Raising A Society of Fascists

[bripat9643]

So it looks like the Socialists won in the historic struggle of semantics.

Not semantics, douchebag.

Hitler's National Socialists were brutal, racist, insular, conquering dirtbags.

Fascists weren't racists. Mussolini was an Empire-Builder but Italians forgot how to fight 1,500 years ago.

Franco was neither a racist nor an Empire Builder.

And you're just a moron

I'm sorry **** wad, but I must disagree. Your alleged argument is entirely semantic. As if the word "socialist" had anything to do with Nazi philosophy. Feel free to elaborate about Hitler's writing's and speeches promoting communist ideals.

The Nazis despised liberals. Edgetho despises liberals.

Ironic isn't it.

It's Ironic that you're as stupid as NYcarbineer.

 

[NYcarbineer]

So it looks like the Socialists won in the historic struggle of semantics.

Not semantics, douchebag.

Hitler's National Socialists were brutal, racist, insular, conquering dirtbags.

Fascists weren't racists. Mussolini was an Empire-Builder but Italians forgot how to fight 1,500 years ago.

Franco was neither a racist nor an Empire Builder.

And you're just a moron

I'm sorry **** wad, but I must disagree. Your alleged argument is entirely semantic. As if the word "socialist" had anything to do with Nazi philosophy. Feel free to elaborate about Hitler's writing's and speeches promoting communist ideals.

The Nazis despised liberals. Edgetho despises liberals.

In Europe liberals are people who believe in laissez faire capitalism, so that doesn't help your case. You also despise laissez faire capitalism.

That's not true. The liberals of the early 20th century were represented by the likes of the Labour Party in the UK, which had split from the so-called classical liberals and had taken up the cause of advancing the welfare state.

No sane person thinks the European left embraces laissez-faire capitalism, then or now.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Sorry, but Boren was totally within school regulations and the law to expel those two idiot racist students. It is pathetic that anyone would sing such a song in 2015. I hope more of the students who were involved in that song get expelled.

If I were black and saw a video of a bunch of white students laughingly singing about lynching people of my race, I would not only be outraged, but in the back of my mind I would wonder just how safe I would be on that campus.

Right....I'm certain that you are more of an law expert than Eugene Volokh .... law professor, the Gary T. Schwartz Professor of Law at the UCLA School of Law.


"First, racist speech is constitutionally protected, just as is expression of other contemptible ideas; and universities may not discipline students based on their speech. That has been the unanimous view of courts that have considered campus speech codes and other campus speech restrictions — see here for some citations. The same, of course, is true for fraternity speech, racist or otherwise; see Iota Xi Chapter of Sigma Chi Fraternity v. George Mason University (4th Cir. 1993)."
Oklahoma University s Expulsion Of Racist Students Sets A Dangerous Precedent



So....within the context of this thread, that post identifies you as a fascist.

 

[NYcarbineer]

So it looks like the Socialists won in the historic struggle of semantics.

Not semantics, douchebag.

Hitler's National Socialists were brutal, racist, insular, conquering dirtbags.

Fascists weren't racists. Mussolini was an Empire-Builder but Italians forgot how to fight 1,500 years ago.

Franco was neither a racist nor an Empire Builder.

And you're just a moron

I'm sorry **** wad, but I must disagree. Your alleged argument is entirely semantic. As if the word "socialist" had anything to do with Nazi philosophy. Feel free to elaborate about Hitler's writing's and speeches promoting communist ideals.

The Nazis despised liberals. Edgetho despises liberals.

In Europe liberals are people who believe in laissez faire capitalism, so that doesn't help your case. You also despise laissez faire capitalism.

Did the Nazis in Germany support more spending for the poor and less spending on defense? That's the sort of accusation you reserve for the left...

 

[PoliticalChic]

Should Liberalsism/Progressivism continue in the ascendancy, American will be fascist, as it was when Progressive Woodrow Wilson was President.


Hyperbole?

Only to a slight degree....'fascism' in America looks different than the long black coated Gestapo of Nazi Germany because it has been altered by the history of America.


'

The Gestapo was only slightly worse than America is today.

Good one.

It doesn't say that, does it, you liar.

 

[PoliticalChic]

So it looks like the Socialists won in the historic struggle of semantics.

Not semantics, douchebag.

Hitler's National Socialists were brutal, racist, insular, conquering dirtbags.

Fascists weren't racists. Mussolini was an Empire-Builder but Italians forgot how to fight 1,500 years ago.

Franco was neither a racist nor an Empire Builder.

And you're just a moron

I'm sorry **** wad, but I must disagree. Your alleged argument is entirely semantic. As if the word "socialist" had anything to do with Nazi philosophy. Feel free to elaborate about Hitler's writing's and speeches promoting communist ideals.

The Nazis despised liberals. Edgetho despises liberals.

Ironic isn't it.

It's Ironic that you're as stupid as NYcarbineer.

Two different iniquities.

That one is stupid.....the NY guy just lies about everything.

 

[PoliticalChic]

So it looks like the Socialists won in the historic struggle of semantics.

Not semantics, douchebag.

Hitler's National Socialists were brutal, racist, insular, conquering dirtbags.

Fascists weren't racists. Mussolini was an Empire-Builder but Italians forgot how to fight 1,500 years ago.

Franco was neither a racist nor an Empire Builder.

And you're just a moron

I'm sorry **** wad, but I must disagree. Your alleged argument is entirely semantic. As if the word "socialist" had anything to do with Nazi philosophy. Feel free to elaborate about Hitler's writing's and speeches promoting communist ideals.

The Nazis despised liberals. Edgetho despises liberals.

In Europe liberals are people who believe in laissez faire capitalism, so that doesn't help your case. You also despise laissez faire capitalism.

Did the Nazis in Germany support more spending for the poor and less spending on defense? That's the sort of accusation you reserve for the left...

If you mean Liberal welfare policies, they aren't FOR the poor, they CREATE the poor by incentivizing behaviors that cause poverty.

You know that, don't you, NYLiar.

 

[bripat9643]

So it looks like the Socialists won in the historic struggle of semantics.

Not semantics, douchebag.

Hitler's National Socialists were brutal, racist, insular, conquering dirtbags.

Fascists weren't racists. Mussolini was an Empire-Builder but Italians forgot how to fight 1,500 years ago.

Franco was neither a racist nor an Empire Builder.

And you're just a moron

I'm sorry **** wad, but I must disagree. Your alleged argument is entirely semantic. As if the word "socialist" had anything to do with Nazi philosophy. Feel free to elaborate about Hitler's writing's and speeches promoting communist ideals.

The Nazis despised liberals. Edgetho despises liberals.

In Europe liberals are people who believe in laissez faire capitalism, so that doesn't help your case. You also despise laissez faire capitalism.

Did the Nazis in Germany support more spending for the poor and less spending on defense? That's the sort of accusation you reserve for the left...

They definitely supported spending on social programs. However, your claim that reduced defense spending is inherently non-fascist would imply that increased defense spending is inherently fascist. That would make FDR a fascist. He is, of course, but you will deny it to your dying breath. FDR also put American citizens in concentration camps. How much more fascist can you get?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Should Liberalsism/Progressivism continue in the ascendancy, American will be fascist, as it was when Progressive Woodrow Wilson was President.


Hyperbole?

Only to a slight degree....'fascism' in America looks different than the long black coated Gestapo of Nazi Germany because it has been altered by the history of America.


'

The Gestapo was only slightly worse than America is today.

Good one.

It doesn't say that, does it, you liar.

You are so full of it. You say that it is only slightly 'hyperbole' to say that American is fascist. It just 'looks' different than the Gestapo.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Not semantics, douchebag.

Hitler's National Socialists were brutal, racist, insular, conquering dirtbags.

Fascists weren't racists. Mussolini was an Empire-Builder but Italians forgot how to fight 1,500 years ago.

Franco was neither a racist nor an Empire Builder.

And you're just a moron

I'm sorry **** wad, but I must disagree. Your alleged argument is entirely semantic. As if the word "socialist" had anything to do with Nazi philosophy. Feel free to elaborate about Hitler's writing's and speeches promoting communist ideals.

The Nazis despised liberals. Edgetho despises liberals.

In Europe liberals are people who believe in laissez faire capitalism, so that doesn't help your case. You also despise laissez faire capitalism.

Did the Nazis in Germany support more spending for the poor and less spending on defense? That's the sort of accusation you reserve for the left...

If you mean Liberal welfare policies, they aren't FOR the poor, they CREATE the poor by incentivizing behaviors that cause poverty.

You know that, don't you, NYLiar.

Answering only yes or no, did the Nazi's in Germany support more spending on the poor and less on the military?

 

[bripat9643]

I'm sorry **** wad, but I must disagree. Your alleged argument is entirely semantic. As if the word "socialist" had anything to do with Nazi philosophy. Feel free to elaborate about Hitler's writing's and speeches promoting communist ideals.

The Nazis despised liberals. Edgetho despises liberals.

In Europe liberals are people who believe in laissez faire capitalism, so that doesn't help your case. You also despise laissez faire capitalism.

Did the Nazis in Germany support more spending for the poor and less spending on defense? That's the sort of accusation you reserve for the left...

If you mean Liberal welfare policies, they aren't FOR the poor, they CREATE the poor by incentivizing behaviors that cause poverty.

You know that, don't you, NYLiar.

Answering only yes or no, did the Nazi's in Germany support more spending on the poor and less on the military?

Those are two separate issues, turd.

So here are the cireteria for fascism we have established so far:

Social programs for the poor and the aged: FDR - check, Hitler - check
Increased military spending: FDR- check, Hitler -check
Put's unpopular racial minorities in concentration camps: FDR - check, Hitler - check
Claiming he desires peace while preparing for war: FDR - check, Hitler - check

 

[NYcarbineer]

Not semantics, douchebag.

Hitler's National Socialists were brutal, racist, insular, conquering dirtbags.

Fascists weren't racists. Mussolini was an Empire-Builder but Italians forgot how to fight 1,500 years ago.

Franco was neither a racist nor an Empire Builder.

And you're just a moron

I'm sorry **** wad, but I must disagree. Your alleged argument is entirely semantic. As if the word "socialist" had anything to do with Nazi philosophy. Feel free to elaborate about Hitler's writing's and speeches promoting communist ideals.

The Nazis despised liberals. Edgetho despises liberals.

In Europe liberals are people who believe in laissez faire capitalism, so that doesn't help your case. You also despise laissez faire capitalism.

Did the Nazis in Germany support more spending for the poor and less spending on defense? That's the sort of accusation you reserve for the left...

They definitely supported spending on social programs. However, your claim that reduced defense spending is inherently non-fascist would imply that increased defense spending is inherently fascist. That would make FDR a fascist. He is, of course, but you will deny it to your dying breath. FDR also put American citizens in concentration camps. How much more fascist can you get?

When you compare the Nazis to modern American liberals, you have to be able to show how they are similar in more ways than they are different.

Since you've conceded by punting on the above, let's move on to this.

Did the Nazis support diversity, multiculturalism, minority rights, as you love to disparagingly remind liberals of their support for the same?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

The Nazis despised liberals. Edgetho despises liberals.

dear, the Nazis were liberals who just like out liberals believed in bigger and bigger govt and less and less capitalism.

Do you understand?.

 

[Dot Com]

Answering only yes or no, did the Nazi's in Germany support more spending on the poor and less on the military?

 

[NYcarbineer]

The Nazis despised liberals. Edgetho despises liberals.

In Europe liberals are people who believe in laissez faire capitalism, so that doesn't help your case. You also despise laissez faire capitalism.

Did the Nazis in Germany support more spending for the poor and less spending on defense? That's the sort of accusation you reserve for the left...

If you mean Liberal welfare policies, they aren't FOR the poor, they CREATE the poor by incentivizing behaviors that cause poverty.

You know that, don't you, NYLiar.

Answering only yes or no, did the Nazi's in Germany support more spending on the poor and less on the military?

Those are two separate issues, turd.

You think she's such a simpleton she couldn't answer 'yes and yes' or 'yes and no' or 'no and yes' or 'no and no'?

That's cold lol.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The Nazis despised liberals. Edgetho despises liberals.

dear, the Nazis were liberals who just like out liberals believed in bigger and bigger govt and less and less capitalism.

Do you understand?.

Conservatives want bigger and bigger and bigger government in the form of the military. That doesn't sound liberal to me.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Vestment

That's not true. The liberals of the early 20th century were represented by the likes of the Labour Party in the UK, which had split from the so-called classical liberals and had taken up the cause of advancing the welfare state.

Yes... precisely. Progressives... OKA: fascists.

Who are the same Brits the fired Churchill, the instant the US Beat the hell out of the Nazis... who were Fascists, OKA: progressives.

The only thing that the British progressives had against Hitler was Hitler's desire to take over their country... and of course the bombs he was dropping on their head. Same with the French Progressives... and the Polish Progressives. Naturally, the Polish Progressives had the additional ***** of the forced labor camps, the summary executions, gas chambers and such, but no more so than the German Progs of the same religious affiliation.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Not semantics, douchebag.

Hitler's National Socialists were brutal, racist, insular, conquering dirtbags.

Fascists weren't racists. Mussolini was an Empire-Builder but Italians forgot how to fight 1,500 years ago.

Franco was neither a racist nor an Empire Builder.

And you're just a moron

I'm sorry **** wad, but I must disagree. Your alleged argument is entirely semantic. As if the word "socialist" had anything to do with Nazi philosophy. Feel free to elaborate about Hitler's writing's and speeches promoting communist ideals.

The Nazis despised liberals. Edgetho despises liberals.

In Europe liberals are people who believe in laissez faire capitalism, so that doesn't help your case. You also despise laissez faire capitalism.

Did the Nazis in Germany support more spending for the poor and less spending on defense? That's the sort of accusation you reserve for the left...

If you mean Liberal welfare policies, they aren't FOR the poor, they CREATE the poor by incentivizing behaviors that cause poverty.

You know that, don't you, NYLiar.

So did Nazi Germany create more poor? As I recall, the Nazis put a lot of people to work building up their military...

...someone else did that in 1980's didn't he???? What was his name, again?

...you know the guy who went to Bitburg in 1983 and and placed a wreath at the German cemetery loaded with dead SS troopers.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

The Nazis despised liberals. Edgetho despises liberals.

dear, the Nazis were liberals who just like out liberals believed in bigger and bigger govt and less and less capitalism.

Do you understand?.

Conservatives want bigger and bigger and bigger government in the form of the military. That doesn't sound liberal to me.

HEY! A Concession made of straw~ How CUTE!

Your straw concession is duly noted and summarily accepted... .

 

[bripat9643]

In Europe liberals are people who believe in laissez faire capitalism, so that doesn't help your case. You also despise laissez faire capitalism.

Did the Nazis in Germany support more spending for the poor and less spending on defense? That's the sort of accusation you reserve for the left...

If you mean Liberal welfare policies, they aren't FOR the poor, they CREATE the poor by incentivizing behaviors that cause poverty.

You know that, don't you, NYLiar.

Answering only yes or no, did the Nazi's in Germany support more spending on the poor and less on the military?

Those are two separate issues, turd.

You think she's such a simpleton she couldn't answer 'yes and yes' or 'yes and no' or 'no and yes' or 'no and no'?

That's cold lol.

I posted the correct answers to avoid any possible confusion.