President Trump: Making America Normal Again

Wikipedia:

Causes of income inequality in the United States - Wikipedia



That means nothing. The OP is about returning to Normal America and my response was that the period between the 50' to the 70's was the Normal America we all enjoyed. Now the Rich are enjoying life more than in the 50's-70's and the poor are enjoying life less than during those years.

This is not about comparing our poor with the rest of the world


Pure BS reply. It is the Republicans giving the tax cuts that help the rich more. It is the Democrats that are promoting services (Medicaid, Medicare, Health Insurance, Welfare, etc) that help the poor.



You are blind-by-choice
No. My eyes are wide open. That's why I know more than you do about this stuff. A LOT more than you do apparently.

Wiki is useful to get names of people and things, code words and concepts to help us do real research, but it is not a reliable source for accurate information. Most articles these days are for gullible leftists who want a particular point of view expressed and try to pretend they've found it.

I don't expect you to understand, but:
1% reduction of one million in taxes owed is $10,000 - the taxpayer will still pay $990,000 in taxes.

10% reduction of five thousand in taxes owed is $500. The taxpayer will still pay $4,500 in taxes.

So yes a tiny percentage reduction of the wealthy person's taxable income will save the rich person more than a ten times larger percentage reduction in the taxable income of the less wealthy person's taxable income only because the wealthy person pays so much more in taxes than does the lower income person. But you can't say the tax reforms only benefitted the rich.

That $500 is more valuable to the lower income person and will be more personally beneficial than will the $10,000 in savings of the rich.

Further that rich person may have provided that lower income person with a job, benefits, opportunity to become richer. He likely invests in businesses that help them grow and hire people giving them opportunity to become richer. He likely has cash in savings that provides opportunity for other people to borrow to start up or expand their businesses or otherwise become riche or to buy their cars or homes that also expands the economy and helps everybody. And he probably gives away money that helps us build new hospital wings, museum exhibits, do research or otherwise become better as a society.

The lower income person does little or none of that--he/she isn't in a position to offer anybody a job--but he does sell his valuable labor for income to support himself/herself and maybe a family and also contributes to the economy that benefits everybody. And in our country he has more opportunity to join the ranks of the rich than he would have in any other country.


President Trump and MAGA patriots want to keep it that way because that is what a normal America looks like. Yes there is income inequality. But our 'poor' live better than do than most of the rich in most of the rest of the world.
 
BONGINO, BONDI and the EPSTEIN FILES

Some musings on the Bondi/Epstein flap. So many are really disappointed that the juicy information there won't be forthcoming, and in our modern culture there is a tendency to want heads to roll when we are disappointed. And when there is disagreement the urge to take sides can be irrisistible. So Megyn Kelly and Charlie Kirk have taken Dan Bongino's side in the Epstein dispute and call for Bondi's resignation. And Megyn suggests maybe also Kristi Noem should resign?

I love Pam Bondi. I love Dan Bongino. But could they both be right here? Or does one of them have to be wrong.

Bongino was so sure Epstein was murdered before he went to the FBI. But after reviewing the evidence he admitted that he had changed his mind. He hasn't been nearly as trashed for that as Pam has. But in his defense (and Kash's), they were both quiet about it while the investigation was reviewed and they finally gave their conclusion about it.

Pam, if she is to be faulted at all. was pretty vocal about what she expected to find in the Epstein files and triggered an enormous amount of speculation and anticipation as she assured us again and again that it was all there and we would have it.

But then when they actually got through that mountain of stuff and alas there was no 'there' there, she had to say there was no Epstein list found, no 'little black book', nothing to incriminate anybody. Just photos and videos and notes that would have compromised the privacy of the victims. Whoops. The prurient information exposing evil people had either been removed and buried somewhere or destroyed if it ever existed.

Should she be fired for that? Criticism for over promising before the investigation was complete is probably justified. But I don't think is warrants her losing her job.

Trump is standing by both Bongino and Bondi and assures us everything is okay. I choose to trust that.

In a normal America there has to be some trust.
 
No. My eyes are wide open. That's why I know more than you do about this stuff. A LOT more than you do apparently.

Wiki is useful to get names of people and things, code words and concepts to help us do real research, but it is not a reliable source for accurate information. Most articles these days are for gullible leftists who want a particular point of view expressed and try to pretend they've found it.

I don't expect you to understand, but:
1% reduction of one million in taxes owed is $10,000 - the taxpayer will still pay $990,000 in taxes.

10% reduction of five thousand in taxes owed is $500. The taxpayer will still pay $4,500 in taxes.

So yes a tiny percentage reduction of the wealthy person's taxable income will save the rich person more than a ten times larger percentage reduction in the taxable income of the less wealthy person's taxable income only because the wealthy person pays so much more in taxes than does the lower income person. But you can't say the tax reforms only benefitted the rich.

That $500 is more valuable to the lower income person and will be more personally beneficial than will the $10,000 in savings of the rich.

Further that rich person may have provided that lower income person with a job, benefits, opportunity to become richer. He likely invests in businesses that help them grow and hire people giving them opportunity to become richer. He likely has cash in savings that provides opportunity for other people to borrow to start up or expand their businesses or otherwise become riche or to buy their cars or homes that also expands the economy and helps everybody. And he probably gives away money that helps us build new hospital wings, museum exhibits, do research or otherwise become better as a society.

The lower income person does little or none of that--he/she isn't in a position to offer anybody a job--but he does sell his valuable labor for income to support himself/herself and maybe a family and also contributes to the economy that benefits everybody. And in our country he has more opportunity to join the ranks of the rich than he would have in any other country.


President Trump and MAGA patriots want to keep it that way because that is what a normal America looks like. Yes there is income inequality. But our 'poor' live better than do than most of the rich in most of the rest of the world.
There is absolutely no way you understand this better than I do unless you have credentials that support your statement.

This (evaluation of economic conditions) is something I have been PROFESSIONALLY for 48 years. I was trained by the best 2 companies in the business in the 80's (Prudential Bache and Merrill Lynch) and for the past 20 years, my income has depended on my evaluations and the numbers I have accomplished support my words.

What are YOUR qualifications? What numbers, data, and information do you use to make your evaluations?

Tell me, I am awaiting your answer to prove that you know more than me!!!!
 
There is absolutely no way you understand this better than I do unless you have credentials that support your statement.

This (evaluation of economic conditions) is something I have been PROFESSIONALLY for 48 years. I was trained by the best 2 companies in the business in the 80's (Prudential Bache and Merrill Lynch) and for the past 20 years, my income has depended on my evaluations and the numbers I have accomplished support my words.

What are YOUR qualifications? What numbers, data, and information do you use to make your evaluations?

Tell me, I am awaiting your answer to prove that you know more than me!!!!
My qualificattions are living in the real world, working for a variety of industries, starting up and running a small business, plus receiving some of the best real education and management training anybody could ask for. My arguments however are supported by verifiable data provided by credible sources.

And I'm smart enough to know that Wikipedia is NOT a credible source to ANYBODY with any kind of education. And that those who cannot support their arguments with anything other than insults and judgmentalism of other people generally don't have a clue what they are talking about and couldn't support their position if their lives depended on it.
 
DGS49 started a thread on this and I encourage all to participate in that. But his OP belongs in this thread too:

"While the non-Fox Media hyperventilates about the dustup between Trump and Musk, here is what they are ignoring...because they really don't want you to know that Trump and the Republicans are trying to do everything that got them elected.

[QUOTING KIRK]

Here are 50 MAJOR wins from Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill that the media is ignoring

1. No taxes on tips — servers, bartenders, and bellhops just got a raise Promises made, promises kept
2.Made Trump tax cuts permanent — Biden wanted them to expire.
3.Child tax credit raised to $2,500
4.Overtime pay tax-free — work hard, actually keep more.
5.$1.6 trillion in spending cuts — the largest rollback of government bloat in U.S. history. http://
6.Work requirement for welfare — able-bodied? Then get off the couch.
7.Deporting 1 million illegal immigrants per year — no more catch and release.
8. Builds the wall—finishes it — 701 miles of serious border protection. Massive!
9.10,000 new ICE agents — law and order at the border. Huge!
10.Eliminates Medicaid for illegal aliens — American benefits for Americans.
11.“Trump Savings Accounts” for kids — build generational wealth from birth. Game changer.
12.Slashes IRS funding — no more 87,000 new agents breathing down your neck.http://
13.Green New Deal defunded — no more money for solar BS.http://
14.Energy production unleashed — back to drilling, fracking, etc.
15.Tariffs on Chinese-built ships — protect American shipbuilders.http://
16.Buy American, build American — required on all infrastructure projects.http://
17.Estate tax protections expanded — family farms and businesses stay in the family.
18.Repeals DEI mandates — merit matters again. DEI is dying.
19.Bans taxpayer-funded gender ideology in federal agencies.
20.Military pay raise + benefits boost
21.National missile defense (“Golden Dome”)
22.HSA accounts expanded — use them for direct primary care.http://
23.School choice tax credits — parents, not unions, control education. Historic!
24.Feds barred from mandating pronoun usage.
25.Medicaid block grants to states — local control, not DC strings. Saves hundreds of billions.
26.Revives apprenticeship programs — college not required to succeed. The cartel hates this.
27.1% of exports must ship under U.S. flag
28.Mandates voter ID for federal elections.
29.Ends ESG mandates in retirement accounts
30.Cracks down on Big Pharma middlemen
31.Bans drag shows for kids at federally funded venues.
32.Fires the climate cult from federal boards
33.Veterans get priority housing access
34. Tax credit for buying American-made vehicles
35.Stops Chinese ownership of U.S. farmland — our soil is finally protected!.
36.Bans CRT from federal training programs.
37.Ends taxpayer-funded abortions abroad. And defunds planned parenthood!
38.Guts federal diversity czars — cuts the bloated bureaucracy.
39.Revives the Keystone XL pipeline .
40. Eliminates federal COVID emergency powers
41.Enacts Social Security tax cuts for seniors.
42.Defends religious liberty in the workplace
43. Restores due process on college campuses.
44. Massively expands trade school funding
45. Outlaws federal funding for gender transitions for minors.
46. Creates nationwide “patriot curriculum” grant fund
47.Halts funding to the UN’s woke agenda arms.
48. Tax breaks for adoption and large families.
49. Increases penalties for fentanyl trafficking — life in prison for cartels.
50. Restores cash bail in federal jurisdictions — no more revolving-door criminals."

 
Last edited:
One thing SCOTUS definitely needs to address are these all encompassing, nation wide injunctions being issued by district and federal courts. Such courts should be advised that their jurisdiction is limited and they are given no authority to make law or change existing law. Yes, they can order a temporary stay within their jurisdiction to protect the rights of individuals and give them time to make their case, but a New York Court can't make rules for Arizona or Kansas or other parts of the country.

Honest question though. Why can't a large group of aliens rounded up by ICE be brought to court and receive judicial permission to take them back to their home countries? That would greatly expedite the process. Giving an individual hearing to more than 20 million aliens is just not reasonable. And there is nothing in the law that requires any alien to be represented by an attorney.
They are foreign invaders and should be treated as POWs
 
My qualificattions are living in the real world, working for a variety of industries, starting up and running a small business, plus receiving some of the best real education and management training anybody could ask for. My arguments however are supported by verifiable data provided by credible sources.

And I'm smart enough to know that Wikipedia is NOT a credible source to ANYBODY with any kind of education. And that those who cannot support their arguments with anything other than insults and judgmentalism of other people generally don't have a clue what they are talking about and couldn't support their position if their lives depended on it.
Your credentials do not rise to the level of my credentials. I have been in 6 different industries and successful in each one, and have had 2 successful businesses, one of which was #1 in my area.

Having said that, you say that your views are supported by data, well then supply the data.
 
Your credentials do not rise to the level of my credentials. I have been in 6 different industries and successful in each one, and have had 2 successful businesses, one of which was #1 in my area.

Having said that, you say that your views are supported by data, well then supply the data.
I did. You ignored it.;
 
What do they need to see? The horde storming the border with automatic weapons?
I mean I hope some GOP members are looking into revision of the existing law to make it possible to do mass deportations without interference from these unethical activist judges.
 
I'm parking the complete text of President Trump's "TruthSocial" post here so everyone can see how it is being grossly misrepresented by dishonest media and leftists

"Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump

The Radical Left Democrats have hit pay dirt, again! Just like with the FAKE and fully discredited Steele Dossier, the lying 51 “Intelligence” Agents, the Laptop from Hell, which the Dems swore had come from Russia (No, it came from Hunter Biden’s bathroom!), and even the Russia, Russia, Russia Scam itself, a totally fake and made up story used in order to hide Crooked Hillary Clinton’s big loss in the 2016 Presidential Election, these Scams and Hoaxes are all the Democrats are good at - It’s all they have - They are no good at governing, no good at policy, and no good at picking winning candidates. Also, unlike Republicans, they stick together like glue.

(New paragraph created by Foxfyre. Text is unaltered.)

Their new SCAM is what we will forever call the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax, and my PAST supporters have bought into this “bullshit,” hook, line, and sinker. They haven’t learned their lesson, and probably never will, even after being conned by the Lunatic Left for 8 long years. I have had more success in 6 months than perhaps any President in our Country’s history, and all these people want to talk about, with strong prodding by the Fake News and the success starved Dems, is the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax. Let these weaklings continue forward and do the Democrats work, don’t even think about talking of our incredible and unprecedented success, because I don’t want their support anymore! Thank you for your attention to this matter. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!
Jul 16, 2025, 7:43 AM

This is not attacking his base in any way no matter how it is misrepresented. It is shrugging off the fickle people who only pretend to be conservative or on the right but are really as TDS afflicted as anybody on the left.
 
This is not attacking his base in any way no matter how it is misrepresented. It is shrugging off the fickle people who only pretend to be conservative or on the right but are really as TDS afflicted as anybody on the left.
IOW, people who refuse to use common sense, logic and critical thinking.
 
I have to give Chris Cuomo some props for intellectual honesty here since Epstein has become the Democrats new dishonest "Russia Russia Russia' propaganda battle cry. But he's right. If there was anyting incriminating re Trump in those files, the Democrats sure as hell would have posted or leaked it when they had control of them.

 
So the Trump administration killed the grant to shoot thousands and thousands of barred owls to protect spotted owls in the west coast states.

Seems there was opposition from both sides of the aisle to this policy initiated by the Biden Administration last year.

In the world of inefficiency and ineffectiveness, if true:

". . .(opposing) activist groups cited a $4.5 million grant awarded last year to the Hoopa Valley Tribe in California to kill 1,500 owls over four years — a cost of roughly $3,000 per bird. . . "

According to my linked source, the slaughter of barred owls would be less than 1/2 of 1% of that population. A reduction in barred owls that small would save the spotted owl? Come on. Let's utilize some serious critical thinking here.

Certainly there is a better use of taxpayer money than to waste it on something that ridiculous (as well as our natural compulsion against shooting one species of owl to save another.)


Other sources say 450,000 barred owls to be killed in California. (Though it is unclear that it was actually Newsom who ordered that.)

 
Last edited:
15th post
ANOTHER WIN - FAIR TRADE WITH THE EU

As another deadline for making a deal with the EU approached, the EU did. We now have fair trade with the EU countries as well as the U.K. They pay 15% tariffs. We pay 15% tariffs.

That might seem a little silly, why not just zero tariffs? But this was a large concession from the E.U. For decades they enjoyed no tariffs on their exports to the U.S. while charging us significant tariffs for the U.S. products they imported.

Also the deal included their agreement to make significant investments in the U.S. while purchasing $750 billion in energy from the USA instead of Russia. Good for us. Good for them. Terrible for Russia who sooner or later is going to have to deal to end the Ukraine War.

Trump the master negotiator gives us (and the world) another big win.
 
Russia - Russia - Russia

Parking this link here for future reference:

OBAMA'S IC COMMUNITY Delibately sabotaged President Trump. The complete document is in this article:


They most likely won't, but if the MSM actually reports this, it could go a long way to discredit a truly dangerous and evil deep state and help restore a normal America.
 
GOOD ECONOMIC REPORT TODAY

Second quarter GDP numbers are in today at 3%, twice the expectation. Salaries are up. Inflation remains very low. Net exports added 5% to the GDP numbers indicating tariffs are not hurting our economy in any way. The BBB assured taxpayers that they would not be decimated by the Trump 45 tax reforms ending this year that would have happened had Harris been elected so consumer confidence is back.

Yay President Trump! Making a great America normal again!

Trump continues to lean on Powell to lower interest rates to boost the housing market and allow American to buy and refinance their homes again. The Fed is meeting today though and the good money is on Powell not reducing rates though more Fed members are now encouraging him to do so.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom