The Co2 fraud is misdiagnosing fires, and life on land is perishing because of this fraud

[mamooth]

There are fires globally. There is but one explanation, ever increasing human consumption of FINITE land based fresh water is leaving plants dry and ready to burn.

Water isn't destroyed, dumbass. It's not removed from the global water cycle(*). Whatever the use, it eventually goes back into the oceans and/or the atmosphere, and then rains back down. Did you not learn about the water cycle in first grade?

(*Except for rare instances like being injected into a fracking well, being split by electrolysis, or being consumed in a chemical reacion such as the curing of concrete, or leaking down to form groundwater that isn't sucked back up. These cases are completely insignificant in terms of the total amount of water in the biosphere. Since so much groundwater is being pumped up now, the total amount of water available is increasing.)

 

[EMH]

historical backup

The map of the Arctic is the historical backup. LOL!!!

WHY is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland, but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?

Jeopardy! music still playing...

 

[EMH]

Water isn't destroyed, dumbass. It's not removed from the global water cycle(*). Whatever the use, it eventually goes back into the oceans and/or the atmosphere, and then rains back down. Did you not learn about the water cycle in first grade

Nobody is saying that, Mossad Witch.

The claim is that humans are sucking an ever increasing amount of finite land based fresh water out of nature, and THAT is leaving plants dry and ready to burn.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The map of the Arctic is the historical backup. LOL!!!

WHY is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland, but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?

Jeopardy! music still playing...

Still no luck finding historical backup for your glacier claims?
They destroyed all the evidence in Obama's first term?

 

[EMH]

Still no luck finding historical backup for your glacier claims?
They destroyed all the evidence in Obama's first term?

What homO did after her "silence"

obama climate silence 2010 2012 - Google Search

www.google.com

is show the FBI fraud case to the "scientists" and the "scientists" billed us to come up with McBullshit.

Remember our debate, where you cited a "study" claiming wood outside in nature unfrozen did not decompose in 20k years...

How old were the 2.5 mile thick glaciers covering Chicago in the past 20k-5 million years?

This is where the climate debate is now stuck. Every piece of land within 600 miles of a pole is in ice age, everything outside of that is not. Nobody has attempted to dispute that. It is the clear truth of Earth today. Milankovitch Cycles, which I call McBullshit Cycles, take a very...

www.usmessageboard.com

McBullshit is off by a factor of 10+ on all current measures of ice age glaciers. The North American Ice Age is correct. McBullshit is bullshit, and you got destroyed in that debate as usual...

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

What homO did after her "silence"

obama climate silence 2010 2012 - Google Search

www.google.com

is show the FBI fraud case to the "scientists" and the "scientists" billed us to come up with McBullshit.

Remember our debate, where you cited a "study" claiming wood outside in nature unfrozen did not decompose in 20k years...

How old were the 2.5 mile thick glaciers covering Chicago in the past 20k-5 million years?

This is where the climate debate is now stuck. Every piece of land within 600 miles of a pole is in ice age, everything outside of that is not. Nobody has attempted to dispute that. It is the clear truth of Earth today. Milankovitch Cycles, which I call McBullshit Cycles, take a very...

www.usmessageboard.com

McBullshit is off by a factor of 10+ on all current measures of ice age glaciers. The North American Ice Age is correct. McBullshit is bullshit, and you got destroyed in that debate as usual...

Remember our debate, where you cited a "study" claiming wood outside in nature unfrozen did not decompose in 20k years...

The one that mentioned wood and soil samples?

 

[EMH]

Remember our debate, where you cited a "study" claiming wood outside in nature unfrozen did not decompose in 20k years...

The one that mentioned wood and soil samples?

YUP

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

YUP

I'll bet you wish you had as much evidence against that claim.

 

[EMH]

I'll bet you wish you had as much evidence against that claim.

All the evidence needed is there, which is why you cannot refute any of it...

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

All the evidence needed is there, which is why you cannot refute any of it...

Still no evidence from you. It's embarrassing.

 

[EMH]

Still no evidence from you. It's embarrassing.

That's why I'm linking the debate and you still cannot refute any of it...

 

[mamooth]

Nobody is saying that, Mossad Witch.

The claim is that humans are sucking an ever increasing amount of finite land based fresh water out of nature, and THAT is leaving plants dry and ready to burn.

So how are the humans doing that?

Are you claiming that plants far, far away from rivers and groundwater rely on rivers and groundwater?

You seem to be saying that, and it's hilariously stupid.

 

[mamooth]

The map of the Arctic is the historical backup. LOL!!!

WHY is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland, but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?

Jeopardy! music still playing...

That's been answered before, several time.

Each time, you pissed yourself, ran away crying, and lied about it.

I'd rank you as the biggest coward on this board. Given the competition, that's quite an accomplishment on your part.

 

[EMH]

So how are the humans doing that?

Are you claiming that plants far, far away from rivers and groundwater rely on rivers and groundwater?

You seem to be saying that, and it's hilariously stupid.

Every additional human in America consumes fresh water. Fresh water comes from nature, because the Co2 fraud is misdiagnosing the problem and preventing solutions like desalination by stealing all the $$ for the "environment."

Fresh water on land is finite.

What is changing is humans are consuming more and more of it.

If you cannot understand that and its consequences, then you must be a very LOW END MOSSAD with an IQ under 5....

 

[EMH]

That's been answered before, several time.

Each time, you pissed yourself, ran away crying, and lied about it.

I'd rank you as the biggest coward on this board. Given the competition, that's quite an accomplishment on your part.

Your pathetic attempt to answer it is in the thread for all to see, refuted completely as you were LYING/WRONG about precipitation in Greenland vs Alaska by 180 degrees.

 

[mamooth]

Every additional human in America consumes fresh water. Fresh water comes from nature,

No, fresh water comes from specific sources, either bodies of water or groundwater.

Those only provide water to plants that are directly adjacent. Yet we see plants everywhere having trouble.

Thus, your theory is hilariously stupid.

 

[EMH]

No, fresh water comes from specific sources, either bodies of water or groundwater.

Those only provide water to plants that are directly adjacent. Yet we see plants everywhere having trouble.

Thus, your theory is hilariously stupid.

Just how dumb is this. So if a plant is not within 10 feet of a body of water, it has no water??

LOL!!!

Groundwater, there's a term that you do not seem to understand. Try to follow and learn.

Rain/snow is the source of all land based fresh water. That settles in lakes, ponds, rivers, and LAND. On Land, it sinks in soil, groundwater is under soil, but groundwater eventually runs into a body of water, and if that body of water is dropping levels, the groundwater pours into it. It is not separate but part of a system. The water in groundwater does not stay there for 300 years. It either gets sucked up by plants or it flows to where ever gravity/water pressure pulls it.


The system is finite. There are years of more rain and less rain but over time, it is a system and it is finite.

To endlessly INCREASE human consumption of land based fresh water produces precisely what we observe today. Fires, life upstream running out of water and dying. The Co2 fraud's misdiagnosis of it is one of the worst, if not THE WORST, crime ever against the actual environment.

But the Co2 fraud is a Jew Fraud, so defend it you will...

 

[Rigby5]

Well as much as I am sure global warming is real, I doubt these fires are related, and EMH is likely correct they are from excess consumption of water by humans.

If you drain ground well water lower, then all ground above that will also be drier, plants will die, and they will ignite more easily.

But I have not yet looked into rainfall changes?

 

[Rigby5]

No, fresh water comes from specific sources, either bodies of water or groundwater.

Those only provide water to plants that are directly adjacent. Yet we see plants everywhere having trouble.

Thus, your theory is hilariously stupid.

Wrong.
The ground holds moisture like a sponge, so if you drain deep groundwater from drinking wells, then the ground above the sinking water level will all become drier.

The excess well consumption is not local, but lowers the water table everywhere, uniformly.

 

[Dagosa]

There are fires globally. There is but one explanation, ever increasing human consumption of FINITE land based fresh water is leaving plants dry and ready to burn.

The Co2 fraud claims a (ficticious) 2 degree rise in temperature is behind it, not increased human consumption of fresh water.

The data refutes the fraud. Warm tropical rainforests have no such fires, despite being 115F. What is burning is where humans are sucking out too much water, especially off Colorado River. Canada is in similar denial because their "leader" is part of the Co2 fraud and does not care.

There is a human overpopulation problem, and the fires are the first sign of it. Plants do not burn by small amounts of temperature increases (which oh by the way are NOT HAPPENING). If you heat your house to 90F your plants do not go up in flames.

WILDFIRES ARE 100% ABOUT LACK of WATER.

What can we do?

We could build more desalination plants near the oceans and consume ocean water while leaving land based fresh water supplies intact, but the Co2 fraud is sucking up all the taxpayer $$$ and lying and misdiagnosing to keep itself going.

We could enact policies to curb overpopulation.


For those of you absolute morons who do think Co2 is causing the fires, consider this....

Would there be more or less fires if Earth was actually warming???

ANSWER = LESS

Why? Because a warmer Earth is a wetter Earth, that H2O in the atmosphere goes up exponentially with temperature


PROOF is a graph, X axis temperature, Y axis moisture H2O in the atmosphere



First data point X - Earth with max surface temp of 30F Y axis - ZERO - all H2O is frozen, none is in the atmosphere, and yes you can have huge fires in sub zero temperatures, ask Chicago...

Last data point X - Earth with min suface temp of 220F Y axis - All H2O is in the atmosphere, since you boiled out the oceans

Today

Jurassic - WARMER and WETTER

jurassic warmer wetter - Google Search

www.google.com

As we are fooled on a variety of subjects like Murderous Fraud Vax and 911, it is always the dumbest and most fearful who get the diagnosis WRONG.


WE ARE IN A LAND BASED FRESH WATER EMERGENCY that has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH CO2 THAT IS NOT WARMING ANYTHING

No it isn’t. According to Trump, all these fires are the result of poor raking,