Porn question

There's a member, BULLDOG, who has what I consider porn as an avatar.

Is that permitted? Do I have to place him on ignore, or can you just have him change it?

Here's the answer -- best I know. We had the moderator with the MOST EXPERIENCE in "porn" take a look. And the rules say -- no female nipples, no genitalia of ANY kind. And this Moderator/porn expert said that the "nipples were sufficiently blurred". So it's just like watching Survivor, when they have to blur some parts that have "wardrobe malfunctions" during the rope pull or the mud wrestling.

Can we close this case now?? And no -- you can't ask who it was. The Staff porn expert wants to remain anonymous.. :mm:

Her genitalia is available on the internet too. Such a classy first lady.

Now, now. We all know how mad you get when people start talking about Michele being large and dumpy looking. ;)

Michele will be gone soon. You'll have to find something else just as silly to rant about.
 
If you really want a comparison, that's fine. Do you like your role model ex-president Clinton, who scammed and corrupted his way into authority, and then abused, even raped, every intern he could screw?

Between the two, that's far worse.

You can't argue a point with fake news as your back-up, Andy.

There's no evidence towards your claim.

And your comparison is a matter of opinion. Based on a debunked story.
 
There's a member, BULLDOG, who has what I consider porn as an avatar.

Is that permitted? Do I have to place him on ignore, or can you just have him change it?

Here's the answer -- best I know. We had the moderator with the MOST EXPERIENCE in "porn" take a look. And the rules say -- no female nipples, no genitalia of ANY kind. And this Moderator/porn expert said that the "nipples were sufficiently blurred". So it's just like watching Survivor, when they have to blur some parts that have "wardrobe malfunctions" during the rope pull or the mud wrestling.

Can we close this case now?? And no -- you can't ask who it was. The Staff porn expert wants to remain anonymous.. :mm:

Her genitalia is available on the internet too. Such a classy first lady.

Now, now. We all know how mad you get when people start talking about Michele being large and dumpy looking. ;)

Michele will be gone soon. You'll have to find something else just as silly to rant about.

I'm just saying that you all get mad when people say things about Michele or Obama's family, yet you turn around and do the same thing! Lol.
 
There's a member, BULLDOG, who has what I consider porn as an avatar.

Is that permitted? Do I have to place him on ignore, or can you just have him change it?

Here's the answer -- best I know. We had the moderator with the MOST EXPERIENCE in "porn" take a look. And the rules say -- no female nipples, no genitalia of ANY kind. And this Moderator/porn expert said that the "nipples were sufficiently blurred". So it's just like watching Survivor, when they have to blur some parts that have "wardrobe malfunctions" during the rope pull or the mud wrestling.

Can we close this case now?? And no -- you can't ask who it was. The Staff porn expert wants to remain anonymous.. :mm:

Her genitalia is available on the internet too. Such a classy first lady.

I know that's a big burden to carry around on your back. I imagine you must be HORRIFIED every time you wake up and check to make sure that it's still there. All I can say is -- it's YOUR burden man. YOU put it there on yourself. Along with those pix of shirtless Vladimir Putin. It's ALL YOURS...
 
There's a member, BULLDOG, who has what I consider porn as an avatar.

Is that permitted? Do I have to place him on ignore, or can you just have him change it?

Here's the answer -- best I know. We had the moderator with the MOST EXPERIENCE in "porn" take a look. And the rules say -- no female nipples, no genitalia of ANY kind. And this Moderator/porn expert said that the "nipples were sufficiently blurred". So it's just like watching Survivor, when they have to blur some parts that have "wardrobe malfunctions" during the rope pull or the mud wrestling.

Can we close this case now?? And no -- you can't ask who it was. The Staff porn expert wants to remain anonymous.. :mm:

Her genitalia is available on the internet too. Such a classy first lady.

I know that's a big burden to carry around on your back. I imagine you must be HORRIFIED every time you wake up and check to make sure that it's still there. All I can say is -- it's YOUR burden man. YOU put it there on yourself. Along with those pix of shirtless Vladimir Putin. It's ALL YOURS...

:eusa_think:
 
There's a member, BULLDOG, who has what I consider porn as an avatar.

Is that permitted? Do I have to place him on ignore, or can you just have him change it?

Here's the answer -- best I know. We had the moderator with the MOST EXPERIENCE in "porn" take a look. And the rules say -- no female nipples, no genitalia of ANY kind. And this Moderator/porn expert said that the "nipples were sufficiently blurred". So it's just like watching Survivor, when they have to blur some parts that have "wardrobe malfunctions" during the rope pull or the mud wrestling.

Can we close this case now?? And no -- you can't ask who it was. The Staff porn expert wants to remain anonymous.. :mm:

Her genitalia is available on the internet too. Such a classy first lady.

Now, now. We all know how mad you get when people start talking about Michele being large and dumpy looking. ;)

Michele will be gone soon. You'll have to find something else just as silly to rant about.

I'm just saying that you all get mad when people say things about Michele or Obama's family, yet you turn around and do the same thing! Lol.

The difference is subjective or objective. Objectively, Melania posed for lesbian porn to be displayed for jerk bait on the internet. That really happened, and boys jerk off to her picture every day. You can't truthfully say that isn't true. Objectively, you don't like the way Michelle looks. I, and millions of others think she is beautiful. I can truthfully say that.
 
Here's the answer -- best I know. We had the moderator with the MOST EXPERIENCE in "porn" take a look. And the rules say -- no female nipples, no genitalia of ANY kind. And this Moderator/porn expert said that the "nipples were sufficiently blurred". So it's just like watching Survivor, when they have to blur some parts that have "wardrobe malfunctions" during the rope pull or the mud wrestling.

Can we close this case now?? And no -- you can't ask who it was. The Staff porn expert wants to remain anonymous.. :mm:

Her genitalia is available on the internet too. Such a classy first lady.

Now, now. We all know how mad you get when people start talking about Michele being large and dumpy looking. ;)

Michele will be gone soon. You'll have to find something else just as silly to rant about.

I'm just saying that you all get mad when people say things about Michele or Obama's family, yet you turn around and do the same thing! Lol.

The difference is subjective or objective. Objectively, Melania posed for lesbian porn to be displayed for jerk bait on the internet. That really happened, and boys jerk off to her picture every day. You can't truthfully say that isn't true. Objectively, you don't like the way Michelle looks. I, and millions of others think she is beautiful. I can truthfully say that.

So, she did it when she was modeling when she was in her 20s before she was married. I suppose you've never done anything in your 20s or whatever? I've forgotten that I'm in the presence of perfection on Earth when I'm on this forum! :D
 
15th post
There's a member, BULLDOG, who has what I consider porn as an avatar.

Is that permitted? Do I have to place him on ignore, or can you just have him change it?

You mean the censored black and white photo that has a political message attached to it? That is not porn in my opinion.

That's your future fist lady. Show some respect for her tits.
 
There's a member, BULLDOG, who has what I consider porn as an avatar.

Is that permitted? Do I have to place him on ignore, or can you just have him change it?

You mean the censored black and white photo that has a political message attached to it? That is not porn in my opinion.

That's your future fist lady. Show some respect for her tits.

You're just mad that she's not your wife probably. ;) Lol.
 
There's a member, BULLDOG, who has what I consider porn as an avatar.

Is that permitted? Do I have to place him on ignore, or can you just have him change it?

Here's the answer -- best I know. We had the moderator with the MOST EXPERIENCE in "porn" take a look. And the rules say -- no female nipples, no genitalia of ANY kind. And this Moderator/porn expert said that the "nipples were sufficiently blurred". So it's just like watching Survivor, when they have to blur some parts that have "wardrobe malfunctions" during the rope pull or the mud wrestling.

Can we close this case now?? And no -- you can't ask who it was. The Staff porn expert wants to remain anonymous.. :mm:

Her genitalia is available on the internet too. Such a classy first lady.

I know that's a big burden to carry around on your back. I imagine you must be HORRIFIED every time you wake up and check to make sure that it's still there. All I can say is -- it's YOUR burden man. YOU put it there on yourself. Along with those pix of shirtless Vladimir Putin. It's ALL YOURS...

She posed for those pictures with the intention of them being distributed as widely as possible. I'm just doing my part to help.
 
I saw a couple people try
Here's the answer -- best I know. We had the moderator with the MOST EXPERIENCE in "porn" take a look. And the rules say -- no female nipples, no genitalia of ANY kind. And this Moderator/porn expert said that the "nipples were sufficiently blurred". So it's just like watching Survivor, when they have to blur some parts that have "wardrobe malfunctions" during the rope pull or the mud wrestling.

Can we close this case now?? And no -- you can't ask who it was. The Staff porn expert wants to remain anonymous.. :mm:

Her genitalia is available on the internet too. Such a classy first lady.

Now, now. We all know how mad you get when people start talking about Michele being large and dumpy looking. ;)

Michele will be gone soon. You'll have to find something else just as silly to rant about.

I'm just saying that you all get mad when people say things about Michele or Obama's family, yet you turn around and do the same thing! Lol.

The difference is subjective or objective. Objectively, Melania posed for lesbian porn to be displayed for jerk bait on the internet. That really happened, and boys jerk off to her picture every day. You can't truthfully say that isn't true. Objectively, you don't like the way Michelle looks. I, and millions of others think she is beautiful. I can truthfully say that.

That's quite judgemental to say that any art of affection between 2 adults of the same sex is "jerk bait" isn't it? Sounds more like something a bigoted homophobe on the right might leap to.. No?? :badgrin:
 
Back
Top Bottom