Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Absolutely. Once one party sets a “standard”, the other will follow suit.
Free for 4 years, that was not at all the precedent. It was like 4 months. And again it’ll leave the court as a republican majority. The court will not stop taking cases during the 4 years.It should depend on the nominee ... the CW on the two The Donald has already placed is favorable ... I've kinda been following and what little I've seen of their judicial opinions seems spot-on correct ... and they have voted against The Donald several times ...
The precedent is set ... Democrats are free keep the chair vacant if they chose ... let the voters weight in 2022 ...
This nation is easily 6 to 3 with right leaning supreme court judges. Politics has played a huge role in the constant 5 to 4 fiasco we see.Clearly they should. The repubs decided to steal a Obama pick.
The standard was set with Robert Bork in the 80's...in fact rejecting qualified judges of opposing parties has come to te known as getting "BORKED"...Bork actually joked that his name is now an adjective e.g. "there goes another borked judge"Absolutely. Once one party sets a “standard”, the other will follow suit.
Clearly they should. The repubs decided to steal a Obama pick.
Obama gets a trial to deal with his treason against a sitting President, and so does Hillary for her co-masterminding of getting rid of Donald Trump. Trump drains the swamp and goes on to make Americans as well as the entire world have a roast vegan or meat meal when they want, a cure is found that takes away viral enemies to humans, and dietary remedies that have no side effects make a comeback, so that doctors can have more time to deal with fewer life-threatening issues than ever before, and the dietary remedies wipe out the obesity pandemic that kills as many people as cigarettes, and people's lifespans double when more people learn to utilize their pursuit of happiness without being dreged through the political garbage this generation successfully dealt with this year in November. Go USA!Clearly they should. The repubs decided to steal a Obama pick.
Huhwhat? Roberts might as well be a democratic appointee. The other 4 are basically a solid granite voting bloc that always come down the same way.This nation is easily 6 to 3 with right leaning supreme court judges. Politics has played a huge role in the constant 5 to 4 fiasco we see.Clearly they should. The repubs decided to steal a Obama pick.
And if they approve the conservative nomination, the republicans will have a even bigger majority for possibly much more than 4 years which makes your question about (the democrats) sacrificing a loss for a potentially important case a moot point.Ok that’ll give the republicans a majority on the bench for 4 years. Do you sacrifice a loss in potentially important SC cases?Yes they will block any conservative judges.
Well it’d be that mixed with the fact that the GOP only did it when an election was months away, vs the left loosing another presidential election and taking their ball home with them for 4 years. This scenario wouldn’t even be close to what happened in 2016.And if they approve the conservative nomination, the republicans will have a even bigger majority for possibly much more than 4 years which makes your question about (the democrats) sacrificing a loss for a potentially important case a moot point.Ok that’ll give the republicans a majority on the bench for 4 years. Do you sacrifice a loss in potentially important SC cases?Yes they will block any conservative judges.
The democrats are not afraid to play hardball.Well it’d be that mixed with the fact that the GOP only did it when an election was months away, vs the left loosing another presidential election and taking their ball home with them for 4 years. This scenario wouldn’t even be close to what happened in 2016.And if they approve the conservative nomination, the republicans will have a even bigger majority for possibly much more than 4 years which makes your question about (the democrats) sacrificing a loss for a potentially important case a moot point.Ok that’ll give the republicans a majority on the bench for 4 years. Do you sacrifice a loss in potentially important SC cases?Yes they will block any conservative judges.
Well it’d be that mixed with the fact that the GOP only did it when an election was months away, vs the left loosing another presidential election and taking their ball home with them for 4 years. This scenario wouldn’t even be close to what happened in 2016.