Rate of change in the Ordovician extinction

Satellites measured a localized cooling effect above solar farms and solar reduces waste heat. So the widespread use of solar can lead to a net cooling of the planet. That is my claim.

Does the planet cool if the solar is in addition to other energy sources without replacing them?
 
Well now, China is putting in more renewables than the rest of the world put together. At present they are #1 in GHG emissions, we are #2, and India is #3. However, if China keeps up the present rate of renewable implementation, we may soon be #1 again. Certainly implementing the startup of very inefficient and horribly polluting coal fired plants can only damage our nation, and will contribute to making us the #1 polluting nation.

Well now, China is putting in more renewables than the rest of the world put together.

If they add one new coal plant a week and one new solar plant a week, does that still increase their total CO2?

Certainly implementing the startup of very inefficient and horribly polluting coal fired plants can only damage our nation.

Our coal plants are more efficient and less polluting than China's. Should we build more of them than they do?
 
10,000 square miles of solar at present efficiencies would power our nation. Even if it did lead to localized cooling, that is far less than the effect of the 750,000 square miles of Arctic sea ice we have lost since 1980.
Isn't the goal of replacing fossil fuels with solar to cool the planet?
 
I measured a cooling effect in my freezer.

Did the solar panels destroy energy, like my freezer did?

Have you discovered a new physics no one has ever seen before?

Could be.

Reminds me of the brilliant USMB physicist who discovered the fact that photons could see into the future
and across the universe, to decide whether they would travel in a certain direction or not, so that they would
never strike matter that was hotter than the matter that had emitted them.

Like many unsung geniuses, he collapsed into insanity and disappeared.

I pray you don't suffer the same fate.
Does the planet cool if the solar is in addition to other energy sources without replacing them?
Satellites measured a localized cooling effect above 116 solar farms and solar reduces waste heat. So do enough of that and the widespread use of solar can lead to a net cooling of the planet. That is my claim. Which is a horrible idea in the middle of an ice age.
 
Satellites measured a localized cooling effect above 116 solar farms and solar reduces waste heat. So do enough of that and the widespread use of solar can lead to a net cooling of the planet. That is my claim. Which is a horrible idea in the middle of an ice age.

How do the solar panels magically destroy energy?
Can't energy only be transformed from one form to another?

If we need an additional 1 trillion kWh for AI and it's going to all come
from new solar farms, how much cooler will that make the planet?

Show me your calculations.
 
How do the solar panels magically destroy energy?
Can't energy only be transformed from one form to another?

If we need an additional 1 trillion kWh for AI and it's going to all come
from new solar farms, how much cooler will that make the planet?

Show me your calculations.
Satellites measured a localized cooling effect above 116 solar farms and solar reduces waste heat. So do enough of that and the widespread use of solar can lead to a net cooling of the planet. That is my claim. Which is a horrible idea in the middle of an ice age.

But you keep pretending that solar isn't a horrible idea in the middle of an ice age.
 
Satellites measured a localized cooling effect above 116 solar farms and solar reduces waste heat. So do enough of that and the widespread use of solar can lead to a net cooling of the planet. That is my claim. Which is a horrible idea in the middle of an ice age.

But you keep pretending that solar isn't a horrible idea in the middle of an ice age.

You can't show your calculations?
So how do you explain the mysterious loss of energy?
Where did it go?
 
You can't show your calculations?
So how do you explain the mysterious loss of energy?
Where did it go?
Satellite measurements ought to be enough. So should the fact that waste heat will be reduced by replacing fossil fuels with solar. The planet needs more CO2, not less.

Why are you so against fossil fuels?
 
Satellite measurements ought to be enough. So should the fact that waste heat will be reduced by replacing fossil fuels with solar. The planet needs more CO2, not less.

Why are you so against fossil fuels?

How did the satellite measurements explain the loss of energy?
How do you explain the loss of energy?
 
How did the satellite measurements explain the loss of energy?
How do you explain the loss of energy?
The satellites measured the before and after temperature above of the solar farms. The temperatures were lower during the daytime after the solar farms were operational.

Why do you believe replacing fossil fuels with solar power doesn't reduce waste heat?
 
The satellites measured the before and after temperature above of the solar farms. The temperatures were lower during the daytime after the solar farms were operational.

Why do you believe replacing fossil fuels with solar power doesn't reduce waste heat?

The satellites measured the before and after temperature above of the solar farms. The temperatures were lower during the daytime after the solar farms were operational.

It's a miracle!

Why do you believe replacing fossil fuels with solar power doesn't reduce waste heat?

Why are you changing your claim?
 
Satellite measurements ought to be enough. So should the fact that waste heat will be reduced by replacing fossil fuels with solar. The planet needs more CO2, not less.

Why are you so against fossil fuels?

How did the satellite measurements explain the loss of energy?
How do you explain the loss of energy?
 
The satellites measured the before and after temperature above of the solar farms. The temperatures were lower during the daytime after the solar farms were operational.

It's a miracle!

Why do you believe replacing fossil fuels with solar power doesn't reduce waste heat?

Why are you changing your claim?
My claim has always been the widespread use of solar is a bad idea in the middle of an ice age.
 
How did the satellite measurements explain the loss of energy?
How do you explain the loss of energy?
Why does that matter? Aren't the measurements enough? Or do you want more solar power in the middle of an ice age?
 
15th post
I refuse to recognize any geological period other than the Lower Silurian period. :20:
 
I refuse to recognize any geological period other than the Lower Silurian period. :20:
The you aren't going to like this.

1673744930146.webp
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom