Porn question

[flacaltenn]

I saw a couple people try
That's quite judgemental to say that any art of affection between 2 adults of the same sex is "jerk bait" isn't it? Sounds more like something a bigoted homophobe on the right might leap to.. No??

No. People can't control who they love . Posing for lesbian porn pictures is not the same as two people in a loving relationship. Was Melania in a loving relationship with that other lesbian, or was it just porn for porn's sake?

Was Jake Guyenhall faking it in BrokeBack Mountain? It's ART man. Lighten up. You're gonna make me afraid of giving bro hugs.

Jake Guyenhall will not be our first lady, and that movie had more meaning than lesbian porn pictures. What was the message the producers of her pictures were tying to convey other than lesbian porn?

Same message that requires Hollywood to add an LGBTQ character into every new series I guess. Make it omnipresent. Break down the walls of sin. And get people to look at at same sex affection as something OTHER THAN PORN --- dummie.. That's all I got. You guys enjoy this thread in Health/LifeStyle. It's actually better than 90% of the politics threads right now. Thanks BullDog. It's been fun.. .

Why are you thanking him? You should be thanking me for the fun. He's no fun.

You ARE more fun. But other than your decision to not support 3rd party politics -- I've got nothing to fight with you about. Unless you're offended by roll models or something..

 

[ChrisL]

I saw a couple people try
That's quite judgemental to say that any art of affection between 2 adults of the same sex is "jerk bait" isn't it? Sounds more like something a bigoted homophobe on the right might leap to.. No??

No. People can't control who they love . Posing for lesbian porn pictures is not the same as two people in a loving relationship. Was Melania in a loving relationship with that other lesbian, or was it just porn for porn's sake?

Was Jake Guyenhall faking it in BrokeBack Mountain? It's ART man. Lighten up. You're gonna make me afraid of giving bro hugs.

Jake Guyenhall will not be our first lady, and that movie had more meaning than lesbian porn pictures. What was the message the producers of her pictures were tying to convey other than lesbian porn?

Same message that requires Hollywood to add an LGBTQ character into every new series I guess. Make it omnipresent. Break down the walls of sin. And get people to look at at same sex affection as something OTHER THAN PORN --- dummie.. That's all I got. You guys enjoy this thread in Health/LifeStyle. It's actually better than 90% of the politics threads right now. Thanks BullDog. It's been fun.. .

You're welcome. Her photos had nothing to do with the normalization of the homosexual lifestyle. It didn't have anything to do with accepting a mutual loving relationship between two people of the same sex. It was pure porn.

Your safe space is that way

 

[flacaltenn]

I saw a couple people try
That's quite judgemental to say that any art of affection between 2 adults of the same sex is "jerk bait" isn't it? Sounds more like something a bigoted homophobe on the right might leap to.. No??

No. People can't control who they love . Posing for lesbian porn pictures is not the same as two people in a loving relationship. Was Melania in a loving relationship with that other lesbian, or was it just porn for porn's sake?

Was Jake Guyenhall faking it in BrokeBack Mountain? It's ART man. Lighten up. You're gonna make me afraid of giving bro hugs.

Jake Guyenhall will not be our first lady, and that movie had more meaning than lesbian porn pictures. What was the message the producers of her pictures were tying to convey other than lesbian porn?

Same message that requires Hollywood to add an LGBTQ character into every new series I guess. Make it omnipresent. Break down the walls of sin. And get people to look at at same sex affection as something OTHER THAN PORN --- dummie.. That's all I got. You guys enjoy this thread in Health/LifeStyle. It's actually better than 90% of the politics threads right now. Thanks BullDog. It's been fun.. .

You're welcome. Her photos had nothing to do with the normalization of the homosexual lifestyle. It didn't have anything to do with accepting a mutual loving relationship between two people of the same sex. It was pure porn.

OK -- this is OBVIOUSLY important to you. Help me out here. WHERE did that picture appear? And how many like that one exist?

 

[BULLDOG]

Her genitalia is available on the internet too. Such a classy first lady.

Now, now. We all know how mad you get when people start talking about Michele being large and dumpy looking.

Michele will be gone soon. You'll have to find something else just as silly to rant about.

I'm just saying that you all get mad when people say things about Michele or Obama's family, yet you turn around and do the same thing! Lol.

The difference is subjective or objective. Objectively, Melania posed for lesbian porn to be displayed for jerk bait on the internet. That really happened, and boys jerk off to her picture every day. You can't truthfully say that isn't true. Objectively, you don't like the way Michelle looks. I, and millions of others think she is beautiful. I can truthfully say that.

So how many times have you jerked off to it?

And you must really get a rock hard thinking about those "BOYS" jerking off looking at that picture. I mean that must stiffen you up so much that you felt the need to make sure everyone sees it by making an avatar out of it.

Ya if it really bothered you, you wouldn't have made an avatar out of it. You've exposed your hypocrisy. You like the picture. You've been pulling your own pud looking at it, you disgusting pron loving little BOY.

So you think pointing out that our soon to be first lady is a porn star makes me a degenerate? I guess a right winger has to make extreme leaps to keep his head from exploding.

 

[007]

Now, now. We all know how mad you get when people start talking about Michele being large and dumpy looking.

Michele will be gone soon. You'll have to find something else just as silly to rant about.

I'm just saying that you all get mad when people say things about Michele or Obama's family, yet you turn around and do the same thing! Lol.

The difference is subjective or objective. Objectively, Melania posed for lesbian porn to be displayed for jerk bait on the internet. That really happened, and boys jerk off to her picture every day. You can't truthfully say that isn't true. Objectively, you don't like the way Michelle looks. I, and millions of others think she is beautiful. I can truthfully say that.

So how many times have you jerked off to it?

And you must really get a rock hard thinking about those "BOYS" jerking off looking at that picture. I mean that must stiffen you up so much that you felt the need to make sure everyone sees it by making an avatar out of it.

Ya if it really bothered you, you wouldn't have made an avatar out of it. You've exposed your hypocrisy. You like the picture. You've been pulling your own pud looking at it, you disgusting pron loving little BOY.

So you think pointing out that our soon to be first lady is a porn star makes me a degenerate? I guess a right winger has to make extreme leaps to keep his head from exploding.

You have a reading comprehension problem, don't you... ya, conveniently now that the table has been turned on you loving your avatar, and the thought of little boys slapping their meat to it (Mod Edit -- no go. ).... you're pathetic.

 

[BULLDOG]

No. People can't control who they love . Posing for lesbian porn pictures is not the same as two people in a loving relationship. Was Melania in a loving relationship with that other lesbian, or was it just porn for porn's sake?

Was Jake Guyenhall faking it in BrokeBack Mountain? It's ART man. Lighten up. You're gonna make me afraid of giving bro hugs.

Jake Guyenhall will not be our first lady, and that movie had more meaning than lesbian porn pictures. What was the message the producers of her pictures were tying to convey other than lesbian porn?

Same message that requires Hollywood to add an LGBTQ character into every new series I guess. Make it omnipresent. Break down the walls of sin. And get people to look at at same sex affection as something OTHER THAN PORN --- dummie.. That's all I got. You guys enjoy this thread in Health/LifeStyle. It's actually better than 90% of the politics threads right now. Thanks BullDog. It's been fun.. .

You're welcome. Her photos had nothing to do with the normalization of the homosexual lifestyle. It didn't have anything to do with accepting a mutual loving relationship between two people of the same sex. It was pure porn.

OK -- this is OBVIOUSLY important to you. Help me out here. WHERE did that picture appear? And how many like that one exist?

Considering the importance the right gave to a blowjob between consenting adults, this is certainly something that should be part of the discussion. The opportunity it gives to point out the hypocrisy of the right is an added bonus. You can start by googling Melania Porn. The first hit will be
Melania Trump’s girl-on-girl photos from racy shoot revealed | New York Post
There are plenty more than that.

 

[flacaltenn]

Now, now. We all know how mad you get when people start talking about Michele being large and dumpy looking.

Michele will be gone soon. You'll have to find something else just as silly to rant about.

I'm just saying that you all get mad when people say things about Michele or Obama's family, yet you turn around and do the same thing! Lol.

The difference is subjective or objective. Objectively, Melania posed for lesbian porn to be displayed for jerk bait on the internet. That really happened, and boys jerk off to her picture every day. You can't truthfully say that isn't true. Objectively, you don't like the way Michelle looks. I, and millions of others think she is beautiful. I can truthfully say that.

So how many times have you jerked off to it?

And you must really get a rock hard thinking about those "BOYS" jerking off looking at that picture. I mean that must stiffen you up so much that you felt the need to make sure everyone sees it by making an avatar out of it.

Ya if it really bothered you, you wouldn't have made an avatar out of it. You've exposed your hypocrisy. You like the picture. You've been pulling your own pud looking at it, you disgusting pron loving little BOY.

So you think pointing out that our soon to be first lady is a porn star makes me a degenerate? I guess a right winger has to make extreme leaps to keep his head from exploding.

Didn't answer my question.. FORCED me to look it up. Those pics including your Avie came from a European magazine called Max. Headline was "total pop culture and style magazine". Precursor to Maxim, Not much different than Esquire. Maybe even GQ. NOT PORN. No cover I saw required a brown paper wrapper in Kentucky.. And the mag FAILED -- because it couldn't decide WHAT it actually was anyways.

Pop culture = gay issues = artistic license. AND PERHAPS at the time -- in case maybe you never considered it -- MAYBE --- Melania declared herself gay for a week or a month. Would that be HORRIBLE? You against erotic art? Exactly WHAT IS YOUR prudish behavior attributable to here?

 

[ChrisL]

Was Jake Guyenhall faking it in BrokeBack Mountain? It's ART man. Lighten up. You're gonna make me afraid of giving bro hugs.

Jake Guyenhall will not be our first lady, and that movie had more meaning than lesbian porn pictures. What was the message the producers of her pictures were tying to convey other than lesbian porn?

Same message that requires Hollywood to add an LGBTQ character into every new series I guess. Make it omnipresent. Break down the walls of sin. And get people to look at at same sex affection as something OTHER THAN PORN --- dummie.. That's all I got. You guys enjoy this thread in Health/LifeStyle. It's actually better than 90% of the politics threads right now. Thanks BullDog. It's been fun.. .

You're welcome. Her photos had nothing to do with the normalization of the homosexual lifestyle. It didn't have anything to do with accepting a mutual loving relationship between two people of the same sex. It was pure porn.

OK -- this is OBVIOUSLY important to you. Help me out here. WHERE did that picture appear? And how many like that one exist?

Considering the importance the right gave to a blowjob between consenting adults, this is certainly something that should be part of the discussion. The opportunity it gives to point out the hypocrisy of the right is an added bonus. You can start by googling Melania Porn. The first hit will be
Melania Trump’s girl-on-girl photos from racy shoot revealed | New York Post
There are plenty more than that.

Whaat? How is this picture in any way comparable to a married president having sex in the oval office while "serving" the people as the POTUS?

 

[BULLDOG]

Michele will be gone soon. You'll have to find something else just as silly to rant about.

I'm just saying that you all get mad when people say things about Michele or Obama's family, yet you turn around and do the same thing! Lol.

The difference is subjective or objective. Objectively, Melania posed for lesbian porn to be displayed for jerk bait on the internet. That really happened, and boys jerk off to her picture every day. You can't truthfully say that isn't true. Objectively, you don't like the way Michelle looks. I, and millions of others think she is beautiful. I can truthfully say that.

So how many times have you jerked off to it?

And you must really get a rock hard thinking about those "BOYS" jerking off looking at that picture. I mean that must stiffen you up so much that you felt the need to make sure everyone sees it by making an avatar out of it.

Ya if it really bothered you, you wouldn't have made an avatar out of it. You've exposed your hypocrisy. You like the picture. You've been pulling your own pud looking at it, you disgusting pron loving little BOY.

So you think pointing out that our soon to be first lady is a porn star makes me a degenerate? I guess a right winger has to make extreme leaps to keep his head from exploding.

You have a reading comprehension problem, don't you... ya, conveniently now that the table has been turned on you loving your avatar, and the thought of little boys slapping their meat to it turns you on.... you're pathetic.

Sorry, I don't get off to little boys beating off, but I think the fact that they beat off to pictures of the future first lady is worth pointing out.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

There's a member, BULLDOG, who has what I consider porn as an avatar.

Is that permitted? Do I have to place him on ignore, or can you just have him change it?

Here's the answer -- best I know. We had the moderator with the MOST EXPERIENCE in "porn" take a look. And the rules say -- no female nipples, no genitalia of ANY kind. And this Moderator/porn expert said that the "nipples were sufficiently blurred". So it's just like watching Survivor, when they have to blur some parts that have "wardrobe malfunctions" during the rope pull or the mud wrestling.

Can we close this case now?? And no -- you can't ask who it was. The Staff porn expert wants to remain anonymous..

I guess Doc doesn't want people to know what he does with his free time~

 

[BULLDOG]

Michele will be gone soon. You'll have to find something else just as silly to rant about.

I'm just saying that you all get mad when people say things about Michele or Obama's family, yet you turn around and do the same thing! Lol.

The difference is subjective or objective. Objectively, Melania posed for lesbian porn to be displayed for jerk bait on the internet. That really happened, and boys jerk off to her picture every day. You can't truthfully say that isn't true. Objectively, you don't like the way Michelle looks. I, and millions of others think she is beautiful. I can truthfully say that.

So how many times have you jerked off to it?

And you must really get a rock hard thinking about those "BOYS" jerking off looking at that picture. I mean that must stiffen you up so much that you felt the need to make sure everyone sees it by making an avatar out of it.

Ya if it really bothered you, you wouldn't have made an avatar out of it. You've exposed your hypocrisy. You like the picture. You've been pulling your own pud looking at it, you disgusting pron loving little BOY.

So you think pointing out that our soon to be first lady is a porn star makes me a degenerate? I guess a right winger has to make extreme leaps to keep his head from exploding.

Didn't answer my question.. FORCED me to look it up. Those pics including your Avie came from a European magazine called Max. Headline was "total pop culture and style magazine". Precursor to Maxim, Not much different than Esquire. Maybe even GQ. NOT PORN. No cover I saw required a brown paper wrapper in Kentucky.. And the mag FAILED -- because it couldn't decide WHAT it actually was anyways.

Pop culture = gay issues = artistic license. AND PERHAPS at the time -- in case maybe you never considered it -- MAYBE --- Melania declared herself gay for a week or a month. Would that be HORRIBLE? You against erotic art? Exactly WHAT IS YOUR prudish behavior attributable to here?

I am far from a prude. I just think our future first lady's lesbian porn should be known as widely as she hoped when she posed for it.

 

[rdean]

There's a member, BULLDOG, who has what I consider porn as an avatar.

Is that permitted? Do I have to place him on ignore, or can you just have him change it?

Don't talk about our First Lady that way.

 

[BULLDOG]

Jake Guyenhall will not be our first lady, and that movie had more meaning than lesbian porn pictures. What was the message the producers of her pictures were tying to convey other than lesbian porn?

Same message that requires Hollywood to add an LGBTQ character into every new series I guess. Make it omnipresent. Break down the walls of sin. And get people to look at at same sex affection as something OTHER THAN PORN --- dummie.. That's all I got. You guys enjoy this thread in Health/LifeStyle. It's actually better than 90% of the politics threads right now. Thanks BullDog. It's been fun.. .

You're welcome. Her photos had nothing to do with the normalization of the homosexual lifestyle. It didn't have anything to do with accepting a mutual loving relationship between two people of the same sex. It was pure porn.

OK -- this is OBVIOUSLY important to you. Help me out here. WHERE did that picture appear? And how many like that one exist?

Considering the importance the right gave to a blowjob between consenting adults, this is certainly something that should be part of the discussion. The opportunity it gives to point out the hypocrisy of the right is an added bonus. You can start by googling Melania Porn. The first hit will be
Melania Trump’s girl-on-girl photos from racy shoot revealed | New York Post
There are plenty more than that.

Whaat? How is this picture in any way comparable to a married president having sex in the oval office while "serving" the people as the POTUS?

Private actions between consenting adults is not the same as posing for lesbian porn with the intention of distributing it as widely as possible.

 

[flacaltenn]

Was Jake Guyenhall faking it in BrokeBack Mountain? It's ART man. Lighten up. You're gonna make me afraid of giving bro hugs.

Jake Guyenhall will not be our first lady, and that movie had more meaning than lesbian porn pictures. What was the message the producers of her pictures were tying to convey other than lesbian porn?

Same message that requires Hollywood to add an LGBTQ character into every new series I guess. Make it omnipresent. Break down the walls of sin. And get people to look at at same sex affection as something OTHER THAN PORN --- dummie.. That's all I got. You guys enjoy this thread in Health/LifeStyle. It's actually better than 90% of the politics threads right now. Thanks BullDog. It's been fun.. .

You're welcome. Her photos had nothing to do with the normalization of the homosexual lifestyle. It didn't have anything to do with accepting a mutual loving relationship between two people of the same sex. It was pure porn.

OK -- this is OBVIOUSLY important to you. Help me out here. WHERE did that picture appear? And how many like that one exist?

Considering the importance the right gave to a blowjob between consenting adults, this is certainly something that should be part of the discussion. The opportunity it gives to point out the hypocrisy of the right is an added bonus. You can start by googling Melania Porn. The first hit will be
Melania Trump’s girl-on-girl photos from racy shoot revealed | New York Post
There are plenty more than that.

That's all from the SAME SINGLE photo shoot. Says so in your link. Max Mag was the only one who printed them.
Photographer says.

“I always loved women together, because I have been with a lot of women who desired the ménage à trois,” said Jarl Ale de Basseville, the French fashion photographer who snapped the pictures.

“This is beauty and not porn. I am always shocked by the porn industry because they are destroying the emotion and the essence of purity and simplicity.”

Here's the dude's picture. Does he look like a sketchy porn producer??

NO !! He looks very Euro and might be LGBTQ himself.
You should actually read the stuff you cut/paste.

 

[ChrisL]

There's a member, BULLDOG, who has what I consider porn as an avatar.

Is that permitted? Do I have to place him on ignore, or can you just have him change it?

Don't talk about our First Lady that way.

You forgot one!

 

[BULLDOG]

Jake Guyenhall will not be our first lady, and that movie had more meaning than lesbian porn pictures. What was the message the producers of her pictures were tying to convey other than lesbian porn?

Same message that requires Hollywood to add an LGBTQ character into every new series I guess. Make it omnipresent. Break down the walls of sin. And get people to look at at same sex affection as something OTHER THAN PORN --- dummie.. That's all I got. You guys enjoy this thread in Health/LifeStyle. It's actually better than 90% of the politics threads right now. Thanks BullDog. It's been fun.. .

You're welcome. Her photos had nothing to do with the normalization of the homosexual lifestyle. It didn't have anything to do with accepting a mutual loving relationship between two people of the same sex. It was pure porn.

OK -- this is OBVIOUSLY important to you. Help me out here. WHERE did that picture appear? And how many like that one exist?

Considering the importance the right gave to a blowjob between consenting adults, this is certainly something that should be part of the discussion. The opportunity it gives to point out the hypocrisy of the right is an added bonus. You can start by googling Melania Porn. The first hit will be
Melania Trump’s girl-on-girl photos from racy shoot revealed | New York Post
There are plenty more than that.

That's all from the SAME SINGLE photo shoot. Says so in your link. Max Mag was the only one who printed them.
Photographer says.

“I always loved women together, because I have been with a lot of women who desired the ménage à trois,” said Jarl Ale de Basseville, the French fashion photographer who snapped the pictures.

“This is beauty and not porn. I am always shocked by the porn industry because they are destroying the emotion and the essence of purity and simplicity.”

Here's the dude's picture. Does he look like a sketchy porn producer??

NO !! He looks very Euro and might be LGBTQ himself.
You should actually read the stuff you cut/paste.

Doesn't matter. Her pictures are jerk bait across the internet. Distributed as widely as possible, just like she intended.

There's a member, BULLDOG, who has what I consider porn as an avatar.

Is that permitted? Do I have to place him on ignore, or can you just have him change it?

Don't talk about our First Lady that way.

You forgot one!

As usual, a right winger posts a fake picture. If it wasn't for lies, the right would have nothing.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

Doesn't matter. Her pictures are jerk bait across the internet. Distributed as widely as possible, just like she intended.

Uhm. And? She's not infringing on the rights of others, why do you care?

As usual, a right winger posts a fake picture. If it wasn't for lies, the right would have nothing.

The left wing media is exposed as being a propaganda arm, and the DNC is exposed as being liars who intentionally subvert the will of their supporters, and you call the right liars? Cute.

 

[BULLDOG]

Doesn't matter. Her pictures are jerk bait across the internet. Distributed as widely as possible, just like she intended.

Uhm. And? She's not infringing on the rights of others, why do you care?

As usual, a right winger posts a fake picture. If it wasn't for lies, the right would have nothing.

The left wing media is exposed as being a propaganda arm, and the DNC is exposed as being liars who intentionally subvert the will of their supporters, and you call the right liars? Cute.

Does it bother you that the future first lady has her tits displayed all across the internet? Good.

 

[BULLDOG]

Doesn't matter. Her pictures are jerk bait across the internet. Distributed as widely as possible, just like she intended.

Uhm. And? She's not infringing on the rights of others, why do you care?

As usual, a right winger posts a fake picture. If it wasn't for lies, the right would have nothing.

The left wing media is exposed as being a propaganda arm, and the DNC is exposed as being liars who intentionally subvert the will of their supporters, and you call the right liars? Cute.

Doesn't change the fact that that picture is a fake.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

Doesn't matter. Her pictures are jerk bait across the internet. Distributed as widely as possible, just like she intended.

Uhm. And? She's not infringing on the rights of others, why do you care?

As usual, a right winger posts a fake picture. If it wasn't for lies, the right would have nothing.

The left wing media is exposed as being a propaganda arm, and the DNC is exposed as being liars who intentionally subvert the will of their supporters, and you call the right liars? Cute.

Does it bother you that the future first lady has her tits displayed all across the internet? Good.

No, but it clearly bothers you. She's not infringing on my rights, I therefor don't care. I'm glad it bothers you, though. Liberal sorrow makes me happy.