Psaki Hints At Govt Intervention Into Musk Twitter-Buy To Fight 'Misinformation'

easyt65

Diamond Member
Aug 4, 2015
90,307
61,089
2,645

Biden Spokesman Jen Psaki floated the idea during another Biden Administration Misinformation Press Conference the possible need for the govt yo inject itself into the private sector bussines deal involving Elon Musk purchasing Twitter

Musk bought Twitter to end the Un-Constitutional sensorring and banning of members for posting conservative views and information, such as un-altered transcripts of Democrats comments, legislation, and action. Musk seeks to restore freedom of speech on Twitter, which is the story so far.

Evidently the leading source of misinformation in the US, the Biden administration, tge US government doesn't want this to happen and is considering injecting itself in the middle of this private sector business transaction in order to impose government restrictions and mandates on the new owner and how this private cirizen-owned social media platform can operate.

Hmm, de ja vu....flashback.....where have I heard / seen this before? Oh yeah, Putin/Russia, Xi/China, Castro/Cuba, etc...
 

Biden Spokesman Jen Psaki floated the idea during another Biden Administration Misinformation Press Conference the possible need for the govt yo inject itself into the private sector bussines deal involving Elon Musk purchasing Twitter

Musk bought Twitter to end the Un-Constitutional sensorring and banning of members for posting conservative views and information, such as un-altered transcripts of Democrats comments, legislation, and action. Musk seeks to restore freedom of speech on Twitter, which is the story so far.

Evidently the leading source of misinformation in the US, the Biden administration, tge US government doesn't want this to happen and is considering injecting itself in the middle of this private sector business transaction in order to impose government restrictions and mandates on the new owner and how this private cirizen-owned social media platform can operate.

Hmm, de ja vu....flashback.....where have I heard / seen this before? Oh yeah, Putin/Russia, Xi/China, Castro/Cuba, etc...
well, desantis just did it.

disney spoke out against "don't say gay" and yes; it's stupid and politically motivated. but fuck man, what ISN'T these days? the answer was to use political power to punish them. you can justify it any which way you like, but the end result is in fact, the same. much like when dems do something stupid like "can't nominate a SCOTUS in a lame duck year!" it comes back to you.

precedent set. lets see where it goes.
 

Biden Spokesman Jen Psaki floated the idea during another Biden Administration Misinformation Press Conference the possible need for the govt yo inject itself into the private sector bussines deal involving Elon Musk purchasing Twitter

Musk bought Twitter to end the Un-Constitutional sensorring and banning of members for posting conservative views and information, such as un-altered transcripts of Democrats comments, legislation, and action. Musk seeks to restore freedom of speech on Twitter, which is the story so far.

Evidently the leading source of misinformation in the US, the Biden administration, tge US government doesn't want this to happen and is considering injecting itself in the middle of this private sector business transaction in order to impose government restrictions and mandates on the new owner and how this private cirizen-owned social media platform can operate.

Hmm, de ja vu....flashback.....where have I heard / seen this before? Oh yeah, Putin/Russia, Xi/China, Castro/Cuba, etc...
What these far-left extremist Democrats are calling "misinformation" is people telling the truth about them.
Censorship is a tool of tyrants.
Censorship is always a prelude to crimes against humanity.

censorshipishate.jpg
 
Last edited:
Obama and Hillary also chimed in on this.

They didnt say a word until Musk bought Twitter.

IF THE ALGORITHM IS OPEN SOURCE, WHAT IS THE PROBLEM?

Someone from the cult explain to me specifically why an open source algorithm?
 
Sorry bout that,

1. The puppet master obiwan is still guiding the Libtards.
2. Ole big ears with the biggest ego, just won't go away, Durham is the man to make him GO!
3. And if he fails *Durham*, he is a hired hand to protect them.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
 

Biden Spokesman Jen Psaki floated the idea during another Biden Administration Misinformation Press Conference the possible need for the govt yo inject itself into the private sector bussines deal involving Elon Musk purchasing Twitter

Musk bought Twitter to end the Un-Constitutional sensorring and banning of members for posting conservative views and information, such as un-altered transcripts of Democrats comments, legislation, and action. Musk seeks to restore freedom of speech on Twitter, which is the story so far.

Evidently the leading source of misinformation in the US, the Biden administration, tge US government doesn't want this to happen and is considering injecting itself in the middle of this private sector business transaction in order to impose government restrictions and mandates on the new owner and how this private cirizen-owned social media platform can operate.

Hmm, de ja vu....flashback.....where have I heard / seen this before? Oh yeah, Putin/Russia, Xi/China, Castro/Cuba, etc...
And Zelinksy who banned all opposition parties in Ukraine, and banned The Russian Language as well.
 
Sorry bout that,

1. Like USA should ban Spanish?
2. Like the Libtards should be banned?
3. The DNC colluded with Russia to invent a story to circumvent the American voters.
4. I think that maybe treasonous.
5. If so, isn't that enough to warrant the DNC to be banned?

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
 
Last edited:
well, desantis just did it.

disney spoke out against "don't say gay" and yes; it's stupid and politically motivated. but fuck man, what ISN'T these days? the answer was to use political power to punish them. you can justify it any which way you like, but the end result is in fact, the same. much like when dems do something stupid like "can't nominate a SCOTUS in a lame duck year!" it comes back to you.

precedent set. lets see where it goes.
Fighting Back Is Not the Same Morally As Starting a Fight

Taking away a special benefit is not punishment; that's all DeSantis did. Neither would revoking the citizenship of anchor babies be punishment.
 
Last edited:
Facts that they will label racist and thus against public good thus misinformation
Exactly what I said 5 minutes after the buy was announced
 

Biden Spokesman Jen Psaki floated the idea during another Biden Administration Misinformation Press Conference the possible need for the govt yo inject itself into the private sector bussines deal involving Elon Musk purchasing Twitter

Musk bought Twitter to end the Un-Constitutional sensorring and banning of members for posting conservative views and information, such as un-altered transcripts of Democrats comments, legislation, and action. Musk seeks to restore freedom of speech on Twitter, which is the story so far.

Evidently the leading source of misinformation in the US, the Biden administration, tge US government doesn't want this to happen and is considering injecting itself in the middle of this private sector business transaction in order to impose government restrictions and mandates on the new owner and how this private cirizen-owned social media platform can operate.

Hmm, de ja vu....flashback.....where have I heard / seen this before? Oh yeah, Putin/Russia, Xi/China, Castro/Cuba, etc...

Straight out of Stalin's playbook.

Old Joe and Red Jen's motto is "Make the USSR Great Again!".

She's even got the hat:

1651003180239.png
 

Biden Spokesman Jen Psaki floated the idea during another Biden Administration Misinformation Press Conference the possible need for the govt yo inject itself into the private sector bussines deal involving Elon Musk purchasing Twitter

Musk bought Twitter to end the Un-Constitutional sensorring and banning of members for posting conservative views and information, such as un-altered transcripts of Democrats comments, legislation, and action. Musk seeks to restore freedom of speech on Twitter, which is the story so far.

Evidently the leading source of misinformation in the US, the Biden administration, tge US government doesn't want this to happen and is considering injecting itself in the middle of this private sector business transaction in order to impose government restrictions and mandates on the new owner and how this private cirizen-owned social media platform can operate.

Hmm, de ja vu....flashback.....where have I heard / seen this before? Oh yeah, Putin/Russia, Xi/China, Castro/Cuba, etc...


How does Potato Chip know there will be "disinformation" on Twitter now?
 

Biden Spokesman Jen Psaki floated the idea during another Biden Administration Misinformation Press Conference the possible need for the govt yo inject itself into the private sector bussines deal involving Elon Musk purchasing Twitter

Musk bought Twitter to end the Un-Constitutional sensorring and banning of members for posting conservative views and information, such as un-altered transcripts of Democrats comments, legislation, and action. Musk seeks to restore freedom of speech on Twitter, which is the story so far.

Evidently the leading source of misinformation in the US, the Biden administration, tge US government doesn't want this to happen and is considering injecting itself in the middle of this private sector business transaction in order to impose government restrictions and mandates on the new owner and how this private cirizen-owned social media platform can operate.

Hmm, de ja vu....flashback.....where have I heard / seen this before? Oh yeah, Putin/Russia, Xi/China, Castro/Cuba, etc...
:p

This I'd like to see.

LMAO

Yet another nail in the Democratic party coffin.
 
I should have seen this coming.

After all these are the same people who swore 2020 election was bullet proof, then one year later when their numbers tanked suddenly started demanding election reform saying 2024 elections could be illegitimate.

They don't want people to have a voice when those voices say things they don't like.
 
Evidently the leading source of misinformation in the US, the Biden administration, the US government doesn't want this to happen and is considering injecting itself in the middle of this private sector business transaction in order to impose government restrictions and mandates on the new owner and how this private citizen-owned social media platform can operate.

Constitutionally, I don't believe the Biden Administration has a leg to stand on. It could be nothing more than the obligatory political posturing whenever something happens that the Left doesn't like. Don't forget that the Far Left owns the Democratic Party these days, so the BA has to say something even if it means nothing.
 

Forum List

Back
Top