Progressives Protest Parades

[PoliticalChic]

I don't have to refute point by point some lunatic bullshit that you or PC made up.

If it's "lunatic bullshit" then you should have no trouble refuting it.

I doubt you even read PoliticalChic 's post.

I doubt on his reading ability, period.

 

[IM2]

Since the 32nd President.

I would go back even further to the 28th pres.

But you are correct.

The vulgarity.
So characteristic of the low IQ Liberal.
Being neither articulate nor informed, yet desirous of making a forceful presentation, the lesser poster resorts to modes of operation vulgarity.
Time and again, when folks realize they have been skewered, their language falls to the vulgar. It's one of those hard to hide psychological tells....your anger at being bested leaks out as vulgarity.
That is why I never have to do the same.

Exactly. This principle can be extended beyond an internet forum. In the real world, when leftists are losing they resort to personal attacks and even violence.

Humorous when Liberals and Democrats are suddenly worried about costs and spending.

It really is a hoot, isn't it? But they're perfectly fine with spending trillions to provide free healthcare for illegals.

And Obama is Muslim.

Without a doubt. Given his background, how could he be anything else?

He made a pretty lousy Muslim... Causing Muslims to die in Syria

Lots of Muslims are responsible for the deaths of other Muslims.

Notice that the muslims Obama killed were all Sunni. Obama is a Shia, just like his Iranian puppetmaster Valerie Jarrett. And that's why he gave $130 billion in cash to the mullahs in Iran.

Obama was not a Muslim. But your post shows the you're a loony tune, so there's no more need to waste time.

It took two decades for the Left/Liberals/Democrats to admit that Bill Clinton is a serial rapist.

Only took two years for the admission that Trump never colluded with the Russians.


In time, Obama's Muslim faith will be admitted, as well.


Tough for your sort to keep the truth hidden.

There is no proof Clinton was a serial rapist. His adultery was never approved by liberals. Although you conservatives had gay child molesters in your midst.

Mueller never considered collusion. Maybe you read the report then talk.

Obama is not a Muslim, and it really would not matter if he was.

Tough for you loons to accept truth over fiction.

Now go read the cartoons.

 

[Deno]

Let’s see if Trump is capable of acting Presidential

The main thing is Trump is more than capable at smacking you Tards around.

You are the biggest threat to America.

 

[Diver Diva]

I doubt on his reading ability, period.

 

[IM2]

Obama was not a Muslim. But your post shows the you're a loony tune, so there's no more need to waste time.

And I believe Barack Hussain Obama is a muslim. Instead of resorting to insults, why don't you refute point-by-point the convincing argument PoliticalChic made earlier in this thread?

I don't have to refute point by point some lunatic bullshit that you or PC made up. Obama attended a Christian church for years. People like you still bitch about who his pastor was. People believe in Santa Claus and the Easter bunny too. You'll be telling us about that phone call you got from Elvis pretty soon.

Meaning, it is apparent, you can't.

Everything in my exegesis is linked, sourced and documented.



Don't worry....no one believes anything you post anyway. Just stick to the Liberal "is not, isssssss nnoooooootttttttt!!!"

We all can post up lunacy and use non credible websites for information and claim that it's fact because we have links. That's what you have done

 

[IM2]

I don't have to refute point by point some lunatic bullshit that you or PC made up.

If it's "lunatic bullshit" then you should have no trouble refuting it.

I doubt you even read PoliticalChic 's post.

I read it. It contains the usual stupidity.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Since the 32nd President.

I would go back even further to the 28th pres.

But you are correct.

The vulgarity.
So characteristic of the low IQ Liberal.
Being neither articulate nor informed, yet desirous of making a forceful presentation, the lesser poster resorts to modes of operation vulgarity.
Time and again, when folks realize they have been skewered, their language falls to the vulgar. It's one of those hard to hide psychological tells....your anger at being bested leaks out as vulgarity.
That is why I never have to do the same.

Exactly. This principle can be extended beyond an internet forum. In the real world, when leftists are losing they resort to personal attacks and even violence.

Humorous when Liberals and Democrats are suddenly worried about costs and spending.

It really is a hoot, isn't it? But they're perfectly fine with spending trillions to provide free healthcare for illegals.

And Obama is Muslim.

Without a doubt. Given his background, how could he be anything else?

He made a pretty lousy Muslim... Causing Muslims to die in Syria

Lots of Muslims are responsible for the deaths of other Muslims.

Notice that the muslims Obama killed were all Sunni. Obama is a Shia, just like his Iranian puppetmaster Valerie Jarrett. And that's why he gave $130 billion in cash to the mullahs in Iran.

Obama was not a Muslim. But your post shows the you're a loony tune, so there's no more need to waste time.

It took two decades for the Left/Liberals/Democrats to admit that Bill Clinton is a serial rapist.

Only took two years for the admission that Trump never colluded with the Russians.


In time, Obama's Muslim faith will be admitted, as well.


Tough for your sort to keep the truth hidden.

There is no proof Clinton was a serial rapist. His adultery was never approved by liberals. Although you conservatives had gay child molesters in your midst.

Mueller never considered collusion. Maybe you read the report then talk.

Obama is not a Muslim, and it really would not matter if he was.

Tough for you loons to accept truth over fiction.

Now go read the cartoons.

Burying you is so very simple, because you are.

But.....
Let's check:


"With all the scandals in the news, liberals are turning on President Clinton. MSNBC’s Chris Hayes reckons that the “center left” is “overdue for a real reckoning” with Mr. Clinton. The Times’ Michelle Goldberg says, “I believe Juanita,” a reference to Mrs. Broaddrick, who in the late 1990s alleged that in 1978, Mr. Clinton, then Arkansas’ attorney-general, raped her at a hotel. Mr. Clinton has long denied the charge. Chelsea Handler tweets an apology to Mrs. Broaddrick. Ross Douthat, referring to the special prosecutor who turned Mr. Clinton over to Congress for impeachment for perjury and obstruction, asks, “What if Ken Starr was right?”
'Juanita's News'



"[Robert] Bartley explained the [Wall Street] Journal’s thinking in a famous editorial called “Juanita’s News.” It included the prophetic sentences about Mrs. Broaddrick: “Unlike the line of women who preceded her — Gennifer Flowers, Paula Jones, Elizabeth Ward Gracen, Kathleen Willey — there doesn't seem to be much interest in nit-picking her veracity. It appears her story will stand as a stark coda to the Clinton saga; let the world conclude what it will.”
'Juanita's News'


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NYTimes: a day late and a dollar short...


"But with Paula Jones and Monica Lewinsky, we know what happened: A president being sued for sexual harassment tried to buy off a mistress-turned-potential-witness with White House favors, and then committed perjury serious enough to merit disbarment. Which also brought forward a compelling allegation from Juanita Broaddrick that the president had raped her.

The longer I spent with these old stories, the more I came back to a question: If exploiting a willing intern is a serious enough abuse of power to warrant resignation, why is obstructing justice in a sexual harassment case not serious enough to warrant impeachment? Especially when the behavior is part of a longstanding pattern that also may extend to rape? Would any feminist today hesitate to take a similar opportunity to remove a predatory studio head or C.E.O.?


...the most important escalators were the Democrats. They had an opportunity, with Al Gore waiting in the wings, to show a predator the door and establish some moral common ground for a polarizing country.

And what they did instead — turning their party into an accessory to Clinton’s appetites, shamelessly abandoning feminist principle, smearing victims and blithely ignoring his most credible accuser, all because Republicans funded the investigations and they’re prudes and it’s all just Sexual McCarthyism — feels in the cold clarity of hindsight like a great act of partisan deformation." Opinion | What if Ken Starr Was Right?

------------------------------------------------------

Again?
The Democrats.....
"...turning their party into an accessory to Clinton’s appetites, shamelessly abandoning feminist principle, smearing victims and blithely ignoring his most credible accuser,..."


Exactly what we on the Right have said all along.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I quoted the house organ for Liberalism, Inc.....the NYSlimes.

Your post is simply one more example of the fact that the least intelligent are Liberal acolytes....many of whom....you.....cannot keep up with the alterations in the propaganda.


We have learned from the Times and from your post...

a. The Left now admits what we on the Right always said about Bill 'the rapist' Clinton

and

b. you are a low-life moron.


Any questions?

Everyone always knew that Clinton was a rapist....and now the Liberal elites are ready to admit it.

Only the lock-step Liberals who have followed their marching orders for years still pretend that it isn't true.

That, in itself, proves what we on the Right have always said about you matinetes, who behave more like iron filings in a magnetic field than sentient human beings.


For those of us on the Right, who have always been right.....it's a win-win.


Keep squirming.....or slither away.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Had it not been for Trump's election....none of this would be happening!
With Hillary running, the whole rape-apologist program of the Democrats came to the the forefront....and they had to pretend that Trump was on the same level (the gutter) as Bill 'the rapist' Clinton.

Here's the 'divide:' the Democrats with at least a double digit IQ are ready to admit the truth, the rape history that the Right has been revealing about Clinton for...what....decades.

You, a total dunce, are still fighting the war you've lost.

2. Which Liberal outlets are now admitting what we on the Right have said for decades?


The New York Times

MSNBC

The Atlantic

Slate


Vox


Politico


"So the recent wave of liberals “reckoning” with Bill Clinton’s sexual offenses should be put into proper context. It is not the beginning of the end for the Clintons atop the Democratic Party. It’s just the end.

….the mea culpas from Bill’s defenders proliferating through lefty media, from the New York Times to Politico to Vox, are anything but brave. They’re convenient."
https://nypost.com/2017/11/16/dems-...ses-is-the-final-nail-in-the-clintons-coffin/





3. On the other side....lying low-life imbeciles.....you.....who can't keep up with the program.





Buried you again, huh?

Time for your 'is not, issssssss noooooottttttttt!" post.

 

[Diver Diva]

Burying you is so very simple, because you are.

But.....
Let's check:


"With all the scandals in the news, liberals are turning on President Clinton. MSNBC’s Chris Hayes reckons that the “center left” is “overdue for a real reckoning” with Mr. Clinton. The Times’ Michelle Goldberg says, “I believe Juanita,” a reference to Mrs. Broaddrick, who in the late 1990s alleged that in 1978, Mr. Clinton, then Arkansas’ attorney-general, raped her at a hotel. Mr. Clinton has long denied the charge. Chelsea Handler tweets an apology to Mrs. Broaddrick. Ross Douthat, referring to the special prosecutor who turned Mr. Clinton over to Congress for impeachment for perjury and obstruction, asks, “What if Ken Starr was right?”
'Juanita's News'



"[Robert] Bartley explained the [Wall Street] Journal’s thinking in a famous editorial called “Juanita’s News.” It included the prophetic sentences about Mrs. Broaddrick: “Unlike the line of women who preceded her — Gennifer Flowers, Paula Jones, Elizabeth Ward Gracen, Kathleen Willey — there doesn't seem to be much interest in nit-picking her veracity. It appears her story will stand as a stark coda to the Clinton saga; let the world conclude what it will.”
'Juanita's News'


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NYTimes: a day late and a dollar short...


"But with Paula Jones and Monica Lewinsky, we know what happened: A president being sued for sexual harassment tried to buy off a mistress-turned-potential-witness with White House favors, and then committed perjury serious enough to merit disbarment. Which also brought forward a compelling allegation from Juanita Broaddrick that the president had raped her.

The longer I spent with these old stories, the more I came back to a question: If exploiting a willing intern is a serious enough abuse of power to warrant resignation, why is obstructing justice in a sexual harassment case not serious enough to warrant impeachment? Especially when the behavior is part of a longstanding pattern that also may extend to rape? Would any feminist today hesitate to take a similar opportunity to remove a predatory studio head or C.E.O.?


...the most important escalators were the Democrats. They had an opportunity, with Al Gore waiting in the wings, to show a predator the door and establish some moral common ground for a polarizing country.

And what they did instead — turning their party into an accessory to Clinton’s appetites, shamelessly abandoning feminist principle, smearing victims and blithely ignoring his most credible accuser, all because Republicans funded the investigations and they’re prudes and it’s all just Sexual McCarthyism — feels in the cold clarity of hindsight like a great act of partisan deformation." Opinion | What if Ken Starr Was Right?

------------------------------------------------------

Again?
The Democrats.....
"...turning their party into an accessory to Clinton’s appetites, shamelessly abandoning feminist principle, smearing victims and blithely ignoring his most credible accuser,..."


Exactly what we on the Right have said all along.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I quoted the house organ for Liberalism, Inc.....the NYSlimes.

Your post is simply one more example of the fact that the least intelligent are Liberal acolytes....many of whom....you.....cannot keep up with the alterations in the propaganda.


We have learned from the Times and from your post...

a. The Left now admits what we on the Right always said about Bill 'the rapist' Clinton

and

b. you are a low-life moron.


Any questions?

Everyone always knew that Clinton was a rapist....and now the Liberal elites are ready to admit it.

Only the lock-step Liberals who have followed their marching orders for years still pretend that it isn't true.

That, in itself, proves what we on the Right have always said about you matinetes, who behave more like iron filings in a magnetic field than sentient human beings.


For those of us on the Right, who have always been right.....it's a win-win.


Keep squirming.....or slither away.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Had it not been for Trump's election....none of this would be happening!
With Hillary running, the whole rape-apologist program of the Democrats came to the the forefront....and they had to pretend that Trump was on the same level (the gutter) as Bill 'the rapist' Clinton.

Here's the 'divide:' the Democrats with at least a double digit IQ are ready to admit the truth, the rape history that the Right has been revealing about Clinton for...what....decades.

You, a total dunce, are still fighting the war you've lost.

2. Which Liberal outlets are now admitting what we on the Right have said for decades?


The New York Times

MSNBC

The Atlantic

Slate


Vox


Politico


"So the recent wave of liberals “reckoning” with Bill Clinton’s sexual offenses should be put into proper context. It is not the beginning of the end for the Clintons atop the Democratic Party. It’s just the end.

….the mea culpas from Bill’s defenders proliferating through lefty media, from the New York Times to Politico to Vox, are anything but brave. They’re convenient."
https://nypost.com/2017/11/16/dems-...ses-is-the-final-nail-in-the-clintons-coffin/





3. On the other side....lying low-life imbeciles.....you.....who can't keep up with the program.





Buried you again, huh?

Time for your 'is not, issssssss noooooottttttttt!" post.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Obama was not a Muslim. But your post shows the you're a loony tune, so there's no more need to waste time.

And I believe Barack Hussain Obama is a muslim. Instead of resorting to insults, why don't you refute point-by-point the convincing argument PoliticalChic made earlier in this thread?

I don't have to refute point by point some lunatic bullshit that you or PC made up. Obama attended a Christian church for years. People like you still bitch about who his pastor was. People believe in Santa Claus and the Easter bunny too. You'll be telling us about that phone call you got from Elvis pretty soon.

Meaning, it is apparent, you can't.

Everything in my exegesis is linked, sourced and documented.



Don't worry....no one believes anything you post anyway. Just stick to the Liberal "is not, isssssss nnoooooootttttttt!!!"

We all can post up lunacy and use non credible websites for information and claim that it's fact because we have links. That's what you have done

White flag?


I got it.....but it's the only 'white' you seem to favor, huh?

 

[PoliticalChic]

I don't have to refute point by point some lunatic bullshit that you or PC made up.

If it's "lunatic bullshit" then you should have no trouble refuting it.

I doubt you even read PoliticalChic 's post.

I read it. It contains the usual stupidity.

I can see why you are considered an expert on 'stupidity.'

 

[PoliticalChic]

Obama was not a Muslim. But your post shows the you're a loony tune, so there's no more need to waste time.

And I believe Barack Hussain Obama is a muslim. Instead of resorting to insults, why don't you refute point-by-point the convincing argument PoliticalChic made earlier in this thread?

I don't have to refute point by point some lunatic bullshit that you or PC made up. Obama attended a Christian church for years. People like you still bitch about who his pastor was. People believe in Santa Claus and the Easter bunny too. You'll be telling us about that phone call you got from Elvis pretty soon.

Meaning, it is apparent, you can't.

Everything in my exegesis is linked, sourced and documented.



Don't worry....no one believes anything you post anyway. Just stick to the Liberal "is not, isssssss nnoooooootttttttt!!!"

We all can post up lunacy and use non credible websites for information and claim that it's fact because we have links. That's what you have done

Clinton Misogyny - Sex
Juanita Broaddrick (AR)- rape
Eileen Wellstone (Oxford) - rape
Elizabeth Ward Gracen - rape - quid pro quo, post incident intimidation
Regina Hopper Blakely - "forced himself on her, biting, bruising her"
Kathleen Willey (WH) - sexual assault, intimidations, threats
Sandra Allen James (DC) - sexual assault
22 Year Old 1972 (Yale) - sexual assault
Kathy Bradshaw (AK) - sexual assault
Cristy Zercher - unwelcomed sexual advance, intimidations
Paula Jones (AR) - unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
Carolyn Moffet -unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
1974 student at University of Arkansas - unwelcomed physical contact
1978-1980 - seven complaints per Arkansas state troopers
Monica Lewinsky - quid pro quo, post incident character assault
Gennifer Flowers - quid pro quo, post incident character assault
Dolly Kyle Browning - post incident character assault
Sally Perdue - post incident threats
Betty Dalton - rebuffed his advances, married to one of his supporters
Denise Reeder - apologetic note scanned
http://www.alamo-girl.com/0262.htm


And...just recently: "Leslie Millwee says that on two of the alleged occasions, Clinton groped her while he rubbed himself against her and reached climax." EXCLUSIVE VIDEO INTERVIEW: New Bill Clinton Sexual Assault Accuser Goes Public for the First Time | Breitbart

 

[Diver Diva]

White flag?

He's bleeding pretty bad, PC. Don't kill him or we won't have him around to play with.

 

[IM2]

Obama was not a Muslim. But your post shows the you're a loony tune, so there's no more need to waste time.

And I believe Barack Hussain Obama is a muslim. Instead of resorting to insults, why don't you refute point-by-point the convincing argument PoliticalChic made earlier in this thread?

I don't have to refute point by point some lunatic bullshit that you or PC made up. Obama attended a Christian church for years. People like you still bitch about who his pastor was. People believe in Santa Claus and the Easter bunny too. You'll be telling us about that phone call you got from Elvis pretty soon.

Meaning, it is apparent, you can't.

Everything in my exegesis is linked, sourced and documented.



Don't worry....no one believes anything you post anyway. Just stick to the Liberal "is not, isssssss nnoooooootttttttt!!!"

We all can post up lunacy and use non credible websites for information and claim that it's fact because we have links. That's what you have done

Clinton Misogyny - Sex
Juanita Broaddrick (AR)- rape
Eileen Wellstone (Oxford) - rape
Elizabeth Ward Gracen - rape - quid pro quo, post incident intimidation
Regina Hopper Blakely - "forced himself on her, biting, bruising her"
Kathleen Willey (WH) - sexual assault, intimidations, threats
Sandra Allen James (DC) - sexual assault
22 Year Old 1972 (Yale) - sexual assault
Kathy Bradshaw (AK) - sexual assault
Cristy Zercher - unwelcomed sexual advance, intimidations
Paula Jones (AR) - unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
Carolyn Moffet -unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
1974 student at University of Arkansas - unwelcomed physical contact
1978-1980 - seven complaints per Arkansas state troopers
Monica Lewinsky - quid pro quo, post incident character assault
Gennifer Flowers - quid pro quo, post incident character assault
Dolly Kyle Browning - post incident character assault
Sally Perdue - post incident threats
Betty Dalton - rebuffed his advances, married to one of his supporters
Denise Reeder - apologetic note scanned
http://www.alamo-girl.com/0262.htm


And...just recently: "Leslie Millwee says that on two of the alleged occasions, Clinton groped her while he rubbed himself against her and reached climax." EXCLUSIVE VIDEO INTERVIEW: New Bill Clinton Sexual Assault Accuser Goes Public for the First Time | Breitbart

That link said the page didn't exist.

But see, the entire problem with you and more specifically with this OP is that it's incorrect. Opposing Trumps parade doesn't mean we hate America or the 4th. I personally don't celebrate the 4th, because June 25, 1865 was the first Independence day for blacks. However liberals will be enjoying this holiday just as much as conservatives, if not more. It's always been that way and the divisive shit your silly ass tries to post doesn't change that. I don't need to go looking for links to prove that. The celebrations going on in homes and cities both liberal and conservative on THIS DAY, renders your little opinion to the lunacy it truly is.

So go light a roman candle and use it for a sex toy. Perhaps you find that satisfaction you have never experienced.

 

[IM2]

White flag?

He's bleeding pretty bad, PC. Don't kill him or we won't have him around to play with.

Lol! You 2 dumb ------- aren't capable.

 

[miketx]

I wonder if the boy who would be queen will be at the parades?

 

[gipper]

i'll be honest, i don't get the need for the tanks on parade. seems like someone trying too hard to show pride in our military and using them as a display vs. their intended purpose. if you respect the military, stop making them do a dance like this.

Agreed. Plus after two decades of nonstop war, its time to promote nonintervention.

One thing is most amusing about this story. We have the MSM and some politicians complaining about the cost. LMFAO! A government $22 trillion in debt, obviously doesn’t give two shits about spending. When do they EVER complain about cost?

You would oppose this if Hillary was prez.

You would approve this if Big Ears or Cankles were prez.

 

[rightwinger]

Obama was not a Muslim. But your post shows the you're a loony tune, so there's no more need to waste time.

And I believe Barack Hussain Obama is a muslim. Instead of resorting to insults, why don't you refute point-by-point the convincing argument PoliticalChic made earlier in this thread?

Now, if we could only find that god damned birth certificate

 

[miketx]

Obama was not a Muslim. But your post shows the you're a loony tune, so there's no more need to waste time.

And I believe Barack Hussain Obama is a muslim. Instead of resorting to insults, why don't you refute point-by-point the convincing argument PoliticalChic made earlier in this thread?

Now, if we could only find that god damned birth certificate

What would that prove other than he was born in Hawaii?

 

[westwall]

He pulled us out of TPP which would have been a disaster for the middle class. He pulled us out of obummers illegal iran deal which was great for iran but shit for the rest of the world. So yeah, he has done a lot for this country. you're just too fucking stupid to understand.

How does Iran impact my life here negatively?

Iran is very, very low on an list of problems.

The truth is we're far more likely to have a Civil War here, between groups like Proud Boys / Tea Party/ Neo-Nazis vs ANTIFA, La Raza, and BLM.

That's our main concern, because Iran probably won't be so suicidal to attack the USA, knowing it will be bombed to extinction.

On the other hand, the sneaky Globalists can prop up the fifth column here, to collapse the USA from within..... Which then the USA colossal military & nuke arsenal means hardly anything........ The USA can't Nuke themselves.

Let them get a bomb and you will find out.

Can Iran even have a undetected delivery system to launch Nukes into the USA?

Besides, our meddling in Mid-Eastern affairs, brings hatred against the USA.

This really wasn't our problem, it is now because we did intervene in Mid-East affairs.

If Iran gets the bomb, they will use it. How can a person like you be so obtuse...

I think it's far more likely that Iran gets bombed by the West, than Iran ever bombs anybody.

The USA, and Israel aren't exactly peaceful nations, either.

Facts in evidence show your opinion to already be catastrophically wrong.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

How does Iran impact my life here negatively?

Iran is very, very low on an list of problems.

The truth is we're far more likely to have a Civil War here, between groups like Proud Boys / Tea Party/ Neo-Nazis vs ANTIFA, La Raza, and BLM.

That's our main concern, because Iran probably won't be so suicidal to attack the USA, knowing it will be bombed to extinction.

On the other hand, the sneaky Globalists can prop up the fifth column here, to collapse the USA from within..... Which then the USA colossal military & nuke arsenal means hardly anything........ The USA can't Nuke themselves.

Let them get a bomb and you will find out.

Can Iran even have a undetected delivery system to launch Nukes into the USA?

Besides, our meddling in Mid-Eastern affairs, brings hatred against the USA.

This really wasn't our problem, it is now because we did intervene in Mid-East affairs.

If Iran gets the bomb, they will use it. How can a person like you be so obtuse...

I think it's far more likely that Iran gets bombed by the West, than Iran ever bombs anybody.

The USA, and Israel aren't exactly peaceful nations, either.

Facts in evidence show your opinion to already be catastrophically wrong.

How many countries has Iran attacked or invaded in the last few decades?