Progressive Propaganda: The Voter Fraud Edition

[P@triot]

Show it in your receipt.

I always do!

The minute it’s a headline that I see, I will definitely share!

 

[candycorn]

No sweetie, your only thing is irrational feelings. It’s why liberals are completely incapable of logic & reason or accepting basic facts.

It’s also why all of you fly off the handle and get violent when confronted by logic & reason.

Any proof to any massive voter fraud?

Nope. I win.

 

[P@triot]

Any proof to any massive voter fraud?

Yep. And I provided volumes of it. Enough to meet the “beyond a reasonable doubt” requirement in a court of law.

Denying reality doesn’t alter reality, no matter how much you bat-shit crazy “that man is a ‘real’ woman” liberals wished otherwise.

 

[P@triot]

No sweetie, your only thing is irrational feelings. It’s why liberals are completely incapable of logic & reason or accepting basic facts.

It’s also why all of you fly off the handle and get violent when confronted by logic & reason.

Boy candycorn - how timely was this post?!? No sooner had I posted it than you fascists once again tried to murder our duly democratically elected President.

Once again, I was proven right. It’s amazing how that happens when one just accepts facts and applies logic & reason.

Latest on White House shooting — CBS News

A gunman was killed after opening fire at a Secret Service checkpoint outside the White House on Saturday night, officials said. CBS News' Nancy Cordes, Nicole Sganga and Natalie Brand have the latest.

apple.news

 

[P@triot]

Ohhhhh candycorn …. 1 man pled guilty to submitting 106 fraudulent ballots.

Isn’t it amazing you actually thought each person was guilty of a single fake ballot?

So much for your “only 1,600”

Don’t feel bad hon. Liberals lack all ability to reason because they aren’t very bright and are totally controlled by their feelings/emotions.

 

[candycorn]

Ohhhhh candycorn …. 1 man pled guilty to submitting 106 fraudulent ballots.

Isn’t it amazing you actually thought each person was guilty of a single fake ballot?

So much for your “only 1,600”

Don’t feel bad hon. Liberals lack all ability to reason because they aren’t very bright and are totally controlled by their feelings/emotions.

I always feel better after dealing with you. You gave me a superiority complex.

Like now for example.

Applications. Not ballots.

 

[candycorn]

I always feel better after dealing with you. You gave me a superiority complex.

Like now for example.

View attachment 1262266

Applications. Not ballots.

Also…the 1620 incidents was YOUR source.

 

[P@triot]

Also…the 1620 incidents was YOUR source.

Yes sweetie…it was a database of actual convictions (because you kept claiming that voter fraud wasn’t real so prosecutions in a court of law was the ultimate evidence).

As a low-IQ leftist though, you still struggle to grasp that:

• Each person doesn’t limit themselves to a single ballot
• 100% of voter fraud is not caught
• 100% of the voter fraud that is caught is not prosecuted for various reasons (not enough evidence, a liberal DA who wants the voter fraud to continue, etc.).

I don’t know what else to do to help you. I’m not a special ed teacher. And I cannot give you common sense. It’s so clear and yet you still struggle

 

[P@triot]

Applications. Not ballots.

Oh sweetie…what do you think he was fraudulently requesting ballots for - to burn in his fireplace??

And what he did is VOTER FRAUD…which is why he was convicted

Your level of desperation because I’ve painted you into a corner with facts, logic, & reason has you saying some really embarrassing stuff.

“It doesn’t matter he committed voter fraud…it wasn’t a ballot” - candycorn

 

[candycorn]

Yes sweetie…it was a database of actual convictions (because you kept claiming that voter fraud wasn’t real so prosecutions in a court of law was the ultimate evidence).

You’re lying about my position. I said it wasn’t much of an issue. Mathematics prove I’m right.

I don’t know what else to do to help you. I’m not a special ed teacher.

Thats unfortunate...you certainly need one. Remember back when you tried to change the definition of “always”? That speaks to your profound mental illness....well, that and along with your thinking that 0.00008% is “rampant” anything over 44 years.

And I cannot give you common sense.

Especially since you lack any yourself.

Cheers.

 

[P@triot]

Remember back when you tried to change the definition of “always”?

No, but I remember having to explain that basic definition to you

 

[P@triot]

Ohhhhh candycorn - that thing that “never happens” just happened again

Your denials of reality are just getting embarrassing at this point.

How long do you think you can keep your charade up before you simply can’t deny reality any further?