Political rhetoric similar: reaction isn’t.

[BackAgain]

Here’s a very interesting observation from over in Twitter land:



“Fight like hell” is understood to be figurative to liberals. Except when they’d prefer not to admit it.

 

[BULLDOG]

Here’s a very interesting observation from over in Twitter land:



“Fight like hell” is understood to be figurative to liberals. Except when they’d prefer not to admit it.

When you can point to an attack on the capitol, complete with a gallows built on the lawn, and chants encouraging the hanging of our VP, and intended to overthrow the legal election of a president, you might have something to compare.

 

[whitehall]

Supreme Court demonstrators are on record for shouting that certain named Justices "will pay". Since they are appointed for life it seems the threat isn't related to their political career but their personal safety. I say round up the S.C. demonstrators who are on record for threatening Justices and treat them as the terrorists they are.

 

[BackAgain]

When you can point to an attack on the capitol, complete with a gallows built on the lawn, and chants encouraging the hanging of our VP, and intended to overthrow the legal election of a president, you might have something to compare.

A fake gallows. Symbolic (and yes stupid) speech. Ignorant chants, too. But all beside the point. The point — which you are urgently seeking to evade — is the word choice of Trump and the word choice of a dopey US Senator from NY. (No. Not Schumer. The other dopey US Senator from NY). Both said “fight like hell.” Both were clearly speaking figuratively. But the libtard reaction differs.

 

[MarathonMike]

The difference is Democrats "Fight Like Hell" with nearly all of TV and social media, the intelligence agencies and the DOJ in their arsenal to fight.

 

[BULLDOG]

A fake gallows. Symbolic (and yes stupid) speech. Ignorant chants, too. But all beside the point. The point — which you are urgently seeking to evade — is the word choice of Trump and the word choice of a dopey US Senator from NY. (No. Not Schumer. The other dopey US Senator from NY). Both said “fight like hell.” Both were clearly speaking figuratively. But the libtard reaction differs.

All those coup participants are claiming they were only doing what their president told them to do. Obviously trump's instructions didn't sound figurative to them.

 

[BackAgain]

All those coup participants are claiming they were only doing what their president told them to do. Obviously trump's instructions didn't sound figurative to them.

By that logic — any attempt at any kind of violence at the SCOTUS or against any SCOTUS Justice would have to be similarly attributable to Sen. Gillibrand. And I’ll tell you the obvious truth. It’s bullshit. You can’t seriously blame a public figure for using an old figure of speech when some mutts appear to take it literally.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

All those coup participants are claiming they were only doing what their president told them to do. Obviously trump's instructions didn't sound figurative to them.

By that reasoning every one of the BLM rioters should be in prison right now.

 

[Sandisk]

Here’s a very interesting observation from over in Twitter land:



“Fight like hell” is understood to be figurative to liberals. Except when they’d prefer not to admit it.

There is NOTHING interesting in twitter or Facebook.
Both are for people with small/shallow minds

 

[BackAgain]

There is NOTHING interesting in twitter or Facebook.
Both are for people with small/shallow minds

Your contribution here then makes you a perfect candidate to sign up for both. You can get the 2 for 1 plan for your extra measure of shallow.