‘Pride’ Night at the Old Ballpark

[fncceo]

'Pride' might very well be the doom of the gay lifestyle. I've been running this through my head while walking the dog, so bear with me.

It has long been a truism that homosexuality isn't a learned behavior, but something one is born with, therefore, a genetic trait.

It is also widely believed, and supported by research, that sexual attraction varies for all individuals along a scale from pure heterosexual to pure homosexual. With full purity on either end being the exception. This would suggest that there is no single "gay gene" but a whole plethora of different genetic traits that push us along the scale of sexual preference. Because there is no biological advantage in homosexuality (biology only cares about procreation), it has to continue being passed on to offspring by persons of a homosexual preference engaging in a heterosexual, breeding, relationship.

Currently, a certain amount of the population, believed to be about 10% practice a homosexual lifestyle. The actual percentage of those with homosexual proclivities may, in fact, be much higher. However, because of a sliding scale of sexual preference, it can be assumed that, due to social convention, many persons learning towards a homosexual preference married (or formed intimate relations) with the opposite sex in order to "fit in". This awkward and uncomfortable arrangement for appearances sake did afford those with a genetic preference towards homosexuality to pass on those traits to their offspring, continuing the genetic line of those with a homosexual preference.

As a homosexual lifestyle become more and more accepted, read i.e. 'normal', there will be less social pressure for marginally gay persons to enter into heterosexual relationships in order to 'fit in'. Providing fewer opportunities to pass the homosexual proclivity to succeeding generations.

In fact, if homosexuality becomes fully acceptable with no social stigmas, it's possible that the trait itself could be bred out of the species in just a few generations.

 

[candycorn]

I love how this thread brings out right wing hatred. More please.

I don't love it, but yes, it does bring out right wing hatred, but it is hatred of bad things that we all SHOULD be hating. Like you would hate murder, rape, arson, or election cheating.

So for those people who DON'T hate these displays of sex perversion and lunacy, one can only wonder why not ?

You're the sick fuck who dates women 50 years younger than you--or at least tries to with, I'm sure, zero success.

 

[candycorn]

'Pride' might very well be the doom of the gay lifestyle. I've been running this through my head while walking the dog, so bear with me.

It has long been a truism that homosexuality isn't a learned behavior, but something one is born with, therefore, a genetic trait.

It is also widely believed, and supported by research, that sexual attraction varies for all individuals along a scale from pure heterosexual to pure homosexual. With full purity on either end being the exception. This would suggest that there is no single "gay gene" but a whole plethora of different genetic traits that push us along the scale of sexual preference. Because there is no biological advantage in homosexuality (biology only cares about procreation), it has to continue being passed on to offspring by persons of a homosexual preference engaging in a heterosexual, breeding, relationship.

Currently, a certain amount of the population, believed to be about 10% practice a homosexual lifestyle. The actual percentage of those with homosexual proclivities may, in fact, be much higher. However, because of a sliding scale of sexual preference, it can be assumed that, due to social convention, many persons learning towards a homosexual preference married (or formed intimate relations) with the opposite sex in order to "fit in". This awkward and uncomfortable arrangement for appearances sake did afford those with a genetic preference towards homosexuality to pass on those traits to their offspring, continuing the genetic line of those with a homosexual preference.

As a homosexual lifestyle become more and more accepted, read i.e. 'normal', there will be less social pressure for marginally gay persons to enter into heterosexual relationships in order to 'fit in'. Providing fewer opportunities to pass the homosexual proclivity to succeeding generations.

In fact, if homosexuality becomes fully acceptable with no social stigmas, it's possible that the trait itself could be bred out of the species in just a few generations.

Uncharacteristically you may be on to something. As they say about a blind squirrel.....good job on finding an acorn.

Now complete the thought...what do you think happens in "just a few generations"? C'mon....I know you can do it....think.

 

[Polishprince]

'Pride' might very well be the doom of the gay lifestyle. I've been running this through my head while walking the dog, so bear with me.

It has long been a truism that homosexuality isn't a learned behavior, but something one is born with, therefore, a genetic trait.

It is also widely believed, and supported by research, that sexual attraction varies for all individuals along a scale from pure heterosexual to pure homosexual. With full purity on either end being the exception. This would suggest that there is no single "gay gene" but a whole plethora of different genetic traits that push us along the scale of sexual preference. Because there is no biological advantage in homosexuality (biology only cares about procreation), it has to continue being passed on to offspring by persons of a homosexual preference engaging in a heterosexual, breeding, relationship.

Currently, a certain amount of the population, believed to be about 10% practice a homosexual lifestyle. The actual percentage of those with homosexual proclivities may, in fact, be much higher. However, because of a sliding scale of sexual preference, it can be assumed that, due to social convention, many persons learning towards a homosexual preference married (or formed intimate relations) with the opposite sex in order to "fit in". This awkward and uncomfortable arrangement for appearances sake did afford those with a genetic preference towards homosexuality to pass on those traits to their offspring, continuing the genetic line of those with a homosexual preference.

As a homosexual lifestyle become more and more accepted, read i.e. 'normal', there will be less social pressure for marginally gay persons to enter into heterosexual relationships in order to 'fit in'. Providing fewer opportunities to pass the homosexual proclivity to succeeding generations.

In fact, if homosexuality becomes fully acceptable with no social stigmas, it's possible that the trait itself could be bred out of the species in just a few generations.

Uncharacteristically you may be on to something. As they say about a blind squirrel.....good job on finding an acorn.

Now complete the thought...what do you think happens in "just a few generations"? C'mon....I know you can do it....think.

What will happen in a few generations, although probably sooner, is that the homo population will just move to even more outrageous behavior.

The Tremendous Senator Santorum pointed out, legal sodomy and gay marriage are just steps along the way. After people get used to one thing, they move on to something else. sex with animals, plants, etc. The great LGBTQ actor Richard Gere started the fad of shoving gerbils into his caboose. Now its more common than ever. This fellow I was drinking with in a bar knows it for a fact. His nephew's girlfriend has a cousin that knows someone who works for the UPMC hospital in Pittsburgh. A regular Saturday evening means a huge influx of business in the Proctology Lab.

 

[candycorn]

'Pride' might very well be the doom of the gay lifestyle. I've been running this through my head while walking the dog, so bear with me.

It has long been a truism that homosexuality isn't a learned behavior, but something one is born with, therefore, a genetic trait.

It is also widely believed, and supported by research, that sexual attraction varies for all individuals along a scale from pure heterosexual to pure homosexual. With full purity on either end being the exception. This would suggest that there is no single "gay gene" but a whole plethora of different genetic traits that push us along the scale of sexual preference. Because there is no biological advantage in homosexuality (biology only cares about procreation), it has to continue being passed on to offspring by persons of a homosexual preference engaging in a heterosexual, breeding, relationship.

Currently, a certain amount of the population, believed to be about 10% practice a homosexual lifestyle. The actual percentage of those with homosexual proclivities may, in fact, be much higher. However, because of a sliding scale of sexual preference, it can be assumed that, due to social convention, many persons learning towards a homosexual preference married (or formed intimate relations) with the opposite sex in order to "fit in". This awkward and uncomfortable arrangement for appearances sake did afford those with a genetic preference towards homosexuality to pass on those traits to their offspring, continuing the genetic line of those with a homosexual preference.

As a homosexual lifestyle become more and more accepted, read i.e. 'normal', there will be less social pressure for marginally gay persons to enter into heterosexual relationships in order to 'fit in'. Providing fewer opportunities to pass the homosexual proclivity to succeeding generations.

In fact, if homosexuality becomes fully acceptable with no social stigmas, it's possible that the trait itself could be bred out of the species in just a few generations.

Uncharacteristically you may be on to something. As they say about a blind squirrel.....good job on finding an acorn.

Now complete the thought...what do you think happens in "just a few generations"? C'mon....I know you can do it....think.

What will happen in a few generations, although probably sooner, is that the homo population will just move to even more outrageous behavior.

The Tremendous Senator Santorum pointed out, legal sodomy and gay marriage are just steps along the way. After people get used to one thing, they move on to something else. sex with animals, plants, etc. The great LGBTQ actor Richard Gere started the fad of shoving gerbils into his caboose. Now its more common than ever. This fellow I was drinking with in a bar knows it for a fact. His nephew's girlfriend has a cousin that knows someone who works for the UPMC hospital in Pittsburgh. A regular Saturday evening means a huge influx of business in the Proctology Lab.

Hell, they may even pay multiple porn stars for sex....just like your blob?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Hell, they may even pay multiple porn stars for sex....just like your blob?

Or just sneak up behind them and sniff their hair.

 

[Polishprince]

'Pride' might very well be the doom of the gay lifestyle. I've been running this through my head while walking the dog, so bear with me.

It has long been a truism that homosexuality isn't a learned behavior, but something one is born with, therefore, a genetic trait.

It is also widely believed, and supported by research, that sexual attraction varies for all individuals along a scale from pure heterosexual to pure homosexual. With full purity on either end being the exception. This would suggest that there is no single "gay gene" but a whole plethora of different genetic traits that push us along the scale of sexual preference. Because there is no biological advantage in homosexuality (biology only cares about procreation), it has to continue being passed on to offspring by persons of a homosexual preference engaging in a heterosexual, breeding, relationship.

Currently, a certain amount of the population, believed to be about 10% practice a homosexual lifestyle. The actual percentage of those with homosexual proclivities may, in fact, be much higher. However, because of a sliding scale of sexual preference, it can be assumed that, due to social convention, many persons learning towards a homosexual preference married (or formed intimate relations) with the opposite sex in order to "fit in". This awkward and uncomfortable arrangement for appearances sake did afford those with a genetic preference towards homosexuality to pass on those traits to their offspring, continuing the genetic line of those with a homosexual preference.

As a homosexual lifestyle become more and more accepted, read i.e. 'normal', there will be less social pressure for marginally gay persons to enter into heterosexual relationships in order to 'fit in'. Providing fewer opportunities to pass the homosexual proclivity to succeeding generations.

In fact, if homosexuality becomes fully acceptable with no social stigmas, it's possible that the trait itself could be bred out of the species in just a few generations.

Uncharacteristically you may be on to something. As they say about a blind squirrel.....good job on finding an acorn.

Now complete the thought...what do you think happens in "just a few generations"? C'mon....I know you can do it....think.

What will happen in a few generations, although probably sooner, is that the homo population will just move to even more outrageous behavior.

The Tremendous Senator Santorum pointed out, legal sodomy and gay marriage are just steps along the way. After people get used to one thing, they move on to something else. sex with animals, plants, etc. The great LGBTQ actor Richard Gere started the fad of shoving gerbils into his caboose. Now its more common than ever. This fellow I was drinking with in a bar knows it for a fact. His nephew's girlfriend has a cousin that knows someone who works for the UPMC hospital in Pittsburgh. A regular Saturday evening means a huge influx of business in the Proctology Lab.

Hell, they may even pay multiple porn stars for sex....just like your blob?

Just because President Trump was accused of something, doesn't mean he actually did it.

I thought you libs would have learned that already- when the accusation that the President hired hoes to ruin mattresses in Moscow hotels blew up in your faces.

Remember this, and never forget, Trump is the only President ever to be Exonerated twice in fake impeachment trials.

 

[candycorn]

Hell, they may even pay multiple porn stars for sex....just like your blob?

Or just sneak up behind them and sniff their hair.

Or force their teen daughters onto the bed to kiss him?

 

[candycorn]

'Pride' might very well be the doom of the gay lifestyle. I've been running this through my head while walking the dog, so bear with me.

It has long been a truism that homosexuality isn't a learned behavior, but something one is born with, therefore, a genetic trait.

It is also widely believed, and supported by research, that sexual attraction varies for all individuals along a scale from pure heterosexual to pure homosexual. With full purity on either end being the exception. This would suggest that there is no single "gay gene" but a whole plethora of different genetic traits that push us along the scale of sexual preference. Because there is no biological advantage in homosexuality (biology only cares about procreation), it has to continue being passed on to offspring by persons of a homosexual preference engaging in a heterosexual, breeding, relationship.

Currently, a certain amount of the population, believed to be about 10% practice a homosexual lifestyle. The actual percentage of those with homosexual proclivities may, in fact, be much higher. However, because of a sliding scale of sexual preference, it can be assumed that, due to social convention, many persons learning towards a homosexual preference married (or formed intimate relations) with the opposite sex in order to "fit in". This awkward and uncomfortable arrangement for appearances sake did afford those with a genetic preference towards homosexuality to pass on those traits to their offspring, continuing the genetic line of those with a homosexual preference.

As a homosexual lifestyle become more and more accepted, read i.e. 'normal', there will be less social pressure for marginally gay persons to enter into heterosexual relationships in order to 'fit in'. Providing fewer opportunities to pass the homosexual proclivity to succeeding generations.

In fact, if homosexuality becomes fully acceptable with no social stigmas, it's possible that the trait itself could be bred out of the species in just a few generations.

Uncharacteristically you may be on to something. As they say about a blind squirrel.....good job on finding an acorn.

Now complete the thought...what do you think happens in "just a few generations"? C'mon....I know you can do it....think.

What will happen in a few generations, although probably sooner, is that the homo population will just move to even more outrageous behavior.

The Tremendous Senator Santorum pointed out, legal sodomy and gay marriage are just steps along the way. After people get used to one thing, they move on to something else. sex with animals, plants, etc. The great LGBTQ actor Richard Gere started the fad of shoving gerbils into his caboose. Now its more common than ever. This fellow I was drinking with in a bar knows it for a fact. His nephew's girlfriend has a cousin that knows someone who works for the UPMC hospital in Pittsburgh. A regular Saturday evening means a huge influx of business in the Proctology Lab.

Hell, they may even pay multiple porn stars for sex....just like your blob?

Just because President Trump was accused of something, doesn't mean he actually did it.

I thought you libs would have learned that already- when the accusation that the President hired hoes to ruin mattresses in Moscow hotels blew up in your faces.

Remember this, and never forget, Trump is the only President ever to be Exonerated twice in fake impeachment trials.

Its been proven. Hence the NDA.

 

[Moonglow]

Does this somehow affect you? Does it make your house worth less? Does it increase your electricity bill? If not, why do you care?

Perhaps, it's because I don't give a fetid dingo's kidney about someone else's sexual orientation (unless I'm planning to woo them) and because if I go to see a baseball game, or any other professional sporting event, I'm there to see people hit, catch, and throw the ball. I'm sure there have to a a FEW things that don't have to involve a political agenda.

Can't we just watch the game?

View attachment 504972

If baseball wasn't so damn boring it wouldn't need entertainment while nothing happens.

 

[Moonglow]

Does this somehow affect you? Does it make your house worth less? Does it increase your electricity bill? If not, why do you care?

What I can't help but wonder is if those who live the LGBTQ+ whatever lifestyle are given some kind of discount during this month just for their lifestyle being what it is at events like this. I am not far from Dollywood and we all know that Dolly is no stranger to being a cheerleader for them people. I am not sure though if they are given any kind of break for it though where going to her place is concerned.

God bless you and Dolly always!!!

Holly

I get one for being a veteran, or a senior.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Ludicrously declaring homosexuality as "pride", and something to be proud of, sends a message to children and young people not fully developed intellectually, that it's normal. This then can induce them to adopt this absurd aberration for themselves.

This then is harmful to them and their families. It is harmful to society as a whole, just as if it would be if people barking like dogs were declared normal, and we then had millions of people barking lie dogs. It's just nuts, and when you legitimize something, it spreads. Not good.

And this is the problem here. Some gay people don't realize how disgusting their actions are to other people. It's similar to if normal people have to witness a 40 year old guy rubbing his hand on a 10 year old girls chest for sexual enjoyment at an amusement park. Most people would be disgusted by that, and would even like to see the 40 year old man executed in public.

On the other hand, gay people can't help the way they feel. It's not a choice for many. You can live your life one of two ways: Do what makes your family and friends happy but live a miserable life, or do what makes you happy, and if your friends and family are miserable, that's their problem.

There is a place to make everybody happy, and that is to keep your personal life personal like most people do. If a guy wants to walk around dressed like a woman, do it at home. Out in public, dress like a normal person and use the public facilities of your gender. If you are gay, keep your gayness at home and don't be kissing each other in front of our children at a restaurant where we are eating.

Our country has decayed so badly that asking people to just keep their personal life at home is asking too much.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Nobody is having sexual relations in public.

Not yet........

 

[pknopp]

Nobody is having sexual relations in public.

Not yet........

That is just a short step from going up and grabbing women by the pussy.

 

[BS Filter]

 

[Polishprince]

Nobody is having sexual relations in public.

Not yet........

That is just a short step from going up and grabbing women by the pussy.

President Trump didn't grab anyone. His statement was made during a routine he was delivering on access hollywood, which was designed to entertain that audience. If you didn't find it entertaining, you aren't alone. NBC didn't think it met their standards for entertainment either, and in fact held on to the tape and didn't release it until the eve of the 2016 election when they thought it would be the most benefit to the Clintons.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

That is just a short step from going up and grabbing women by the pussy.

There are guys who've been doing that as long as there has been man, but at least they do it on their own time and not out in public.

We know how leftists are. You take baby steps, baby steps, baby steps until they get what the ultimately want, and that is a whacked out morally bankrupt society.

 

[pknopp]

Nobody is having sexual relations in public.

Not yet........

That is just a short step from going up and grabbing women by the pussy.

President Trump didn't grab anyone. His statement was made during a routine he was delivering on access hollywood, which was designed to entertain that audience. If you didn't find it entertaining, you aren't alone. NBC didn't think it met their standards for entertainment either, and in fact held on to the tape and didn't release it until the eve of the 2016 election when they thought it would be the most benefit to the Clintons.

Always with the excuses. He wasn't a serial adulterer or routinely take the Lord's name in vain either, right?

 

[pknopp]

That is just a short step from going up and grabbing women by the pussy.

There are guys who've been doing that as long as there has been man, but at least they do it on their own time and not out in public.

We know how leftists are. You take baby steps, baby steps, baby steps until they get what the ultimately want, and that is a whacked out morally bankrupt society.

Who says this wasn't in public and again, we were speaking of the steps towards things in public.

 

[Polishprince]

That is just a short step from going up and grabbing women by the pussy.

There are guys who've been doing that as long as there has been man, but at least they do it on their own time and not out in public.

We know how leftists are. You take baby steps, baby steps, baby steps until they get what the ultimately want, and that is a whacked out morally bankrupt society.

Who says this wasn't in public and again, we were speaking of the steps towards things in public.

It was an entertainment routine that President Trump delivered.

You might find it hard to believe but Vinnie Boombatz really wasn't Rodney Dangerfield's personal physician and Flip Wilson really wasn't a Tranny.

Those were what are called "skits" designed to amuse or entertain you.

And that's their intent, even if you weren't personally entertained.