Pro-lifers cannot have it both ways

[BrokeLoser]

Well see you’re a moron to think such a person exists because you would have to be stupid to think a program like SNAP somehow pays for the yearly overall cost to raise a child.

Taxpayers should never be required to cover the annual cost to raise the children of filthy degenerate liberal whores….I’m good with doing just enough to keep them breathing….Top Ramen and Cup O Noodle…..nothing more.

 

[Billy000]

Taxpayers should never be required to cover the annual cost to raise the children of filthy degenerate liberal whores….I’m good with doing just enough to keep them breathing….Top Ramen and Cup O Noodle…..nothing more.

No program does that you ******* neanderthal lol. The obvious point is that any assistance she would get is a fraction of the overall annual cost of raising a kid. That means it is impossible for her to profit off of having kids. Good god you’re stupid lol

 

[San Souci]

But the kids exist either way so this is completely besides the point.

No it is not. If one chooses to whore around ,Condoms should be used.

 

[San Souci]

Birth control,getting tubes tied,a vasectomy. Democrats problem is A. they lack responsibility and B. planned parenthood is a huge money maker for them.

Supported with Taxpayer funds.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

They can’t tell an impoverished pregnant woman she has to carry the baby to term and then not have her kids receive any government benefits like SNAP after they are born.

Now the automatic response to this is always “well should have never gotten pregnant!”

Uh yeah no shit. Here’s the issue though: the kids exist. They exist right? Should they starve because of something their mom did? Probably not right? You guys get so caught up in shaming the woman that you forget why they get SNAP in the first place. The benefits they get is a small fraction of the full cost to raise a kid every year therefore it’s ridiculous to suggest the mom is profiting off of having kids.

Now some republicans’ fascist solution to this is to force the mom to put the kids up for adoption. Well that’s obviously a stupid idea. It’s not like people are lining up to adopt the kids huh? Meanwhile such a foster system would cost the government an astronomical amount of money per year. Far more than the cost of SNAP.

Do republicans realize how insane it is to suggest a ludicrous idea like this just so that mere PENNIES will not be taken out of their OWN paychecks to pay for this program?

Yeah really Christian of you guys! Jesus would be proud.

The main defining characteristic of a terrorist is a willingness to kill or harm innocent third parties to promote a political cause.

Which is exactly what you are demonstrating here — a willingness to murder innocent children in order to promote a corrupt and tyrannical form of socialism/kleptocracy.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Are you pretending that Jesus didn’t encourage giving to charity? Wow you’re stupid.

Once again, the left knows not what "charity" means.

Government theft and redistribution is not charity.

And I am not even a Christian. Praise Thor.

 

[jbander]

LOL....I see the democrat party had done you well......

Not only are you boring but you are a waste also. Go away. Stupid shit from a stupid shit.

 

[Billy000]

Once again, the left knows not what "charity" means.

Government theft and redistribution is not charity.

And I am not even a Christian. Praise Thor.

I’m not even talking about taxation. Republicans Christians in general, do very little to help the poor.

 

[Delldude]

Not only are you boring but you are a waste also. Go away. Stupid shit from a stupid shit.

Thank you for the kind words......I know it took you to your intellectual limitations to respond as you did.

God bless you and thank you for the kind words.

 

[jbander]

Thank you for the kind words......I know it took you to your intellectual limitations to respond as you did.

God bless you and thank you for the kind words.

What a fricken loser

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

I’m not even talking about taxation. Republicans Christians in general, do very little to help the poor.

And I don't even give a shit.

100% of my Fed Income Taxes may as well be flushed down the toilet or set on fire. The FedGov does me ZERO good. Complete theft and waste.

For that reason, I will NEVER give to "charity" except for assisted suicide for the worthless. I will pay for that.

I hope all poor people die a miserable death.

 

[Billy000]

And I don't even give a shit.

100% of my Fed Income Taxes may as well be flushed down the toilet or set on fire. The FedGov does me ZERO good. Complete theft and waste.

For that reason, I will NEVER give to "charity" except for assisted suicide for the worthless. I will pay for that.

I hope all poor people die a miserable death.

Hey moron why did you even start arguing against my point about republicans and Christianity in the first place?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Hey moron why did you even start arguing against my point about republicans and Christianity in the first place?

Because you're a ******* commie and your ultimate goal is government theft of everything.

 

[jc456]

They can’t tell an impoverished pregnant woman she has to carry the baby to term and then not have her kids receive any government benefits like SNAP after they are born

You’re pro death so life isn’t important to you. You do enjoy insulting people you feel are inferior to you.

 

[jc456]

Because you're a ******* commie and your ultimate goal is government theft of everything.

And he’s pro death and feels blacks are inferior

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Let them starve, the planet will supposedly kill us all anyway.

So better to kill them slowly over time than they not be born at all?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

I sure can.

It's easy, watch.

Is that pro life?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Actually your source was stupid. It didn’t explain why those 2 million werent weren’t actually doing the adopting. It’s clearly because they all want infants and not older children.

“About 135,000 children are adopted in the United States each year. Of non- stepparent adoptions, about 59% are from the child welfare (or foster) system, 26% are from other countries, and 15% are voluntarily relinquished American babies.”

“There are 107,918 foster children eligible for and waiting to be adopted. In 2014, 50,644 foster kids were adopted — a number that has stayed roughly consistent for the past five years. The average age of a waiting child is 7.7 years old and 29% of them will spend at least three years in foster care.”

“The average child waits for an adoptive family for more than three years. 11 percent spend 5 years or more waiting for a family (43,083 children). The average age of children waiting for an adoptive family is 8.”

“On any given day, there are nearly 428,000 children in foster care in the United States. In 2015, over 670,000 children spent time in U.S. foster care. Unfortunately, instead of being safely reunified with their families — or moved quickly into adoptive homes — many will languish for years in foster homes or institutions.

How long does the average child spend in the foster care system?​

More than 60% of children in foster care spend two to five years in the system before being adopted. Almost 20% spend five or more years in foster care before being adopted. Some never get adopted.”

US Adoption Statistics | Adoption Network

US Adoption Statistics may surprise you as nearly 100 million Americans have adoption in their immediate family. Learn more here.

adoptionnetwork.com

The worst part is they are turfed with nothing at 18.

After 18, Foster Kids Face Tough Road Ahead

New research shows that less that half of former foster youth are employed at 23, and only six percent have finished college. Mark Courtney, research and development director at Partners For Our Children, and Jeremy Long, who aged out of foster care three years ago at 18, talk about the...

www.npr.org

 

[Hutch Starskey]

So the argument is unless society is going to pay for the care and feeding of my children I should be allowed to kill them?

No, dope.
The argument is why is your way of killing them better.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Yeah they can

you don't need Socialism to prevent murder.

But, again, I am pro choice until the age of two. Kill those ******* worthless shit spawn. All you ******* cocksuckers do is take up air and suck off everybody else with your ******* Socialism.

But let's take your shit a step further.

I think we should execute people who can't support themselves.

How about that?

Murder fantasy.
Go figure.