Psaki Hints At Govt Intervention Into Musk Twitter-Buy To Fight 'Misinformation'

"Misinformation" is far different than "Disinformation". Who knew right?? So "Misinformation" ;.... "False information that is spread, regardless of intent to mislead"... Let that sink in...Now we have "Disinformation";...."Deliberately misleading or biased information." See the difference?? ......."Disinformation" has long been used as a very powerful, destructive and divisive tool.
 
When fifty one "former security officials" all assured us that Hunter's laptop was Russian disinformation, I was inclined to believe them. As it turned out it was these fifty one people that were, in fact, spreading "Disinformation". Misinformation is basically "wrong" information. Disinformation is basically scumbags lying.
 
Last edited:
I believe it is very important for all Americans to be fully aware of the difference between "misinformation" and "disinformation" . Confusion between the two allows evil to thrive.
 
I believe it is very important for all Americans to be fully aware of the difference between "misinformation" and "disinformation" . Confusion between the two allows evil to thrive.
Like the from Covid versus with Covid
Libs can’t afford full information for all parties to evaluate the merits of
 
Last edited:

Biden Spokesman Jen Psaki floated the idea during another Biden Administration Misinformation Press Conference the possible need for the govt yo inject itself into the private sector bussines deal involving Elon Musk purchasing Twitter

Musk bought Twitter to end the Un-Constitutional sensorring and banning of members for posting conservative views and information, such as un-altered transcripts of Democrats comments, legislation, and action. Musk seeks to restore freedom of speech on Twitter, which is the story so far.

Evidently the leading source of misinformation in the US, the Biden administration, tge US government doesn't want this to happen and is considering injecting itself in the middle of this private sector business transaction in order to impose government restrictions and mandates on the new owner and how this private cirizen-owned social media platform can operate.

Hmm, de ja vu....flashback.....where have I heard / seen this before? Oh yeah, Putin/Russia, Xi/China, Castro/Cuba, etc...
Biden only wants Pravda sites...like CNN and MsNBC
 

Biden Spokesman Jen Psaki floated the idea during another Biden Administration Misinformation Press Conference the possible need for the govt yo inject itself into the private sector bussines deal involving Elon Musk purchasing Twitter

Musk bought Twitter to end the Un-Constitutional sensorring and banning of members for posting conservative views and information, such as un-altered transcripts of Democrats comments, legislation, and action. Musk seeks to restore freedom of speech on Twitter, which is the story so far.

Evidently the leading source of misinformation in the US, the Biden administration, tge US government doesn't want this to happen and is considering injecting itself in the middle of this private sector business transaction in order to impose government restrictions and mandates on the new owner and how this private cirizen-owned social media platform can operate.

Hmm, de ja vu....flashback.....where have I heard / seen this before? Oh yeah, Putin/Russia, Xi/China, Castro/Cuba, etc...


1. The government has no authority to interfere with the sale.
2. They've been talking about the regulation of social media for a long time and nothing has happened, because what ever they try to do will have to pass SCOTUS scrutiny. That won't be easy.

That said the writer at the Blaze made a lot of assumptions.

.
 
Constitutionally, I don't believe the Biden Administration has a leg to stand on. It could be nothing more than the obligatory political posturing whenever something happens that the Left doesn't like. Don't forget that the Far Left owns the Democratic Party these days, so the BA has to say something even if it means nothing.

I was watching Tucker tonight and he said they were talking about going after Musks' other business adventures, kind of like what they were trying to do to Trump in NYC. A year after 1/6 and they are still conducting witch hunts on Trump.

Democrats are Nazis, that's all there is to it. They use the federal government and agencies to carry out their personal political fights. They used the FBI and FISA courts to try and get Trump. Dementia sent them out to find his daughters stolen diary before anybody made it public revealing his inappropriate actions with her. They also hid Hunter's laptop for over two years. The FBI coordinated with CNN to make sure they had cameras there in the middle of the night when they arrested Roger Stone. The list goes on and on and on.

The problem is nobody ever goes after these people.
 
I'll reiterate, There is huge difference between "Misinformation" and "Disinformation". "Misinformation" may contain incorrect views expressed by ill-informed people. Contrast that to "Disinformation", which is essentially a powerful weapon that is used by people that fully well know that exactly what they are claiming is false.... Fifty one experts all (falsely) claiming that Hunter's laptop was Russian "disinformation" is the classic example of "disinformation".. and is quite different from "misinformation".
 
Last edited:
"Misinformation" is far different than "Disinformation". Who knew right?? So "Misinformation" ;.... "False information that is spread, regardless of intent to mislead"... Let that sink in...Now we have "Disinformation";...."Deliberately misleading or biased information." See the difference?? ......."Disinformation" has long been used as a very powerful, destructive and divisive tool.
Whoever Controls Language Controls Thought

So is the contemporary fad of using "different than" rather than the intelligent "different from" misinformation or disinformation? Either way, "than" implies a value judgment, such as higher, longer, or less intelligent. Different only states that something is not the same as something else. It is similar to separate.

Would you say, "The annex is separate than the main building"?

Therefore, this acquired deficiency is disinformation, because the Educationists know perfectly well that the ignorant and dysfunctional grammar they are pushing leads to ignorant and dysfunctional thought. That's what the media, including this Netrix, are designed for. Don't deny that you are under the spell of those who are "powerful, destructive, and divisive."

Don't follow the grammar chanted by professional speakers. Their common way of speaking proves that they are in the same bipartisan clique. What if every on-air personality spoke with the same regional accent? Wouldn't you be suspicious and hesitate to take sides?
 
Screen-Shot-2022-04-25-at-7.08.53-PM.png


4bba78f5fd3044bdabbd4d53dc61555847eb28b361725b99b44663d6defea687.jpg


5a1fa1f064de564f73460c857f6a93ec440bd3c824537469a7f346d4d578f946.jpg


mtv.jpg
 
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE do just that Biden.

It will be just another nail in the coffin that will end this administration, and absolutely seal the deal for a conservative takeover in the mid terms.
 

Forum List

Back
Top