Proving NIST wrong about their 9/11 conclusions.

[the other mike]

 

[the other mike]

 

[Soupnazi630]

Really?

You mean that conspiracy theory hasn't been sucked dry yet?

Calling it a theory makes you one of the conspirers.
We'll be watching you.

It is in fact wrong to call it a theory. The scientific standard is that a theory is supported by evidence. Your claim has no supoorting evidence and therefore is not a theory. In fact it is not a hypothesis. It is a delusional pile of bunk. Fewer and fewer people are buying into it.

 

[the other mike]

It is in fact wrong to call it a theory. The scientific standard is that a theory is supported by evidence. Your claim has no supoorting evidence and therefore is not a theory. In fact it is not a hypothesis. It is a delusional pile of bunk. Fewer and fewer people are buying into it.

Actually, More and more people are
still learning about it.

 

[Soupnazi630]

It is in fact wrong to call it a theory. The scientific standard is that a theory is supported by evidence. Your claim has no supoorting evidence and therefore is not a theory. In fact it is not a hypothesis. It is a delusional pile of bunk. Fewer and fewer people are buying into it.

Actually, More and more people are
still learning about it.

Wrong.

It is old newds long since known and proven to be false and fewer and fewer are giving a shit about such worthless stupid ideas.