Anyone who isnt lockstep with Trump loses his Republican cred these days.This is a Republican led investigation ......
As a lifelong Republican, Mueller will play by the book
Mueller is as much a Republican as John McStain was.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Anyone who isnt lockstep with Trump loses his Republican cred these days.This is a Republican led investigation ......
As a lifelong Republican, Mueller will play by the book
Mueller is as much a Republican as John McStain was.
Anyone who isnt lockstep with Trump loses his Republican cred these days.This is a Republican led investigation ......
As a lifelong Republican, Mueller will play by the book
Mueller is as much a Republican as John McStain was.
His ******* job is a prime example of rule breaking.No he won't, there is a "rule" that does not allow him to bring charges against the Trump Campaign during the election period.... but against other Americans involved with the Russians or additional Russians, perhaps.
Though knowing Mueller, who is a rule follower, and mum is always the word out of his staff, I'd say it is highly highly highly UNLIKELY.
He will not break the rules, or interfere like Director Comey did with Hillary Clinton..... no way Jose! He has worked very hard in keeping this Russian Influence Investigation by the book, he ain't gonna change his stripes now...and give people reasons to scream bloody murder and delegitimize or undermine his entire investigation.
Anyone who isnt lockstep with Trump loses his Republican cred these days.This is a Republican led investigation ......
As a lifelong Republican, Mueller will play by the book
Mueller is as much a Republican as John McStain was.
He is about as Republican as Hillary Clinton's Cankles.Herr Mueller? You mean the Republican prosector appointed by a Republican administration who is running an investigation overseen by a Republican FBI and DOJ??The Left and The DemTards are pretty desperate right now, so Herr Mueller is the DemNazi Party's only hope.
Ok buddy... haha
To this day, no one can cite any rule or regulation or criminal statute that validates the appointing of Robert Mueller as Special Counsel.His ******* job is a prime example of rule breaking.No he won't, there is a "rule" that does not allow him to bring charges against the Trump Campaign during the election period.... but against other Americans involved with the Russians or additional Russians, perhaps.
Though knowing Mueller, who is a rule follower, and mum is always the word out of his staff, I'd say it is highly highly highly UNLIKELY.
He will not break the rules, or interfere like Director Comey did with Hillary Clinton..... no way Jose! He has worked very hard in keeping this Russian Influence Investigation by the book, he ain't gonna change his stripes now...and give people reasons to scream bloody murder and delegitimize or undermine his entire investigation.
#1...... You must have a crime to investigate before you can form a Special Counsel in the first place. Not to mention the fact that a special counsel wasn't needed because the FBI was already conducting an investigation and found no evidence of collusion.
Sabatoge? WTF, he was trying to rescue her campaign once news got out about her secret server and her sharing classified intel with Sid Vicious Blumenthal in an Insider Trading Scheme.You mean like the attempted sabstoge of Clinton by Comey right before the election...like that?Will this coordinated Deep State sabotage of Trump continue? Will Mueller try to influence the Midterm Election by way of Pre-Election Indictment Dump? What do you think?
Do I really need to explain it? I’ll just use your own words...And how, exactly, does my statement show I care more about politics than honesty?I pointed out that your statement shows you care more about politics than honesty. You responded with a whataboutism. So no it was an empty throw away retort.Better than the one you were trying to make.Wow, great pointNow there's an ironic statement.I can see how important transparency and honesty is to you. Haha![]()
![]()
![]()
Oh you mean we should pay more attention to the distraction than the focus?! Ok, haha.Anyone that cared about honesty would have demanded that Clinton, The DNC, Obama and Putin's work with and the financing of The Dirty Dossier should have been front and center of any investigation of Russian Involvement with the 2016 Election.I pointed out that your statement shows you care more about politics than honesty. You responded with a whataboutism. So no it was an empty throw away retort.Better than the one you were trying to make.Wow, great pointNow there's an ironic statement.I can see how important transparency and honesty is to you. Haha![]()
![]()
![]()
Mueller will make ZERO mention of it, or Clinton and Obama's purchasing it. He will pretend like THAT never happened.
This makes his entire Investigation Null and Void.
Oh you mean we should pay more attention to the distraction than the focus?! Ok, haha.Anyone that cared about honesty would have demanded that Clinton, The DNC, Obama and Putin's work with and the financing of The Dirty Dossier should have been front and center of any investigation of Russian Involvement with the 2016 Election.I pointed out that your statement shows you care more about politics than honesty. You responded with a whataboutism. So no it was an empty throw away retort.Better than the one you were trying to make.Wow, great pointNow there's an ironic statement.![]()
![]()
Mueller will make ZERO mention of it, or Clinton and Obama's purchasing it. He will pretend like THAT never happened.
This makes his entire Investigation Null and Void.
What exactly do you want to investigate? Clinton paid for oppo research that wasn’t even used during the election, except for its leak as an unverified political report? You sound desperate and incapable of staying on point without pointing in another direction.
Oh really? And you know this from what? Looking at extremely redacted fisa warrants? Fact is you don’t know what was presented to get those warrants. Also none of the fisa stuff was used during the election for anything. Even right wing poster boy Trey Gowdy who was Read in on the FISA warrants said that they were justified. Your argument is a joke.Oh you mean we should pay more attention to the distraction than the focus?! Ok, haha.Anyone that cared about honesty would have demanded that Clinton, The DNC, Obama and Putin's work with and the financing of The Dirty Dossier should have been front and center of any investigation of Russian Involvement with the 2016 Election.I pointed out that your statement shows you care more about politics than honesty. You responded with a whataboutism. So no it was an empty throw away retort.Better than the one you were trying to make.Wow, great point![]()
![]()
Mueller will make ZERO mention of it, or Clinton and Obama's purchasing it. He will pretend like THAT never happened.
This makes his entire Investigation Null and Void.
What exactly do you want to investigate? Clinton paid for oppo research that wasn’t even used during the election, except for its leak as an unverified political report? You sound desperate and incapable of staying on point without pointing in another direction.
Blahh Wasn't even used? Comey, Rosenstein, Yates, McCabe used Clinton and Obama's Purchased Putin Propaganda to File False Affidavits in an Unconstitutional Secret Court (FISA) for Surveillance Warrants on a Presidential Candidate and his family and supporters, and volunteers.
I wouldn't be so uncivil as to call you a LIAR, but I will state that your are a Prolific Prevaricator.
And how is that dishonest? This is funny. A lib hack like you talking about honesty.Do I really need to explain it? I’ll just use your own words...And how, exactly, does my statement show I care more about politics than honesty?I pointed out that your statement shows you care more about politics than honesty. You responded with a whataboutism. So no it was an empty throw away retort.Better than the one you were trying to make.Wow, great pointNow there's an ironic statement.![]()
![]()
“Republicans should make a prediction that they will try this, then if they do, Trump can say "I told you they would try this". It would cast a big shadow of doubt over their claims and render them ineffective. If they don't try it, no blowback for Trump.”

Sure, when have I been dishonest? Point something out, I always call it as I see it.And how is that dishonest? This is funny. A lib hack like you talking about honesty.Do I really need to explain it? I’ll just use your own words...And how, exactly, does my statement show I care more about politics than honesty?I pointed out that your statement shows you care more about politics than honesty. You responded with a whataboutism. So no it was an empty throw away retort.Better than the one you were trying to make.Wow, great point![]()
![]()
“Republicans should make a prediction that they will try this, then if they do, Trump can say "I told you they would try this". It would cast a big shadow of doubt over their claims and render them ineffective. If they don't try it, no blowback for Trump.”![]()
Oh really? And you know this from what? Looking at extremely redacted fisa warrants? Fact is you don’t know what was presented to get those warrants. Also none of the fisa stuff was used during the election for anything. Even right wing poster boy Trey Gowdy who was Read in on the FISA warrants said that they were justified. Your argument is a joke.Oh you mean we should pay more attention to the distraction than the focus?! Ok, haha.Anyone that cared about honesty would have demanded that Clinton, The DNC, Obama and Putin's work with and the financing of The Dirty Dossier should have been front and center of any investigation of Russian Involvement with the 2016 Election.I pointed out that your statement shows you care more about politics than honesty. You responded with a whataboutism. So no it was an empty throw away retort.Better than the one you were trying to make.![]()
Mueller will make ZERO mention of it, or Clinton and Obama's purchasing it. He will pretend like THAT never happened.
This makes his entire Investigation Null and Void.
What exactly do you want to investigate? Clinton paid for oppo research that wasn’t even used during the election, except for its leak as an unverified political report? You sound desperate and incapable of staying on point without pointing in another direction.
Blahh Wasn't even used? Comey, Rosenstein, Yates, McCabe used Clinton and Obama's Purchased Putin Propaganda to File False Affidavits in an Unconstitutional Secret Court (FISA) for Surveillance Warrants on a Presidential Candidate and his family and supporters, and volunteers.
I wouldn't be so uncivil as to call you a LIAR, but I will state that your are a Prolific Prevaricator.
Sure, when have I been dishonest? Point something out, I always call it as I see it.And how is that dishonest? This is funny. A lib hack like you talking about honesty.Do I really need to explain it? I’ll just use your own words...And how, exactly, does my statement show I care more about politics than honesty?I pointed out that your statement shows you care more about politics than honesty. You responded with a whataboutism. So no it was an empty throw away retort.Better than the one you were trying to make.![]()
“Republicans should make a prediction that they will try this, then if they do, Trump can say "I told you they would try this". It would cast a big shadow of doubt over their claims and render them ineffective. If they don't try it, no blowback for Trump.”![]()
You on the other hand just suggested that the Republican Party play a tactic to discredit any potential release of information that could be damaging to them for an election. You say this without knowing anything about the information, you just want to discredit it. So you have no interest in finding facts or being honest you want to play petty political games. How do you not understand how that is dishonest?!
Will this coordinated Deep State sabotage of Trump continue? Will Mueller try to influence the Midterm Election by way of Pre-Election Indictment Dump? What do you think?