Please show me where Israel children taught how to stab Palestinians?

1947, 1948-1949, 1967, 1967-1970, 1973 all attacks by arab league nations with the treat of wiping out the Jews and destroying Israel.

None as they are all seen as militia under international law, or they were forced to be human shields by hamas/fatah
You cannot be serious




Whats wrong are you another hater that thinks the international laws should not be for the Jews as well. Read those international laws and see just what hamas CANT do without causing major problems for its citizens. One thing is to ask them to be human shields without facing them being classed as militia. Force them to be human shields and they get the blame for their deaths as it is a war crime.
This human shiled bs is just an excuse israel uses to rationalize away civilian casualties.




Then why does the UN ICC and ICJ call it a hamas war crime
Link?





Why have you lost the ones I have already given you.
 
And it has been the same odds since 1947 and still the arabs cant win. Not even when Israel had nothing but farm tools in 1948.

yeah, farm tools and a shitload of weapons the British and Americans gave them.

The Zionshits haven't won a war since 1967 without the Americans bailing them out. And a lot of these young Israeli kids are wondering why they are paying three times the going rate for the privilege of living next to people who want to murder you.

To be fair, the Zionists stole a lot of American and British equipment in 1947-8, in 1973 the Zionists had to threaten to go nuclear, they were losing so badly, to get their American sugar daddy to rearm them. It's no wonder they went all over themselves to make peace with Egypt in 1977, on more or less the same terms they'd contemptuously rejected out of hand in in 1972.





LINK ?
 
And it has been the same odds since 1947 and still the arabs cant win. Not even when Israel had nothing but farm tools in 1948.

yeah, farm tools and a shitload of weapons the British and Americans gave them.

The Zionshits haven't won a war since 1967 without the Americans bailing them out. And a lot of these young Israeli kids are wondering why they are paying three times the going rate for the privilege of living next to people who want to murder you.




They got no weapons from the British or Americans, and not until 1949 did they get weapons from Checkoslovakia that they had to pay for.

America gave them no aid until the late 1970's early 1980's

The Israelis have won every war the Palestinians have started. And the Palestinians seem to be the losers every day as they get the honour of burying their dead more often the Israelis. This is what you find when you start poking the hornets nest with short sticks all the time.


keep trying to LIE about the Jews and I will keep showing you up for LYING
 
It is a rather bizarre concept as there is not now, and has not been a nation of "Palestine". The foreign Arab invaders / squatters / land grabbers never were "Pal'istanians" as such a nationality never existed .:laugh::laugh::laugh:
No need to. The Israeli's are on land they have no clear title to. It has nothing to do with the Pals.





Yet the LoN treaty clearly says that the land is theirs. And that became International law, so you are wrong again
 
Yet the LoN treaty clearly says that the land is theirs. And that became International law, so you are wrong again

The LON said nothing of the sort, nor did they have the authority to give away Arab land because Europe wanted to get rid of their Jews.





WRONG as they were the LEGAL LAND OWNERS at the time and they granted land to the arab muslims (78% of palestine) and land to the Jews (22% of palestine) Do you want the actual International law posting again to show everyone that you ignore anything that proves the Jews own Israel.

Want to apologise now for telling porkies before you are shown to LIE to spread Jew hatred and incite violence
 
WRONG as they were the LEGAL LAND OWNERS at the time and they granted land to the arab muslims (78% of palestine) and land to the Jews (22% of palestine) Do you want the actual International law posting again to show everyone that you ignore anything that proves the Jews own Israel.

Want to apologise now for telling porkies before you are shown to LIE to spread Jew hatred and incite violence

No, the League of Nations was NOT the legal land owners. that's an imperialists view of things, and Imperialism is so 19th century.

You do realize that Imperialism was a bad thing and led to lots of bad results, right?

Zionism is the last, sick gasp of Imperialism.

What the Zionists need to do is learn to live in peace with the rightful owners of the land. If they had done that in 1948 instead of trying to run everything, they probably wouldn't have the problems they have now.

You see, the thing is, when South Africa finally ended Apartheid, the blacks were pretty cool about it.

I don't see the Palis being so understanding when they have their boots on the Zionists' necks.
 
WRONG as they were the LEGAL LAND OWNERS at the time and they granted land to the arab muslims (78% of palestine) and land to the Jews (22% of palestine) Do you want the actual International law posting again to show everyone that you ignore anything that proves the Jews own Israel.

Want to apologise now for telling porkies before you are shown to LIE to spread Jew hatred and incite violence

No, the League of Nations was NOT the legal land owners. that's an imperialists view of things, and Imperialism is so 19th century.

You do realize that Imperialism was a bad thing and led to lots of bad results, right?

Zionism is the last, sick gasp of Imperialism.

What the Zionists need to do is learn to live in peace with the rightful owners of the land. If they had done that in 1948 instead of trying to run everything, they probably wouldn't have the problems they have now.

You see, the thing is, when South Africa finally ended Apartheid, the blacks were pretty cool about it.

I don't see the Palis being so understanding when they have their boots on the Zionists' necks.





WRONG as they acquired the land under the Ottoman surrender, this has been posted on here at least once a month. And was posted in full only yesterday by RoccoR

Yes we see it every day in the actions of the muslims.

That would be the muslims

They are the rightful owners of the land as the Legal owners granted them the land in 1923. In 1948 they followed International law in declaring independence of the mandate and the arab muslim hordes invaded and attacked in the hope of wiping them out.

That cool that they evicted them from their lands, raped the women and girls and mass murdered most of the whites. That is why South Africa is one of the most dangerous places to visit if you are white. Look it up and see what happened when the ANC ran the country under Mandella.

They will not change a thing if the ever manage to take over, and will just go on a murder spree. Will you party in public when the body count rises, or will you do it in private because the world will be out for your blood.
 
That cool that they evicted them from their lands, raped the women and girls and mass murdered most of the whites. That is why South Africa is one of the most dangerous places to visit if you are white. Look it up and see what happened when the ANC ran the country under Mandella.

Uh, I did. They had "reconcilation" committees and most of the Whites stayed and kept most of their wealth. It was actually a lot better than the bastards deserved.

the World is pretty much over it's European Infection. Israel is just the last rash.
 
That cool that they evicted them from their lands, raped the women and girls and mass murdered most of the whites. That is why South Africa is one of the most dangerous places to visit if you are white. Look it up and see what happened when the ANC ran the country under Mandella.

Uh, I did. They had "reconcilation" committees and most of the Whites stayed and kept most of their wealth. It was actually a lot better than the bastards deserved.

the World is pretty much over it's European Infection. Israel is just the last rash.





WRONG as they left in their thousands, either in coffins of planes. The ANC went wild and started a bloodbath



Can the murder of South African whites be called genocide?

A few things can be said with absolute certainty.

  • The majority of all white murder victims in South Africa are killed by black perpetrators. In fact, the percentage of white murder victims that were killed by black perpetrators is definitely over 75%.
  • A significant number of black on white murders include torture or particularly gruesome means of execution.
  • There is often little to no financial gain acquired during this murders.
  • Whites in South Africa are being murdered at a significantly higher rate than whites living in any majority white nation anywhere in the world.
  • White farmers are being murdered in South Africa at one of the highest rates that any group of people anywhere in the world are being killed. Estimates vary wildly, but even the most conservative estimates would translate into an astronomic murder rate.
  • Many black politicians, including the current president, have recently sung songs in public that glorify the murder of white people.
  • Some black on black murders in South Africa are also motivated by ethnic hatred.
 
Wow, guy, you found something on a White Supremist Website?





AND ? ? ? ?

And it's horseshit.

This article discusses SA after Apartheid in more detail. It talks about some of the good and bad.

The reality is... White in South Africa STILL live better than blacks.

20 years since apartheid: What's changed in South Africa, and what hasn't | GlobalPost




SO WHY HAVE ALL THE WHITES GONE ? WHY ARE THERE SO MANY MURDERS IN S. A.
 
No, they think it's a good idea to take back their ancient spiritual and ethnic homeland, from the descendants of the most recent group to conquer it, and to eject those degenerate and impotent heirs of a once-mighty conquering collection of tribes. Judging by their adversaries own propaganda shrinkage-maps, they're doing a great job of it, so far.

Meh, not really. Zionist expansion reached its' maximum in 1967. Since then, they've been giving up land for peace. They've given up the Sinai, Gaza, chunks of the West bank. It's only a matter of time before they either have to have a "Two-State" solution that cuts the country in half or have to give up the Apartheid policies and become a minority in their own "country". either one works for me.

And, sorry, taking someone else's land because a sky pixie said so is kind of stupid.

Where was that sky pixie when Hitler was turning them into lampshades and bars of soap?




Why will they have to give up Israel then because that is what you are demanding. And why will they have to allow terrorists free access to Israel when no other civilised nation does. There is no international law that forces any nation to admit undesirables access to their land, and they can evict anyone that has dual nationality who shows they are an enemy of the state.

And you have once again shown that you are stupid for using this outdated reason when International law says they owned the land to begin with.

Where was America when he was doing that, sending Hilter more weapons to kill more untermensch. Then the Japs bombed Pearl Harbour.
According to UN Resolution 181:

1. Citizenship. Palestinian citizens residing in Palestine outside the City of Jerusalem, as well as Arabs and Jews who, not holding Palestinian citizenship, reside in Palestine outside the City of Jerusalem shall, upon the recognition of independence, become citizens of the State in which they are resident and enjoy full civil and political rights.

A/RES/181(II) of 29 November 1947

The Palestinian refugees are Israeli citizens.




How could they be resident when they left on the orders of the arab league
Link?
 
15th post
No, they think it's a good idea to take back their ancient spiritual and ethnic homeland, from the descendants of the most recent group to conquer it, and to eject those degenerate and impotent heirs of a once-mighty conquering collection of tribes. Judging by their adversaries own propaganda shrinkage-maps, they're doing a great job of it, so far.

Meh, not really. Zionist expansion reached its' maximum in 1967. Since then, they've been giving up land for peace. They've given up the Sinai, Gaza, chunks of the West bank. It's only a matter of time before they either have to have a "Two-State" solution that cuts the country in half or have to give up the Apartheid policies and become a minority in their own "country". either one works for me.

And, sorry, taking someone else's land because a sky pixie said so is kind of stupid.

Where was that sky pixie when Hitler was turning them into lampshades and bars of soap?




Why will they have to give up Israel then because that is what you are demanding. And why will they have to allow terrorists free access to Israel when no other civilised nation does. There is no international law that forces any nation to admit undesirables access to their land, and they can evict anyone that has dual nationality who shows they are an enemy of the state.

And you have once again shown that you are stupid for using this outdated reason when International law says they owned the land to begin with.

Where was America when he was doing that, sending Hilter more weapons to kill more untermensch. Then the Japs bombed Pearl Harbour.
According to UN Resolution 181:

1. Citizenship. Palestinian citizens residing in Palestine outside the City of Jerusalem, as well as Arabs and Jews who, not holding Palestinian citizenship, reside in Palestine outside the City of Jerusalem shall, upon the recognition of independence, become citizens of the State in which they are resident and enjoy full civil and political rights.

A/RES/181(II) of 29 November 1947

The Palestinian refugees are Israeli citizens.




How could they be resident when they left on the orders of the arab league
Link?




Don't you read the links already given on this subject, here a new one to add to your list




WHY DID THE ARABS LEAVE ISRAEL?


1948 - Palestinian journalist describes Arab leaders action in 1948:

"To the [Arab] Kings and Presidents: Poverty is killing us... yet you are still searching for the way to provide aid... like the armies of your predecessors in the year of 1948, who forced us to leave [Israel], on the pretext of clearing the battlefields of civilians... " [Fuad Abu Higla, columnist official PA daily Al Hayat Al Jadida, in an article before an Arab Summit, critical of Arab leaders for a series of failures. Al-Hayat Al-Jadidah, March 19, 2001]



"The Arab exodus from other villages were not caused by actual battle, but by the exaggerated description spread by Arab leaders to encourage the other Arab nations to fight the Jews." Yunes Ahmed Assad, A survivor of the Deir Yassin massacre, Al Urdun, 1948




"The fact that there are these refugees is the direct consequence of the actions of the Arab states, in opposing partition and the Jewish State. The Arab States agreed to this policy unanimously, and they must share in the solution of the problem." Emile Ghoury, an Arab commander and Palestine High Committee secretary, the Beirut Daily Telegraph 1948.
 
Did you read mine that sows the whites to have been ethnically cleansed from S/A.

Yeah, I did. And after I got done reading this laughable bit of Nazi propaganda, I pointed out the real facts. That South Africa not only has kept all it whites, but they are still enjoying most of their ill-gotten gains from Apartheid.
 
Meh, not really. Zionist expansion reached its' maximum in 1967. Since then, they've been giving up land for peace. They've given up the Sinai, Gaza, chunks of the West bank. It's only a matter of time before they either have to have a "Two-State" solution that cuts the country in half or have to give up the Apartheid policies and become a minority in their own "country". either one works for me.

And, sorry, taking someone else's land because a sky pixie said so is kind of stupid.

Where was that sky pixie when Hitler was turning them into lampshades and bars of soap?




Why will they have to give up Israel then because that is what you are demanding. And why will they have to allow terrorists free access to Israel when no other civilised nation does. There is no international law that forces any nation to admit undesirables access to their land, and they can evict anyone that has dual nationality who shows they are an enemy of the state.

And you have once again shown that you are stupid for using this outdated reason when International law says they owned the land to begin with.

Where was America when he was doing that, sending Hilter more weapons to kill more untermensch. Then the Japs bombed Pearl Harbour.
According to UN Resolution 181:

1. Citizenship. Palestinian citizens residing in Palestine outside the City of Jerusalem, as well as Arabs and Jews who, not holding Palestinian citizenship, reside in Palestine outside the City of Jerusalem shall, upon the recognition of independence, become citizens of the State in which they are resident and enjoy full civil and political rights.

A/RES/181(II) of 29 November 1947

The Palestinian refugees are Israeli citizens.




How could they be resident when they left on the orders of the arab league
Link?




Don't you read the links already given on this subject, here a new one to add to your list




WHY DID THE ARABS LEAVE ISRAEL?


1948 - Palestinian journalist describes Arab leaders action in 1948:

"To the [Arab] Kings and Presidents: Poverty is killing us... yet you are still searching for the way to provide aid... like the armies of your predecessors in the year of 1948, who forced us to leave [Israel], on the pretext of clearing the battlefields of civilians... " [Fuad Abu Higla, columnist official PA daily Al Hayat Al Jadida, in an article before an Arab Summit, critical of Arab leaders for a series of failures. Al-Hayat Al-Jadidah, March 19, 2001]



"The Arab exodus from other villages were not caused by actual battle, but by the exaggerated description spread by Arab leaders to encourage the other Arab nations to fight the Jews." Yunes Ahmed Assad, A survivor of the Deir Yassin massacre, Al Urdun, 1948




"The fact that there are these refugees is the direct consequence of the actions of the Arab states, in opposing partition and the Jewish State. The Arab States agreed to this policy unanimously, and they must share in the solution of the problem." Emile Ghoury, an Arab commander and Palestine High Committee secretary, the Beirut Daily Telegraph 1948.
Decisive causes of abandonment of Palestinian villages and towns according to Benny Morris
Decisive causes of abandonment Occurrences[141]

military assault on settlement 215
influence of nearby town's fall 59
expulsion by Jewish forces 53
fear (of being caught up in fighting) 48
whispering campaigns 15
abandonment on Arab orders 6
unknown 44

Causes of the 1948 Palestinian exodus - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Start @ 16:50

 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom