Poll: Do You Agree with US Policy to Kill Narco Terrorists?

Do you agree with US policy to kill narco terrorists?

  • Yes

    Votes: 66 71.0%
  • No

    Votes: 27 29.0%

  • Total voters
    93
But now Democrats are fighting to protect Narco Smugglers and limit Trumps power to stop them.

Summary According to Democrats....
Tis FAR better for Millions of Americans to die, rather than to kill a handful of drug smugglers.
 
Last edited:
When you've lost the your argument, you devolve to personal insults, literally every time - hence "you poopyhead"
When did I lose an argument? To be an argument, you’d actually have to respond with something relevant.
 
But now Democrats are fighting to protect Narco Smugglers and limit Trumps power to stop them.

Summary According to Democrats....
Tis better for Millions of Americans to die, than to kill a handful of drug smugglers.
Keep wankin'
 
As a reminder, the first strike was also illegal. There is no armed conflict, so there are no legitimate targets. Not the people. Not the boats. Not the drugs. It's murder whether Bradley was aiming at the people or aiming at the drugs knowing the people would die.
 
When did I lose an argument? To be an argument, you’d actually have to respond with something relevant.
LOL The one that ended with you stamping your feet and whining "It also demonstrates how you are incapable of critical thinking."

QED
 
LOL The one that ended with you stamping your feet and whining "It also demonstrates how you are incapable of critical thinking."

QED
It ended when you failed to respond to my initial point other than to plead ignorance.
 
As a reminder, the first strike was also illegal. There is no armed conflict, so there are no legitimate targets. Not the people. Not the boats. Not the drugs. It's murder whether Bradley was aiming at the people or aiming at the drugs knowing the people would die.



Well, is Shashank Joshi says so.................. :cuckoo: :auiqs.jpg: :cuckoo: :auiqs.jpg:
 
Its good to see democrats defending drug dealers since they already put violent criminals back on the street
It is sad t see toadies of a convicted criminal recommending that the U S Constitution be ignored.
 
that doesn't make them terrorists. Terrorism by definition is political. And your article is wrong the FBI and the US Government 100% defines terrorism as having a political component.


As used in this chapter—

(1) the term “international terrorism” means activities that—

(A) involve violent acts or acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State, or that would be a criminal violation if committed within the jurisdiction of the United States or of any State;

(B) appear to be intended—

(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;

(ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or


(iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and


(C) occur primarily outside the territorial jurisdiction of the United States, or transcend national boundaries in terms of the means by which they are accomplished, the persons they appear intended to intimidate or coerce, or the locale in which their perpetrators operate or seek asylum;
Neertheless the FBI has included 'narco terrorism' in its definition of terrorists. Probably because they employ terrorist tactics to get their poison into American society. The article was not wrong about that.

And can you say for certain that there is nothing political involved in those cartels? That they are not condoned, allowed, encouraged, funded by foreign governments? That they are exclusively private enterprise?

"At a recent hearing on Capitol Hill, FBI Director Kash Patel celebrated the Trump administration's labeling of drug cartels as foreign terrorist organizations, and told lawmakers the United States should go after narcotraffickers like it did al-Qaida in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. . ."


 
It is sad t see toadies of a convicted criminal recommending that the U S Constitution be ignored.
Show us the clause of the Constitution that says drug cartel smugglers in the open ocean are covered by it, Shitlips.

Betcha can't.
 
Show us the clause of the Constitution that says drug cartel smugglers in the open ocean are covered by it, Shitlips.

Betcha can't.
You are confused, rude boy.

Trump says,

Screen Shot 2025-12-03 at 12.28.33 PM.webp

"This is war!"

The U.S. Constitution grants Congress the exclusive power to declare war, as outlined in Article I, Section 8, Clause 11.

Please post the names of your "drug cartel smugglers" and the evidence that leads you to believe that those who were killed were what you claim they were.

You can lash out with juvenile incivilities if you can't, of course.
 
You are confused, rude boy.

The U.S. Constitution grants Congress the exclusive power to declare war, as outlined in Article I, Section 8, Clause 11.

Please post the names of your "drug cartel smugglers" and the evidence that leads you to believe that those who were killed were what you claim they were.

You can lash out with juvenile incivilities if you can't, of course.
Nope. That doesn't show where drug cartels on the open ocean are covered by our Constituiton, Shitlips. :auiqs.jpg:

Try again.
 
It is sad t see toadies of a convicted criminal recommending that the U S Constitution be ignored.
Then prove it with an actual thought. What we are really seeing is Trump making fools out of democrats who are now defending drug dealers. They already allow violent crime in their cities. Isnt there a right to life clause?
 
So some other narco terrorists State is supplying the drug? Do they have significant oil reserves?
Most of our elicit drugs come from Mexico. About 90% of Venezuelan drugs are cocaine and is destined for Europe.
 
15th post
Much is being made of US policy to kill narco terrorists in international waters. Do you agree with this policy?

Biden said we should strike the drug lords ("narco-terrorists") where they live. It's amazing how much the Democrats have changed since the 80's....

 
Neertheless the FBI has included 'narco terrorism' in its definition of terrorists. Probably because they employ terrorist tactics to get their poison into American society. The article was not wrong about that.

Since when? Since we decided we wanted to prosecute a war against Venezuela? :auiqs.jpg:


And can you say for certain that there is nothing political involved in those cartels? That they are not condoned, allowed, encouraged, funded by foreign governments? That they are exclusively private enterprise?

What's their stated political goal for these crimes? What are they trying to intimidate the US Government into doing through these crimes?

"At a recent hearing on Capitol Hill, FBI Director Kash Patel celebrated the Trump administration's labeling of drug cartels as foreign terrorist organizations, and told lawmakers the United States should go after narcotraffickers like it did al-Qaida in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. . ."



So the admin wants to target cartels and that same admin applauding that it named said cartels as terrorists so that it could utilize existing Congressional Authorization to do so is proof that the cartels are terrorists? At least it's not circular logic.... :rolleyes:
 
I agree with Biden and Schumer..........................BLOW THEM ALL UP!
 
Biden said we should strike the drug lords ("narco-terrorists") where they live. It's amazing how much the Democrats have changed since the 80's....


Get Congress to ok it and this isn't an issue. Half of the issue with most of what the Trump admin does is it wants to take short cuts instead of going through the required process in order to enact it's policies/goals. Labeling the cartels "narco terrorists" is just another in a long string of those shortcuts.
 
Back
Top Bottom