Epic research connects Jared to Gaza and Iran

There is no hope of getting Munchers to read articles of that length and information density .

That is why Deep State is so successful -- it does not bother to proselytise .
It just issues edicts from the Council of 300 and hands out enough money and power to Munchers to carry out requirements .

Munchers simply cannot handle propositions of more than two or three sentences .
Which in large part explains the success of Slogan Makers and quick trick Sales Showmen .

They switch Comprehension from the brain to Emotional Centres .
 
1777545470927.webp


". . . The questions I keep coming back to are the same ones I have been asking across this whole investigation.
  1. Did the Smith investigation connect the documents to the Saudi sovereign wealth architecture?
  2. Was the PIF’s investment in Affinity Partners discussed before Trump left office or after?
  3. Did anyone with advance knowledge of Operation Epic Fury position investments to profit from the war it produced?
  4. Why did the Crown Prince override his own screening panel to pay an inexperienced fund nearly ninety million dollars in fees that have produced zero return?
  5. And why are the people in a position to answer those questions the same people the answers would expose?"

I have been suspecting for some time that the stated reasons for this aggression are not the true reasons.
 
I view the agenda of the establishment like two rival gangs fighting a turf war. It is about whose friends, allies and family will profit off of this agenda.

Did the Smith investigation connect the documents to the Saudi sovereign wealth architecture?

In this context, I am more willing to bet that the Smith investigations had more to do with Trump's investigations and evidence of electoral corruption and deep states' attempted exfiltration of the J6 debacle & the congressional inquiry intended to obfuscate that connection.

And why are the people in a position to answer those questions the same people the answers would expose?"

There is no one in the guberment that has any desire to reveal this, regardless of party IMO.
 
Last edited:
Kait has written extensively on the Epstein Files, her work is first class

Here she connects the architecture of the Epstein Operation to Gaza, the Saudis, Jared and Operation Epic Fury

Comments without reading will be vigorously ignored

Is The Architecture Epstein Designed What Kushner Now Runs? THE RED STRING BOARD
That's a lot to take in. I'm getting ready for work so had to read quickly. I'll have to read it again later. It was a bit hard to follow but it's clearly a power play designed to benefit the Saudis AND Israel. It appears that it was Epstein's idea but Kushner may have had to "take him out" and commandeered the operation? Is that a fair assessment? I'm sure I missed something along the way.

Could we assume that it plays into "the Greater Israel Project?"
 
That's a lot to take in. I'm getting ready for work so had to read quickly. I'll have to read it again later. It was a bit hard to follow but it's clearly a power play designed to benefit the Saudis AND Israel. It appears that it was Epstein's idea but Kushner may have had to "take him out" and commandeered the operation? Is that a fair assessment? I'm sure I missed something along the way.

Could we assume that it plays into "the Greater Israel Project?"

It does and once you realize MAGA was a psyop, sending Jared to Iran makes perfect (dollars and) cents
 
So Affinity Partners operates outside of US banking regulations?
 
This statement is false when you look at the supposed 'Epstein arrangement' to get the kingdom out of the US financial system, as a matter of fact, it's completely the opposite, they are now much further engrained into the US banking system with Affinity Partners.


The position Kushner now operates is the same corridor, with the same patron, the same access, the same cash flow, and the same legal architecture, and the only meaningful difference between 2017 and 2022 seems to be the man holding the position.
 
Is she stating that because the PIF pays management fees to investment brokers that manage their funds that these investment brokers are making more money even if the profit from oil sales is not a part of what the investment broker is managing? Because that is not the case when I researched it myself. So another false claim.

As of April 2026, there is no evidence that Affinity Partners has increased its management fees to Saudi Arabia as a direct result of the Strait of Hormuz closure. While the closure has significantly impacted global energy markets and shipping costs, Affinity's fee structure remains governed by established private equity agreements that typically do not fluctuate based on maritime security events.

Fee Structure and Current Status
  • Fixed Fee Rate: Affinity Partners currently charges the Saudi Public Investment Fund (PIF) a fixed 1.25% annual management fee on its $2 billion commitment.
  • Total Fees Collected: As of early 2026, the firm has reportedly collected approximately $157 million in total fees from foreign clients, with $87 million of that coming directly from the Saudi government.
  • Lack of Profit Returns: Investigations by the Senate Finance Committee have highlighted that these fees have been paid despite the firm generating "little to no return" for its investors since its inception.

Every barrel Iran cannot sell is a barrel Saudi Arabia sells at over one hundred and ten dollars instead of sixty-five, and the International Energy Agency has called the closure of Hormuz the largest oil supply shock on record. The price difference flows into the Saudi Public Investment Fund, the PIF pays the management fees on Affinity Partners, and Kushner collects the fees, which means the financial benefit from this war...
 
Where is the evidence to support the claim in the last sentence, how does she know what those records would expose? All this is, is a carefully crafted bunch of unrelated suppositions tied together that are not supported by any concrete evidence at all.


Every mechanism of American government that could connect this architecture to the intelligence has been captured by someone whose own exposure depends on all of it staying hidden.

The Treasury Secretary refusing to release one billion dollars in Epstein-related suspicious activity reports is the same man who chairs the federal committee reviewing Saudi acquisitions of American companies for national security implications, including the fifty-five billion dollar acquisition of Electronic Arts in which Affinity Partners holds a stake. Which means the man who decided whether or not to release the records is the same man deciding whether or not to approve the deals those records would expose.
 
Munchers simply cannot handle propositions of more than two or three sentences .
Propositions of more than one sentence are arguments which lack a proper foundation.
 
Back
Top Bottom