If only that were true. The truth is that figures don't lie but liars figure.The only thing people cannot manipulate in this world is math.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If only that were true. The truth is that figures don't lie but liars figure.The only thing people cannot manipulate in this world is math.
A time when we aren't having "hundred year" events every few years instead of every hundred.Define “normal “Nope, it's not.That's awesome!!I just ran the following experiment 100 times, making it as statistically significant as the AGW temperature data from 1850:
My 20 gallon fishtank was half full of water (H2O) the thermometer read 72.
I added a teeny, tiny liitle bit of Bromo Seltzer, like 1/4 of a gram which released a hail of CO2 into the contained fish tank.
An hour later, the thermometer still read 72.
I conducted this experiment 100 consecutive days and never measured any increase in temperature.
We conclude that increasing CO2 from 280 to 400PPM has no effect on temperature.
When can we expect the weather to go back to normal?
It already is
When will it be?
Example?A time when we aren't having "hundred year" events every few years instead of every hundred.Define “normal “Nope, it's not.That's awesome!!I just ran the following experiment 100 times, making it as statistically significant as the AGW temperature data from 1850:
My 20 gallon fishtank was half full of water (H2O) the thermometer read 72.
I added a teeny, tiny liitle bit of Bromo Seltzer, like 1/4 of a gram which released a hail of CO2 into the contained fish tank.
An hour later, the thermometer still read 72.
I conducted this experiment 100 consecutive days and never measured any increase in temperature.
We conclude that increasing CO2 from 280 to 400PPM has no effect on temperature.
When can we expect the weather to go back to normal?
It already is
When will it be?
1974?Example?A time when we aren't having "hundred year" events every few years instead of every hundred.Define “normal “Nope, it's not.That's awesome!!I just ran the following experiment 100 times, making it as statistically significant as the AGW temperature data from 1850:
My 20 gallon fishtank was half full of water (H2O) the thermometer read 72.
I added a teeny, tiny liitle bit of Bromo Seltzer, like 1/4 of a gram which released a hail of CO2 into the contained fish tank.
An hour later, the thermometer still read 72.
I conducted this experiment 100 consecutive days and never measured any increase in temperature.
We conclude that increasing CO2 from 280 to 400PPM has no effect on temperature.
When can we expect the weather to go back to normal?
It already is
When will it be?
What? What events are you referring to?1974?Example?A time when we aren't having "hundred year" events every few years instead of every hundred.Define “normal “Nope, it's not.That's awesome!!I just ran the following experiment 100 times, making it as statistically significant as the AGW temperature data from 1850:
My 20 gallon fishtank was half full of water (H2O) the thermometer read 72.
I added a teeny, tiny liitle bit of Bromo Seltzer, like 1/4 of a gram which released a hail of CO2 into the contained fish tank.
An hour later, the thermometer still read 72.
I conducted this experiment 100 consecutive days and never measured any increase in temperature.
We conclude that increasing CO2 from 280 to 400PPM has no effect on temperature.
When can we expect the weather to go back to normal?
It already is
When will it be?
You asked a silly question, so I gave you a silly answer.What? What events are you referring to?1974?Example?A time when we aren't having "hundred year" events every few years instead of every hundred.Define “normal “Nope, it's not.That's awesome!!I just ran the following experiment 100 times, making it as statistically significant as the AGW temperature data from 1850:
My 20 gallon fishtank was half full of water (H2O) the thermometer read 72.
I added a teeny, tiny liitle bit of Bromo Seltzer, like 1/4 of a gram which released a hail of CO2 into the contained fish tank.
An hour later, the thermometer still read 72.
I conducted this experiment 100 consecutive days and never measured any increase in temperature.
We conclude that increasing CO2 from 280 to 400PPM has no effect on temperature.
When can we expect the weather to go back to normal?
It already is
When will it be?
What events are you referring to? Link it?You asked a silly question, so I gave you a silly answer.What? What events are you referring to?1974?Example?A time when we aren't having "hundred year" events every few years instead of every hundred.Define “normal “Nope, it's not.That's awesome!!I just ran the following experiment 100 times, making it as statistically significant as the AGW temperature data from 1850:
My 20 gallon fishtank was half full of water (H2O) the thermometer read 72.
I added a teeny, tiny liitle bit of Bromo Seltzer, like 1/4 of a gram which released a hail of CO2 into the contained fish tank.
An hour later, the thermometer still read 72.
I conducted this experiment 100 consecutive days and never measured any increase in temperature.
We conclude that increasing CO2 from 280 to 400PPM has no effect on temperature.
When can we expect the weather to go back to normal?
It already is
When will it be?
Now try again, and this time think before you post.
I'll miss you.Goodbye douche.If only that were true. The truth is that figures don't lie but liars figure.The only thing people cannot manipulate in this world is math.
Lol, your an idiot. Co2 is a greenhouse gas meaning it traps light heat to start. What you have done is adding it to water. You have actually part of an experiment you have made your water more acidic. Your scientific method is hilarious. You wanna test get to plastic bottles. Fill one with air and cap. Fill the other with 20 percent more co2. Grab 250 watt light. Space bottles equal distance from light. . Forgot step place thermo meter in bottles before capping. In 30 minutes you will see a difference in temperature.I just ran the following experiment 100 times, making it as statistically significant as the AGW temperature data from 1850:
My 20 gallon fishtank was half full of water (H2O) the thermometer read 72.
I added a teeny, tiny liitle bit of Bromo Seltzer, like 1/4 of a gram which released a hail of CO2 into the contained fish tank.
An hour later, the thermometer still read 72.
I conducted this experiment 100 consecutive days and never measured any increase in temperature.
We conclude that increasing CO2 from 280 to 400PPM has no effect on temperature.
Lol, your an idiot. Co2 is a greenhouse gas meaning it traps light heat to start. What you have done is adding it to water. You have actually part of an experiment you have made your water more acidic. Your scientific method is hilarious. You wanna test get to plastic bottles. Fill one with air and cap. Fill the other with 20 percent more co2. Grab 250 watt light. Space bottles equal distance from light. . Forgot step place thermo meter in bottles before capping. In 30 minutes you will see a difference in temperature.I just ran the following experiment 100 times, making it as statistically significant as the AGW temperature data from 1850:
My 20 gallon fishtank was half full of water (H2O) the thermometer read 72.
I added a teeny, tiny liitle bit of Bromo Seltzer, like 1/4 of a gram which released a hail of CO2 into the contained fish tank.
An hour later, the thermometer still read 72.
I conducted this experiment 100 consecutive days and never measured any increase in temperature.
We conclude that increasing CO2 from 280 to 400PPM has no effect on temperature.
Nope, it's not.That's awesome!!I just ran the following experiment 100 times, making it as statistically significant as the AGW temperature data from 1850:
My 20 gallon fishtank was half full of water (H2O) the thermometer read 72.
I added a teeny, tiny liitle bit of Bromo Seltzer, like 1/4 of a gram which released a hail of CO2 into the contained fish tank.
An hour later, the thermometer still read 72.
I conducted this experiment 100 consecutive days and never measured any increase in temperature.
We conclude that increasing CO2 from 280 to 400PPM has no effect on temperature.
When can we expect the weather to go back to normal?
It already is
When will it be?
Ya, lol.okLol, your an idiot. Co2 is a greenhouse gas meaning it traps light heat to start. What you have done is adding it to water. You have actually part of an experiment you have made your water more acidic. Your scientific method is hilarious. You wanna test get to plastic bottles. Fill one with air and cap. Fill the other with 20 percent more co2. Grab 250 watt light. Space bottles equal distance from light. . Forgot step place thermo meter in bottles before capping. In 30 minutes you will see a difference in temperature.I just ran the following experiment 100 times, making it as statistically significant as the AGW temperature data from 1850:
My 20 gallon fishtank was half full of water (H2O) the thermometer read 72.
I added a teeny, tiny liitle bit of Bromo Seltzer, like 1/4 of a gram which released a hail of CO2 into the contained fish tank.
An hour later, the thermometer still read 72.
I conducted this experiment 100 consecutive days and never measured any increase in temperature.
We conclude that increasing CO2 from 280 to 400PPM has no effect on temperature.
However, the central thesis of AGW remains that increasing CO2 at these deminimus levels traps heat and raises temperatures. I did not observe this in my primitive and limited experiments
But it isn't. Record setting weather is happening every years these days. That's not normal.Nope, it's not.That's awesome!!I just ran the following experiment 100 times, making it as statistically significant as the AGW temperature data from 1850:
My 20 gallon fishtank was half full of water (H2O) the thermometer read 72.
I added a teeny, tiny liitle bit of Bromo Seltzer, like 1/4 of a gram which released a hail of CO2 into the contained fish tank.
An hour later, the thermometer still read 72.
I conducted this experiment 100 consecutive days and never measured any increase in temperature.
We conclude that increasing CO2 from 280 to 400PPM has no effect on temperature.
When can we expect the weather to go back to normal?
It already is
When will it be?
Actually, it is.
But it isn't. Record setting weather is happening every years these days. That's not normal.Nope, it's not.That's awesome!!I just ran the following experiment 100 times, making it as statistically significant as the AGW temperature data from 1850:
My 20 gallon fishtank was half full of water (H2O) the thermometer read 72.
I added a teeny, tiny liitle bit of Bromo Seltzer, like 1/4 of a gram which released a hail of CO2 into the contained fish tank.
An hour later, the thermometer still read 72.
I conducted this experiment 100 consecutive days and never measured any increase in temperature.
We conclude that increasing CO2 from 280 to 400PPM has no effect on temperature.
When can we expect the weather to go back to normal?
It already is
When will it be?
Actually, it is.
Lol, your an idiot. Co2 is a greenhouse gas meaning it traps light heat to start. What you have done is adding it to water. You have actually part of an experiment you have made your water more acidic. Your scientific method is hilarious. You wanna test get to plastic bottles. Fill one with air and cap. Fill the other with 20 percent more co2. Grab 250 watt light. Space bottles equal distance from light. . Forgot step place thermo meter in bottles before capping. In 30 minutes you will see a difference in temperature.I just ran the following experiment 100 times, making it as statistically significant as the AGW temperature data from 1850:
My 20 gallon fishtank was half full of water (H2O) the thermometer read 72.
I added a teeny, tiny liitle bit of Bromo Seltzer, like 1/4 of a gram which released a hail of CO2 into the contained fish tank.
An hour later, the thermometer still read 72.
I conducted this experiment 100 consecutive days and never measured any increase in temperature.
We conclude that increasing CO2 from 280 to 400PPM has no effect on temperature.
However, the central thesis of AGW remains that increasing CO2 at these deminimus levels traps heat and raises temperatures. I did not observe this in my primitive and limited experiments
But it isn't. Record setting weather is happening every years these days. That's not normal.Nope, it's not.That's awesome!!I just ran the following experiment 100 times, making it as statistically significant as the AGW temperature data from 1850:
My 20 gallon fishtank was half full of water (H2O) the thermometer read 72.
I added a teeny, tiny liitle bit of Bromo Seltzer, like 1/4 of a gram which released a hail of CO2 into the contained fish tank.
An hour later, the thermometer still read 72.
I conducted this experiment 100 consecutive days and never measured any increase in temperature.
We conclude that increasing CO2 from 280 to 400PPM has no effect on temperature.
When can we expect the weather to go back to normal?
It already is
When will it be?
Actually, it is.
The flaw in your dishonest trolling there is that liquid water blocks longwave IR extremely well, so adding more CO2 is insignificant.I just
Oh... well then in that case your test failed to simulate the conditions of our habitat and is this yielding irrelevant results. Keep trying.Is your tank salt water? If so, drop some ice cubes in it and set up a heat lamp... then constrict a bio dome that can replicate an atmospheric habitat similar to earth. Then measure how the melting of the ice effects the currents, sea life, and weather patterns of your environment. Once you get all that going check back in and we can’t play with contaminants and how they effect the habitatI just ran the following experiment 100 times, making it as statistically significant as the AGW temperature data from 1850:
My 20 gallon fishtank was half full of water (H2O) the thermometer read 72.
I added a teeny, tiny liitle bit of Bromo Seltzer, like 1/4 of a gram which released a hail of CO2 into the contained fish tank.
An hour later, the thermometer still read 72.
I conducted this experiment 100 consecutive days and never measured any increase in temperature.
We conclude that increasing CO2 from 280 to 400PPM has no effect on temperature.
It's fresh water, Honey Boo Boo.
The experiment was merely to test for any increase in temperature from an increase in CO2 at the level that the AGW Cult tells us is already causing a Sixth Extinction Cycle.
The Experiment holds it's first test! Slade agrees that there is no increase in temperature!
Oh good, I guess since we are now just making up declarations for eachother we can move this thread into satire and proceed.
CrusaderFrank admits his experiment was actually dropping a number two into the toilet while taking his own temperature. No temperature change was recorded
Should be easy for you to post an experiment showing a temperature increase, right?
Very easy. I just did... you didn’t read my post? You need to take the water temp not your own... that’s where you mess yours up.
But it isn't. Record setting weather is happening every years these days. That's not normal.Nope, it's not.That's awesome!!I just ran the following experiment 100 times, making it as statistically significant as the AGW temperature data from 1850:
My 20 gallon fishtank was half full of water (H2O) the thermometer read 72.
I added a teeny, tiny liitle bit of Bromo Seltzer, like 1/4 of a gram which released a hail of CO2 into the contained fish tank.
An hour later, the thermometer still read 72.
I conducted this experiment 100 consecutive days and never measured any increase in temperature.
We conclude that increasing CO2 from 280 to 400PPM has no effect on temperature.
When can we expect the weather to go back to normal?
It already is
When will it be?
Actually, it is.