Cecilie1200
Diamond Member
The mayor wisely did not order the police into the area when there were thousands of bystanders and protesters. In the area, many were carrying guns. After the first shooting she told the leaders that Chop must end and she announced that CHOP would be cleared but she did not specify a date. Shortly before the police entered the area she again told the protesters they must leave because Chop was ending, and many more left As a result many protesters packed and left. The police entered the area and there was no shootings and no serious injuries which was her goal.Still pushing this 'peaceful' narrative?
They had 4 shootings during the protest and THAT is why the mayor ended it not to mention the lawsuit from those that live in the area and were tired of being prevented free access to their own damn property.
![]()
Another Fatal Shooting in Seattle’s ‘CHOP’ Protest Zone (Published 2020)
City officials have vowed to dismantle the free-protest area set up during anti-police demonstrations and retake the Capitol Hill police station. But worries of confrontation have delayed a resolution.www.nytimes.com
Does not help that the protest blocking emergency responders in at least one of the shootings may well have led to some deaths as well.
So you're saying that your idea of "wisdom" is to only enforce laws when the criminals are going to be agreeable about being arrested? If they're too dangerous and violent and scary, we just let them do whatever they want because they might get mad otherwise?