By installing a massive amount of global cooling solar farms?Sounds serious!
How are you going to get China to stop releasing CO2?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
By installing a massive amount of global cooling solar farms?Sounds serious!
How are you going to get China to stop releasing CO2?
By installing a massive amount of global cooling solar farms?
That’s funny because I think widespread use of solar power is a horrible idea.You're sounding like a leftist again.
I aced my engineering economics class in college. You?I know it's about economics, but this book could help you here as well.
That’s funny because I think widespread use of solar power is a horrible idea.
I aced my engineering economics class in college. You?
Blocking sunlight which would have heated the surface of the plant is a bad idea in the middle of an ice age regardless of the method used.It may be the worst idea ever.
But not because moving energy from A>B causes the planet to cool.
I’m sure you do see it that way.It's always sad when you get older and forget all the science and math you once knew.
Blocking sunlight which would have heated the surface of the plant is a bad idea in the middle of an ice age regardless of the method used.
I’m sure you do see it that way.
Anything which prevents visible light from striking the surface of the planet is blocking that light from producing heat at the surface. And satellite measurements show a localized cooling effect.If you said "reflecting" instead of "blocking", you might have a point.
Since the panels reflect much less energy back to space, your claim is backwards.
Tell me how replacing fossil fuels with solar doesn’t reduce waste heat.Tell me again how the energy moved from the solar panel to the
household appliances somehow warms the planet less.
Use some of your engineering economics, if you think that will help.
Anything which prevents visible light from striking the surface of the planet is blocking that light from producing heat at the surface. And satellite measurements show a localized cooling effect.
Tell me how replacing fossil fuels with solar doesn’t reduce waste heat.
Satellites measured a cooling effect at solar farms and solar reduces waste heat.Why does the photon striking the surface warm the planet more than the electricity
generated from the photon striking the panel?
Isn't the energy conserved?
Satellites measured a localized cooling effect above solar farms and solar reduces waste heat. So the widespread use of solar can lead to a net cooling of the planet. That is my claim.If you're changing your original claim, state it plainly.
Well now, China is putting in more renewables than the rest of the world put together. At present they are #1 in GHG emissions, we are #2, and India is #3. However, if China keeps up the present rate of renewable implementation, we may soon be #1 again. Certainly implementing the startup of very inefficient and horribly polluting coal fired plants can only damage our nation, and will contribute to making us the #1 polluting nation.Sounds serious!
How are you going to get China to stop releasing CO2?
10,000 square miles of solar at present efficiencies would power our nation. Even if it did lead to localized cooling, that is far less than the effect of the 750,000 square miles of Arctic sea ice we have lost since 1980.Satellites measured a localized cooling effect above solar farms and solar reduces waste heat. So the widespread use of solar can lead to a net cooling of the planet. That is my claim.
10,000 square miles of solar at present efficiencies would power our nation. Even if it did lead to localized cooling, that is far less than the effect of the 750,000 square miles of Arctic sea ice we have lost since 1980.
Satellites measured a cooling effect at solar farms and solar reduces waste heat.