Rate of change in the Ordovician extinction

[elektra]

The planet is warming just like it always does after the end of a glacial period. You aren't helping the opposition to AGW by denying the planet is warming.

How about the sea level? Do you believe the sea level is rising?

I have not given my opinion either way. It is interesting how you make assumptions with zero knowledge. Of course you think you know something about me so your comprehension is very poor.

If you like, you can start a thread and if I fine it not so boring as your typical posts maybe I will participate

 

[ding]

#6, 7; Prior to the very rapid increase in manmade GHG's in the atmosphere, the CO2 levels were determined by the response to the Milankovitch Cycles. But as the GHG levels climbed rapidly, they became the driving force for retaining heat in the atmosphere and oceans. The so called hockey stick graph, and all the studies that verified that graph, confirmed this.

Incorrect. Orbital forcing is the red herring of the climate community. Disruption of heat circulation from the Atlantic to the Arctic triggers abrupt northern hemisphere glaciation. Extensive continental glaciation amplifies the glaciation due to and increase in albedo. Resumption of heat circulation from the Atlantic to the Arctic causes the northern hemisphere to deglaciate due to a reduction in albedo as the ice melts.

 

[ding]

I have not given my opinion either way. It is interesting how you make assumptions with zero knowledge. Of course you think you know something about me so your comprehension is very poor.

If you like, you can start a thread and if I fine it not so boring as your typical posts maybe I will participate

That's probably because you are afraid to admit what you believe.

 

[elektra]

That's probably because you are afraid to admit what you believe.

Or maybe it is because the temperature is going up and down thus you are a fool to argue either way.

 

[ding]

Or maybe it is because the temperature is going up and down thus you are a fool to argue either way.

It is an interglacial period. The overall trend is warming. And it will continue to warm until the next glacial period begins and there will be no mistaking that abrupt climate change. Just like it has done the last 30 glacial cycles for the last 3 million years.

 

[elektra]

It is an interglacial period. The overall trend is warming. And it will continue to warm until the next glacial period begins and there will be no mistaking that abrupt climate change. Just like it has done the last 30 glacial cycles for the last 3 million years.

Again, so what. I told you, I never mentioned your opinion, I have not replied to you or your opinion at all. Now you keep trolling my posts for what? So I can point out you are fool?

This is at least the 20th time you have trolled my post.

This is the fact that I know. Ding-a-ling has for days, weeks, months, years, repeated the same old tired opinion. Ding-a-ling has ran out of people to tell the tired old fairy tale too. Hence, ding-a-ling must troll more people to find a new adversary to repeat the tired old opinions to.

Ding-a-ling, carry on, fool

 

[ding]

Again, so what. I told you, I never mentioned your opinion, I have not replied to you or your opinion at all. Now you keep trolling my posts for what? So I can point out you are fool?

This is at least the 20th time you have trolled my post.

This is the fact that I know. Ding-a-ling has for days, weeks, months, years, repeated the same old tired opinion. Ding-a-ling has ran out of people to tell the tired old fairy tale too. Hence, ding-a-ling must troll more people to find a new adversary to repeat the tired old opinions to.

Ding-a-ling, carry on, fool

Nice rant. Make sure to tell everyone that you don't accept the planet is warming or the seas are rising.

 

[elektra]

Nice rant. Make sure to tell everyone that ..

okay
Ding is very angry at me because in another thread I told ding that ding's opinion that solar and wind are a great is pure bullshit

Ever since then ding has decided to be a filthy fucking liar, trolling and spamming my commentary

Is that about right ding or are you going to show that ding is a liar and will continue to lie.

Ding makes old crock look like the good guy

Ding, maga, anti-agw people dont need your help ding. You make us look bad when you spew lies and hatred.

 

[ding]

okay
Ding is very angry at me because in another thread I told ding that ding's opinion that solar and wind are a great is pure bullshit

Ever since then ding has decided to be a filthy fucking liar, trolling and spamming my commentary

Is that about right ding or are you going to show that ding is a liar and will continue to lie.

Ding makes old crock look like the good guy

Ding, maga, anti-agw people dont need your help ding. You make us look bad when you spew lies and hatred.

I'm not angry. If I were angry I'd be making this personal like you are making this personal. I think you need to face the reality that I know more about this stuff than you do.

 

[ding]

Hahaha, you got banned from a thread for trolling my post over ten times now you come into this thread and start back with your trolling and lies.

Ding, you are very angry seeking revenge, why else would you pist your colored pictures in this thread after they got deleted in the other,

I asked old crock for the study old crock made claims about. Can you provide the study or at least, a pretty pictures of the study.

Yes, you know so much more cause you posted a colored picture literally 231 times

Like I said before, I'm not angry. If I were angry I'd be making this personal like you are making this personal. I think you need to face the reality that I know more about this stuff than you do.

 

[toobfreak]

Now Westie, you have repeatedly proven yourself a fool.

Why do you persist in these blatant ad hominems? Do you really think they add weight to your /scientific/ arguments?

Dr. James Hansen is one of the most respected atmospheric physicists in the world.

At best, this means little more than he is widely accepted among a culture of politically-driven climatologists who long ago were exposed for selectively picking and altering data in order to advance an unproven, uncertain theory simply because it better cements their careers and assures them profits from many years of future work in the field.

I point out that every great scientist in history from Tesla to Einstein to Copernicus to Peter Higgs were all UNPOPULAR, none of them were widely respected in their time, and they all had to fight tooth and nail to get their correct and valid ideas heard because they bucked the prevailing trend.

Therefore, anyone who is "most respected" in the science community without proven creed usually becomes most suspect to me.

 

[ding]

Ding, maga, anti-agw people dont need your help ding. You make us look bad when you spew lies and hatred.

You really are wound up.

 

[ReinyDays]

Why do you persist in these blatant ad hominems? Do you really think they add weight to your /scientific/ arguments?


At best, this means little more than he is widely accepted among a culture of politically-driven climatologists who long ago were exposed for selectively picking and altering data in order to advance an unproven, uncertain theory simply because it better cements their careers and assures them profits from many years of future work in the field.

I point out that every great scientist in history from Tesla to Einstein to Copernicus to Peter Higgs were all UNPOPULAR, none of them were widely respected in their time, and they all had to fight tooth and nail to get their correct and valid ideas heard because they bucked the prevailing trend.

Therefore, anyone who is "most respected" in the science community without proven creed usually becomes most suspect to me.

Galileo Galilei was to be hung, drawn and quartered except he was childhood friends with The Pope ... only got sentenced to house arrest until dead ...

I've read parts of Dr. Hanson's textbook on climate ... the peer-review committee at the publishing house didn't let him get to carried away with his hysteria campaign ... he touched upon CO2's roll, but only on the context of about 20 other factors that effect climate ... oh, and he used math ...