Midnight FM
Gold Member
- May 4, 2025
- 797
- 349
- 143
This is my general view on sex:
Sex and reproduction are not the purpose of life. Cavemen were more than capable of reproducing, but if everyone believed that was the only purpose of life, we wouldn't have modern civilization. Sex and reproduction may play a role in most people's lives, but the purpose of life is far more nuanced than that.
While the primary biological function of sex is reproduction, it isn't the only purpose of sex, and intimacy is arguably a superior purpose. While biological reproduction serves a survival function, the reality is that it is rare for people in the modern world to have to reproduce in order to survive, and most people who decide to have children don't do so in order to "perpetuate the human race" - they do so for more nuanced personal reasons.
So in essence, sex is something that people do simply because they're biologically hardwired to, but it doesn't always serve a specific purpose (such as in the case of people who have unplanned children), and if sex results in children being born into less-than-ideal circumstances, there can be consequences. And while the human race will always need some people to be having children in order to perpetuate itself, theoretically, many people could choose not to have children, and the human race would still continue to survive. A downsize in population wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing, just as how people in the developed world are already having fewer children than they did in more primitive times where factors such as life expectancy were lower and rates of infant mortality were higher.
Sex and reproduction are not the purpose of life. Cavemen were more than capable of reproducing, but if everyone believed that was the only purpose of life, we wouldn't have modern civilization. Sex and reproduction may play a role in most people's lives, but the purpose of life is far more nuanced than that.
While the primary biological function of sex is reproduction, it isn't the only purpose of sex, and intimacy is arguably a superior purpose. While biological reproduction serves a survival function, the reality is that it is rare for people in the modern world to have to reproduce in order to survive, and most people who decide to have children don't do so in order to "perpetuate the human race" - they do so for more nuanced personal reasons.
So in essence, sex is something that people do simply because they're biologically hardwired to, but it doesn't always serve a specific purpose (such as in the case of people who have unplanned children), and if sex results in children being born into less-than-ideal circumstances, there can be consequences. And while the human race will always need some people to be having children in order to perpetuate itself, theoretically, many people could choose not to have children, and the human race would still continue to survive. A downsize in population wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing, just as how people in the developed world are already having fewer children than they did in more primitive times where factors such as life expectancy were lower and rates of infant mortality were higher.
Last edited:
