So i am watching the Republican debate and I am inspired on a lot of thing but one of them is national defense and ISIS. You know lets be honest....Obama is a *****. The world tramples all over us under his administration and Hillary is not as much of a ***** but she is a ***** too. Both of them are too worries abut how the world looks at us instead of what is best for us.
Putin is walking over Obama and us like he is making Obama his submissive *****. Might as well put a ball gaga in his mouth. Our planes run when a Russian plane comes into our declared airspace. Can you believe this? The question was asked "do you shoot down a Russian plane?" If you declare that space and they enter it...DAMN RIGHT YOU SHOOT IT DOWN. Turkey did. Does Turkey suddenly have more balls than us. JESUS this administration is a bunch of wimps. I would take any of these Republican candidates over the corrupt and pussified Hillary
My take. Jeb Bush....dude...they don't want to talk to you. They won't tell you the truth. You are a naive fool and you will get us killed.
Trump...you are an asshole. The PC society we live in makes us feel shame that we agree with you...but you are right...COMPLETELY right but we are too afraid to say it
Fiorina....why can't you get a foothold? I like you most of all.
Ben......get angry. You are right but you are too soft spoken and people think you don't have guts.
Ted...too polished.
Marco...I love you....lets see what happens.
No one else matters.
What I can say is that this administration under Obama is such a bunch of chicken shits....we havent seen this since the USSR walked all over JFK and Iran made Jimmy Carter and the USA their cuckold *****. Want to know why Jimmy Carter and Obama are the most popular presidents OUTSIDE of the United States...because when they were in power the rest of the world owned us.
That's not who we are and that's not who the world needs and WANTS us to be..and yes,...the world bitches but the world WANTS us to lead and Obama and Hillary are not leaders...they are cuckolds to the world.
I am tired of the United States being pussies under this administration and under liberal leadership. You want to win this war? Accept what war is. People die. And sometimes the wrong people...but that is not a concern our enemy has. and THAT is why we are losing.
We gained our independence because Great Britain tried to fight a gentleman's war. That is what we are doing now. We didn't fight a gentleman's war to gain our independence. If we try this time we will continue to get our collective asses kicked because our enemy is not interested in "the rules"
Seems to be caveman mentality.
Be strong, kill, otherwise you're weak.
Oh come off it. There ARE countries in the world that A) manage to run their countries for the people and B) don't go to stupid wars.
I consider these much better than being grunts.
Dear
frigidweirdo
These tactics are sometimes necessary with violent bullies who will otherwise test you.
Preemptive type of deterrence is sometimes necessary with THESE types to discourage them from trying anything at all.
Wolves who live by pack mentality and pecking order
might need to be policed by other Wolves who defend territory by those rules.
Bark louder, defend your pack from any attacks on weaker members to test you,
and mark and patrol your turf.
Where you are right that this is NOT necessary is when you are dealing with friendly neighbors
or members of your own pack.
As someone posted, they credit Obama for holding down the GOP
this is actually dividing the nation against ourselves and making us weak.
The GOP is not the enemy but half the public that Obama is supposed to represent as a federal official.
So this is attacking and dividing your own pack, trying to be the Alpha Male.
He wouldn't have to do that if he followed and enforced the Constitution where
the whole pack agrees.
Unity by enforcing common laws and standards can be done when all the groups are under the same laws.
With terrorists and people not following due process, but who will attack by their own judgments, these aren't agreeing to follow civil laws and rules of engagement but make it clear they don't respect and won't respond to such approaches. So such groups may require
deterrence, by threats to use force in the same way they do, until they can be contained.
This is like keeping an armed guard or police at banks or airports, etc. After a criminal is caught and detained, then you can apply the civil process; but it may require "use of force" or THREAT of guns before that point to deter attacks to begin with.
Do you agree there are two different contexts going on?
I agree with you that it is wrongful to take the retributive, preemptive collective punishment
mentality and apply it to the wrong group that would respond to civil methods. But with lawless bullies, these extreme types have to be deterred by speaking their language.
NOTE: since both major parties seem to have different styles of leadership and priorities/focus, this is why I would recommend using the Republican/conservative style of leadership for executive and
military strategies in preemptive law enforcement security and defense by deterrence.
And focus the Democratic focus on social programs and democratic relations
on internal affairs within already established civil relations.
Once we establish security, then diplomacy is possible.
But trying to be diplomatic with a war mongering bully trying to test you
is the wrong approach in the wrong order. And Obama comes across completely
backwards by treating civil countrymen under Constitutional laws as the bullies to dominate over,
while treating terrorists as less of a threat. It makes sense to me he should have aligned
with fellow compatriot Constitutionalists on agreed policies, so that we could better manage
both our foreign and domestic affairs, instead of making enemies and dividing on both fronts.
