Of course China wanted
their boy in the White House. Joe Biden violated the Emoluments Clause for China as VP and he’ll do it again as President.
Get the latest breaking news, in-depth reporting, and insightful analysis on a wide range of topics, including politics, culture, and world events | The Epoch Times is a trusted source for real news and information that is free from influence and bias.
www.theepochtimes.com
The two words every Trumper hates: "PROVE IT".
The thing is the courts and officials won't give them the chance to prove anything. You know that. If you don't you are uninformed or a liar. Probably both.
You have to make specific allegations and you have to offer evidence in order to be heard in court. The litigants WERE given a chance in their court briefs but they failed to do.
Are you suggesting courts no longer need specific allegations or evidence to proceed? Surely, you aren't THAT stupid. Care ton address that, Bucky?
Are you a lawyer? They had no evidentiary hearings. That means the evidence was never presented. Judges deny things for all sorts of reasons and not one had the guts. Intimidation from the Left is working. Just look at what is going a show of power fit for the new Warlord who will lead you against your neighbors.
You're just a sick **** going along with this bullshit.
You have to offer up evidence in order to have an evidentiary hearing. In fact, in a lot of cases, Trumps lawyers admitted they weren't even alleging fraud.
"What does evidentiary hearing mean?
An
evidentiary hearing is a legal court proceeding that involves eyewitness testimony, given under oath, that's relevant to the case. The presiding judge will hear and take into consideration live eyewitness
evidence presented during the
hearing in order to make a fair ruling."
The rule is simple. If no evidence is offered, no hearing is warranted.
Most of the cases were tossed because there was no evidence offered and/or no specific allegations. Other cases were tossed because Trumps team filed them to the wrong court.
In AR over 20 binders of affidavits were presented as evidence. The judge did not hear the case. And the censorship and the repetition of the lie is already an admission of guilt already.
the affidavits offered no evidence.
Mostly they were just hearsay. and some names were even redacted.
Many of the affidavits offered were highly suspect and were some time written for the person filing the affidavits. Project Veritas wrote many of the affidavits themselves and the persons signing them didnt even know what they said.
And swearing to such an affidavit under oath isn't really much of a risk to someone of facing perjury charges since they are seldom prosecuted, have a minor punishment, and are hard to convict. Besides, Im sure there were plenty of Trumpers will to commit perjury.
You can't point to a single case where there was tangible evidence of fraud. Not one. And they are all public record.
BTW, some of the fraud charges DID get a hearing and they were still rejected.
So far, you haven't proven a damn thing. You're just another cult member.