President Trump's silence makes him complicit in Saudi Arabia's bombing of innocent Yemeni children

[WTP]

Jim Carrey Takes Aim at Yemen School Bus Bombing in New Art

Remember how Jim Carrey protested against Barry Obama's drone strikes on children?
Yea, me neither.

Obama’s covert drone war in numbers: ten times more strikes than Bush - NationofChange

Total people reported killed
Pakistan 11-12
Yemen 147-203
Somalia 204-292
Afghanistan 1389-1597

And a lot more with Trump; ttps://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2018/05/how-many-civilians-did-trump-kill-in-drone-strikes-last-year/

 

[harmonica]

Yemini children are the concern of Yemen. Leave Saudi Arabia alone and the children will be fine. It is none of our business and none of Trump's business either.

It's none of our business to be all over Central and South America, but we make them our business, just like we made Iraq our business when we fabricated that war that created ISIS; CIA in South America | Geopolitical Monitor

The Secret History of ISIS

We make everyone in the world our business at the expense of the most vulnerable. We've been doing it for decades.

1. saddam started not 1, but 2 wars
2. saddam gassed his own people
saddam started/created the Persian Gulf War--not the US

Great! Then you won't mind giving us the more accurate account, as to how the U.S. wasn't the one's who started this war, based on the false information Dick Cheney pedaled, trying to tie Saddam to Zarqawi will you? Show us how the Frontline documentary is inaccurate; The Secret History of ISIS

saddam attacked Kuwait
you are saying the US would've went to war with Iraq if they didn't attack Kuwait??!!
totally, undeniably can't be proven

When are you planning on showing us how the Frontline video is wrong? The Secret History of ISIS

so the US made Saddam attack Kuwait........!!??!!
nice

 

[harmonica]

Yemini children are the concern of Yemen. Leave Saudi Arabia alone and the children will be fine. It is none of our business and none of Trump's business either.

It's none of our business to be all over Central and South America, but we make them our business, just like we made Iraq our business when we fabricated that war that created ISIS; CIA in South America | Geopolitical Monitor

The Secret History of ISIS

We make everyone in the world our business at the expense of the most vulnerable. We've been doing it for decades.

1. saddam started not 1, but 2 wars
2. saddam gassed his own people
saddam started/created the Persian Gulf War--not the US

Great! Then you won't mind giving us the more accurate account, as to how the U.S. wasn't the one's who started this war, based on the false information Dick Cheney pedaled, trying to tie Saddam to Zarqawi will you? Show us how the Frontline documentary is inaccurate; The Secret History of ISIS

saddam attacked Kuwait
you are saying the US would've went to war with Iraq if they didn't attack Kuwait??!!
totally, undeniably can't be proven

Oh boy, this is going to be fun. First coward, we weren't talking about Iraq and Kuwait, we were talking about Saddam, Zarqawi, and the second Iraq war. We started the second war by tying Saddam to Zarqawi, which was a made up excuse by Cheney to start this second war against Saddam. You of course cowardly deflected by going to the first war, because you have no argument for the second war. Seeing that you didn't watch the documentary in full, and you have nothing to counter that argument with anyway, you punted to the first war. Lol!The Secret History of ISIS

You folks on the Right just don't have what it takes to keep some skin in this game.

As for the first war, we had to deal with another criminal, who was actually Bush Sr.

Did you know that Bush Sr. had his own oil venture going on with Kuwait?

And did you know, that when Saddam got upset about Kuwait slant drilling for oil on Iraqi territory, Bush, through Ed Gillespie told Saddam, that Bush wasn't getting involved with his disputes with Kuwait. But when Iraq invaded Kuwait, then Bush said no. Why? Because of Bush's own oil interests that were there. That is why he rescued Kuwait, and that is why Bush never went all the way into Baghdad.

there is no second war
PG1 ended in a ceasefire
in a ceasefire there are agreements where by if the signatories violate the ceasefire, the others can justifiably continue the war

The toughest demand is the elimination of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, including all chemical and biological weapons and all ballistic missiles with a range greater than 90 miles. Diplomats said the aim was to rid Iraq of Soviet-made Scud missiles, which it used during the war against Israel and Saudi Arabia.

U.N. Security Council adopts Persian Gulf War cease-fire resolution

its support for terrorist groups

to make immediate on-site inspection of the weapons

...the Iraqis hindered the inspections--this, by itself, is all the cause needed to renew the war
Iraq War | 2003–2011
they found one of the most famous/important terrorist hiding in---------IRAQ!!!
CNN.com - U.S. captures mastermind of Achille Lauro hijacking - Apr. 16, 2003
Iraq Again Hindering Inspections, U.N. Told
saddam started the crap--NOT the US

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

For the life of me, I cannot understand the western leaders support for Saudi Arabia. Those bastards are constantly ******* up shit in the ME.

Exactly how is fighting Iranian-backed rebels who are constantly attacking them "******* up shit in the ME"? You have no idea what is going on there, do you?

Did you know this same rebels unsuccessfully attacked our Navy ships with missiles at the southern end of the Red Sea not too long ago? Didn't think so!

Oh yes I do. The Houti were bad freaking shots. We blasted them and taught them a lesson in 2016. BUT they were targeting the UAE and Saudi warships.

We keep calling this shit civil wars. It's a ******* blatant lie when foreign countries are involved to call this shit in Yemen a civil ******* war. You know just like the bullshit our media has foisted on us about a Syrian civil war.

Syria wasn't a civil war either. The bullshit that allowed the rise of ISIS and AQ to rise in Syria was our doing because we backed ******* Saudi Arabia in their wish to take over Syria and give it to the Muslim Brotherhood.

Saudi Arabia is constantly causing shit in the ME. Why the hell we back them is beyond comprehension.

Why wouldn't we, dumbass? Should we be backing the Houthis and Iran?

Go back to bed! You are lost!

 

[deanrd]

Jim Carrey Takes Aim at Yemen School Bus Bombing in New Art

Remember how Jim Carrey protested against Barry Obama's drone strikes on children?
Yea, me neither.

Obama’s covert drone war in numbers: ten times more strikes than Bush - NationofChange

Total people reported killed
Pakistan 11-12
Yemen 147-203
Somalia 204-292
Afghanistan 1389-1597

If it killed children, Republicans were probably cheering. Isn't that what they do when children are shot? It's only the fetus they want to protect. They don't even want children to healthcare or school lunches if they are hungry. We know who Republicans are. Their policies tell us.

 

[tinydancer]

For the life of me, I cannot understand the western leaders support for Saudi Arabia. Those bastards are constantly ******* up shit in the ME.

Exactly how is fighting Iranian-backed rebels who are constantly attacking them "******* up shit in the ME"? You have no idea what is going on there, do you?

Did you know this same rebels unsuccessfully attacked our Navy ships with missiles at the southern end of the Red Sea not too long ago? Didn't think so!

Oh yes I do. The Houti were bad freaking shots. We blasted them and taught them a lesson in 2016. BUT they were targeting the UAE and Saudi warships.

We keep calling this shit civil wars. It's a ******* blatant lie when foreign countries are involved to call this shit in Yemen a civil ******* war. You know just like the bullshit our media has foisted on us about a Syrian civil war.

Syria wasn't a civil war either. The bullshit that allowed the rise of ISIS and AQ to rise in Syria was our doing because we backed ******* Saudi Arabia in their wish to take over Syria and give it to the Muslim Brotherhood.

Saudi Arabia is constantly causing shit in the ME. Why the hell we back them is beyond comprehension.

Why wouldn't we, dumbass? Should we be backing the Houthis and Iran?

Go back to bed! You are lost!

We shouldn't be backing anyone. We SHOULD be able to condemn the SA for their actions in Yemen. It's disgusting that we turn a blind eye to the shit the SA does.

 

[tinydancer]

Jim Carrey Takes Aim at Yemen School Bus Bombing in New Art

Remember how Jim Carrey protested against Barry Obama's drone strikes on children?
Yea, me neither.

Obama’s covert drone war in numbers: ten times more strikes than Bush - NationofChange

Total people reported killed
Pakistan 11-12
Yemen 147-203
Somalia 204-292
Afghanistan 1389-1597

If it killed children, Republicans were probably cheering. Isn't that what they do when children are shot? It's only the fetus they want to protect. They don't even want children to healthcare or school lunches if they are hungry. We know who Republicans are. Their policies tell us.

Oh **** right off asshole. Many R's are completely against these actions and are calling out Trump and others for this bullshit so called civil war that started by the way when O was in charge. I hope everyone keeps the pressure up against SA against Yemen.

 

[Papageorgio]

This despicable embrace of the Saudis should be a bigger scandal than it is. But the administration is benefiting from its own self-induced chaos and dysfunction. American journalists and the public are so focused on our domestic disorder that they pay ever less attention to conflicts abroad.

Our expectations have also adjusted steadily downward. It's disgusting that Pompeo didn't push the Saudis on their recent slaughter of children, but not surprising?

So if he comments he is guilty and if he doesn’t comment he is guilty. Not sure how anyone can win with you scenerio.

US foreign policy has always been pragmatic. There is no change under Trump. He is no better or worse than his predeccessors.
But he could have had a word with the saudis.

"Stop slaughtering infants" would have been ok. But maybe Yemeni kids are worth less than the syrian kids he was so concerned about last year ?

Yep, as soon as Trump says anything about Saudi Arabia, the left will accuse him of being to soft or to hard on the Saudis.

Perhaps he has already called the Saudi governmentand voice his disapproval.

As far as better or worse? No better or worse, I agree.

At the end of the day, Trump and his parasite family have business with the Saudi's. Beyond that, Trump and family could give two shits what the Saudi's do.

No different than any other President in the last 30 years.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

For the life of me, I cannot understand the western leaders support for Saudi Arabia. Those bastards are constantly ******* up shit in the ME.

Exactly how is fighting Iranian-backed rebels who are constantly attacking them "******* up shit in the ME"? You have no idea what is going on there, do you?

Did you know this same rebels unsuccessfully attacked our Navy ships with missiles at the southern end of the Red Sea not too long ago? Didn't think so!

Oh yes I do. The Houti were bad freaking shots. We blasted them and taught them a lesson in 2016. BUT they were targeting the UAE and Saudi warships.

We keep calling this shit civil wars. It's a ******* blatant lie when foreign countries are involved to call this shit in Yemen a civil ******* war. You know just like the bullshit our media has foisted on us about a Syrian civil war.

Syria wasn't a civil war either. The bullshit that allowed the rise of ISIS and AQ to rise in Syria was our doing because we backed ******* Saudi Arabia in their wish to take over Syria and give it to the Muslim Brotherhood.

Saudi Arabia is constantly causing shit in the ME. Why the hell we back them is beyond comprehension.

Why wouldn't we, dumbass? Should we be backing the Houthis and Iran?

Go back to bed! You are lost!

We shouldn't be backing anyone. We SHOULD be able to condemn the SA for their actions in Yemen. It's disgusting that we turn a blind eye to the shit the SA does.

Defending their borders is disgusting? Are you a libtard?

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Yemen should have tbought twice before they attacked Saudi Arabia.

Houthi fighters attack Saudi ship off Yemen's coast

 

[LuckyDuck]

This despicable embrace of the Saudis should be a bigger scandal than it is. But the administration is benefiting from its own self-induced chaos and dysfunction. American journalists and the public are so focused on our domestic disorder that they pay ever less attention to conflicts abroad.

Our expectations have also adjusted steadily downward. It's disgusting that Pompeo didn't push the Saudis on their recent slaughter of children, but not surprising?

The US embracing of Saudi Arabia began in 1933 under your precious FDR....a Democrat and was solidified in 1945 under Truman....a Democrat; since then ALL presidents, Democrat and Republicans alike have been allied with Saudi Arabia and supplying them with armament and since that time, the Saudis have had on and off again conflicts with the Shiites, using weapons provided by the US and sometimes inflicting civilian casualties. This is no different. You clearly show that you are only complaining because Trump is president. We heard no complaints from the Democratic chorus against the Saudis in the past when Democrats were in the White House.
Perhaps you should go seek a more realistic subject to complain about with regards to Trump.

 

[WTP]

This despicable embrace of the Saudis should be a bigger scandal than it is. But the administration is benefiting from its own self-induced chaos and dysfunction. American journalists and the public are so focused on our domestic disorder that they pay ever less attention to conflicts abroad.

Our expectations have also adjusted steadily downward. It's disgusting that Pompeo didn't push the Saudis on their recent slaughter of children, but not surprising?

The US embracing of Saudi Arabia began in 1933 under your precious FDR....a Democrat and was solidified in 1945 under Truman....a Democrat; since then ALL presidents, Democrat and Republicans alike have been allied with Saudi Arabia and supplying them with armament and since that time, the Saudis have had on and off again conflicts with the Shiites, using weapons provided by the US and sometimes inflicting civilian casualties. This is no different. You clearly show that you are only complaining because Trump is president. We heard no complaints from the Democratic chorus against the Saudis in the past when Democrats were in the White House.
Perhaps you should go seek a more realistic subject to complain about with regards to Trump.

The difference being, Trump and family are doing their own profiteering. That is what this whole presidency is about. White House investigating $500 million in loans to Jared Kushner's family firm Obama wasn't profiting off the Saudi's.

 

[WTP]

It's none of our business to be all over Central and South America, but we make them our business, just like we made Iraq our business when we fabricated that war that created ISIS; CIA in South America | Geopolitical Monitor

The Secret History of ISIS

We make everyone in the world our business at the expense of the most vulnerable. We've been doing it for decades.

1. saddam started not 1, but 2 wars
2. saddam gassed his own people
saddam started/created the Persian Gulf War--not the US

Great! Then you won't mind giving us the more accurate account, as to how the U.S. wasn't the one's who started this war, based on the false information Dick Cheney pedaled, trying to tie Saddam to Zarqawi will you? Show us how the Frontline documentary is inaccurate; The Secret History of ISIS

saddam attacked Kuwait
you are saying the US would've went to war with Iraq if they didn't attack Kuwait??!!
totally, undeniably can't be proven

When are you planning on showing us how the Frontline video is wrong? The Secret History of ISIS

so the US made Saddam attack Kuwait........!!??!!
nice

Damn, you people are some more kind of ignorant.

 

[WTP]

This despicable embrace of the Saudis should be a bigger scandal than it is. But the administration is benefiting from its own self-induced chaos and dysfunction. American journalists and the public are so focused on our domestic disorder that they pay ever less attention to conflicts abroad.

Our expectations have also adjusted steadily downward. It's disgusting that Pompeo didn't push the Saudis on their recent slaughter of children, but not surprising?

So if he comments he is guilty and if he doesn’t comment he is guilty. Not sure how anyone can win with you scenerio.

US foreign policy has always been pragmatic. There is no change under Trump. He is no better or worse than his predeccessors.
But he could have had a word with the saudis.

"Stop slaughtering infants" would have been ok. But maybe Yemeni kids are worth less than the syrian kids he was so concerned about last year ?

Yep, as soon as Trump says anything about Saudi Arabia, the left will accuse him of being to soft or to hard on the Saudis.

Perhaps he has already called the Saudi governmentand voice his disapproval.

As far as better or worse? No better or worse, I agree.

At the end of the day, Trump and his parasite family have business with the Saudi's. Beyond that, Trump and family could give two shits what the Saudi's do.

No different than any other President in the last 30 years.

Is that right? Prove to us all where Obama was profiting off the Saudi's.

 

[WTP]

It's none of our business to be all over Central and South America, but we make them our business, just like we made Iraq our business when we fabricated that war that created ISIS; CIA in South America | Geopolitical Monitor

The Secret History of ISIS

We make everyone in the world our business at the expense of the most vulnerable. We've been doing it for decades.

1. saddam started not 1, but 2 wars
2. saddam gassed his own people
saddam started/created the Persian Gulf War--not the US

Great! Then you won't mind giving us the more accurate account, as to how the U.S. wasn't the one's who started this war, based on the false information Dick Cheney pedaled, trying to tie Saddam to Zarqawi will you? Show us how the Frontline documentary is inaccurate; The Secret History of ISIS

saddam attacked Kuwait
you are saying the US would've went to war with Iraq if they didn't attack Kuwait??!!
totally, undeniably can't be proven

Oh boy, this is going to be fun. First coward, we weren't talking about Iraq and Kuwait, we were talking about Saddam, Zarqawi, and the second Iraq war. We started the second war by tying Saddam to Zarqawi, which was a made up excuse by Cheney to start this second war against Saddam. You of course cowardly deflected by going to the first war, because you have no argument for the second war. Seeing that you didn't watch the documentary in full, and you have nothing to counter that argument with anyway, you punted to the first war. Lol!The Secret History of ISIS

You folks on the Right just don't have what it takes to keep some skin in this game.

As for the first war, we had to deal with another criminal, who was actually Bush Sr.

Did you know that Bush Sr. had his own oil venture going on with Kuwait?

And did you know, that when Saddam got upset about Kuwait slant drilling for oil on Iraqi territory, Bush, through Ed Gillespie told Saddam, that Bush wasn't getting involved with his disputes with Kuwait. But when Iraq invaded Kuwait, then Bush said no. Why? Because of Bush's own oil interests that were there. That is why he rescued Kuwait, and that is why Bush never went all the way into Baghdad.

there is no second war
PG1 ended in a ceasefire
in a ceasefire there are agreements where by if the signatories violate the ceasefire, the others can justifiably continue the war

The toughest demand is the elimination of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, including all chemical and biological weapons and all ballistic missiles with a range greater than 90 miles. Diplomats said the aim was to rid Iraq of Soviet-made Scud missiles, which it used during the war against Israel and Saudi Arabia.

U.N. Security Council adopts Persian Gulf War cease-fire resolution

its support for terrorist groups

to make immediate on-site inspection of the weapons

...the Iraqis hindered the inspections--this, by itself, is all the cause needed to renew the war
Iraq War | 2003–2011
they found one of the most famous/important terrorist hiding in---------IRAQ!!!
CNN.com - U.S. captures mastermind of Achille Lauro hijacking - Apr. 16, 2003
Iraq Again Hindering Inspections, U.N. Told
saddam started the crap--NOT the US

Holy cow! Talk about a coward changing the subject, and not addressing the real reasons for how and why they went to war. The war was a total lie, and Hubris proved it;

 

[Papageorgio]

So if he comments he is guilty and if he doesn’t comment he is guilty. Not sure how anyone can win with you scenerio.

US foreign policy has always been pragmatic. There is no change under Trump. He is no better or worse than his predeccessors.
But he could have had a word with the saudis.

"Stop slaughtering infants" would have been ok. But maybe Yemeni kids are worth less than the syrian kids he was so concerned about last year ?

Yep, as soon as Trump says anything about Saudi Arabia, the left will accuse him of being to soft or to hard on the Saudis.

Perhaps he has already called the Saudi governmentand voice his disapproval.

As far as better or worse? No better or worse, I agree.

At the end of the day, Trump and his parasite family have business with the Saudi's. Beyond that, Trump and family could give two shits what the Saudi's do.

No different than any other President in the last 30 years.

Is that right? Prove to us all where Obama was profiting off the Saudi's.

There hasn’t been a President in at least the last 30 years, that has stood up to the Saudis.

 

[The Purge]

And what has Oboma and Hillary have to say?....after all they are the titular heads of the DNC!

 

[basquebromance]

Bomb in Yemen school bus strike was US-supplied - CNN

 

[WTP]

US foreign policy has always been pragmatic. There is no change under Trump. He is no better or worse than his predeccessors.
But he could have had a word with the saudis.

"Stop slaughtering infants" would have been ok. But maybe Yemeni kids are worth less than the syrian kids he was so concerned about last year ?

Yep, as soon as Trump says anything about Saudi Arabia, the left will accuse him of being to soft or to hard on the Saudis.

Perhaps he has already called the Saudi governmentand voice his disapproval.

As far as better or worse? No better or worse, I agree.

At the end of the day, Trump and his parasite family have business with the Saudi's. Beyond that, Trump and family could give two shits what the Saudi's do.

No different than any other President in the last 30 years.

Is that right? Prove to us all where Obama was profiting off the Saudi's.

There hasn’t been a President in at least the last 30 years, that has stood up to the Saudis.

I said "Trump and family have been profiting off the Saudi's". You said, "no different than any other president in the last thirty years". I asked you to prove that Obama was doing that. Lol! Then you ran away like a coward and changed the subject. Are all Republicans on this board cowards and liars? Apparently so!

 

[Papageorgio]

Yep, as soon as Trump says anything about Saudi Arabia, the left will accuse him of being to soft or to hard on the Saudis.

Perhaps he has already called the Saudi governmentand voice his disapproval.

As far as better or worse? No better or worse, I agree.

At the end of the day, Trump and his parasite family have business with the Saudi's. Beyond that, Trump and family could give two shits what the Saudi's do.

No different than any other President in the last 30 years.

Is that right? Prove to us all where Obama was profiting off the Saudi's.

There hasn’t been a President in at least the last 30 years, that has stood up to the Saudis.

I said "Trump and family have been profiting off the Saudi's". You said, "no different than any other president in the last thirty years". I asked you to prove that Obama was doing that. Lol! Then you ran away like a coward and changed the subject. Are all Republicans on this board cowards and liars? Apparently so!

Lol! Get emotional much? I thought I clarified myself, I was commenting on your last sentence. Whether a President has profited or not, not one in the last, at least 30 years has stood up to the Saudis.

Secondly, I am not a Republican, I didn’t vote Republican in two out of the last three elections. I vote the person not the party.