- Mar 16, 2012
- 59,248
- 17,529
- 2,180
- Thread starter
- #21
How is our history divisive? Our history is either taught, or it isn't. You can call it history, or critical race theory, which schools do not call it that. So technically, CRT isn't taught any way. History is.
So how does Youngkin logically label it divisive? And how will he make teaching history illegal? Answer, he cannot. And it is not divisive, because our history is our history. So the whole idea from Republicans is ludicrous. Youngkin himself is constantly referring to Martin Luther King. Just mentioning his name is history, or CRT. You can't mention one, without referring to the other, even if the word race isn't used. Anyway, legally, Youngkin is an ignoramus who knows nothing about governing or the law.
Let's let Glen Kirschner school this bozo about the law;
Already posted why CRT is a divisive, Marxist cultist ideology that teaches hatred of America and Whites.