Poll to condemn or condone "the violence and law breaking that took place inside the Capital on 1/6"

[lennypartiv]

Prove it.
Or quit whining.

Rudy has the evidence. The AZ audit will provide more evidence.

 

[dudmuck]

Prove it.
Or quit whining.

Rudy has the evidence. The AZ audit will provide more evidence.

Rudy's law license is suspended, and the AZ "audit" has been going on for 3 months, that ship has sailed already.

 

[WEATHER53]

We condemn all murders of unarmed protestors whether glass is broken or not

 

[WEATHER53]

"No one tricked them into storming the Capitol."

I disagree only in detail with poster Faun's post above.
Some WERE fooled, foolishly fooled. Some normal solid good hearted but delusional GOP people who did come to the Ellipse and many marched in solidarity towards the Capitol. Some of them foolishly entered the Capitol because the mob ahead of them did.
If their mugs are caught on camera they will pay some price for their temporary loss of senses.

However........

For many others, going to the Capitol to disrupt the transfer of power was what they had communicated with each other about, and made plans for tactical operations to effect (see Oathkeepers, Proud Boys, Three Percenters, etc).
They were NOT tricked. Not fooled. They were 'Believers'.
They were True Believers in the infallibility of Don Trump, and Rudy G., and Roger Stone, et al.

Those folks were not 'tricked' January 6th.
Don Trump, Rudy Giuliani, Trump Jr., Diamond & Silk, Roger Stone, Mo Brooks, Madison Cawthorn .......all stood on that stage on the Ellipse and urged action to stop the steal. And they said ...march to the Capitol, combat by arms, strength, yadda, yadda, yadda.

Notably, we all remember it was Don Trump in late December who urged his 75 million Twitter followers to Stop the Steal.....and come to DC on the 6th as "it will be wild".

Agree plus it was known well in advance they were coming and no real preventative measures were taken

 

[Chillicothe]

Agree plus it was known well in advance they were coming and no real preventative measures were taken

Not enough protective measures were undertaken. We all can agree on that.

However, that does not in any way absolve or mitigate the traitorous violence those invaders inflicted upon the lawful officers, or on the building and its fixtures. And more importantly, it does not minimize one iota the traitorous intent of the invaders which was to stop the Constitutional duty of Congress to affirm the vote and begin the lawful and peaceful transfer of power.

There SHOULD have been more barriers, more police, more police with armored riot gear, more police with guns.
But.......we ain't gonna blame the victims for what the rioters did to them.
And to America.

 

[Correll]

.

Insurrection is defined by the goal of the actors.
Trying to alter the results of an election through physical disruption of the democratic process is an insurrection.

Please tell us, oh TDS-suffering, irrational hate-driven, Marxist Socialist talking points parroter, how unarmed, selfie-taking trespassers were going to alter the 2020 election?

Now compare that incident to the Democrat/foreign-supported domestic terrorists whose violent 'insurrection' caused the President and his family to be rushed to the WH bunker while agents from the FBI, DHS, & Secret Service along with the Capitol and Local Police were forced to engage and push back the violent terrorists, resulting in 14 Secret Service members being injured, the DC mayor ordering new security fencing be installed, the clearing of the park by police IOT put up that fencing, and another Debunked LIE / 'Conspiracy Theory' about Trump having something to d with the clearing of the park.

In the end, this is just another one of MANY incidents in which Democrats accuse others of doing what they have already done and of being who they are.

the reason Trump went to hide in his bunker last summer and setup barriers around whitehouse is that he wanted to shoot protesters, even the peaceful ones

Trump wanted military to ‘crack skulls’ of George Floyd protesters, book claims

Former president called demonstrators ‘thugs’ amid nationwide outrage over racial injustice

www.independent.co.uk

The vast majority of republicans have voted to condemn the 1/6 rioters.


Your talk of "soft" is just you lying. Like the liberal you are.

whats the point of condemning them?
what really matters is a commission to investigate it.
two republicans voted for investigation.

House votes to establish committee to investigate Jan. 6 Capitol riot

Two Republicans — Cheney and Kinzinger — joined the Democrats in approving the new panel.

www.nbcnews.com

The point is that people like you have been trying to smear all republicans with the actions of a tiny group.

That is people like you, using the 1/6 riot to divide this nation in order for partisan advantage.


YOu know that. THat is why you are doing it.

That's what y'all do. You did (and still do it) it with followers of Islam. Y'all do it with BLM.

just more Republican projection...

Did you forget that I was the republican that made a big deal about Trump increasing his black male vote?

Almost like I can distinguish between sub groups based on their behavior.


My point stands.

The point is that people like you have been trying to smear all republicans with the actions of a tiny group.

That is people like you, using the 1/6 riot to divide this nation in order for partisan advantage.


YOu know that. THat is why you are doing it.

Not even close. Nobody is asking for all Republicans to be thrown in jail, just the rioters. Nobody is trying to ban Republicans from entering the country like Trump tried to ban Muslims.

The only people I see “using” the riot are Trump wannabes. They are using it to make money.

Bullshit. The riot is being used to smear republicans and Trump supporters as a group. Hell, the meme right above does that. You posted in this thread, but didn't say anything about it. Do you support that behavior, or are you just remaining quite while other more partisan lefties do it?

Saying that the rioters/terrorists on January 6 were all Republican is a true statement. Saying that all Republicans are rioters and terrorists is not a true statement.

It is similar to the statement that not all Republicans are racist but most racist are Republicans.

1. Note that you had to quality "all rioters". How ironic. ANd you can't see it even now can you?

2. We have one admitted antifa guy who was there agitating. It is a plausible theory.

3. Your wace baiting is just you being an asshole.

1. My apologies. Let me rephrase. Not all Trumpsters rioted, but most of the rioters were Trumpsters.

2. Did you link to this alleged "antifa guy"? Who is this alleged individual?

3. Pointing out the undeniable fact that you are a racist isn't baiting, it's stating facts.

1. Plenty of rioters that are not trump supporters. Indeed, the vast majority are leftards.

2.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/01/16/sullivan-video-arrested/

"Sullivan, who has at turns identified himself as a racial justice protester and leftist documentarian,"


3. Your wace baiting is just you being an asshole.

1. Not on January 6th. That day it was all Trump supporters.

2. Fact Check: Was a member of Antifa arrested in the Capitol riot?

The Ruling​

False.​

​

None of the 230 people arrested for alleged participation in the Capitol attacks were linked to any left-wing movement. There is no evidence that Sullivan was a member of Antifa, Black Lives Matter or any other left-leaning group, especially a "leader" of Antifa.​

3. Just stating the fact that you are a racist. Facts are facts and not baiting. You believe yourself to be better and smarter than people with more melanin than you. (SPOILER ALERT...you aren't)

1. YOu assume.

2. Sorry. He self identifies as a "wacial justice" what have you. THat makes him yours.

3. Better? I never said better. That was the voices in your head, mr wacistbaiter.

1. We conclude based on ALL the evidence.
2. Not ANTIFA, not BLM, not the FBI. It was all Trumpsters
3. You believe you are more intelligent based on the color of your skin. You're not.

1. We have one proven example of a lefty infiltrator. That disproves your claim of "all" and raises the possibility of more.

2. You admitted that the iq gap is real. Now you are talking shit.

1. I debunked your "proven lefty"
2. I provided evidence that the ID gap doe as not mean whites are more intelligent than blacks as racists believe (and you, apparently...guess that makes you racist)

1. No, you didn't. He is a self identified "wacial justice" type. That makes him yours.

2. No, you argued for environmental causes. That does not negate the gap, it is just an attempt to explain it away. The gap is still there. your confusing on this is kind of sad.

1. Sorry, Trumpster, the January 6th riot is all on Trump cultists.

2. What is sad is your need to feel superior to people of color. (You aren’t superior in any way, shape or form) What you are is straight up racist.

1. That you would like about sullivan demonstrates that you and people like you, could be lying about others.

2. I've never claimed to be superior. That was something you made up in your head.

1. The scores of Trump supporters that have been arrested paint a different story. The riot on January 6 was Trump supporters.

2. That’s good because you aren’t. You aren’t more intelligent or superior in any way, shape or form.

1. You said all. Now you seem to be arguing majority. Are you walking it back? Sullivan is a lefty.

2. You missed my point on purpose in order to make a personal attack. That was you losing. My point stands. I don't judge personal worth by intelligence. That being said, ignoring the reality of the iq gap sets us up for failure.

1. Nope, not walking anything back. January 6th was a riot of Trump supporters, period.

2. Saying that you aren't superior to black and brown skinned people is only a personal attack if you're a racist piece of shit that actually feels they are superior in some way. (You are not)

1. Except for the self identified wacial justice "reporter", Sullivan. So, your statement is wrong. Why do you stand by a point you know has been debunked? Do you like looking like a liar?


2. ONly a liar would pretend that calling someone wacist in our society isn't a personal insult. YOu are being an asshole.

3. My point stands. you assumed shit that I never said, and you were an asshole based on your assumptions.

4. The education and IQ gaps are still real. That you want to have a fit about causes, is irrelevant.

1. That’s a pretty ironic statement coming from you who completely ignores all facts and evidence in favor of your “feelings”. Sullivan is a grifter like Trump nothing more. He feeds off all chaos much like Trump.

2. I wasn’t calling you a racist in that statement. I said you aren’t superior to people of color. You seem to take that as an insult. It’s not an insult it’s a statement of fact.

3. I haven’t seen you make any points, only express your feelings.

4. The IQ gap is real but it isn’t based on intelligence. You aren’t more intelligent than people of color. I know that bothers you but it’s true nonetheless.

1. Sullivan self identifies as a wacial justice activist. That makes him one of yours.

2. I never claimed to be superior.

3. Bullshit.

4. You constantly try to make this personal. The point remains. The iq gap is real. That matters. It explains much that people like you want to blame on wacism.

1. Sullivan shows up wherever there is conflict in order to sell footage. That makes him a grifter like Trump.

2. Good because you’re not. You’re not more intelligent either.

3. Sorry sweet cheeks that’s true shit.

4. The IQ gap is real but does not reflect decreased intelligence in black and brown people. Education is not a reflection of intelligence. You want to ascribe greater intelligence to single race. That’s junk science

Racism in education is real despite your repeated denials of facts and studies.

1. His job might be what passes for "journalism" today, but ideologically he is one of yours. Your denial is a lie and supports my point that you people have anti-credibility.

2. i.q. tests say otherwise. Generally speaking.

3. I assign nothing. The stats show the difference. You admit the difference. Our disagreement is on cause. You want to explain it away, because it clashes with your ideology.

4. What if the education gap is a result of broken families and/or lower I.Q. and you spend the next 4O years, persecuting white, supposedly wacist teachers and administrators, and have no positive effect?

 

[lennypartiv]

I see Chillicothe supports protests until Republicans start protesting.

 

[Seawytch]

.

Insurrection is defined by the goal of the actors.
Trying to alter the results of an election through physical disruption of the democratic process is an insurrection.

Please tell us, oh TDS-suffering, irrational hate-driven, Marxist Socialist talking points parroter, how unarmed, selfie-taking trespassers were going to alter the 2020 election?

Now compare that incident to the Democrat/foreign-supported domestic terrorists whose violent 'insurrection' caused the President and his family to be rushed to the WH bunker while agents from the FBI, DHS, & Secret Service along with the Capitol and Local Police were forced to engage and push back the violent terrorists, resulting in 14 Secret Service members being injured, the DC mayor ordering new security fencing be installed, the clearing of the park by police IOT put up that fencing, and another Debunked LIE / 'Conspiracy Theory' about Trump having something to d with the clearing of the park.

In the end, this is just another one of MANY incidents in which Democrats accuse others of doing what they have already done and of being who they are.

the reason Trump went to hide in his bunker last summer and setup barriers around whitehouse is that he wanted to shoot protesters, even the peaceful ones

Trump wanted military to ‘crack skulls’ of George Floyd protesters, book claims

Former president called demonstrators ‘thugs’ amid nationwide outrage over racial injustice

www.independent.co.uk

The vast majority of republicans have voted to condemn the 1/6 rioters.


Your talk of "soft" is just you lying. Like the liberal you are.

whats the point of condemning them?
what really matters is a commission to investigate it.
two republicans voted for investigation.

House votes to establish committee to investigate Jan. 6 Capitol riot

Two Republicans — Cheney and Kinzinger — joined the Democrats in approving the new panel.

www.nbcnews.com

The point is that people like you have been trying to smear all republicans with the actions of a tiny group.

That is people like you, using the 1/6 riot to divide this nation in order for partisan advantage.


YOu know that. THat is why you are doing it.

That's what y'all do. You did (and still do it) it with followers of Islam. Y'all do it with BLM.

just more Republican projection...

Did you forget that I was the republican that made a big deal about Trump increasing his black male vote?

Almost like I can distinguish between sub groups based on their behavior.


My point stands.

The point is that people like you have been trying to smear all republicans with the actions of a tiny group.

That is people like you, using the 1/6 riot to divide this nation in order for partisan advantage.


YOu know that. THat is why you are doing it.

Not even close. Nobody is asking for all Republicans to be thrown in jail, just the rioters. Nobody is trying to ban Republicans from entering the country like Trump tried to ban Muslims.

The only people I see “using” the riot are Trump wannabes. They are using it to make money.

Bullshit. The riot is being used to smear republicans and Trump supporters as a group. Hell, the meme right above does that. You posted in this thread, but didn't say anything about it. Do you support that behavior, or are you just remaining quite while other more partisan lefties do it?

Saying that the rioters/terrorists on January 6 were all Republican is a true statement. Saying that all Republicans are rioters and terrorists is not a true statement.

It is similar to the statement that not all Republicans are racist but most racist are Republicans.

1. Note that you had to quality "all rioters". How ironic. ANd you can't see it even now can you?

2. We have one admitted antifa guy who was there agitating. It is a plausible theory.

3. Your wace baiting is just you being an asshole.

1. My apologies. Let me rephrase. Not all Trumpsters rioted, but most of the rioters were Trumpsters.

2. Did you link to this alleged "antifa guy"? Who is this alleged individual?

3. Pointing out the undeniable fact that you are a racist isn't baiting, it's stating facts.

1. Plenty of rioters that are not trump supporters. Indeed, the vast majority are leftards.

2.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/01/16/sullivan-video-arrested/

"Sullivan, who has at turns identified himself as a racial justice protester and leftist documentarian,"


3. Your wace baiting is just you being an asshole.

1. Not on January 6th. That day it was all Trump supporters.

2. Fact Check: Was a member of Antifa arrested in the Capitol riot?

The Ruling​

False.​

​

None of the 230 people arrested for alleged participation in the Capitol attacks were linked to any left-wing movement. There is no evidence that Sullivan was a member of Antifa, Black Lives Matter or any other left-leaning group, especially a "leader" of Antifa.​

3. Just stating the fact that you are a racist. Facts are facts and not baiting. You believe yourself to be better and smarter than people with more melanin than you. (SPOILER ALERT...you aren't)

1. YOu assume.

2. Sorry. He self identifies as a "wacial justice" what have you. THat makes him yours.

3. Better? I never said better. That was the voices in your head, mr wacistbaiter.

1. We conclude based on ALL the evidence.
2. Not ANTIFA, not BLM, not the FBI. It was all Trumpsters
3. You believe you are more intelligent based on the color of your skin. You're not.

1. We have one proven example of a lefty infiltrator. That disproves your claim of "all" and raises the possibility of more.

2. You admitted that the iq gap is real. Now you are talking shit.

1. I debunked your "proven lefty"
2. I provided evidence that the ID gap doe as not mean whites are more intelligent than blacks as racists believe (and you, apparently...guess that makes you racist)

1. No, you didn't. He is a self identified "wacial justice" type. That makes him yours.

2. No, you argued for environmental causes. That does not negate the gap, it is just an attempt to explain it away. The gap is still there. your confusing on this is kind of sad.

1. Sorry, Trumpster, the January 6th riot is all on Trump cultists.

2. What is sad is your need to feel superior to people of color. (You aren’t superior in any way, shape or form) What you are is straight up racist.

1. That you would like about sullivan demonstrates that you and people like you, could be lying about others.

2. I've never claimed to be superior. That was something you made up in your head.

1. The scores of Trump supporters that have been arrested paint a different story. The riot on January 6 was Trump supporters.

2. That’s good because you aren’t. You aren’t more intelligent or superior in any way, shape or form.

1. You said all. Now you seem to be arguing majority. Are you walking it back? Sullivan is a lefty.

2. You missed my point on purpose in order to make a personal attack. That was you losing. My point stands. I don't judge personal worth by intelligence. That being said, ignoring the reality of the iq gap sets us up for failure.

1. Nope, not walking anything back. January 6th was a riot of Trump supporters, period.

2. Saying that you aren't superior to black and brown skinned people is only a personal attack if you're a racist piece of shit that actually feels they are superior in some way. (You are not)

1. Except for the self identified wacial justice "reporter", Sullivan. So, your statement is wrong. Why do you stand by a point you know has been debunked? Do you like looking like a liar?


2. ONly a liar would pretend that calling someone wacist in our society isn't a personal insult. YOu are being an asshole.

3. My point stands. you assumed shit that I never said, and you were an asshole based on your assumptions.

4. The education and IQ gaps are still real. That you want to have a fit about causes, is irrelevant.

1. That’s a pretty ironic statement coming from you who completely ignores all facts and evidence in favor of your “feelings”. Sullivan is a grifter like Trump nothing more. He feeds off all chaos much like Trump.

2. I wasn’t calling you a racist in that statement. I said you aren’t superior to people of color. You seem to take that as an insult. It’s not an insult it’s a statement of fact.

3. I haven’t seen you make any points, only express your feelings.

4. The IQ gap is real but it isn’t based on intelligence. You aren’t more intelligent than people of color. I know that bothers you but it’s true nonetheless.

1. Sullivan self identifies as a wacial justice activist. That makes him one of yours.

2. I never claimed to be superior.

3. Bullshit.

4. You constantly try to make this personal. The point remains. The iq gap is real. That matters. It explains much that people like you want to blame on wacism.

1. Sullivan shows up wherever there is conflict in order to sell footage. That makes him a grifter like Trump.

2. Good because you’re not. You’re not more intelligent either.

3. Sorry sweet cheeks that’s true shit.

4. The IQ gap is real but does not reflect decreased intelligence in black and brown people. Education is not a reflection of intelligence. You want to ascribe greater intelligence to single race. That’s junk science

Racism in education is real despite your repeated denials of facts and studies.

1. His job might be what passes for "journalism" today, but ideologically he is one of yours. Your denial is a lie and supports my point that you people have anti-credibility.

2. i.q. tests say otherwise. Generally speaking.

3. I assign nothing. The stats show the difference. You admit the difference. Our disagreement is on cause. You want to explain it away, because it clashes with your ideology.

4. What if the education gap is a result of broken families and/or lower I.Q. and you spend the next 4O years, persecuting white, supposedly wacist teachers and administrators, and have no positive effect?

1. His job is chaos chasing grifter....which makes him EXACTLY like Trump.

2. No, they really don't. I understand it's important to you that you believe yourself to be more intelligent than blacks. You are not.

The unwelcome revival of ârace scienceâ

The long read: Its defenders claim to be standing up for uncomfortable truths, but race science is still as bogus as ever

www.theguardian.com

Ten years ago, our grasp of the actual science was firm enough for Craig Venter, the American biologist who led the private effort to decode the human genome, to respond to claims of a link between race and intelligence by declaring: “There is no basis in scientific fact or in the human genetic code for the notion that skin colour will be predictive of intelligence.”​

 

[dudmuck]

We condemn all murders of unarmed protestors whether glass is broken or not

trespassing with a violent armed mob isnt protesting.

 

[Correll]

.

Insurrection is defined by the goal of the actors.
Trying to alter the results of an election through physical disruption of the democratic process is an insurrection.

Please tell us, oh TDS-suffering, irrational hate-driven, Marxist Socialist talking points parroter, how unarmed, selfie-taking trespassers were going to alter the 2020 election?

Now compare that incident to the Democrat/foreign-supported domestic terrorists whose violent 'insurrection' caused the President and his family to be rushed to the WH bunker while agents from the FBI, DHS, & Secret Service along with the Capitol and Local Police were forced to engage and push back the violent terrorists, resulting in 14 Secret Service members being injured, the DC mayor ordering new security fencing be installed, the clearing of the park by police IOT put up that fencing, and another Debunked LIE / 'Conspiracy Theory' about Trump having something to d with the clearing of the park.

In the end, this is just another one of MANY incidents in which Democrats accuse others of doing what they have already done and of being who they are.

the reason Trump went to hide in his bunker last summer and setup barriers around whitehouse is that he wanted to shoot protesters, even the peaceful ones

Trump wanted military to ‘crack skulls’ of George Floyd protesters, book claims

Former president called demonstrators ‘thugs’ amid nationwide outrage over racial injustice

www.independent.co.uk

The vast majority of republicans have voted to condemn the 1/6 rioters.


Your talk of "soft" is just you lying. Like the liberal you are.

whats the point of condemning them?
what really matters is a commission to investigate it.
two republicans voted for investigation.

House votes to establish committee to investigate Jan. 6 Capitol riot

Two Republicans — Cheney and Kinzinger — joined the Democrats in approving the new panel.

www.nbcnews.com

The point is that people like you have been trying to smear all republicans with the actions of a tiny group.

That is people like you, using the 1/6 riot to divide this nation in order for partisan advantage.


YOu know that. THat is why you are doing it.

That's what y'all do. You did (and still do it) it with followers of Islam. Y'all do it with BLM.

just more Republican projection...

Did you forget that I was the republican that made a big deal about Trump increasing his black male vote?

Almost like I can distinguish between sub groups based on their behavior.


My point stands.

The point is that people like you have been trying to smear all republicans with the actions of a tiny group.

That is people like you, using the 1/6 riot to divide this nation in order for partisan advantage.


YOu know that. THat is why you are doing it.

Not even close. Nobody is asking for all Republicans to be thrown in jail, just the rioters. Nobody is trying to ban Republicans from entering the country like Trump tried to ban Muslims.

The only people I see “using” the riot are Trump wannabes. They are using it to make money.

Bullshit. The riot is being used to smear republicans and Trump supporters as a group. Hell, the meme right above does that. You posted in this thread, but didn't say anything about it. Do you support that behavior, or are you just remaining quite while other more partisan lefties do it?

Saying that the rioters/terrorists on January 6 were all Republican is a true statement. Saying that all Republicans are rioters and terrorists is not a true statement.

It is similar to the statement that not all Republicans are racist but most racist are Republicans.

1. Note that you had to quality "all rioters". How ironic. ANd you can't see it even now can you?

2. We have one admitted antifa guy who was there agitating. It is a plausible theory.

3. Your wace baiting is just you being an asshole.

1. My apologies. Let me rephrase. Not all Trumpsters rioted, but most of the rioters were Trumpsters.

2. Did you link to this alleged "antifa guy"? Who is this alleged individual?

3. Pointing out the undeniable fact that you are a racist isn't baiting, it's stating facts.

1. Plenty of rioters that are not trump supporters. Indeed, the vast majority are leftards.

2.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/01/16/sullivan-video-arrested/

"Sullivan, who has at turns identified himself as a racial justice protester and leftist documentarian,"


3. Your wace baiting is just you being an asshole.

1. Not on January 6th. That day it was all Trump supporters.

2. Fact Check: Was a member of Antifa arrested in the Capitol riot?

The Ruling​

False.​

​

None of the 230 people arrested for alleged participation in the Capitol attacks were linked to any left-wing movement. There is no evidence that Sullivan was a member of Antifa, Black Lives Matter or any other left-leaning group, especially a "leader" of Antifa.​

3. Just stating the fact that you are a racist. Facts are facts and not baiting. You believe yourself to be better and smarter than people with more melanin than you. (SPOILER ALERT...you aren't)

1. YOu assume.

2. Sorry. He self identifies as a "wacial justice" what have you. THat makes him yours.

3. Better? I never said better. That was the voices in your head, mr wacistbaiter.

1. We conclude based on ALL the evidence.
2. Not ANTIFA, not BLM, not the FBI. It was all Trumpsters
3. You believe you are more intelligent based on the color of your skin. You're not.

1. We have one proven example of a lefty infiltrator. That disproves your claim of "all" and raises the possibility of more.

2. You admitted that the iq gap is real. Now you are talking shit.

1. I debunked your "proven lefty"
2. I provided evidence that the ID gap doe as not mean whites are more intelligent than blacks as racists believe (and you, apparently...guess that makes you racist)

1. No, you didn't. He is a self identified "wacial justice" type. That makes him yours.

2. No, you argued for environmental causes. That does not negate the gap, it is just an attempt to explain it away. The gap is still there. your confusing on this is kind of sad.

1. Sorry, Trumpster, the January 6th riot is all on Trump cultists.

2. What is sad is your need to feel superior to people of color. (You aren’t superior in any way, shape or form) What you are is straight up racist.

1. That you would like about sullivan demonstrates that you and people like you, could be lying about others.

2. I've never claimed to be superior. That was something you made up in your head.

1. The scores of Trump supporters that have been arrested paint a different story. The riot on January 6 was Trump supporters.

2. That’s good because you aren’t. You aren’t more intelligent or superior in any way, shape or form.

1. You said all. Now you seem to be arguing majority. Are you walking it back? Sullivan is a lefty.

2. You missed my point on purpose in order to make a personal attack. That was you losing. My point stands. I don't judge personal worth by intelligence. That being said, ignoring the reality of the iq gap sets us up for failure.

1. Nope, not walking anything back. January 6th was a riot of Trump supporters, period.

2. Saying that you aren't superior to black and brown skinned people is only a personal attack if you're a racist piece of shit that actually feels they are superior in some way. (You are not)

1. Except for the self identified wacial justice "reporter", Sullivan. So, your statement is wrong. Why do you stand by a point you know has been debunked? Do you like looking like a liar?


2. ONly a liar would pretend that calling someone wacist in our society isn't a personal insult. YOu are being an asshole.

3. My point stands. you assumed shit that I never said, and you were an asshole based on your assumptions.

4. The education and IQ gaps are still real. That you want to have a fit about causes, is irrelevant.

1. That’s a pretty ironic statement coming from you who completely ignores all facts and evidence in favor of your “feelings”. Sullivan is a grifter like Trump nothing more. He feeds off all chaos much like Trump.

2. I wasn’t calling you a racist in that statement. I said you aren’t superior to people of color. You seem to take that as an insult. It’s not an insult it’s a statement of fact.

3. I haven’t seen you make any points, only express your feelings.

4. The IQ gap is real but it isn’t based on intelligence. You aren’t more intelligent than people of color. I know that bothers you but it’s true nonetheless.

1. Sullivan self identifies as a wacial justice activist. That makes him one of yours.

2. I never claimed to be superior.

3. Bullshit.

4. You constantly try to make this personal. The point remains. The iq gap is real. That matters. It explains much that people like you want to blame on wacism.

1. Sullivan shows up wherever there is conflict in order to sell footage. That makes him a grifter like Trump.

2. Good because you’re not. You’re not more intelligent either.

3. Sorry sweet cheeks that’s true shit.

4. The IQ gap is real but does not reflect decreased intelligence in black and brown people. Education is not a reflection of intelligence. You want to ascribe greater intelligence to single race. That’s junk science

Racism in education is real despite your repeated denials of facts and studies.

1. His job might be what passes for "journalism" today, but ideologically he is one of yours. Your denial is a lie and supports my point that you people have anti-credibility.

2. i.q. tests say otherwise. Generally speaking.

3. I assign nothing. The stats show the difference. You admit the difference. Our disagreement is on cause. You want to explain it away, because it clashes with your ideology.

4. What if the education gap is a result of broken families and/or lower I.Q. and you spend the next 4O years, persecuting white, supposedly wacist teachers and administrators, and have no positive effect?

1. His job is chaos chasing grifter....which makes him EXACTLY like Trump.

2. No, they really don't. I understand it's important to you that you believe yourself to be more intelligent than blacks. You are not.

The unwelcome revival of ârace scienceâ

The long read: Its defenders claim to be standing up for uncomfortable truths, but race science is still as bogus as ever

www.theguardian.com

Ten years ago, our grasp of the actual science was firm enough for Craig Venter, the American biologist who led the private effort to decode the human genome, to respond to claims of a link between race and intelligence by declaring: “There is no basis in scientific fact or in the human genetic code for the notion that skin colour will be predictive of intelligence.”​

1. He is a leftist who infiltrated the crowd under false pretenses. Something you are denying as a possibility while admitting that it happened. Standard lefty lying.

2. Thus, the belief that the riot might have been caused by lefty infiltrators, and/or with the help of deep state operatives, is plausble.


3. Sounds like he is playing word games. I note he does not deny the I.Q. gap. He just states that they have not found any cause. That's fine. I didn't claim a cause, just noted the gap.


4. How many times are you going to accuse white people, even white liberals (teachers) of wacism, when you know the real issue is the i.q. gap? How many people do you want to fire or ruin, because you accuse them of wacism, when you know the real cause is the i.q. gap? How much money do you want to spend trying to root out wacism, when you know the real causa is the i.q. gap?

 

[Seawytch]

.

Insurrection is defined by the goal of the actors.
Trying to alter the results of an election through physical disruption of the democratic process is an insurrection.

Please tell us, oh TDS-suffering, irrational hate-driven, Marxist Socialist talking points parroter, how unarmed, selfie-taking trespassers were going to alter the 2020 election?

Now compare that incident to the Democrat/foreign-supported domestic terrorists whose violent 'insurrection' caused the President and his family to be rushed to the WH bunker while agents from the FBI, DHS, & Secret Service along with the Capitol and Local Police were forced to engage and push back the violent terrorists, resulting in 14 Secret Service members being injured, the DC mayor ordering new security fencing be installed, the clearing of the park by police IOT put up that fencing, and another Debunked LIE / 'Conspiracy Theory' about Trump having something to d with the clearing of the park.

In the end, this is just another one of MANY incidents in which Democrats accuse others of doing what they have already done and of being who they are.

the reason Trump went to hide in his bunker last summer and setup barriers around whitehouse is that he wanted to shoot protesters, even the peaceful ones

Trump wanted military to ‘crack skulls’ of George Floyd protesters, book claims

Former president called demonstrators ‘thugs’ amid nationwide outrage over racial injustice

www.independent.co.uk

The vast majority of republicans have voted to condemn the 1/6 rioters.


Your talk of "soft" is just you lying. Like the liberal you are.

whats the point of condemning them?
what really matters is a commission to investigate it.
two republicans voted for investigation.

House votes to establish committee to investigate Jan. 6 Capitol riot

Two Republicans — Cheney and Kinzinger — joined the Democrats in approving the new panel.

www.nbcnews.com

The point is that people like you have been trying to smear all republicans with the actions of a tiny group.

That is people like you, using the 1/6 riot to divide this nation in order for partisan advantage.


YOu know that. THat is why you are doing it.

That's what y'all do. You did (and still do it) it with followers of Islam. Y'all do it with BLM.

just more Republican projection...

Did you forget that I was the republican that made a big deal about Trump increasing his black male vote?

Almost like I can distinguish between sub groups based on their behavior.


My point stands.

The point is that people like you have been trying to smear all republicans with the actions of a tiny group.

That is people like you, using the 1/6 riot to divide this nation in order for partisan advantage.


YOu know that. THat is why you are doing it.

Not even close. Nobody is asking for all Republicans to be thrown in jail, just the rioters. Nobody is trying to ban Republicans from entering the country like Trump tried to ban Muslims.

The only people I see “using” the riot are Trump wannabes. They are using it to make money.

Bullshit. The riot is being used to smear republicans and Trump supporters as a group. Hell, the meme right above does that. You posted in this thread, but didn't say anything about it. Do you support that behavior, or are you just remaining quite while other more partisan lefties do it?

Saying that the rioters/terrorists on January 6 were all Republican is a true statement. Saying that all Republicans are rioters and terrorists is not a true statement.

It is similar to the statement that not all Republicans are racist but most racist are Republicans.

1. Note that you had to quality "all rioters". How ironic. ANd you can't see it even now can you?

2. We have one admitted antifa guy who was there agitating. It is a plausible theory.

3. Your wace baiting is just you being an asshole.

1. My apologies. Let me rephrase. Not all Trumpsters rioted, but most of the rioters were Trumpsters.

2. Did you link to this alleged "antifa guy"? Who is this alleged individual?

3. Pointing out the undeniable fact that you are a racist isn't baiting, it's stating facts.

1. Plenty of rioters that are not trump supporters. Indeed, the vast majority are leftards.

2.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/01/16/sullivan-video-arrested/

"Sullivan, who has at turns identified himself as a racial justice protester and leftist documentarian,"


3. Your wace baiting is just you being an asshole.

1. Not on January 6th. That day it was all Trump supporters.

2. Fact Check: Was a member of Antifa arrested in the Capitol riot?

The Ruling​

False.​

​

None of the 230 people arrested for alleged participation in the Capitol attacks were linked to any left-wing movement. There is no evidence that Sullivan was a member of Antifa, Black Lives Matter or any other left-leaning group, especially a "leader" of Antifa.​

3. Just stating the fact that you are a racist. Facts are facts and not baiting. You believe yourself to be better and smarter than people with more melanin than you. (SPOILER ALERT...you aren't)

1. YOu assume.

2. Sorry. He self identifies as a "wacial justice" what have you. THat makes him yours.

3. Better? I never said better. That was the voices in your head, mr wacistbaiter.

1. We conclude based on ALL the evidence.
2. Not ANTIFA, not BLM, not the FBI. It was all Trumpsters
3. You believe you are more intelligent based on the color of your skin. You're not.

1. We have one proven example of a lefty infiltrator. That disproves your claim of "all" and raises the possibility of more.

2. You admitted that the iq gap is real. Now you are talking shit.

1. I debunked your "proven lefty"
2. I provided evidence that the ID gap doe as not mean whites are more intelligent than blacks as racists believe (and you, apparently...guess that makes you racist)

1. No, you didn't. He is a self identified "wacial justice" type. That makes him yours.

2. No, you argued for environmental causes. That does not negate the gap, it is just an attempt to explain it away. The gap is still there. your confusing on this is kind of sad.

1. Sorry, Trumpster, the January 6th riot is all on Trump cultists.

2. What is sad is your need to feel superior to people of color. (You aren’t superior in any way, shape or form) What you are is straight up racist.

1. That you would like about sullivan demonstrates that you and people like you, could be lying about others.

2. I've never claimed to be superior. That was something you made up in your head.

1. The scores of Trump supporters that have been arrested paint a different story. The riot on January 6 was Trump supporters.

2. That’s good because you aren’t. You aren’t more intelligent or superior in any way, shape or form.

1. You said all. Now you seem to be arguing majority. Are you walking it back? Sullivan is a lefty.

2. You missed my point on purpose in order to make a personal attack. That was you losing. My point stands. I don't judge personal worth by intelligence. That being said, ignoring the reality of the iq gap sets us up for failure.

1. Nope, not walking anything back. January 6th was a riot of Trump supporters, period.

2. Saying that you aren't superior to black and brown skinned people is only a personal attack if you're a racist piece of shit that actually feels they are superior in some way. (You are not)

1. Except for the self identified wacial justice "reporter", Sullivan. So, your statement is wrong. Why do you stand by a point you know has been debunked? Do you like looking like a liar?


2. ONly a liar would pretend that calling someone wacist in our society isn't a personal insult. YOu are being an asshole.

3. My point stands. you assumed shit that I never said, and you were an asshole based on your assumptions.

4. The education and IQ gaps are still real. That you want to have a fit about causes, is irrelevant.

1. That’s a pretty ironic statement coming from you who completely ignores all facts and evidence in favor of your “feelings”. Sullivan is a grifter like Trump nothing more. He feeds off all chaos much like Trump.

2. I wasn’t calling you a racist in that statement. I said you aren’t superior to people of color. You seem to take that as an insult. It’s not an insult it’s a statement of fact.

3. I haven’t seen you make any points, only express your feelings.

4. The IQ gap is real but it isn’t based on intelligence. You aren’t more intelligent than people of color. I know that bothers you but it’s true nonetheless.

1. Sullivan self identifies as a wacial justice activist. That makes him one of yours.

2. I never claimed to be superior.

3. Bullshit.

4. You constantly try to make this personal. The point remains. The iq gap is real. That matters. It explains much that people like you want to blame on wacism.

1. Sullivan shows up wherever there is conflict in order to sell footage. That makes him a grifter like Trump.

2. Good because you’re not. You’re not more intelligent either.

3. Sorry sweet cheeks that’s true shit.

4. The IQ gap is real but does not reflect decreased intelligence in black and brown people. Education is not a reflection of intelligence. You want to ascribe greater intelligence to single race. That’s junk science

Racism in education is real despite your repeated denials of facts and studies.

1. His job might be what passes for "journalism" today, but ideologically he is one of yours. Your denial is a lie and supports my point that you people have anti-credibility.

2. i.q. tests say otherwise. Generally speaking.

3. I assign nothing. The stats show the difference. You admit the difference. Our disagreement is on cause. You want to explain it away, because it clashes with your ideology.

4. What if the education gap is a result of broken families and/or lower I.Q. and you spend the next 4O years, persecuting white, supposedly wacist teachers and administrators, and have no positive effect?

1. His job is chaos chasing grifter....which makes him EXACTLY like Trump.

2. No, they really don't. I understand it's important to you that you believe yourself to be more intelligent than blacks. You are not.

The unwelcome revival of ârace scienceâ

The long read: Its defenders claim to be standing up for uncomfortable truths, but race science is still as bogus as ever

www.theguardian.com

Ten years ago, our grasp of the actual science was firm enough for Craig Venter, the American biologist who led the private effort to decode the human genome, to respond to claims of a link between race and intelligence by declaring: “There is no basis in scientific fact or in the human genetic code for the notion that skin colour will be predictive of intelligence.”​

1. He is a leftist who infiltrated the crowd under false pretenses. Something you are denying as a possibility while admitting that it happened. Standard lefty lying.

2. Thus, the belief that the riot might have been caused by lefty infiltrators, and/or with the help of deep state operatives, is plausble.


3. Sounds like he is playing word games. I note he does not deny the I.Q. gap. He just states that they have not found any cause. That's fine. I didn't claim a cause, just noted the gap.


4. How many times are you going to accuse white people, even white liberals (teachers) of wacism, when you know the real issue is the i.q. gap? How many people do you want to fire or ruin, because you accuse them of wacism, when you know the real cause is the i.q. gap? How much money do you want to spend trying to root out wacism, when you know the real causa is the i.q. gap?

1. Lets pretend for a second that your contention is true. And? One guy who purports to be a "lefty" (that no leftist group will admit to his membership) was there filming so he could sell the footage. So what? That doesn't change ANY of the facts. The riot was still made up entirely of Trump supporters.

2. No, skippy that is not plausible on Earth One. Hell, it's even a stretch on Earth Two.

3. What it sounds like is a racists trying to feel superior. How sad is your life that you need to believe you're more intelligent than blacks? (Your'e not)

4. I'm simply pointing out facts that you don't like. Institutionalized racism exists. It exists in our education, justice, employment, healthcare and housing. The only way to eradicate it is to recognize it exists. Racists don't want to eradicate it so they deny it exists.

 

[Correll]

.

Insurrection is defined by the goal of the actors.
Trying to alter the results of an election through physical disruption of the democratic process is an insurrection.

Please tell us, oh TDS-suffering, irrational hate-driven, Marxist Socialist talking points parroter, how unarmed, selfie-taking trespassers were going to alter the 2020 election?

Now compare that incident to the Democrat/foreign-supported domestic terrorists whose violent 'insurrection' caused the President and his family to be rushed to the WH bunker while agents from the FBI, DHS, & Secret Service along with the Capitol and Local Police were forced to engage and push back the violent terrorists, resulting in 14 Secret Service members being injured, the DC mayor ordering new security fencing be installed, the clearing of the park by police IOT put up that fencing, and another Debunked LIE / 'Conspiracy Theory' about Trump having something to d with the clearing of the park.

In the end, this is just another one of MANY incidents in which Democrats accuse others of doing what they have already done and of being who they are.

the reason Trump went to hide in his bunker last summer and setup barriers around whitehouse is that he wanted to shoot protesters, even the peaceful ones

Trump wanted military to ‘crack skulls’ of George Floyd protesters, book claims

Former president called demonstrators ‘thugs’ amid nationwide outrage over racial injustice

www.independent.co.uk

The vast majority of republicans have voted to condemn the 1/6 rioters.


Your talk of "soft" is just you lying. Like the liberal you are.

whats the point of condemning them?
what really matters is a commission to investigate it.
two republicans voted for investigation.

House votes to establish committee to investigate Jan. 6 Capitol riot

Two Republicans — Cheney and Kinzinger — joined the Democrats in approving the new panel.

www.nbcnews.com

The point is that people like you have been trying to smear all republicans with the actions of a tiny group.

That is people like you, using the 1/6 riot to divide this nation in order for partisan advantage.


YOu know that. THat is why you are doing it.

That's what y'all do. You did (and still do it) it with followers of Islam. Y'all do it with BLM.

just more Republican projection...

Did you forget that I was the republican that made a big deal about Trump increasing his black male vote?

Almost like I can distinguish between sub groups based on their behavior.


My point stands.

The point is that people like you have been trying to smear all republicans with the actions of a tiny group.

That is people like you, using the 1/6 riot to divide this nation in order for partisan advantage.


YOu know that. THat is why you are doing it.

Not even close. Nobody is asking for all Republicans to be thrown in jail, just the rioters. Nobody is trying to ban Republicans from entering the country like Trump tried to ban Muslims.

The only people I see “using” the riot are Trump wannabes. They are using it to make money.

Bullshit. The riot is being used to smear republicans and Trump supporters as a group. Hell, the meme right above does that. You posted in this thread, but didn't say anything about it. Do you support that behavior, or are you just remaining quite while other more partisan lefties do it?

Saying that the rioters/terrorists on January 6 were all Republican is a true statement. Saying that all Republicans are rioters and terrorists is not a true statement.

It is similar to the statement that not all Republicans are racist but most racist are Republicans.

1. Note that you had to quality "all rioters". How ironic. ANd you can't see it even now can you?

2. We have one admitted antifa guy who was there agitating. It is a plausible theory.

3. Your wace baiting is just you being an asshole.

1. My apologies. Let me rephrase. Not all Trumpsters rioted, but most of the rioters were Trumpsters.

2. Did you link to this alleged "antifa guy"? Who is this alleged individual?

3. Pointing out the undeniable fact that you are a racist isn't baiting, it's stating facts.

1. Plenty of rioters that are not trump supporters. Indeed, the vast majority are leftards.

2.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/01/16/sullivan-video-arrested/

"Sullivan, who has at turns identified himself as a racial justice protester and leftist documentarian,"


3. Your wace baiting is just you being an asshole.

1. Not on January 6th. That day it was all Trump supporters.

2. Fact Check: Was a member of Antifa arrested in the Capitol riot?

The Ruling​

False.​

​

None of the 230 people arrested for alleged participation in the Capitol attacks were linked to any left-wing movement. There is no evidence that Sullivan was a member of Antifa, Black Lives Matter or any other left-leaning group, especially a "leader" of Antifa.​

3. Just stating the fact that you are a racist. Facts are facts and not baiting. You believe yourself to be better and smarter than people with more melanin than you. (SPOILER ALERT...you aren't)

1. YOu assume.

2. Sorry. He self identifies as a "wacial justice" what have you. THat makes him yours.

3. Better? I never said better. That was the voices in your head, mr wacistbaiter.

1. We conclude based on ALL the evidence.
2. Not ANTIFA, not BLM, not the FBI. It was all Trumpsters
3. You believe you are more intelligent based on the color of your skin. You're not.

1. We have one proven example of a lefty infiltrator. That disproves your claim of "all" and raises the possibility of more.

2. You admitted that the iq gap is real. Now you are talking shit.

1. I debunked your "proven lefty"
2. I provided evidence that the ID gap doe as not mean whites are more intelligent than blacks as racists believe (and you, apparently...guess that makes you racist)

1. No, you didn't. He is a self identified "wacial justice" type. That makes him yours.

2. No, you argued for environmental causes. That does not negate the gap, it is just an attempt to explain it away. The gap is still there. your confusing on this is kind of sad.

1. Sorry, Trumpster, the January 6th riot is all on Trump cultists.

2. What is sad is your need to feel superior to people of color. (You aren’t superior in any way, shape or form) What you are is straight up racist.

1. That you would like about sullivan demonstrates that you and people like you, could be lying about others.

2. I've never claimed to be superior. That was something you made up in your head.

1. The scores of Trump supporters that have been arrested paint a different story. The riot on January 6 was Trump supporters.

2. That’s good because you aren’t. You aren’t more intelligent or superior in any way, shape or form.

1. You said all. Now you seem to be arguing majority. Are you walking it back? Sullivan is a lefty.

2. You missed my point on purpose in order to make a personal attack. That was you losing. My point stands. I don't judge personal worth by intelligence. That being said, ignoring the reality of the iq gap sets us up for failure.

1. Nope, not walking anything back. January 6th was a riot of Trump supporters, period.

2. Saying that you aren't superior to black and brown skinned people is only a personal attack if you're a racist piece of shit that actually feels they are superior in some way. (You are not)

1. Except for the self identified wacial justice "reporter", Sullivan. So, your statement is wrong. Why do you stand by a point you know has been debunked? Do you like looking like a liar?


2. ONly a liar would pretend that calling someone wacist in our society isn't a personal insult. YOu are being an asshole.

3. My point stands. you assumed shit that I never said, and you were an asshole based on your assumptions.

4. The education and IQ gaps are still real. That you want to have a fit about causes, is irrelevant.

1. That’s a pretty ironic statement coming from you who completely ignores all facts and evidence in favor of your “feelings”. Sullivan is a grifter like Trump nothing more. He feeds off all chaos much like Trump.

2. I wasn’t calling you a racist in that statement. I said you aren’t superior to people of color. You seem to take that as an insult. It’s not an insult it’s a statement of fact.

3. I haven’t seen you make any points, only express your feelings.

4. The IQ gap is real but it isn’t based on intelligence. You aren’t more intelligent than people of color. I know that bothers you but it’s true nonetheless.

1. Sullivan self identifies as a wacial justice activist. That makes him one of yours.

2. I never claimed to be superior.

3. Bullshit.

4. You constantly try to make this personal. The point remains. The iq gap is real. That matters. It explains much that people like you want to blame on wacism.

1. Sullivan shows up wherever there is conflict in order to sell footage. That makes him a grifter like Trump.

2. Good because you’re not. You’re not more intelligent either.

3. Sorry sweet cheeks that’s true shit.

4. The IQ gap is real but does not reflect decreased intelligence in black and brown people. Education is not a reflection of intelligence. You want to ascribe greater intelligence to single race. That’s junk science

Racism in education is real despite your repeated denials of facts and studies.

1. His job might be what passes for "journalism" today, but ideologically he is one of yours. Your denial is a lie and supports my point that you people have anti-credibility.

2. i.q. tests say otherwise. Generally speaking.

3. I assign nothing. The stats show the difference. You admit the difference. Our disagreement is on cause. You want to explain it away, because it clashes with your ideology.

4. What if the education gap is a result of broken families and/or lower I.Q. and you spend the next 4O years, persecuting white, supposedly wacist teachers and administrators, and have no positive effect?

1. His job is chaos chasing grifter....which makes him EXACTLY like Trump.

2. No, they really don't. I understand it's important to you that you believe yourself to be more intelligent than blacks. You are not.

The unwelcome revival of ârace scienceâ

The long read: Its defenders claim to be standing up for uncomfortable truths, but race science is still as bogus as ever

www.theguardian.com

Ten years ago, our grasp of the actual science was firm enough for Craig Venter, the American biologist who led the private effort to decode the human genome, to respond to claims of a link between race and intelligence by declaring: “There is no basis in scientific fact or in the human genetic code for the notion that skin colour will be predictive of intelligence.”​

1. He is a leftist who infiltrated the crowd under false pretenses. Something you are denying as a possibility while admitting that it happened. Standard lefty lying.

2. Thus, the belief that the riot might have been caused by lefty infiltrators, and/or with the help of deep state operatives, is plausble.


3. Sounds like he is playing word games. I note he does not deny the I.Q. gap. He just states that they have not found any cause. That's fine. I didn't claim a cause, just noted the gap.


4. How many times are you going to accuse white people, even white liberals (teachers) of wacism, when you know the real issue is the i.q. gap? How many people do you want to fire or ruin, because you accuse them of wacism, when you know the real cause is the i.q. gap? How much money do you want to spend trying to root out wacism, when you know the real causa is the i.q. gap?

1. Lets pretend for a second that your contention is true. And? One guy who purports to be a "lefty" (that no leftist group will admit to his membership) was there filming so he could sell the footage. So what? That doesn't change ANY of the facts. The riot was still made up entirely of Trump supporters.

2. No, skippy that is not plausible on Earth One. Hell, it's even a stretch on Earth Two.

3. What it sounds like is a racists trying to feel superior. How sad is your life that you need to believe you're more intelligent than blacks? (Your'e not)

4. I'm simply pointing out facts that you don't like. Institutionalized racism exists. It exists in our education, justice, employment, healthcare and housing. The only way to eradicate it is to recognize it exists. Racists don't want to eradicate it so they deny it exists.

1. The riot was not made up entirely of Trump supporters. We know of at least one lefty who infiltrated under false pretenses. Right there that a. disproves your claim and b. raises the possibility of others.

2. If one lefty can infiltrate, others could too. How many professional, experienced agitators do you need to start a riot? Especially when you have teh police waving in protestors into the building?

3. Not my intent at all. That was just shit you assumed. You are an asshole.

4. Repeatedly asserting shit, is not pointing out facts. You have demonstrated that you assume shit and just build on top of that, and think it so and are an asshole based on it.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

.

Insurrection is defined by the goal of the actors.
Trying to alter the results of an election through physical disruption of the democratic process is an insurrection.

Please tell us, oh TDS-suffering, irrational hate-driven, Marxist Socialist talking points parroter, how unarmed, selfie-taking trespassers were going to alter the 2020 election?

Now compare that incident to the Democrat/foreign-supported domestic terrorists whose violent 'insurrection' caused the President and his family to be rushed to the WH bunker while agents from the FBI, DHS, & Secret Service along with the Capitol and Local Police were forced to engage and push back the violent terrorists, resulting in 14 Secret Service members being injured, the DC mayor ordering new security fencing be installed, the clearing of the park by police IOT put up that fencing, and another Debunked LIE / 'Conspiracy Theory' about Trump having something to d with the clearing of the park.

In the end, this is just another one of MANY incidents in which Democrats accuse others of doing what they have already done and of being who they are.

the reason Trump went to hide in his bunker last summer and setup barriers around whitehouse is that he wanted to shoot protesters, even the peaceful ones

Trump wanted military to ‘crack skulls’ of George Floyd protesters, book claims

Former president called demonstrators ‘thugs’ amid nationwide outrage over racial injustice

www.independent.co.uk

The vast majority of republicans have voted to condemn the 1/6 rioters.


Your talk of "soft" is just you lying. Like the liberal you are.

whats the point of condemning them?
what really matters is a commission to investigate it.
two republicans voted for investigation.

House votes to establish committee to investigate Jan. 6 Capitol riot

Two Republicans — Cheney and Kinzinger — joined the Democrats in approving the new panel.

www.nbcnews.com

The point is that people like you have been trying to smear all republicans with the actions of a tiny group.

That is people like you, using the 1/6 riot to divide this nation in order for partisan advantage.


YOu know that. THat is why you are doing it.

That's what y'all do. You did (and still do it) it with followers of Islam. Y'all do it with BLM.

just more Republican projection...

Did you forget that I was the republican that made a big deal about Trump increasing his black male vote?

Almost like I can distinguish between sub groups based on their behavior.


My point stands.

The point is that people like you have been trying to smear all republicans with the actions of a tiny group.

That is people like you, using the 1/6 riot to divide this nation in order for partisan advantage.


YOu know that. THat is why you are doing it.

Not even close. Nobody is asking for all Republicans to be thrown in jail, just the rioters. Nobody is trying to ban Republicans from entering the country like Trump tried to ban Muslims.

The only people I see “using” the riot are Trump wannabes. They are using it to make money.

Bullshit. The riot is being used to smear republicans and Trump supporters as a group. Hell, the meme right above does that. You posted in this thread, but didn't say anything about it. Do you support that behavior, or are you just remaining quite while other more partisan lefties do it?

Saying that the rioters/terrorists on January 6 were all Republican is a true statement. Saying that all Republicans are rioters and terrorists is not a true statement.

It is similar to the statement that not all Republicans are racist but most racist are Republicans.

1. Note that you had to quality "all rioters". How ironic. ANd you can't see it even now can you?

2. We have one admitted antifa guy who was there agitating. It is a plausible theory.

3. Your wace baiting is just you being an asshole.

1. My apologies. Let me rephrase. Not all Trumpsters rioted, but most of the rioters were Trumpsters.

2. Did you link to this alleged "antifa guy"? Who is this alleged individual?

3. Pointing out the undeniable fact that you are a racist isn't baiting, it's stating facts.

1. Plenty of rioters that are not trump supporters. Indeed, the vast majority are leftards.

2.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/01/16/sullivan-video-arrested/

"Sullivan, who has at turns identified himself as a racial justice protester and leftist documentarian,"


3. Your wace baiting is just you being an asshole.

1. Not on January 6th. That day it was all Trump supporters.

2. Fact Check: Was a member of Antifa arrested in the Capitol riot?

The Ruling​

False.​

​

None of the 230 people arrested for alleged participation in the Capitol attacks were linked to any left-wing movement. There is no evidence that Sullivan was a member of Antifa, Black Lives Matter or any other left-leaning group, especially a "leader" of Antifa.​

3. Just stating the fact that you are a racist. Facts are facts and not baiting. You believe yourself to be better and smarter than people with more melanin than you. (SPOILER ALERT...you aren't)

1. YOu assume.

2. Sorry. He self identifies as a "wacial justice" what have you. THat makes him yours.

3. Better? I never said better. That was the voices in your head, mr wacistbaiter.

1. We conclude based on ALL the evidence.
2. Not ANTIFA, not BLM, not the FBI. It was all Trumpsters
3. You believe you are more intelligent based on the color of your skin. You're not.

1. We have one proven example of a lefty infiltrator. That disproves your claim of "all" and raises the possibility of more.

2. You admitted that the iq gap is real. Now you are talking shit.

1. I debunked your "proven lefty"
2. I provided evidence that the ID gap doe as not mean whites are more intelligent than blacks as racists believe (and you, apparently...guess that makes you racist)

1. No, you didn't. He is a self identified "wacial justice" type. That makes him yours.

2. No, you argued for environmental causes. That does not negate the gap, it is just an attempt to explain it away. The gap is still there. your confusing on this is kind of sad.

1. Sorry, Trumpster, the January 6th riot is all on Trump cultists.

2. What is sad is your need to feel superior to people of color. (You aren’t superior in any way, shape or form) What you are is straight up racist.

1. That you would like about sullivan demonstrates that you and people like you, could be lying about others.

2. I've never claimed to be superior. That was something you made up in your head.

1. The scores of Trump supporters that have been arrested paint a different story. The riot on January 6 was Trump supporters.

2. That’s good because you aren’t. You aren’t more intelligent or superior in any way, shape or form.

1. You said all. Now you seem to be arguing majority. Are you walking it back? Sullivan is a lefty.

2. You missed my point on purpose in order to make a personal attack. That was you losing. My point stands. I don't judge personal worth by intelligence. That being said, ignoring the reality of the iq gap sets us up for failure.

1. Nope, not walking anything back. January 6th was a riot of Trump supporters, period.

2. Saying that you aren't superior to black and brown skinned people is only a personal attack if you're a racist piece of shit that actually feels they are superior in some way. (You are not)

1. Except for the self identified wacial justice "reporter", Sullivan. So, your statement is wrong. Why do you stand by a point you know has been debunked? Do you like looking like a liar?


2. ONly a liar would pretend that calling someone wacist in our society isn't a personal insult. YOu are being an asshole.

3. My point stands. you assumed shit that I never said, and you were an asshole based on your assumptions.

4. The education and IQ gaps are still real. That you want to have a fit about causes, is irrelevant.

1. That’s a pretty ironic statement coming from you who completely ignores all facts and evidence in favor of your “feelings”. Sullivan is a grifter like Trump nothing more. He feeds off all chaos much like Trump.

2. I wasn’t calling you a racist in that statement. I said you aren’t superior to people of color. You seem to take that as an insult. It’s not an insult it’s a statement of fact.

3. I haven’t seen you make any points, only express your feelings.

4. The IQ gap is real but it isn’t based on intelligence. You aren’t more intelligent than people of color. I know that bothers you but it’s true nonetheless.

1. Sullivan self identifies as a wacial justice activist. That makes him one of yours.

2. I never claimed to be superior.

3. Bullshit.

4. You constantly try to make this personal. The point remains. The iq gap is real. That matters. It explains much that people like you want to blame on wacism.

1. Sullivan shows up wherever there is conflict in order to sell footage. That makes him a grifter like Trump.

2. Good because you’re not. You’re not more intelligent either.

3. Sorry sweet cheeks that’s true shit.

4. The IQ gap is real but does not reflect decreased intelligence in black and brown people. Education is not a reflection of intelligence. You want to ascribe greater intelligence to single race. That’s junk science

Racism in education is real despite your repeated denials of facts and studies.

1. His job might be what passes for "journalism" today, but ideologically he is one of yours. Your denial is a lie and supports my point that you people have anti-credibility.

2. i.q. tests say otherwise. Generally speaking.

3. I assign nothing. The stats show the difference. You admit the difference. Our disagreement is on cause. You want to explain it away, because it clashes with your ideology.

4. What if the education gap is a result of broken families and/or lower I.Q. and you spend the next 4O years, persecuting white, supposedly wacist teachers and administrators, and have no positive effect?

1. His job is chaos chasing grifter....which makes him EXACTLY like Trump.

2. No, they really don't. I understand it's important to you that you believe yourself to be more intelligent than blacks. You are not.

The unwelcome revival of ârace scienceâ

The long read: Its defenders claim to be standing up for uncomfortable truths, but race science is still as bogus as ever

www.theguardian.com

Ten years ago, our grasp of the actual science was firm enough for Craig Venter, the American biologist who led the private effort to decode the human genome, to respond to claims of a link between race and intelligence by declaring: “There is no basis in scientific fact or in the human genetic code for the notion that skin colour will be predictive of intelligence.”​

1. He is a leftist who infiltrated the crowd under false pretenses. Something you are denying as a possibility while admitting that it happened. Standard lefty lying.

2. Thus, the belief that the riot might have been caused by lefty infiltrators, and/or with the help of deep state operatives, is plausble.


3. Sounds like he is playing word games. I note he does not deny the I.Q. gap. He just states that they have not found any cause. That's fine. I didn't claim a cause, just noted the gap.


4. How many times are you going to accuse white people, even white liberals (teachers) of wacism, when you know the real issue is the i.q. gap? How many people do you want to fire or ruin, because you accuse them of wacism, when you know the real cause is the i.q. gap? How much money do you want to spend trying to root out wacism, when you know the real causa is the i.q. gap?

1. Lets pretend for a second that your contention is true. And? One guy who purports to be a "lefty" (that no leftist group will admit to his membership) was there filming so he could sell the footage. So what? That doesn't change ANY of the facts. The riot was still made up entirely of Trump supporters.

2. No, skippy that is not plausible on Earth One. Hell, it's even a stretch on Earth Two.

3. What it sounds like is a racists trying to feel superior. How sad is your life that you need to believe you're more intelligent than blacks? (Your'e not)

4. I'm simply pointing out facts that you don't like. Institutionalized racism exists. It exists in our education, justice, employment, healthcare and housing. The only way to eradicate it is to recognize it exists. Racists don't want to eradicate it so they deny it exists.

As Long as you recognize it was just a riot I don't care who you say was there.

 

[WEATHER53]

Agree plus it was known well in advance they were coming and no real preventative measures were taken

Not enough protective measures were undertaken. We all can agree on that.

However, that does not in any way absolve or mitigate the traitorous violence those invaders inflicted upon the lawful officers, or on the building and its fixtures. And more importantly, it does not minimize one iota the traitorous intent of the invaders which was to stop the Constitutional duty of Congress to affirm the vote and begin the lawful and peaceful transfer of power.

There SHOULD have been more barriers, more police, more police with armored riot gear, more police with guns.
But.......we ain't gonna blame the victims for what the rioters did to them.
And to America.

Pelosi wanted the protest to escalate thus no preventative measures and she had agitators inserted. Then after her plants turned thing violent the one way media conjured up another witch hunt of Trump ordering an Insurrection.
What those people did there in a few hours is fly shit in a cattle pasture compared to months long, multiple cities rioting and permitted “venting” of BLM and Woketards

 

[WEATHER53]

We condemn all murders of unarmed protestors whether glass is broken or not

trespassing with a violent armed mob isnt protesting.

Maybe 25% of your statement is true but what is 100% true is no one legally gets shot to death for breaking glass.

 

[Lesh]

.

Insurrection is defined by the goal of the actors.
Trying to alter the results of an election through physical disruption of the democratic process is an insurrection.

Please tell us, oh TDS-suffering, irrational hate-driven, Marxist Socialist talking points parroter, how unarmed, selfie-taking trespassers were going to alter the 2020 election?

Now compare that incident to the Democrat/foreign-supported domestic terrorists whose violent 'insurrection' caused the President and his family to be rushed to the WH bunker while agents from the FBI, DHS, & Secret Service along with the Capitol and Local Police were forced to engage and push back the violent terrorists, resulting in 14 Secret Service members being injured, the DC mayor ordering new security fencing be installed, the clearing of the park by police IOT put up that fencing, and another Debunked LIE / 'Conspiracy Theory' about Trump having something to d with the clearing of the park.

In the end, this is just another one of MANY incidents in which Democrats accuse others of doing what they have already done and of being who they are.

the reason Trump went to hide in his bunker last summer and setup barriers around whitehouse is that he wanted to shoot protesters, even the peaceful ones

Trump wanted military to ‘crack skulls’ of George Floyd protesters, book claims

Former president called demonstrators ‘thugs’ amid nationwide outrage over racial injustice

www.independent.co.uk

The vast majority of republicans have voted to condemn the 1/6 rioters.


Your talk of "soft" is just you lying. Like the liberal you are.

whats the point of condemning them?
what really matters is a commission to investigate it.
two republicans voted for investigation.

House votes to establish committee to investigate Jan. 6 Capitol riot

Two Republicans — Cheney and Kinzinger — joined the Democrats in approving the new panel.

www.nbcnews.com

The point is that people like you have been trying to smear all republicans with the actions of a tiny group.

That is people like you, using the 1/6 riot to divide this nation in order for partisan advantage.


YOu know that. THat is why you are doing it.

That's what y'all do. You did (and still do it) it with followers of Islam. Y'all do it with BLM.

just more Republican projection...

Did you forget that I was the republican that made a big deal about Trump increasing his black male vote?

Almost like I can distinguish between sub groups based on their behavior.


My point stands.

The point is that people like you have been trying to smear all republicans with the actions of a tiny group.

That is people like you, using the 1/6 riot to divide this nation in order for partisan advantage.


YOu know that. THat is why you are doing it.

Not even close. Nobody is asking for all Republicans to be thrown in jail, just the rioters. Nobody is trying to ban Republicans from entering the country like Trump tried to ban Muslims.

The only people I see “using” the riot are Trump wannabes. They are using it to make money.

Bullshit. The riot is being used to smear republicans and Trump supporters as a group. Hell, the meme right above does that. You posted in this thread, but didn't say anything about it. Do you support that behavior, or are you just remaining quite while other more partisan lefties do it?

Saying that the rioters/terrorists on January 6 were all Republican is a true statement. Saying that all Republicans are rioters and terrorists is not a true statement.

It is similar to the statement that not all Republicans are racist but most racist are Republicans.

1. Note that you had to quality "all rioters". How ironic. ANd you can't see it even now can you?

2. We have one admitted antifa guy who was there agitating. It is a plausible theory.

3. Your wace baiting is just you being an asshole.

1. My apologies. Let me rephrase. Not all Trumpsters rioted, but most of the rioters were Trumpsters.

2. Did you link to this alleged "antifa guy"? Who is this alleged individual?

3. Pointing out the undeniable fact that you are a racist isn't baiting, it's stating facts.

1. Plenty of rioters that are not trump supporters. Indeed, the vast majority are leftards.

2.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/01/16/sullivan-video-arrested/

"Sullivan, who has at turns identified himself as a racial justice protester and leftist documentarian,"


3. Your wace baiting is just you being an asshole.

1. Not on January 6th. That day it was all Trump supporters.

2. Fact Check: Was a member of Antifa arrested in the Capitol riot?

The Ruling​

False.​

​

None of the 230 people arrested for alleged participation in the Capitol attacks were linked to any left-wing movement. There is no evidence that Sullivan was a member of Antifa, Black Lives Matter or any other left-leaning group, especially a "leader" of Antifa.​

3. Just stating the fact that you are a racist. Facts are facts and not baiting. You believe yourself to be better and smarter than people with more melanin than you. (SPOILER ALERT...you aren't)

1. YOu assume.

2. Sorry. He self identifies as a "wacial justice" what have you. THat makes him yours.

3. Better? I never said better. That was the voices in your head, mr wacistbaiter.

1. We conclude based on ALL the evidence.
2. Not ANTIFA, not BLM, not the FBI. It was all Trumpsters
3. You believe you are more intelligent based on the color of your skin. You're not.

1. We have one proven example of a lefty infiltrator. That disproves your claim of "all" and raises the possibility of more.

2. You admitted that the iq gap is real. Now you are talking shit.

1. I debunked your "proven lefty"
2. I provided evidence that the ID gap doe as not mean whites are more intelligent than blacks as racists believe (and you, apparently...guess that makes you racist)

1. No, you didn't. He is a self identified "wacial justice" type. That makes him yours.

2. No, you argued for environmental causes. That does not negate the gap, it is just an attempt to explain it away. The gap is still there. your confusing on this is kind of sad.

1. Sorry, Trumpster, the January 6th riot is all on Trump cultists.

2. What is sad is your need to feel superior to people of color. (You aren’t superior in any way, shape or form) What you are is straight up racist.

1. That you would like about sullivan demonstrates that you and people like you, could be lying about others.

2. I've never claimed to be superior. That was something you made up in your head.

1. The scores of Trump supporters that have been arrested paint a different story. The riot on January 6 was Trump supporters.

2. That’s good because you aren’t. You aren’t more intelligent or superior in any way, shape or form.

1. You said all. Now you seem to be arguing majority. Are you walking it back? Sullivan is a lefty.

2. You missed my point on purpose in order to make a personal attack. That was you losing. My point stands. I don't judge personal worth by intelligence. That being said, ignoring the reality of the iq gap sets us up for failure.

Sullivan is not and was not a lefty. He was disavowed by BLM months before 1/6 and his brother is affiliated with the Proud Boys.

You know better.

Stop lying

 

[Lesh]

We condemn all murders of unarmed protestors whether glass is broken or not

trespassing with a violent armed mob isnt protesting.

Maybe 25% of your statement is true but what is 100% true is no one legally gets shot to death for breaking glass.

They DO get shot if they breech a police barricade protecting most of the members of our government

 

[Faun]

.

Insurrection is defined by the goal of the actors.
Trying to alter the results of an election through physical disruption of the democratic process is an insurrection.

Please tell us, oh TDS-suffering, irrational hate-driven, Marxist Socialist talking points parroter, how unarmed, selfie-taking trespassers were going to alter the 2020 election?

Now compare that incident to the Democrat/foreign-supported domestic terrorists whose violent 'insurrection' caused the President and his family to be rushed to the WH bunker while agents from the FBI, DHS, & Secret Service along with the Capitol and Local Police were forced to engage and push back the violent terrorists, resulting in 14 Secret Service members being injured, the DC mayor ordering new security fencing be installed, the clearing of the park by police IOT put up that fencing, and another Debunked LIE / 'Conspiracy Theory' about Trump having something to d with the clearing of the park.

In the end, this is just another one of MANY incidents in which Democrats accuse others of doing what they have already done and of being who they are.

the reason Trump went to hide in his bunker last summer and setup barriers around whitehouse is that he wanted to shoot protesters, even the peaceful ones

Trump wanted military to ‘crack skulls’ of George Floyd protesters, book claims

Former president called demonstrators ‘thugs’ amid nationwide outrage over racial injustice

www.independent.co.uk

The vast majority of republicans have voted to condemn the 1/6 rioters.


Your talk of "soft" is just you lying. Like the liberal you are.

whats the point of condemning them?
what really matters is a commission to investigate it.
two republicans voted for investigation.

House votes to establish committee to investigate Jan. 6 Capitol riot

Two Republicans — Cheney and Kinzinger — joined the Democrats in approving the new panel.

www.nbcnews.com

The point is that people like you have been trying to smear all republicans with the actions of a tiny group.

That is people like you, using the 1/6 riot to divide this nation in order for partisan advantage.


YOu know that. THat is why you are doing it.

That's what y'all do. You did (and still do it) it with followers of Islam. Y'all do it with BLM.

just more Republican projection...

Did you forget that I was the republican that made a big deal about Trump increasing his black male vote?

Almost like I can distinguish between sub groups based on their behavior.


My point stands.

The point is that people like you have been trying to smear all republicans with the actions of a tiny group.

That is people like you, using the 1/6 riot to divide this nation in order for partisan advantage.


YOu know that. THat is why you are doing it.

Not even close. Nobody is asking for all Republicans to be thrown in jail, just the rioters. Nobody is trying to ban Republicans from entering the country like Trump tried to ban Muslims.

The only people I see “using” the riot are Trump wannabes. They are using it to make money.

Bullshit. The riot is being used to smear republicans and Trump supporters as a group. Hell, the meme right above does that. You posted in this thread, but didn't say anything about it. Do you support that behavior, or are you just remaining quite while other more partisan lefties do it?

Saying that the rioters/terrorists on January 6 were all Republican is a true statement. Saying that all Republicans are rioters and terrorists is not a true statement.

It is similar to the statement that not all Republicans are racist but most racist are Republicans.

1. Note that you had to quality "all rioters". How ironic. ANd you can't see it even now can you?

2. We have one admitted antifa guy who was there agitating. It is a plausible theory.

3. Your wace baiting is just you being an asshole.

1. My apologies. Let me rephrase. Not all Trumpsters rioted, but most of the rioters were Trumpsters.

2. Did you link to this alleged "antifa guy"? Who is this alleged individual?

3. Pointing out the undeniable fact that you are a racist isn't baiting, it's stating facts.

1. Plenty of rioters that are not trump supporters. Indeed, the vast majority are leftards.

2.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/01/16/sullivan-video-arrested/

"Sullivan, who has at turns identified himself as a racial justice protester and leftist documentarian,"


3. Your wace baiting is just you being an asshole.

1. Not on January 6th. That day it was all Trump supporters.

2. Fact Check: Was a member of Antifa arrested in the Capitol riot?

The Ruling​

False.​

​

None of the 230 people arrested for alleged participation in the Capitol attacks were linked to any left-wing movement. There is no evidence that Sullivan was a member of Antifa, Black Lives Matter or any other left-leaning group, especially a "leader" of Antifa.​

3. Just stating the fact that you are a racist. Facts are facts and not baiting. You believe yourself to be better and smarter than people with more melanin than you. (SPOILER ALERT...you aren't)

1. YOu assume.

2. Sorry. He self identifies as a "wacial justice" what have you. THat makes him yours.

3. Better? I never said better. That was the voices in your head, mr wacistbaiter.

1. We conclude based on ALL the evidence.
2. Not ANTIFA, not BLM, not the FBI. It was all Trumpsters
3. You believe you are more intelligent based on the color of your skin. You're not.

1. We have one proven example of a lefty infiltrator. That disproves your claim of "all" and raises the possibility of more.

2. You admitted that the iq gap is real. Now you are talking shit.

1. I debunked your "proven lefty"
2. I provided evidence that the ID gap doe as not mean whites are more intelligent than blacks as racists believe (and you, apparently...guess that makes you racist)

1. No, you didn't. He is a self identified "wacial justice" type. That makes him yours.

2. No, you argued for environmental causes. That does not negate the gap, it is just an attempt to explain it away. The gap is still there. your confusing on this is kind of sad.

1. Sorry, Trumpster, the January 6th riot is all on Trump cultists.

2. What is sad is your need to feel superior to people of color. (You aren’t superior in any way, shape or form) What you are is straight up racist.

1. That you would like about sullivan demonstrates that you and people like you, could be lying about others.

2. I've never claimed to be superior. That was something you made up in your head.

1. The scores of Trump supporters that have been arrested paint a different story. The riot on January 6 was Trump supporters.

2. That’s good because you aren’t. You aren’t more intelligent or superior in any way, shape or form.

1. You said all. Now you seem to be arguing majority. Are you walking it back? Sullivan is a lefty.

2. You missed my point on purpose in order to make a personal attack. That was you losing. My point stands. I don't judge personal worth by intelligence. That being said, ignoring the reality of the iq gap sets us up for failure.

Sullivan is not and was not a lefty. He was disavowed by BLM months before 1/6 and his brother is affiliated with the Proud Boys.

You know better.

Stop lying

He also tried joining that bastion of Liberal Democrats, the Proud Boys.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

trespassing with a violent armed mob isnt protesting.

So who was armed? Last I read, not one of the rioters had a firearm. Correct, they were trespassing, and some of them are locked up in solitary confinement for trespassing.

 

[Seawytch]

.

Insurrection is defined by the goal of the actors.
Trying to alter the results of an election through physical disruption of the democratic process is an insurrection.

Please tell us, oh TDS-suffering, irrational hate-driven, Marxist Socialist talking points parroter, how unarmed, selfie-taking trespassers were going to alter the 2020 election?

Now compare that incident to the Democrat/foreign-supported domestic terrorists whose violent 'insurrection' caused the President and his family to be rushed to the WH bunker while agents from the FBI, DHS, & Secret Service along with the Capitol and Local Police were forced to engage and push back the violent terrorists, resulting in 14 Secret Service members being injured, the DC mayor ordering new security fencing be installed, the clearing of the park by police IOT put up that fencing, and another Debunked LIE / 'Conspiracy Theory' about Trump having something to d with the clearing of the park.

In the end, this is just another one of MANY incidents in which Democrats accuse others of doing what they have already done and of being who they are.

the reason Trump went to hide in his bunker last summer and setup barriers around whitehouse is that he wanted to shoot protesters, even the peaceful ones

Trump wanted military to ‘crack skulls’ of George Floyd protesters, book claims

Former president called demonstrators ‘thugs’ amid nationwide outrage over racial injustice

www.independent.co.uk

The vast majority of republicans have voted to condemn the 1/6 rioters.


Your talk of "soft" is just you lying. Like the liberal you are.

whats the point of condemning them?
what really matters is a commission to investigate it.
two republicans voted for investigation.

House votes to establish committee to investigate Jan. 6 Capitol riot

Two Republicans — Cheney and Kinzinger — joined the Democrats in approving the new panel.

www.nbcnews.com

The point is that people like you have been trying to smear all republicans with the actions of a tiny group.

That is people like you, using the 1/6 riot to divide this nation in order for partisan advantage.


YOu know that. THat is why you are doing it.

That's what y'all do. You did (and still do it) it with followers of Islam. Y'all do it with BLM.

just more Republican projection...

Did you forget that I was the republican that made a big deal about Trump increasing his black male vote?

Almost like I can distinguish between sub groups based on their behavior.


My point stands.

The point is that people like you have been trying to smear all republicans with the actions of a tiny group.

That is people like you, using the 1/6 riot to divide this nation in order for partisan advantage.


YOu know that. THat is why you are doing it.

Not even close. Nobody is asking for all Republicans to be thrown in jail, just the rioters. Nobody is trying to ban Republicans from entering the country like Trump tried to ban Muslims.

The only people I see “using” the riot are Trump wannabes. They are using it to make money.

Bullshit. The riot is being used to smear republicans and Trump supporters as a group. Hell, the meme right above does that. You posted in this thread, but didn't say anything about it. Do you support that behavior, or are you just remaining quite while other more partisan lefties do it?

Saying that the rioters/terrorists on January 6 were all Republican is a true statement. Saying that all Republicans are rioters and terrorists is not a true statement.

It is similar to the statement that not all Republicans are racist but most racist are Republicans.

1. Note that you had to quality "all rioters". How ironic. ANd you can't see it even now can you?

2. We have one admitted antifa guy who was there agitating. It is a plausible theory.

3. Your wace baiting is just you being an asshole.

1. My apologies. Let me rephrase. Not all Trumpsters rioted, but most of the rioters were Trumpsters.

2. Did you link to this alleged "antifa guy"? Who is this alleged individual?

3. Pointing out the undeniable fact that you are a racist isn't baiting, it's stating facts.

1. Plenty of rioters that are not trump supporters. Indeed, the vast majority are leftards.

2.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/01/16/sullivan-video-arrested/

"Sullivan, who has at turns identified himself as a racial justice protester and leftist documentarian,"


3. Your wace baiting is just you being an asshole.

1. Not on January 6th. That day it was all Trump supporters.

2. Fact Check: Was a member of Antifa arrested in the Capitol riot?

The Ruling​

False.​

​

None of the 230 people arrested for alleged participation in the Capitol attacks were linked to any left-wing movement. There is no evidence that Sullivan was a member of Antifa, Black Lives Matter or any other left-leaning group, especially a "leader" of Antifa.​

3. Just stating the fact that you are a racist. Facts are facts and not baiting. You believe yourself to be better and smarter than people with more melanin than you. (SPOILER ALERT...you aren't)

1. YOu assume.

2. Sorry. He self identifies as a "wacial justice" what have you. THat makes him yours.

3. Better? I never said better. That was the voices in your head, mr wacistbaiter.

1. We conclude based on ALL the evidence.
2. Not ANTIFA, not BLM, not the FBI. It was all Trumpsters
3. You believe you are more intelligent based on the color of your skin. You're not.

1. We have one proven example of a lefty infiltrator. That disproves your claim of "all" and raises the possibility of more.

2. You admitted that the iq gap is real. Now you are talking shit.

1. I debunked your "proven lefty"
2. I provided evidence that the ID gap doe as not mean whites are more intelligent than blacks as racists believe (and you, apparently...guess that makes you racist)

1. No, you didn't. He is a self identified "wacial justice" type. That makes him yours.

2. No, you argued for environmental causes. That does not negate the gap, it is just an attempt to explain it away. The gap is still there. your confusing on this is kind of sad.

1. Sorry, Trumpster, the January 6th riot is all on Trump cultists.

2. What is sad is your need to feel superior to people of color. (You aren’t superior in any way, shape or form) What you are is straight up racist.

1. That you would like about sullivan demonstrates that you and people like you, could be lying about others.

2. I've never claimed to be superior. That was something you made up in your head.

1. The scores of Trump supporters that have been arrested paint a different story. The riot on January 6 was Trump supporters.

2. That’s good because you aren’t. You aren’t more intelligent or superior in any way, shape or form.

1. You said all. Now you seem to be arguing majority. Are you walking it back? Sullivan is a lefty.

2. You missed my point on purpose in order to make a personal attack. That was you losing. My point stands. I don't judge personal worth by intelligence. That being said, ignoring the reality of the iq gap sets us up for failure.

1. Nope, not walking anything back. January 6th was a riot of Trump supporters, period.

2. Saying that you aren't superior to black and brown skinned people is only a personal attack if you're a racist piece of shit that actually feels they are superior in some way. (You are not)

1. Except for the self identified wacial justice "reporter", Sullivan. So, your statement is wrong. Why do you stand by a point you know has been debunked? Do you like looking like a liar?


2. ONly a liar would pretend that calling someone wacist in our society isn't a personal insult. YOu are being an asshole.

3. My point stands. you assumed shit that I never said, and you were an asshole based on your assumptions.

4. The education and IQ gaps are still real. That you want to have a fit about causes, is irrelevant.

1. That’s a pretty ironic statement coming from you who completely ignores all facts and evidence in favor of your “feelings”. Sullivan is a grifter like Trump nothing more. He feeds off all chaos much like Trump.

2. I wasn’t calling you a racist in that statement. I said you aren’t superior to people of color. You seem to take that as an insult. It’s not an insult it’s a statement of fact.

3. I haven’t seen you make any points, only express your feelings.

4. The IQ gap is real but it isn’t based on intelligence. You aren’t more intelligent than people of color. I know that bothers you but it’s true nonetheless.

1. Sullivan self identifies as a wacial justice activist. That makes him one of yours.

2. I never claimed to be superior.

3. Bullshit.

4. You constantly try to make this personal. The point remains. The iq gap is real. That matters. It explains much that people like you want to blame on wacism.

1. Sullivan shows up wherever there is conflict in order to sell footage. That makes him a grifter like Trump.

2. Good because you’re not. You’re not more intelligent either.

3. Sorry sweet cheeks that’s true shit.

4. The IQ gap is real but does not reflect decreased intelligence in black and brown people. Education is not a reflection of intelligence. You want to ascribe greater intelligence to single race. That’s junk science

Racism in education is real despite your repeated denials of facts and studies.

1. His job might be what passes for "journalism" today, but ideologically he is one of yours. Your denial is a lie and supports my point that you people have anti-credibility.

2. i.q. tests say otherwise. Generally speaking.

3. I assign nothing. The stats show the difference. You admit the difference. Our disagreement is on cause. You want to explain it away, because it clashes with your ideology.

4. What if the education gap is a result of broken families and/or lower I.Q. and you spend the next 4O years, persecuting white, supposedly wacist teachers and administrators, and have no positive effect?

1. His job is chaos chasing grifter....which makes him EXACTLY like Trump.

2. No, they really don't. I understand it's important to you that you believe yourself to be more intelligent than blacks. You are not.

The unwelcome revival of ârace scienceâ

The long read: Its defenders claim to be standing up for uncomfortable truths, but race science is still as bogus as ever

www.theguardian.com

Ten years ago, our grasp of the actual science was firm enough for Craig Venter, the American biologist who led the private effort to decode the human genome, to respond to claims of a link between race and intelligence by declaring: “There is no basis in scientific fact or in the human genetic code for the notion that skin colour will be predictive of intelligence.”​

1. He is a leftist who infiltrated the crowd under false pretenses. Something you are denying as a possibility while admitting that it happened. Standard lefty lying.

2. Thus, the belief that the riot might have been caused by lefty infiltrators, and/or with the help of deep state operatives, is plausble.


3. Sounds like he is playing word games. I note he does not deny the I.Q. gap. He just states that they have not found any cause. That's fine. I didn't claim a cause, just noted the gap.


4. How many times are you going to accuse white people, even white liberals (teachers) of wacism, when you know the real issue is the i.q. gap? How many people do you want to fire or ruin, because you accuse them of wacism, when you know the real cause is the i.q. gap? How much money do you want to spend trying to root out wacism, when you know the real causa is the i.q. gap?

1. Lets pretend for a second that your contention is true. And? One guy who purports to be a "lefty" (that no leftist group will admit to his membership) was there filming so he could sell the footage. So what? That doesn't change ANY of the facts. The riot was still made up entirely of Trump supporters.

2. No, skippy that is not plausible on Earth One. Hell, it's even a stretch on Earth Two.

3. What it sounds like is a racists trying to feel superior. How sad is your life that you need to believe you're more intelligent than blacks? (Your'e not)

4. I'm simply pointing out facts that you don't like. Institutionalized racism exists. It exists in our education, justice, employment, healthcare and housing. The only way to eradicate it is to recognize it exists. Racists don't want to eradicate it so they deny it exists.

1. The riot was not made up entirely of Trump supporters. We know of at least one lefty who infiltrated under false pretenses. Right there that a. disproves your claim and b. raises the possibility of others.

2. If one lefty can infiltrate, others could too. How many professional, experienced agitators do you need to start a riot? Especially when you have teh police waving in protestors into the building?

3. Not my intent at all. That was just shit you assumed. You are an asshole.

4. Repeatedly asserting shit, is not pointing out facts. You have demonstrated that you assume shit and just build on top of that, and think it so and are an asshole based on it.

1. Yeah, it was. It was Trump supporters that rioted and stormed the capital and are now getting arrested.

2. Nobody "infiltrated". It wasn't BLM, ANTIFA or the FBI.

3. I made a logical conclusion based on your statements and your (wrong) belief that you are smarter than black people because you are white.

I'd much rather be perceived as an asshole than a racist. studies

5. Providing links and studies are facts. You countering with "I don't believe your studies" isn't providing evidence to the contrary. "Nuh uh" isn't an argument.