lolShe was NOT a valid presidential option.
Ok – neither was Trump, even more so.
Trump was a more invalid option than Clinton – Clinton playing the role of lesser of two evils.
Democrats and Republicans are not ‘the same.’
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
lolShe was NOT a valid presidential option.
Bad news for Trumpcan you substantiate the claim that Trump did not know what was in the boxes, because he lawyers all say they saw them and knew what was there,
We can substantiate the fact that even if Trump de-classified the documents pursuant to the law, it doesn’t change the fact that he remains in legal jeopardy.can you substantiate the claim that Trump did not know what was in the boxes, because he lawyers all say they saw them and knew what was there,
lol
Ok – neither was Trump, even more so.
Trump was a more invalid option than Clinton – Clinton playing the role of less of two evils.
Democrats and Republicans are not ‘the same.’
Are you being purposely dense or do you have problems? It has nothing to do with Trump other then this attack seems only to be politically motivated.Blah, blah, blah...........well, Trump would have if he had another term. No he wouldn't.
I prefer this Trump ex lawyer"Sidney Powell or Rudy Giuliani?
The president has the power to change the rules of declassification whenever he wants to.No one said he did.
It has nothing to do with ‘permission.’
It has to do with the fact that a president can’t simply state that a document is ‘de-classified’; there is a procedure that must be followed.
And conservatives need to abandon this false ‘argument’ and façade – the classification of the documents in no manner mitigate Trump’s criminality.
And you’re at liberty to do so.OK, but that is what I've been arguing.
The lesser of two evils is still evil and not a choice I will make.
Are you being purposely dense or do you have problems? It has nothing to do with Trump other then this attack seems only to be politically motivated.
There were those that took things out of the White House that were not prosecuted nor raided. What part of that do you have trouble understanding?
Trump was not in office when Bill Clinton took things. How would he have prosecuted Bill?
Talking with you is almost like trying to teach a parrot algebra, they can parrot only but do not understand the concept.
can you substantiate the claim that Trump did not know what was in the boxes, because he lawyers all say they saw them and knew what was there,
None. I commented on that. I commented that people chose to not prosecute them. People including Trump. What do you expect me to do about that?
Trump was in charge of prosecuting Hillary. He did not. He promised to prosecute Hillary, not Bill. He didn't. But now you are upset that someone is actually pursuing Trump.
Bluster will not change the facts.12 pages of BS from liberals.. Not one has debunked the OP.. Not one!!!
Liberals have hurt feelings that they could not get Trump and now they are trying like hell to create a crime... This thing has blown up in their faces and it is hilarious... Thanks for adding to Trumps war chest to take back the White House after we take back the lower chambers as well...
You left-tards have awakened the sleeping middle class, they are awake now and this next election is going to be a total wipeout of your brand.
You don't get it... Those documents were declassified prior to Trump leaving office. You have NOTHING!Bluster will not change the facts.
A former President cannot have classified or Top Secret documents in his possession in his home after leaving office, no matter where you look.
He has no evidence of it.You don't get it... Those documents were declassified prior to Trump leaving office. You have NOTHING!
No matter how hard you try, the facts do not change.
- President Donald Trump said he wanted to order the Justice Department to prosecute his former presidential opponent Hillary Clinton and former FBI Director James Comey, The New York Times reported Tuesday.
- The Times, citing two people familiar with the conversation, reported that Trump made the remark in the spring to former White House counsel Don McGahn, who told the president that he had no authority to order such action by the DOJ.
- To impress his point upon Trump, McGahn had White House lawyers draft a memo outlining the consequences of merely asking the DOJ to investigate his political rivals — including impeachment, the newspaper reported.
- President Donald Trump said he wanted to order the Justice Department to prosecute his former presidential opponent Hillary Clinton and former FBI Director James Comey, The New York Times reported Tuesday.
- The Times, citing two people familiar with the conversation, reported that Trump made the remark in the spring to former White House counsel Don McGahn, who told the president that he had no authority to order such action by the DOJ.
- To impress his point upon Trump, McGahn had White House lawyers draft a memo outlining the consequences of merely asking the DOJ to investigate his political rivals — including impeachment, the newspaper reported.
Trump reportedly told White House counsel McGahn he wanted to prosecute Hillary Clinton and James Comey
White House counsel McGahn had White House lawyers draft a memo outlining the consequences of merely asking the DOJ to investigate his political rivals — including impeachment, the newspaper reported.www.cnbc.com
President Donald Trump told his counsel’s office last spring that he wanted to prosecute political adversaries Hillary Clinton and former FBI Director James Comey, an idea that prompted White House lawyers to prepare a memo warning of consequences ranging up to possible impeachment, The New York Times reported Tuesday.
Then-counsel Don McGahn told the president he had no authority to order such a prosecution, and he had White House lawyers prepare the memo arguing against such a move, The Associated Press confirmed with a person familiar with the matter who was not authorized to discuss the situation. McGahn said that Trump could request such a probe but that even asking could lead to accusations of abuse of power, the newspaper said.
Report: Trump wanted to prosecute Comey, Hillary Clinton
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump told his counsel's office last spring that he wanted to prosecute political adversaries Hillary Clinton and former FBI Director James Comey, an idea that prompted White House lawyers to prepare a memo warning of consequences ranging up to possible impeachmentapnews.com
Check my post above # 233 where 2 articles explain why Trump would not prosecute Clinton or ComeyHillary should have been prosecuted for a long list of things.
Check my post above # 233 where 2 articles explain why Trump would not prosecute Clinton or Comey
You did not read them but decided to respond?
Seriously?