Porn question

[Andylusion]

There's a member, BULLDOG, who has what I consider porn as an avatar.

Is that permitted? Do I have to place him on ignore, or can you just have him change it?

 

[Pete7469]

He's an insipid parrot, I've put him on ignore as soon as I saw him post.

Vapid little imbecile that one (Read it with a british accent.)

 

[ChrisL]

There's a member, BULLDOG, who has what I consider porn as an avatar.

Is that permitted? Do I have to place him on ignore, or can you just have him change it?

It's Melania Trump. Did you know that?

 

[aaronleland]

Wipe the cum off your keyboard and move onto the next post.

 

[BULLDOG]

Aren't you proud of your new lesbian porn model/ first lady? That is her, and the picture wasn't taken by some peeping tom looking through a window. She intentionally posed for it with the intention of it being distributed as widely as possible. The first time any first lady has intentionally put lesbian porn on the internet for anybody to look at while they jerk off. Real class that Trump clown is bringing to the White House.

 

[ChrisL]

Aren't you proud of your new lesbian porn model/ first lady? That is her, and the picture wasn't taken by some peeping tom looking through a window. She intentionally posed for it with the intention of it being distributed as widely as possible. The first time any first lady has intentionally put lesbian porn on the internet for anybody to look at while they jerk off. Real class that Trump clown is bringing to the White House.

Who cares? Only prudes. Lol.

 

[kiwiman127]

Or people with chidren.

 

[Andylusion]

Aren't you proud of your new lesbian porn model/ first lady? That is her, and the picture wasn't taken by some peeping tom looking through a window. She intentionally posed for it with the intention of it being distributed as widely as possible. The first time any first lady has intentionally put lesbian porn on the internet for anybody to look at while they jerk off. Real class that Trump clown is bringing to the White House.

I really couldn't care less. I've never considered anyone in politics to be a roll model.

If you really want a comparison, that's fine. Do you like your role model ex-president Clinton, who scammed and corrupted his way into authority, and then abused, even raped, every intern he could screw?

Between the two, that's far worse.

Regardless.... BULLDOG... I don't know you, and I don't have a problem with you. But I hate porn. Hate porn. I don't want to see it.

If the ruling is that your avatar if fine, then I'll put you on ignore. Not because I don't want to read what you have to say, but because I hate porn. Nothing personal.

 

[BULLDOG]

Aren't you proud of your new lesbian porn model/ first lady? That is her, and the picture wasn't taken by some peeping tom looking through a window. She intentionally posed for it with the intention of it being distributed as widely as possible. The first time any first lady has intentionally put lesbian porn on the internet for anybody to look at while they jerk off. Real class that Trump clown is bringing to the White House.

Who cares? Only prudes. Lol.

My view exactly. Everybody wants to see the first lady's tits in a lesbian porn scene. The so called Christian posters might have a problem with it, but the fact that they voted to have her as first lady proves they are hypocrites anyway.

 

[flacaltenn]

There's a member, BULLDOG, who has what I consider porn as an avatar.

Is that permitted? Do I have to place him on ignore, or can you just have him change it?

Here's the answer -- best I know. We had the moderator with the MOST EXPERIENCE in "porn" take a look. And the rules say -- no female nipples, no genitalia of ANY kind. And this Moderator/porn expert said that the "nipples were sufficiently blurred". So it's just like watching Survivor, when they have to blur some parts that have "wardrobe malfunctions" during the rope pull or the mud wrestling.

Can we close this case now?? And no -- you can't ask who it was. The Staff porn expert wants to remain anonymous..

 

[Onyx]

There's a member, BULLDOG, who has what I consider porn as an avatar.

Is that permitted? Do I have to place him on ignore, or can you just have him change it?

You mean the censored black and white photo that has a political message attached to it? That is not porn in my opinion.

 

[ChrisL]

Aren't you proud of your new lesbian porn model/ first lady? That is her, and the picture wasn't taken by some peeping tom looking through a window. She intentionally posed for it with the intention of it being distributed as widely as possible. The first time any first lady has intentionally put lesbian porn on the internet for anybody to look at while they jerk off. Real class that Trump clown is bringing to the White House.

Who cares? Only prudes. Lol.

My view exactly. Everybody wants to see the first lady's tits in a lesbian porn scene. The so called Christian posters might have a problem with it, but the fact that they voted to have her as first lady proves they are hypocrites anyway.

I think it was like 20 years ago or something. Relax.

 

[Onyx]

Permission to show real porn?

 

[Andylusion]

Wipe the cum off your keyboard and move onto the next post.

Really? I don't look at that crap.

There's a member, BULLDOG, who has what I consider porn as an avatar.

Is that permitted? Do I have to place him on ignore, or can you just have him change it?

Here's the answer -- best I know. We had the moderator with the MOST EXPERIENCE in "porn" take a look. And the rules say -- no female nipples, no genitalia of ANY kind. And this Moderator/porn expert said that the "nipples were sufficiently blurred". So it's just like watching Survivor, when they have to blur some parts that have "wardrobe malfunctions" during the rope pull or the mud wrestling.

Can we close this case now?? And no -- you can't ask who it was. The Staff porn expert wants to remain anonymous..

That.... is disturbing that you have a porn expert.

Ok, fine. I'll just ignore him. Thanks.

 

[BULLDOG]

Aren't you proud of your new lesbian porn model/ first lady? That is her, and the picture wasn't taken by some peeping tom looking through a window. She intentionally posed for it with the intention of it being distributed as widely as possible. The first time any first lady has intentionally put lesbian porn on the internet for anybody to look at while they jerk off. Real class that Trump clown is bringing to the White House.

I really couldn't care less. I've never considered anyone in politics to be a roll model.

If you really want a comparison, that's fine. Do you like your role model ex-president Clinton, who scammed and corrupted his way into authority, and then abused, even raped, every intern he could screw?

Between the two, that's far worse.

Regardless.... BULLDOG... I don't know you, and I don't have a problem with you. But I hate porn. Hate porn. I don't want to see it.

If the ruling is that your avatar if fine, then I'll put you on ignore. Not because I don't want to read what you have to say, but because I hate porn. Nothing personal.

Putting me on ignore won't change the fact that young boys are jerking off to our future first lady's lesbian porn.

 

[Andylusion]

Aren't you proud of your new lesbian porn model/ first lady? That is her, and the picture wasn't taken by some peeping tom looking through a window. She intentionally posed for it with the intention of it being distributed as widely as possible. The first time any first lady has intentionally put lesbian porn on the internet for anybody to look at while they jerk off. Real class that Trump clown is bringing to the White House.

Who cares? Only prudes. Lol.

My view exactly. Everybody wants to see the first lady's tits in a lesbian porn scene. The so called Christian posters might have a problem with it, but the fact that they voted to have her as first lady proves they are hypocrites anyway.

Well, there you go. See you later BULLDOG. Ignore it is.

 

[ChrisL]

Lol.

 

[BULLDOG]

There's a member, BULLDOG, who has what I consider porn as an avatar.

Is that permitted? Do I have to place him on ignore, or can you just have him change it?

Here's the answer -- best I know. We had the moderator with the MOST EXPERIENCE in "porn" take a look. And the rules say -- no female nipples, no genitalia of ANY kind. And this Moderator/porn expert said that the "nipples were sufficiently blurred". So it's just like watching Survivor, when they have to blur some parts that have "wardrobe malfunctions" during the rope pull or the mud wrestling.

Can we close this case now?? And no -- you can't ask who it was. The Staff porn expert wants to remain anonymous..

Her genitalia is available on the internet too. Such a classy first lady.

 

[ChrisL]

There's a member, BULLDOG, who has what I consider porn as an avatar.

Is that permitted? Do I have to place him on ignore, or can you just have him change it?

Here's the answer -- best I know. We had the moderator with the MOST EXPERIENCE in "porn" take a look. And the rules say -- no female nipples, no genitalia of ANY kind. And this Moderator/porn expert said that the "nipples were sufficiently blurred". So it's just like watching Survivor, when they have to blur some parts that have "wardrobe malfunctions" during the rope pull or the mud wrestling.

Can we close this case now?? And no -- you can't ask who it was. The Staff porn expert wants to remain anonymous..

Her genitalia is available on the internet too. Such a classy first lady.

Now, now. We all know how mad you get when people start talking about Michele being large and dumpy looking.

 

[Pete7469]

Can we close this case now?? And no -- you can't ask who it was. The Staff porn expert wants to remain anonymous..

Everyone knows it's Don't Taze Me.