Racist Blacks Slashing Whites in New York

[ClosedCaption]

You'll notice that whenever a white person does something to a black person if they end up in court it's not ever ever ever because they did anything wrong. It's all because they were "pressured" to act under duress. Oh, BTW...it's NOT racist because they say it isnt.

A black person does something to a white person and end up in court it's always always always because they are racist and justice is being served.

That's how this racist logic works.

 

[protectionist]

When blacks perpetrate crimes against whites, Nothing. I have heard blacks say how much they HATE whites, they act on that HATE. The press ignores THAT.

They get jail like all criminals. Yes some blacks do not like whites. Some do act on that hatred. This case tho is dealing with robberies for money.

It's a little too simple to day "some blacks hate whites therefore every crime committed is about hatred"...yanno, since they didn't just attack them for no reason...money was the motivation. Which explains why whites weren't the exclusive victim here. Or are you ignoring the other races being victims to further your victim mentality?

In the cases I cited, money was not involved.

21-Year-Old Brooklyn Man Faces Charges In D Train Slash Attack

Police: Man In Brooklyn Subway Attack Told Victim 'I Will Chop You Up'

[UPDATE] Friday Night On The A Train: "I'm Going To Cut You And I'm Going To Get Away With It"[/QUOTE]

 

[protectionist]

You'll notice that whenever a white person does something to a black person if they end up in court it's not ever ever ever because they did anything wrong. It's all because they were "pressured" to act under duress. Oh, BTW...it's NOT racist because they say it isnt.

A black person does something to a white person and end up in court it's always always always because they are racist and justice is being served.

That's how this racist logic works.

A white person did something to a black person ? No kidding! When did that happen ?

Thought that wasn't allowed.

 

[protectionist]

You'll notice that whenever a white person does something to a black person if they end up in court it's not ever ever ever because they did anything wrong. It's all because they were "pressured" to act under duress. Oh, BTW...it's NOT racist because they say it isnt.

A black person does something to a white person and end up in court it's always always always because they are racist and justice is being served.

That's how this racist logic works.

Here's how the racist logic works (as liberals define it) >>>

Black privilege manifests itself in numerous forms:

• Blacks have the right to take pride in their race. Whites don't.

• Blacks can never be racist. Whites are always racist, even if they don't try to be.

• Blacks get to play the race card. Whites don't.

• Blacks never have to feel guilty about being black. Whites are trained to feel guilty about being white.

• Blacks have the right to make blacks only organizations like the Black Student Union and the Congressional Black Caucus. Whites don't.

• Blacks have the right to never take responsibility for their own actions. Anything bad which happens to a black person can be blamed on racism or white people. Whites have to take responsibility and apologize for their actions.

• Rich black people have a right to be rich. Rich white people don't.

• Black people have the right to demonize white people. White people don't have the right to demonize black people.

• Black people are excused when they are prejudiced against white people. White people are never excused for prejudice against black people.

• Black people are a "protected class." White people are not.

• Violent crimes by whites on blacks are "hate crimes." Violent crimes by blacks on whites are just "random" crimes.

• Blacks have the right to affirmative action and minority set-asides. Whites have to earn their positions.

• Blacks are "cool." Whites are "squares" and "rednecks."

• Blacks have the right to say words like "******," which whites are never allowed to use. They have the right to incessantly repeat the word "******" in front of white people, to intimidate them and keep them in their place.

• Blacks can make the most racially insensitive comments and, more often than not, no one blinks twice. They are allowed to insult others without repercussion.[1]

• Blacks can spend their rent money on designer handbags and then complain about how they don’t have the same economic opportunities as everyone else. And they get away with it.[2]

• Black men are sexual supermen. White men are sexually inadequate. Black men have huge penises. White men have small, inadequate penises.

• Blacks have "civil rights". Whites don't.

• Blacks are in prison because of racism. Whites are in prison because they're criminals.

• Black jury members have the right to acquit criminals, if they're black.

• Blacks have the right to put a halt to any policy, statement, symbol, statistic, outcome, word or expression they find offensive. Whites have no such rights.

• Blacks are morally superior to whites.

• "[Blacks] enjoy cultural cache around the world as victors over oppression and the hard reality of what that looks like at this point in world history. The music that they enjoy, the clothes that they wear, their very mannerisms carry a certain amount of gravitas."[3]

• Blacks can assign collective racial guilt to "you white folks." White people cannot do the reverse because that would be racist.

• White people everywhere, and at all times, bear guilt for the crimes of a minority of white people in the past (e.g., slave owners, Adolf Hitler). Making blacks bear guilt, as a race, for the despicable crimes of their criminal minority is stereotyping, racist, and an insult to reason; after all, no one should ever be blamed for the acts of some unrelated person.

• Blacks have "black culture." Whites are not allowed to have white culture.

• African-American studies is a celebration of blackness and black culture. Whiteness studies is a demonization of white people and white culture.

• White people need to undergo diversity/sensitivity training. Black people don't.

• "... any generalization--favorable or unfavorable--about any minority that someone does not like is by definition "racist" and deserves to be suppressed--as long as it is said by a white person. Black diversity consultants, in contrast, can parade, without a shred of empirical evidence, the grossest racial and ethnic stereotypes with virtual impunity."[4]

• It's racist to point out racism by blacks. It's never racist to point out racism by whites.

• Whites have to walk on eggshells around blacks. Blacks don't give a shit what whites think.

• Blacks have the right to riot and commit violent acts in response to perceived grievances. White people have to obey the law at all times.

• Blacks have the right to never be portrayed as criminals or lowlifes in films or on TV. Bad guys on the screen must always be White.

• Blacks have the right to never be ridiculed, mocked, belittled or laughed at. Whites have no such right.

• Black criminals have the right to have their race censored in media reports.

• Facts which cause blacks embarrassment or cast them in a bad light must be suppressed. Facts which cause whites embarrassment or cast them in a bad light are reported as is.

• Blacks can silence and intimidate whites by calling them racist. Whites can't silence and intimidate blacks because that would be racist.

• Forcing whitey to apologize shows black power and clout. Whites can never force blacks to apologize because that would constitute a lynching.

• Whites are held to a system of 'sensitivity' requirements that do not apply to blacks.

• "Whites are monitored, pestered, and punished for preposterous reasons--for a look, for an innocent word, for wearing a T-shirt, for expressing a plausible argument--but blacks can say almost anything with perfect impunity."[5]
• 
  
• In discussions of race between black people and white people the conscious black person is always right; is always the ultimate authority on questions having to do with race and racism; must always be regarded as the ‘injured party,’ or the oppressed. . . . [Whites] cannot possibly be expected to be objective about questions of race."[6]
• 
  
• Blacks may work for explicitly racial goals but whites may not.
• 
  
• Blacks are permitted to notice race. Whites are not.
• 
  
• It is quite acceptable for either party to explicitly go after the black, Hispanic, or even the Jewish vote. In fact both parties gain an indispensable moral authority by doing so. But it is absolutely verboten for either party, or any white candidate, to appeal to whites as a racial identity group. Racial identity is simply forbidden to whites in America and across the entire Western world. Black children today are hammered with the idea of racial identity and pride, yet racial pride in whites constitutes a grave evil. Say 'I'm white and I'm proud' and you are a National Socialist."[7
• 
  
• A black who punches a White person is a hero standing up to oppression. A White person who punches a black is a racist.
• 
  
• It can be publicly admitted that blacks are superior to Whites in certain pursuits (i.e. basketball). It can never be publicly admitted that Whites are superior to blacks in other pursuits (i.e. winning Nobel prizes in science).
• 
  
• When blacks are overrepresented in a desirable field, it is due to their abilities. When Whites are overrepresented in a desirable field, it is due to racism. When blacks are overrepresented in an undesirable field, it is due to racism. When Whites are overrepresented in an undesirable field, it is their own fault.
• 
  
• Most African countries are made up almost entirely of blacks, and have some of the world's highest birth rates. Most European countries consist of White people having to live alongside blacks and other non-whites, and have some of the world's lowest birth rates.

Black privilege - Metapedia

 

[protectionist]

 

[ClosedCaption]

A black who punches a White person is a hero standing up to oppression. A White person who punches a black is a racist.

LOL...

 

[ClosedCaption]

Rich black people have a right to be rich. Rich white people don't.

Hahaha

 

[protectionist]

Rich black people have a right to be rich. Rich white people don't.

Hahaha

So you agree and approve. Well, nobody ever said we wouldn't have any racists here in USMB.

 

[katsteve2012]

Of course you feel harassed. You were called out for starting a bait thread by several people here. And you have not been able to substatiate that "black racists have slashed white people" in multiple recent incidents.

And now you are:
and

HA HA> Of course I'm able to substantiate non-black people (mu words from the OP). And you only now mention the word "multiple". OK. I gave you one example . The one of this loon >>


So you want more ? No problem, Here's another one >> Damon Knowles ( a black guy) who slashed Carmen Rivera (a Hispanic woman) Knowles just attacked the victim for no apparent reason. He just stood up on the train and attacked her. This kind of random seemingly pointless attacks often prove to have been based in racial hate, but the news media is too chickenshit to say it.

View attachment 62735 Slasher Damon Knowles and victim, Carmen Rivera.

21-Year-Old Brooklyn Man Faces Charges In D Train Slash Attack

More examples to come after this. Hey, this is fun.

There have been a reported 200+ slashing crimes in New York over recent months.

You pointed out two.....one was where an Indian and a Hispanic lady were slashed....where are the "racist blacks slashing white people"?

Or are you changing your narrative to "non black" now?

And what about the "non blacks" who slashed others?

What are they in your myopic view?

Miguided citizens who need therapy?

 

[protectionist]

Of course you feel harassed. You were called out for starting a bait thread by several people here. And you have not been able to substatiate that "black racists have slashed white people" in multiple recent incidents.

And now you are:
and

HA HA> Of course I'm able to substantiate non-black people (mu words from the OP). And you only now mention the word "multiple". OK. I gave you one example . The one of this loon >>


So you want more ? No problem, Here's another one >> Damon Knowles ( a black guy) who slashed Carmen Rivera (a Hispanic woman) Knowles just attacked the victim for no apparent reason. He just stood up on the train and attacked her. This kind of random seemingly pointless attacks often prove to have been based in racial hate, but the news media is too chickenshit to say it.

View attachment 62735 Slasher Damon Knowles and victim, Carmen Rivera.

21-Year-Old Brooklyn Man Faces Charges In D Train Slash Attack

More examples to come after this. Hey, this is fun.

There have been a reported 200+ slashing crimes in New York over recent months.

You pointed out two.....one was where an Indian and a Hispanic lady were slashed....where are the "racist blacks slashing white people"?

Or are you changing your narrative to "non black" now?

And what about the "non blacks" who slashed others?

What are they in your myopic view?

Miguided citizens who need therapy?

As YOU KNOW perfectly well, Nothing is changed. SInce the OP I have included other races besides whites, but you seem to be fixated on lying that I only talk about whites. Stop lying.

Here's what the OP said (and I've posted this before) >>"Generally, these have been on subways, and committed by Blacks against Whites mostly, but one Asian woman was attacked, in addition to some Hispanics.
The crimes seem to be race-related, since the perpetrators have been Blacks, and the victims have not.
"

As for non-blacks slashing people, I know of none. Do you ? If you have something to allude to that, let's hear it. So far, in every report I've seen, the slashers were black.

 

[MaryL]

I watched part of the half time show with Byonce on the super bowl (Yay BRONCOS!) That touching tribute with the hands up don't shoot vid with monies contributed to the "blacks lives matter" movement. Was that my imagination or what? Somebody tell blacks lay off shooting each other FIRST, then lay of the racial hyperbole BS and get on with life.

 

[katsteve2012]

Of course you feel harassed. You were called out for starting a bait thread by several people here. And you have not been able to substatiate that "black racists have slashed white people" in multiple recent incidents.

And now you are:
and

HA HA> Of course I'm able to substantiate non-black people (mu words from the OP). And you only now mention the word "multiple". OK. I gave you one example . The one of this loon >>


So you want more ? No problem, Here's another one >> Damon Knowles ( a black guy) who slashed Carmen Rivera (a Hispanic woman) Knowles just attacked the victim for no apparent reason. He just stood up on the train and attacked her. This kind of random seemingly pointless attacks often prove to have been based in racial hate, but the news media is too chickenshit to say it.

View attachment 62735 Slasher Damon Knowles and victim, Carmen Rivera.

21-Year-Old Brooklyn Man Faces Charges In D Train Slash Attack

More examples to come after this. Hey, this is fun.

There have been a reported 200+ slashing crimes in New York over recent months.

You pointed out two.....one was where an Indian and a Hispanic lady were slashed....where are the "racist blacks slashing white people"?

Or are you changing your narrative to "non black" now?

And what about the "non blacks" who slashed others?

What are they in your myopic view?

Miguided citizens who need therapy?

As YOU KNOW perfectly well, Nothing is changed. SInce the OP I have included other races besides whites, but you seem to be fixated on lying that I only talk about whites. Stop lying.

Here's what the OP said (and I've posted this before) >>"Generally, these have been on subways, and committed by Blacks against Whites mostly, but one Asian woman was attacked, in addition to some Hispanics.
The crimes seem to be race-related, since the perpetrators have been Blacks, and the victims have not.
"

As for non-blacks slashing people, I know of none. Do you ? If you have something to allude to that, let's hear it. So far, in every report I've seen, the slashers were black.

In case you have amnesia, the heading of your thread says "Racist blacks slashing whites".

So far you've provided to reports with pictures and in those cases on victim was Hispanic and 1 was Indian. The rest you are ASSuming were black 0n white slashing.

So yes, stop your incessant changing of your own narrative and provide some proof that makes sense or STFU.

 

[protectionist]

I watched part of the half time show with Byonce on the super bowl (Yay BRONCOS!) That touching tribute with the hands up don't shoot vid with monies contributed to the "blacks lives matter" movement. Was that my imagination or what? Somebody tell blacks lay off shooting each other FIRST, then lay of the racial hyperbole BS and get on with life.

Question might be are they really that dumb, that they don't know the "hands up don't shoot" was a crock, proven false by the originators of it ?.... when they caved in under pressure from prosecutors, in the Darren Wilson grand jury hearing. The mouthy liars were all BS, until they suddenly discovered THEY could be jailed for perjury, making a false police report, and obstruction of justice.

Or do they just push what they know to be a lie, because they stupidly feel like it. In any case, the halftime show was heights of stupidity, with people jumping all over your TV screen like a bunch of kangaroos, so a little more stupidity added, hardly matters much.

Looks like the NFL needs to find some new people to set up their Super Bowl half time shows.

 

[protectionist]

In case you have amnesia, the heading of your thread says "Racist blacks slashing whites".

So far you've provided to reports with pictures and in those cases on victim was Hispanic and 1 was Indian. The rest you are ASSuming were black 0n white slashing.

So yes, stop your incessant changing of your own narrative and provide some proof that makes sense or STFU.

NO, I am NOT assuming anything. It is YOU who are doing the assuming (assuming that I was assuming), and incorrectly so. But then, you've been incorrect all through the thread, so we'll give you one point for consistency.

 

[katsteve2012]

In case you have amnesia, the heading of your thread says "Racist blacks slashing whites".

So far you've provided to reports with pictures and in those cases on victim was Hispanic and 1 was Indian. The rest you are ASSuming were black 0n white slashing.

So yes, stop your incessant changing of your own narrative and provide some proof that makes sense or STFU.

NO, I am NOT assuming anything. It is YOU who are doing the assuming (assuming that I was assuming), and incorrectly so. But then, you've been incorrect all through the thread, so we'll give you one point for consistency.

I would have to give you a point for consistency as well. For posting threads that make not one bit of sense, then rave like someone who is nuts to defend his delusions.

 

[protectionist]

I would have to give you a point for consistency as well. For posting threads that make not one bit of sense, then rave like someone who is nuts to defend his delusions.

Thanks for the compliments. ....but I'm fine with or without them.

 

[MaryL]

Hmm, your sarcasm duly noted. When blacks perpetrate crimes against whites, Nothing. I have heard blacks say how much they HATE whites, they act on that HATE. The press ignores THAT. Big-time. The press overplays white on black stuff. Why? Not to underplay all the black crime rates, maybe? Because, that is a real factor here.

Not only the press, but the Obama/Sharpton race hustle machine too, and the local govts they coerce. Like when they went to Sanford, Florida and bullied the locals into pressing senseless charges against George Zimmerman, with threats of US civil rights court action, which the locals couldn't afford to fight in court.

And again, when they did the same thing in Ferguson, MO getting them to place charges against Darren Wilson, and send it to a grand jury. And how they coerced the governor (Jay Nixon) to cave in, and let the rioters riot.

And then with Michael Slager after he (LEGALLY) shot Walter Scott in the back, while Scott was trying to get away.

And then with mayor Stephanie Rawlings in Baltimore, who, incredibly ordered the Baltimore police to become targets for rock-throwing, rioting blacks.

Just a few examples of the kowtowing, pandering to lawless blacks, that has turned America into a mess.

[/QUOTE]
I get it...sort off. A violent brutal hatful community is going to get the kind of policing they deserve. But the liberal press steps in and feeds into the hyper negativity and racial animus and feeds into that vicious cycle, bashing law enforcement but not once questioning the self destructive nature of poor black communities. Why is the media doing this? Somebody needs to put the "media" under the same spotlight and question THEM about their excesses and abuses...

 

[protectionist]

I get it...sort off. A violent brutal hatful community is going to get the kind of policing they deserve. But the liberal press steps in and feeds into the hyper negativity and racial animus and feeds into that vicious cycle, bashing law enforcement but not once questioning the self destructive nature of poor black communities. Why is the media doing this? Somebody needs to put the "media" under the same spotlight and question THEM about their excesses and abuses...

Without a doubt. Most of the media are reckless attack dogs interested only in what they can stir up to get ratings and advertising $$$. Best thing to come along in a long time regarding them is Donald Trump. What a hoot seeing them trying to destroy him, and him laughing at them all the way. I love it.