Pro-lifers cannot have it both ways

[Billy000]

They can’t tell an impoverished pregnant woman she has to carry the baby to term and then not have her kids receive any government benefits like SNAP after they are born.

Now the automatic response to this is always “well should have never gotten pregnant!”

Uh yeah no shit. Here’s the issue though: the kids exist. They exist right? Should they starve because of something their mom did? Probably not right? You guys get so caught up in shaming the woman that you forget why they get SNAP in the first place. The benefits they get is a small fraction of the full cost to raise a kid every year therefore it’s ridiculous to suggest the mom is profiting off of having kids.

Now some republicans’ fascist solution to this is to force the mom to put the kids up for adoption. Well that’s obviously a stupid idea. It’s not like people are lining up to adopt the kids huh? Meanwhile such a foster system would cost the government an astronomical amount of money per year. Far more than the cost of SNAP.

Do republicans realize how insane it is to suggest a ludicrous idea like this just so that mere PENNIES will not be taken out of their OWN paychecks to pay for this program?

Yeah really Christian of you guys! Jesus would be proud.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Christians are the biggest faction helping the less fortunate

/Thread

 

[Confederate Soldier]

So et us kill the kids, and you can kill SNAP. sounds great.

 

[Billy000]

Christians are the biggest faction helping the less fortunate

/Thread

You do a terrible job at it, apparently.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

You do a terrible job at it, apparently.

I'm confident better than you....boob

 

[Billy000]

So et us kill the kids, and you can kill SNAP. sounds great.

Well see you guys don’t actually know how this program works. SNAP also goes to the disabled like the DD population. They depended on it. Are you willing to let them starve?

 

[San Souci]

You do a terrible job at it, apparently.

Ever heard of Condoms?

 

[Thinker101]

They can’t tell an impoverished pregnant woman she has to carry the baby to term and then not have her kids receive any government benefits like SNAP after they are born.

Now the automatic response to this is always “well should have never gotten pregnant!”

Uh yeah no shit. Here’s the issue though: the kids exist. They exist right? Should they starve because of something their mom did? Probably not right? You guys get so caught up in shaming the woman that you forget why they get SNAP in the first place. The benefits they get is a small fraction of the full cost to raise a kid every year therefore it’s ridiculous to suggest the mom is profiting off of having kids.

Now some republicans’ fascist solution to this is to force the mom to put the kids up for adoption. Well that’s obviously a stupid idea. It’s not like people are lining up to adopt the kids huh? Meanwhile such a foster system would cost the government an astronomical amount of money per year. Far more than the cost of SNAP.

Do republicans realize how insane it is to suggest a ludicrous idea like this just so that mere PENNIES will not be taken out of their OWN paychecks to pay for this program?

Yeah really Christian of you guys! Jesus would be proud.

Ya got a link there champ?

 

[Billy000]

I'm confident better than you....boob

I’ve done extensive volunteer work and I’m an atheist. I seriously doubt you’ve done much at all in comparison.

 

[XponentialChaos]

 

[Billy000]

Ever heard of Condoms?

But the kids exist either way so this is completely besides the point.

 

[Billy000]

Ya got a link there champ?

Okay Thinker you tell me what is unclear in what I said and I’ll find a link for you that you don’t ultimately need.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

I’ve done extensive volunteer work and I’m an atheist. I seriously doubt you’ve done much at all in comparison.

I don't really care what you think, boob

Now what? You'll keep lying and blabbering?

 

[Polishprince]

They can’t tell an impoverished pregnant woman she has to carry the baby to term and then not have her kids receive any government benefits like SNAP after they are born.

Now the automatic response to this is always “well should have never gotten pregnant!”

Uh yeah no shit. Here’s the issue though: the kids exist. They exist right? Should they starve because of something their mom did? Probably not right? You guys get so caught up in shaming the woman that you forget why they get SNAP in the first place. The benefits they get is a small fraction of the full cost to raise a kid every year therefore it’s ridiculous to suggest the mom is profiting off of having kids.

Now some republicans’ fascist solution to this is to force the mom to put the kids up for adoption. Well that’s obviously a stupid idea. It’s not like people are lining up to adopt the kids huh? Meanwhile such a foster system would cost the government an astronomical amount of money per year. Far more than the cost of SNAP.

Do republicans realize how insane it is to suggest a ludicrous idea like this just so that mere PENNIES will not be taken out of their OWN paychecks to pay for this program?

Yeah really Christian of you guys! Jesus would be proud.

Why do you think its "unchristian" to have the Baby's Daddy pony up to support the kid- instead of the taxpayers?

 

[OKTexas]

They can’t tell an impoverished pregnant woman she has to carry the baby to term and then not have her kids receive any government benefits like SNAP after they are born.

Now the automatic response to this is always “well should have never gotten pregnant!”

Uh yeah no shit. Here’s the issue though: the kids exist. They exist right? Should they starve because of something their mom did? Probably not right? You guys get so caught up in shaming the woman that you forget why they get SNAP in the first place. The benefits they get is a small fraction of the full cost to raise a kid every year therefore it’s ridiculous to suggest the mom is profiting off of having kids.

Now some republicans’ fascist solution to this is to force the mom to put the kids up for adoption. Well that’s obviously a stupid idea. It’s not like people are lining up to adopt the kids huh? Meanwhile such a foster system would cost the government an astronomical amount of money per year. Far more than the cost of SNAP.

Do republicans realize how insane it is to suggest a ludicrous idea like this just so that mere PENNIES will not be taken out of their OWN paychecks to pay for this program?

Yeah really Christian of you guys! Jesus would be proud.

You obviously have no clue what the fuck you're talking about there silly billy. There are people lining up to adopt those kids.

For every adoption-eligible baby, an invisible queue of 36 couples waits for the chance to take that baby home. Most never will.

Nearly two million infertile couples in the United States are actively trying to adopt a child. Each of those hopeful couples would give their right arm for the privilege of parenting children

Why So Many Families Who Want To Adopt Can’t

For every adoption-eligible baby, an invisible queue of 36 couples waits for the chance to take that baby home. Most never will.

thefederalist.com

.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

You obviously have no clue what the fuck you're talking about there silly billy. There are people lining up to adopt those kids.

For every adoption-eligible baby, an invisible queue of 36 couples waits for the chance to take that baby home. Most never will.

Nearly two million infertile couples in the United States are actively trying to adopt a child. Each of those hopeful couples would give their right arm for the privilege of parenting children

Why So Many Families Who Want To Adopt Can’t

For every adoption-eligible baby, an invisible queue of 36 couples waits for the chance to take that baby home. Most never will.

thefederalist.com

.

Boob is trying to justify killing innocents

 

[Delldude]

View attachment 715583

Mr "I'm not partisan" chimes in....

 

[Delldude]

You obviously have no clue what the fuck you're talking about there silly billy. There are people lining up to adopt those kids.

For every adoption-eligible baby, an invisible queue of 36 couples waits for the chance to take that baby home. Most never will.

Nearly two million infertile couples in the United States are actively trying to adopt a child. Each of those hopeful couples would give their right arm for the privilege of parenting children

Why So Many Families Who Want To Adopt Can’t

For every adoption-eligible baby, an invisible queue of 36 couples waits for the chance to take that baby home. Most never will.

thefederalist.com

.

With all these illegals looking for work, I'd say we got baby sitters out the ass.

 

[Thinker101]

Okay Thinker you tell me what is unclear in what I said and I’ll find a link for you that you don’t ultimately need.

So you don't have a link and just pushing abortions for all.

 

[Delldude]

So you don't have a link and just pushing abortions for all.

Notice these clowns show up on cue.....DNC trolls.