Published 1 day ago Marines say they're being 'crushed' over vaccine refusal: 'A political purge'

The bible shows wars and violence all the time...........These Seals have been killing for this country in the Sandy regions of the world ...........that was not their problem.........They said no via their religious beliefs of the tech which was enabled by stem cell research.

And show me what religions reject the vaccine for that reason.

And if that is the case, it is a hell of a lot more than just that which disqualifies that. A great many modern vaccines do, including chicken pox, rabies, rubella, the number is growing all the time. And it has been that way for years, so why is it only now such a big deal?

And once again, this means they can not get half of the vaccines they are mandated to have and keep current on. So once again, medically ineligible.
 
The military is free to practice their religion as a military member too, as long as good order and discipline are not negatively impacted and there are no laws or regs broken.

And if you are not medically certified to regulations and refuse to do so, you are released.
 
And show me what religions reject the vaccine for that reason.

And if that is the case, it is a hell of a lot more than just that which disqualifies that. A great many modern vaccines do, including chicken pox, rabies, rubella, the number is growing all the time. And it has been that way for years, so why is it only now such a big deal?

And once again, this means they can not get half of the vaccines they are mandated to have and keep current on. So once again, medically ineligible.
Court just shot that down................The Court have a check on power via the Constitution...........Therefore they have just ordered against Brandon..........

That is justified by the Constitution.
 
Why would any conservative parent want to send their kid into a military where the generals came out against Trump and said they were talking to China behind the back of Trump because they said he was inept, but not a word about the inept way Afghanistan was handled under Diaper Joe?

Hell no, our kids won't go!

Let Diaper Joe and company fight their own Left wing wars.
If conservatives turn their back on the military libs will have to start drafting people
 
Court just shot that down................The Court have a check on power via the Constitution

By that definition, the ACA is illegal because "a court" shot it down.

That is not how it works, and to be honest I doubt that it will stand. Because there are courts even higher, that will likely overturn this one.

Just as the ACA action, by the same judge no less. For the same reason, that the "plaintiff" had no cause to file the lawsuit in the first place.

That is why we have higher courts, as a check on power via the Constitution.
 
They are free to practice their religion in the service, too.

Yes, you are. And while I do not remember his name, he came to my unit often to visit Captain Rattan. It was Captain Kalsi, Kalisi, something like that. I only met him a couple of times.

But guess what? They can only wear the beard and turban while stateside. If they deploy, both come off. And they are also aware of that.
 
What law has it made?

Actually, there are many precedents that say the opposite of what these people are trying to say. The Supreme Court many times had made decisions to place limits on religions.

And this is no different. Which is why they are free to practice their religion, as civilians.

But I can quote a slew of SCOTUS decisions that have in fact places limits on religion. Especially if it is for the greater good.
 
Actually, there are many precedents that say the opposite of what these people are trying to say. The Supreme Court many times had made decisions to place limits on religions.

And this is no different. Which is why they are free to practice their religion, as civilians.

But I can quote a slew of SCOTUS decisions that have in fact places limits on religion. Especially if it is for the greater good.
how about quote just one??
 
Literally, right here:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..."

You claim to have taken an oath to uphold the Constitution and you don't even know what it says.

Yet we stomped out many practices in Religions didn’t we? Bigamy is illegal everywhere isn’t it? Isn’t it true that more than one Religion advocates it?
 
Actually, there are many precedents that say the opposite of what these people are trying to say.
Thank you. The context of my question is 'regarding this case in particular'.
 
There’s no political Exceptions just religious ones. Any lying ass marine saying it’s religious and not political should be dismissed as a liar immediately. Any marine dutifully getting a vax is a dutiful marine.
 
Any religion that says it’s ok to kill people but you can’t get a vaccine to save people isn’t a religion.
 
Yet we stomped out many practices in Religions didn’t we? Bigamy is illegal everywhere isn’t it? Isn’t it true that more than one Religion advocates it?
We have. Does that justify doing it again?
 
Yes, you are. And while I do not remember his name, he came to my unit often to visit Captain Rattan. It was Captain Kalsi, Kalisi, something like that. I only met him a couple of times.

But guess what? They can only wear the beard and turban while stateside. If they deploy, both come off. And they are also aware of that.
Irrelevant
 
We have. Does that justify doing it again?

My point is that Social Norms have trumped Religious freedom more than once.

But let’s take Religious Freedom to the current situation. 32 Naval Service Members which includes the Marines have been granted an exception by a Judge based upon Religious Beliefs. Would you trust those people in a combat job? Say as a line Rifleman or a SEAL?
 
By that definition, the ACA is illegal because "a court" shot it down.

That is not how it works, and to be honest I doubt that it will stand. Because there are courts even higher, that will likely overturn this one.

Just as the ACA action, by the same judge no less. For the same reason, that the "plaintiff" had no cause to file the lawsuit in the first place.

That is why we have higher courts, as a check on power via the Constitution.
Which is where we are at Now they have to try and overturn it in a higher court.
 
Back
Top Bottom