Raise Taxes, or Cut Spending????

But...but....but...but GEORGE BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH!!!!!

You must spread some reputation around before giving it to Dude again.

Cut spending.
Eliminate Socialist Security, MediScam, and Welfraud.
Slash military spending, getting out of Iraq and Afghanistan and reducing the size of our armed forces to the level needed solely to defend our nation, not attack other nations.
Transfer more functions back to the state level WHERE THEY BELONG

Then we might be able to keep taxes where they are and pay off the debt in short order.
Then the economy might rebound as the excessive cost of doing business would be reduced.

Then, with the debt eliminated the federal government might reduce taxes to a more reasonable level and not go in the hole.

Too bad the self serving hypocrites in Washington won't release their grip on power just to do right by America.
 
Last edited:
Given our record deficits........Why not do both??

How bout they stop spending first?

Again...

We borrowed $2.5 trillion to pay for the Bush Tax Cuts. If we cut an additional $2.5 trillion in spending we have significantly cut our deficit

No.

We borrowed 2.5 trillion to spend since we did not have that as tax revenue thanks to the Bush cuts.

If we did not spend, we would not have to borrow.

Stop spending first.
 
Why doesn't the government do this: stop spending, period; cut 20% from all departments; make due with the money they will get when the Bush tax cuts expire at the end of the year; stop spending, now??

They can't stop spending. They just passed yet another huge entitlement program that will likely go bankrupt in a few years. The only thing they can do is raise taxes and hope the people don't revolt.

And when the people revolt?

They will be referred to as revolting people by the administration and the press.

The Obama Administration? Yes, they do require that everyone march in lock-step with one-another. The Neoconservatives did that with George W. Bush.
 
I agree, tax all government workers making over 100K at 100%, make all government salaries public information, force them ALL to pay into Social Security, eliminate unfunded government pension guarantees, fully tax universities as the big business they are, fully tax non-profit salaries over 100K, there's some change that should help.

Why stop there?

Lets tax the shit out of EVERY American making over $100,000. You will get a lot more money out of taxing those $20 million executive salaries than you do out of those $175,000 government executive salaries

Than will zero out our deficit tomorrow
 
Eliminate a lot of the welfare state apparatus put in place by the libs so as "have them ******* voting Democrat for the next 100 years".

Now they've turned their sights on the middle class.
 
I agree, tax all government workers making over 100K at 100%, make all government salaries public information, force them ALL to pay into Social Security, eliminate unfunded government pension guarantees, fully tax universities as the big business they are, fully tax non-profit salaries over 100K, there's some change that should help.

Why stop there?

Lets tax the shit out of EVERY American making over $100,000. You will get a lot more money out of taxing those $20 million executive salaries than you do out of those $175,000 government executive salaries

Than will zero out our deficit tomorrow


And the left winger stance of selective equality rears it's ugly head again
 
I agree, tax all government workers making over 100K at 100%, make all government salaries public information, force them ALL to pay into Social Security, eliminate unfunded government pension guarantees, fully tax universities as the big business they are, fully tax non-profit salaries over 100K, there's some change that should help.

Why stop there?

Lets tax the shit out of EVERY American making over $100,000. You will get a lot more money out of taxing those $20 million executive salaries than you do out of those $175,000 government executive salaries

Than will zero out our deficit tomorrow

Well, I guess we know what income bracket your in!!!!

Another bottom feeder..... just as I suspected.

And let's not even get started on the stupidity of your assumption.
 
This is what is wrong with socialists, they do not believe as government workers they are "public" servants. Government is too "loud" today, and why we are here.
 
I agree, tax all government workers making over 100K at 100%, make all government salaries public information, force them ALL to pay into Social Security, eliminate unfunded government pension guarantees, fully tax universities as the big business they are, fully tax non-profit salaries over 100K, there's some change that should help.

Why stop there?

Lets tax the shit out of EVERY American making over $100,000. You will get a lot more money out of taxing those $20 million executive salaries than you do out of those $175,000 government executive salaries

Than will zero out our deficit tomorrow

In that do you include all athletes, media personlaities, celbrities, musicians that are striclty in it for themselves?

Or just the greedy business executives that sacrificed all they had to start a business and applied all they knew to build it up and finally are reaping the financial rewards as they employ thousands at the same time?
 
The socialist are basically admitting that government is big business now, and consider their theft of our children's future puts them on the same level as an American worker somehow. Arrogant elitists, and why we have a candy ass president who never worked a day in his life.
 
I agree, tax all government workers making over 100K at 100%, make all government salaries public information, force them ALL to pay into Social Security, eliminate unfunded government pension guarantees, fully tax universities as the big business they are, fully tax non-profit salaries over 100K, there's some change that should help.

Why stop there?

Lets tax the shit out of EVERY American making over $100,000. You will get a lot more money out of taxing those $20 million executive salaries than you do out of those $175,000 government executive salaries

Than will zero out our deficit tomorrow

In that do you include all athletes, media personlaities, celbrities, musicians that are striclty in it for themselves?

Or just the greedy business executives that sacrificed all they had to start a business and applied all they knew to build it up and finally are reaping the financial rewards as they employ thousands at the same time?

Just the greedy execs... and just the white ones at that!
 
Clueless? Indeed. Obama isn't that smart. "Smart" indicates that you know something: Obama obviously knows very little. He lives in a world of theoreticals and hypotheticals... just another pinhead academian.

Utterly clueless and yes, not all that smart either.
 
Most Americans, including Republicans, want government to support the programs and services they support and abhor those programs being cut or eliminated.

I am all for slashing government salaries, most entitlements and most all military spending. However, I do like having government agencies that try to ensure I have clean air to breath, other private entities arent raping the world around me, the food I eat is safe, and those that actually unable to care for themselves have some minumun standard of comfort afforded to them.
 
I am all for slashing government salaries, most entitlements and most all military spending. However, I do like having government agencies that try to ensure I have clean air to breath, other private entities arent raping the world around me, the food I eat is safe, and those that actually unable to care for themselves have some minumun standard of comfort afforded to them.


And I am for slashing the # of jobs within government, eliminating all federal government entitlement programs, holding military contractors accountable and not paying them for deliverables not delivered... Most people do like things for the good of the populace as a whole, including effective agencies such as the FDA, the courts, etc... And when it comes down to those 'unable to take care of themselves', unfortunately that is not the case with the VAST majority that receive entitlements.... very few would actually be 'wards of the state', and those that are should indeed lose certain rights (just as other wards of the state do, such as mental patients, prisoners, etc)
 

Forum List

Back
Top