Seymour Flops
Diamond Member
It was the former pro-life reverend who turned pro-abortion absolutist, and as such folk do, lied about a perceived political nemisis to make a point.
Schenck said that in 2014, a donor to his organization had dined at the home of Justice Samuel Alito. Afterward, Schenck said, the donor told him she'd learned there that the decision in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, a case before the court that centered on religious liberty, would be favorable to conservatives.
Schenck said the donor shared that information with him weeks before the decision was released to the public, and he used it to prepare a response in advance. Alito wrote the majority opinion in both that case and the Dobbs decision on abortion this summer.

Jordan noted that both the donor, Gayle Wright, and Justice Alito have denied being involved in leaking the information, and questioned Schenck's motives for coming forward with the story.
But that is not the brutal part. Here it is when Jordan catches the good Reverend in a lie once again about the Supreme Court:
Did you see how that dude stammered? Jordan should have followed up with questions about using his clergy role to molest kids, just to see if he would squirm over that also.
If Jordan treats a reverend like that, what will he do to Liz Cheney, and Adam Schiff?
Schenck said that in 2014, a donor to his organization had dined at the home of Justice Samuel Alito. Afterward, Schenck said, the donor told him she'd learned there that the decision in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, a case before the court that centered on religious liberty, would be favorable to conservatives.
Schenck said the donor shared that information with him weeks before the decision was released to the public, and he used it to prepare a response in advance. Alito wrote the majority opinion in both that case and the Dobbs decision on abortion this summer.

Questions from Republicans
Republican members of the Judiciary Committee, including ranking member Jim Jordan of Ohio, expressed skepticism about Schenck's story, which Jordan described as "8-year-old second-hand hearsay."Jordan noted that both the donor, Gayle Wright, and Justice Alito have denied being involved in leaking the information, and questioned Schenck's motives for coming forward with the story.
But that is not the brutal part. Here it is when Jordan catches the good Reverend in a lie once again about the Supreme Court:
Did you see how that dude stammered? Jordan should have followed up with questions about using his clergy role to molest kids, just to see if he would squirm over that also.
If Jordan treats a reverend like that, what will he do to Liz Cheney, and Adam Schiff?