Poll: Cooling, Stable, Warming, AGW?

[Crick]

Predators cloaked in the guise of salvation , looking for sorts that simply can't do the math Crick

Why would they be "looking for sorts that simply can't do the math"

 

[sparky]

Why would they be "looking for sorts that simply can't do the math"

because they need sheepeople like any science that's been politicized to exist Crick

~S~

 

[ReinyDays]

because they need sheepeople like any science that's been politicized to exist Crick

~S~

Let's see your math there Chick ... start with SB ... ha ha ha ...

 

[alang1216]

1. Cooling.
2. Stable with only small variations up/down.
3. Warming by nature's hand with minor or no human causation.
4. Mostly or all AGW. (half+)

I picked 4. I think there is some natural warming but it is exacerbated by humans.

 

[Crick]

I picked 4. I think there is some natural warming but it is exacerbated by humans.

I think fashion makes us wear more clothing than we ought.

 

[ding]

1. Cooling.
2. Stable with only small variations up/down.
3. Warming by nature's hand with minor or no human causation.
4. Mostly or all AGW. (half+)

The overall trend is that of a cooling planet.

 

[ReinyDays]

I think fashion makes us wear more clothing than we ought.

Move to California ... maybe the women aren't prettier, but they sure do wear less ...

 

[sparky]

The truth about mining and clean energy…

Clean energy requires far more minerals than the fuel sources it would replace. And there’s a practical problem on top of the ethical ones...

www.kiteandkeymedia.com

~S~

 

[ReinyDays]

The truth about mining and clean energy…

Clean energy requires far more minerals than the fuel sources it would replace. And there’s a practical problem on top of the ethical ones...

www.kiteandkeymedia.com

~S~

That cobalt will be mined whether it's used for batteries or not ... humans don't leave money in the ground ... ever ...

 

[sparky]

That cobalt will be mined whether it's used for batteries or not ... humans don't leave money in the ground ... ever ...

spoken like a true globalist RD

~S~

 

[Crick]

Move to California ... maybe the women aren't prettier, but they sure do wear less ...

I'm in Florida. There is plenty to look at here in that regard.

 

[abu afak]

The overall trend is that of a cooling planet.

Since when?
`

 

[Crick]

Since when?
`

From about 5,000 years ago till about 1850.

 

[abu afak]

From about 5,000 years ago till about 1850.

I would prefer HIM to answer since HE thinks it's cooling.
He's a disingenuous little Troll.
It's also - arguably - been 'cooling' since the 2016 peak, tho 2020 near tied it.

And if he means 5000 years that is NOT what this poll is about.
Thus the AGW CHOICE, which tells you The period in question. (and IS THEE main debate of the section) (is anyone arguing 5k years?)
He's also (BS) said it's warming (and everything else) is "normal" for "interglacial," his favorite and empty Fudge/deflection.

Now STFU and let ME deal with him (and everyone else) since you blow it every time Mr Magoo.
You can't help chatting endlessly/obtusely, while I 'pin the tail on the donkey' in one post.
Which this post serves to do again. Now 'third party.'
`

`

 

[ReinyDays]

spoken like a true globalist RD

~S~

You mean "Spoken like a true capitalist"? ... if we don't fill the world market, the commie bastard Chinese will ... if we don't want the money, we shouldn't complain about not having money ...

 

[ReinyDays]

I would prefer HIM to answer since HE thinks it's cooling.
He's a disingenuous little Troll.
It's also - arguably - been 'cooling' since the 2016 peak, tho 2020 near tied it.

And if he means 5000 years that is NOT what this poll is about.
Thus the AGW CHOICE, which tells you The period in question. Hark!
He's also (BS) said it's warming (and everything else) is "normal" for "interglacial," his favorite and empty Fudge/deflection.

Now STFU and let ME deal with him (and everyone else) since you blow it every time Mr Magoo.
You can't help chatting endlessly/obtusely, while I 'pin the tail on the donkey' in one post.
Which this post serves (third party) to do again.
`

`

Facts stand no matter who speaks them ... use the PM function if you need a hotel room with him ...

 

[abu afak]

Facts stand no matter who speaks them ... use the PM function if you need a hotel room with him ...

But we don't know what "Facts" he's talking about.
5000 years or the 100-200 this poll is obviously about.
See my post above Again, which you obviously can't understand. (it's virtually always been warming or cooling VS some UNdesignated time)
`

 

[ReinyDays]

But we don't know what "Facts" he's talking about.
5000 years or the 100-200 this poll is obviously about.
See my post above Again, which you obviously can't understand. (it's virtually always been warming or cooling VS some UNdesignated time)
`

Ding is addressing the Interglacial maxima ≈ 15,000 years BP ... in 110,000 years, we'll be at Interglacial Minimum ... cooler ... simple ...

 

[abu afak]

Ding is addressing the Interglacial maxima ≈ 15,000 years BP ... in 110,000 years, we'll be at Interglacial Minimum ... cooler ... simple ...

Then Ding is INTENTIONALLY being UNresponsive to THIS poll so he can say it's cooling (stealth/Disingenuously disagreeing with AGW) by deflecting to a period that is NOT in question/Poll.
THAT was the ruse!

As opposed to how YOU who answered Honestly to the period obviously that is in question, and THEE main debate here.
No one is debating 5K, and AGW would not be a choice if we were.

Got it now?
I understand all the "facts"/what he did completely. You do not.
It's an IQ thing/seeing thru his fudge/time span switch to be able to vote 'cooling' with the Current/'Recent Cooling' side/Nuts.
That's why I'm outing HIM. The 5k years vs the Poll question.
`

 

[ding]

Since when?
`

Since the past 50 million years but especially so the past 3 million years when the planet transitioned to an icehouse planet from a greenhouse planet.