- Thread starter
- #41
No, you imbecile....I'm addressing free speech.
You, being a totalitarian, are unable to discuss the subject as it is anathema to your kind.
You weren't defending the NY Times yesterday, you were trashing it.
Did you find 'free speech' in your rice bowl this morning?
Can you provide any posts of mine that suggest that I was "...defending the NY Times yesterday,"...
...or is this one more variety of lie you've come up with?
You won't respond to this query, will you, you gutter snipe.
I didn't say you were defending the Times you illiterate. I said the opposite.
WHY WEREN'T YOU DEFENDING THE TIMES free speech rights?
From the OP:
"5. The answer to bad speech is good speech."
And that's what I provide.
Sorry, but all of us among the sane know why you're defending the students and their n***** chant.
Sorry....you can't intimidate me.