That's nice. But that was a dodge, which is why i ignored it.
Now tell us how Trump has a right to disparage the court staff, while being a criminal defendant in that court.
You know that will be easily obliterated. Which is why you tap dance and post in bad faith, instead of making your claim in simple English.
The fact you don’t like my examples doesn’t make them any less valid. I’ve come to expect that from you. You have a tendency to omit parts of people’s responses you don’t like, you did it to me quite a bit awhile back. You’d literally cut out every bit of context to a point I would make in order to create a response that fit YOUR narrative. And you call ME a bad faith poster??
I stated my opinions about gag orders. If they threaten someone or if they talk about elements of the case that they shouldn’t be, then I support gag orders. It’s pretty simple
Now tell us how Trump has a right to disparage the court staff, while being a criminal defendant in that court.
He has the right to criticize them, because he’s being unfairly treated. I don’t ever recall seeing any law or article of the cotus that says you are to be free from “disparagement”,
Has he threatened them? Has he said anything about the case that was supposed to be sequestered? No? So all you have is a guy trash talking the people who he feels are engaged in lawfare against him. Where is that a crime?