Putin warns Russia will be at war with NATO if leaders lift Ukraine missile restrictions

It's happening, whether you want to believe it or not. When it does, you'll tell everyone that you saw it coming a mile away. These leaders have a LOT at stake in Ukraine. Wonder what that is? This isn't even a NATO country.

With the prospect of American disengagement from Kyiv following Donald Trump's return to the White House, Paris and London are not ruling out leading a military coalition in Ukraine.

As the conflict in Ukraine enters a new phase of escalation, discussions over sending Western troops and private defense companies to Ukraine have been revived, Le Monde has learned from corroborating sources. These are sensitive discussions, most of which are classified – relaunched in light of a potential American withdrawal of support for Kyiv once Donald Trump takes office on January 20, 2025.

The debate about sending troops to Ukraine, which French President Emmanuel Macron initiated at a meeting between Kyiv's allies in Paris in February, was strongly opposed by some European countries, led by Germany. However, it was relaunched in recent weeks thanks to the visit to France of the UK prime minister, Keir Starmer, for the November 11th commemorations. "Discussions are underway between the UK and France on defense cooperation, particularly with a view to creating a hard core of allies in Europe, focused on Ukraine and wider European security," confided a British military source to Le Monde.


These European leaders are seriously out of touch with reality, they wouldn't tolerate thousands of body bags coming back, and it would be thousands, we could fit the whole British army inside a football stadium.
 
These European leaders are seriously out of touch with reality,
Well, I smell money.
they wouldn't tolerate thousands of body bags coming back, and it would be thousands,.
If that's what it takes to put them in "touch with reality" then I say let them. Start with eager video games Sweden and see the reaction to the body bags. I'll be standing alone the sidelines laughing.
 
Well, I smell money.

If that's what it takes to put them in "touch with reality" then I say let them. Start with eager video games Sweden and see the reaction to the body bags. I'll be standing alone the sidelines laughing.
I live in the UK, i lived through much of the cold war but even then the anti Russian propaganda was not as bad as now, believe me it's 24/7 RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA, many of the herd are just too ignorant and uninformed to see how they have been taken in.
 
I live in the UK, i lived through much of the cold war but even then the anti Russian propaganda was not as bad as now, believe me it's 24/7 RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA, many of the herd are just too ignorant and uninformed to see how they have been taken in.
This is true. I was employed by the RAF in West Berlin during the Cold War and I can attest to the conviction that the USSR was considered the "enemy" but we had an agreement with them and with the DDR. We (the Western military sections of UK, US, and France) took it in turns guarding Rudolf Hess at Spandau prison and Russian generals were invited into British military facilities as a matter of Allied cooperation. I wouldn't call it appreciation but rather mutual respect. This business today is ridiculous.
 
A duplicate thread to mine was predictable!
Same story from the media!

Anyway, this by the media is an obvious offer to Trump to play the threat by Russia as the real thing if Kamala and the Dems aren't stopped soon.

He had already hinted and set the stage!

But it's still fraught with great risk and peril for Trump, on account of the fact that it's near impossible for Americans to have any antiwar feelings for Russians.

And strike two against Trump is the fact that it's a proxy war and few Americans are dying yet in the Ukraine.

(I'll post this in my thread too just in case one is taken down?)
I disagree because the US involvement in striking Russia with these US missile can only lead to the total nuclear destruction of the US. There is no other option by Putin.
 
I disagree because the US involvement in striking Russia with these US missile can only lead to the total nuclear destruction of the US. There is no other option by Putin.
I tend to agree with this. To put it in another way, what would be the advantage to the total nuclear destruction of some other NATO nation be, Sweden for example?
 
I disagree because the US involvement in striking Russia with these US missile can only lead to the total nuclear destruction of the US. There is no other option by Putin.
Russia is still a long way from nuclear being the only option. That just results in both sides losing everything.

America needs to deal with the fact that Russia holds weapons superiority, along with the ability to produce invincible weapons faster than Nato combined.

Make no mistake, China is not sitting idly by. The Brics has now assumed world power and America has itself into a fight to regain it.
 
Russia is still a long way from nuclear being the only option. That just results in both sides losing everything.
.......
Most will agree with you. However, nuclear weapons were created for a purpose and we may today be witness to that purpose. Russia, as a fact, has always been the last man standing. It looks to me that they know how to do it.
 
Most will agree with you. However, nuclear weapons were created for a purpose and we may today be witness to that purpose. Russia, as a fact, has always been the last man standing. It looks to me that they know how to do it.
Don't fall for the US propaganda that tells us that America can win.

Russia's weapons technology has given them the upper hand. Putin only needs a reason now to eliminate the last traces of the Ukraine from the picture.

Think it through. The conventional weapons fight can only end now with the sinking of one or more aircraft carriers.

I rather doubt that will bring on a nuclear war.
 
Most will agree with you. However, nuclear weapons were created for a purpose and we may today be witness to that purpose. Russia, as a fact, has always been the last man standing. It looks to me that they know how to do it.
Don't fall for the US propaganda that tells us that America can win. .....
Who do you think you are contradicting?
 
Who do you think you are contradicting?
I don't understand your question, but ..................

The side that's getting the worst licking is the side that bombards us with their winning propaganda.

As an aside from the US/Russia war, the Zionist regime is barely standing. Their Iron Dome is useless and they're now just another very small country that has to fall.
 
I don't understand your question, but ..................

The side that's getting the worst licking is the side that bombards us with their winning propaganda.
I don't understand your answer, but ....... Russia will prevail.
...... the Zionist regime is barely standing.
I'm not completely sure about that.
Their Iron Dome is useless
I think so, yes.
..... they're now just another very small country that has to fall.
I don't know if it has to fall but I hope that it does.
 
I disagree because the US involvement in striking Russia with these US missile can only lead to the total nuclear destruction of the US. There is no other option by Putin.
Nuclear means destruction of both nations DUMBASS
 
I don't understand your answer, but ....... Russia will prevail.

I'm not completely sure about that.

I think so, yes.

I don't know if it has to fall but I hope that it does.
Think of it as the question on whether Iran is now safe from US/Zionist aggression. I'm pretty certain they are, on account of their ability to wipe Zionism off the map if they're (Iran) is attacked.

And even if that doesn't become necessary, the Zionist regime's people are destined to live in a state of war forever, in exchange for what has been done to the Palestinian people.

Behind the scenes Pakistan and probably Turkey are promising to nuke their asses to Jew hell if they don't behave with Iran. Saudi is now tight with Iran.

60,000 settlers have moved out and that's predicted to become 100,000 soon.

Netanyahu needs to bargain himself a seat at the table and his enemies have lost interest in bargaining.

When we think of Iran, we need to be thinking superpower.
 
I disagree because the US involvement in striking Russia with these US missile can only lead to the total nuclear destruction of the US. There is no other option by Putin.
Putin may be stupid enough to court nuclear war, but the other oligarchs and his generals aren't. He will commit suicide by shooting himself in the back 47 times if he tries to give the order to launch even one nuke. I think he knows that and is bluffing. Ukraine and NATO are calling his bluff.
 
Don't fall for the US propaganda that tells us that America can win.

Russia's weapons technology has given them the upper hand. Putin only needs a reason now to eliminate the last traces of the Ukraine from the picture.

Think it through. The conventional weapons fight can only end now with the sinking of one or more aircraft carriers.

I rather doubt that will bring on a nuclear war.
Carriers are national assets. If Russia sinks an American carrier, at a minimum, Russia will lose the base that launched the weapons that killed the carrier, if the missile comes from a ship or submarine, the attacking vessel will be killed as well as the base it is assigned to as well. It would take many, possible a hundred missiles or more to penetrate the defenses of a carrier battle group and sink a carrier. We have been practicing defending them against missile swarm attacks by Russia ever since the fifties.
 
Putin may be stupid enough to court nuclear war, but the other oligarchs and his generals aren't.
Really? Do you have any specific reason to believe it, short for your wishful thinking and stupid CNN-propaganda?

He will commit suicide by shooting himself in the back 47 times if he tries to give the order to launch even one nuke. I think he knows that and is bluffing. Ukraine and NATO are calling his bluff.
And what if they are not bluffing?
 
Back
Top Bottom