another product.
Producers want to keep their market share.

Too bad that isn't what Trump is doing. Your fantasies aren't conservative policy.

We'll see if we can get to a balanced budget. Trump's budgets start in October.

A strong dollar is conservative policy. Printing money is what democrats like Biden do.

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

If you’re going to quote me, maybe try a a copy and paste.

And I stand by what I posted and my clear refutation of your nonsense.

You got refuted.

We both know it.

every single monthly jobs report during Trump’s first administration (Jan 2017 – Jan 2021) was later revised by the BLS.
Did you just embarrass yourself by claiming Trump had a dumbass BLS statistician during his first term?

You are not convincing when you pretend to have looked things up.

 

[BackAgain]

every single monthly jobs report during Trump’s first administration (Jan 2017 – Jan 2021) was later revised by the BLS.
Did you just embarrass yourself by claiming Trump had a dumbass BLS statistician during his first term?

It’s hard to find any economic numbers for any job numbers etc which were not later subjected to revision, stupid. It’s a function of GIGO.

But pretend your concerns are objective.

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

It’s hard to find any economic numbers for any job numbers etc which were not later subjected to revision, stupid. It’s a function of GIGO.

But pretend your concerns are objective.

This clown embarrassed his buddy Nostra, who is the one who claimed that revisions = errors.
But then, you probably private messaged him apologizing for your oopsie. Keep up with the thread comments next time.

 

[BackAgain]

This clown embarrassed his buddy Nostra, who is the one who claimed that revisions = errors.
But then, you probably private messaged him apologizing for your oopsie. Keep up with the thread comments next time.

Your imagination is as dishonest as you are.

I am pleased I embarrassed you, though.

Well deserved, you stupid ****.

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

Your imagination is as dishonest as you are.

I am pleased I embarrassed you, though.

Well deserved, you stupid ****.

Did Nostra said it’s ok, no hard feelings?
I don’t think you will be wanting to talk about revisions after this unwanted betrayal of your buddy. .

 

[BackAgain]

Did Nostra said it’s ok, no hard feelings?
I don’t think you will be wanting to talk about revisions after this unwanted betrayal of your buddy. .

I wouldn’t know. Unlike you linbtard vermin, we tend to form our own opinions.

Your DNC talking points mean nothing to us. But you silly twits dutifully obey.

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

Not true. Tariffs are shared by the importer, the merchant, and possibly the consumer.

Mostly the consumer. Your $300b profit is a total ******* lie.....just so you can feel good about voting for a total ******* idiot like Trump.

If the consumers paid 100% of the tariff, they'd probably buy another product.
Producers want to keep their market share.

We'll see if we can get to a balanced budget. Trump's budgets start in October.

There is no suspense, simp.....the CBO already stated that Trump's budget will be a disaster.

A strong dollar is conservative policy. Printing money is what democrats like Biden do.

Tariffs are not a conservative policy and the tariffs are going to cause a massive increase in inflation. More MAGA simp lies.

 

[Delldude]

There is no suspense, simp.....the CBO already stated that Trump's budget will be a disaster.

That the same CBO that's full of career democrats?

 

[kyzr]

Mostly the consumer. You $300b profit is a total ******* lie.....just so you can feel good about voting for a total ******* idiot like Trump.

After 4-years of a real idiot, Trump looks "brilliant" by comparison. He can even do real "wide-ranging" press conferences.

There is no suspense, simp.....the CBO already stated that Trump's budget will be a disaster.

CBO said the BBB would have a $380b annual deficit. Compare that to Biden's $1.85T annual deficits.
Tariffs are at least $300b a year, so that almost balances.
Add ib the DOGE $190b annual savings, if congress acts.
Add in the Fed cutting rates, where a 1% cut nets $300b saved in interest on the debt.
Add in the CBO's assumed 1.8% GDP, where 3% GDP is more likely, and tax revenue increases
When the dust settles Trump should net a $500b surplus.

Tariffs are not a conservative policy and the tariffs are going to cause a massive increase in inflation. More MAGA simp lies.

Tariffs don't cause inflation. You were probably saying Biden's inflation was "transitory" at 9%.
If you are right you will win in the mid-terms, if we are right we win.
Its not a debate as much as a platform for 2026.