Pinko Schumer threatens to block Trump's FBI director pick despite lacking votes to do so

[BULLDOG]

The Deputy AG....who was confirmed 96-4 in the senate, was the person who recommended that Comey be fired.

That was the claim 3 or 4 iterations back. Trump made it clear that is not hat happened. Trump requested that evaluation, but said his mind was made up before then,

 

[Preacher]

Whoops, sorry for the double topic. The servers have been acting weird. Please delete.

Yea something is wrong with the forum today. Taking forever to post and then it double posts. Pain in the ass.

 

[ColonelAngus]

BILL CLINTON FIRED WILLIAM SESSIONS IN 1993.

Snowflakes need to STFU.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Trump is a Russian spy...he wasn't activated by Putin until he rode down the escalator.

 

[Cellblock2429]

U.S. Senate Democrats may refuse to vote on Trump FBI pick: Schumer

The top Democrat in the U.S. Senate said on Sunday that Democrats would consider refusing to vote on a new FBI director until a special prosecutor is named to investigate President Donald Trump’s potential ties to Russia.

Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer said his caucus has not yet made a decision on whether to withhold their votes, but added that the issue is being looked at as a way to ensure there is a thorough investigation of alleged Russian meddling in the 2016 U.S. election.

"To have that special prosecutor, people would breathe a sigh of relief because then there would be a real independent person overlooking the FBI director," Schumer told CNN's "State of the Union" program.

Trump sparked a political firestorm when he abruptly fired James Comey, director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation last week. The FBI has been investigating alleged Russian meddling in the U.S. election and possible ties between Moscow and the Trump campaign.

Russia has denied the claims and the White House says there was no collusion.

Trump, who has sought better relations with Russia, has continued to question whether Russia was behind the hacking of email accounts belonging to Democrats involved in Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign.


But Secretary of State Rex Tillerson told NBC's "Meet the Press" program on Sunday there is no question that "the Russians were playing around in our electoral processes."

He defended Trump's decision to meet with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov in the Oval Office last week.

"It's in the interest of the American people, it's in the interest of Russia and the rest of the world that we do something to see if we cannot improve the relationship between the two greatest nuclear powers in the world," Tillerson said.

Democrats have accused Trump of attempting to thwart the FBI's probe and have called for some type of independent inquiry into the matter.


Trump has said he removed Comey because he was not doing a good job and that Comey lost the support of FBI employees.

The Justice Department began interviewing candidates for the FBI director job on Saturday. Some people under consideration include acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe, Republican Senator John Cornyn of Texas, New York Appeals Court Judge Michael Garcia and former Assistant Attorney General Alice Fisher, according to a White House official.

If the Senate vote on an FBI director were to break down along strict party lines, Democrats would not have the votes to block a nominee...

..

Republican Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina said on Sunday there may come a time when a special prosecutor is needed but not now.

"Right now, it is a counterintelligence investigation, not a criminal investigation. So you don't need a special prosecutor," Graham said on "Meet the Press."

Schumer is the one who needs to be investigated along with Hillary Clinton probably:

/---- It's all a ruse to rake in donations for the mid terms. Dems have nothing else.

 

[ClosedCaption]

How does it benefit anyone besides Trump to influence an ongoing investigation?

Because you like Trump so it's OK to obstruct justice only when you're cool with it?

I can see you are a wellspring of IT knowledge.
emails are packed with information.
The FBI already knows everything it needs to know.

I asked why obstructions is OK and your response is to talk about how much the FBI needs or has?

 

[LaDexter]

That Schumer is foaming out at the mouth angry is always a great sign for AMERICA.

 

[Indeependent]

How does it benefit anyone besides Trump to influence an ongoing investigation?

Because you like Trump so it's OK to obstruct justice only when you're cool with it?

I can see you are a wellspring of IT knowledge.
emails are packed with information.
The FBI already knows everything it needs to know.

I asked why obstructions is OK and your response is to talk about how much the FBI needs or has?

If there IS obstruction, it's to protect Hillary, as the FBI hates Trump.
Try better.

 

[LaDexter]

I asked why obstructions is OK

"obstructions" is plural ... s/b obstructions ARE OK (if Hillary or the Dems do it)....


Clearly, not all uneducated were Trump supporters...

 

[bripat9643]

U.S. Senate Democrats may refuse to vote on Trump FBI pick: Schumer

The top Democrat in the U.S. Senate said on Sunday that Democrats would consider refusing to vote on a new FBI director until a special prosecutor is named to investigate President Donald Trump’s potential ties to Russia.

Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer said his caucus has not yet made a decision on whether to withhold their votes, but added that the issue is being looked at as a way to ensure there is a thorough investigation of alleged Russian meddling in the 2016 U.S. election.

"To have that special prosecutor, people would breathe a sigh of relief because then there would be a real independent person overlooking the FBI director," Schumer told CNN's "State of the Union" program.

Trump sparked a political firestorm when he abruptly fired James Comey, director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation last week. The FBI has been investigating alleged Russian meddling in the U.S. election and possible ties between Moscow and the Trump campaign.

Russia has denied the claims and the White House says there was no collusion.

Trump, who has sought better relations with Russia, has continued to question whether Russia was behind the hacking of email accounts belonging to Democrats involved in Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign.


But Secretary of State Rex Tillerson told NBC's "Meet the Press" program on Sunday there is no question that "the Russians were playing around in our electoral processes."

He defended Trump's decision to meet with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov in the Oval Office last week.

"It's in the interest of the American people, it's in the interest of Russia and the rest of the world that we do something to see if we cannot improve the relationship between the two greatest nuclear powers in the world," Tillerson said.

Democrats have accused Trump of attempting to thwart the FBI's probe and have called for some type of independent inquiry into the matter.


Trump has said he removed Comey because he was not doing a good job and that Comey lost the support of FBI employees.

The Justice Department began interviewing candidates for the FBI director job on Saturday. Some people under consideration include acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe, Republican Senator John Cornyn of Texas, New York Appeals Court Judge Michael Garcia and former Assistant Attorney General Alice Fisher, according to a White House official.

If the Senate vote on an FBI director were to break down along strict party lines, Democrats would not have the votes to block a nominee...

..

Republican Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina said on Sunday there may come a time when a special prosecutor is needed but not now.

"Right now, it is a counterintelligence investigation, not a criminal investigation. So you don't need a special prosecutor," Graham said on "Meet the Press."

Schumer is the one who needs to be investigated along with Hillary Clinton probably:

Here's the upshot of Schumer's threat:

 

[bripat9643]

How does it benefit anyone besides Trump to influence an ongoing investigation?

Because you like Trump so it's OK to obstruct justice only when you're cool with it?

We all benefit when that faux investigation is shut down.

 

[ClosedCaption]

How does it benefit anyone besides Trump to influence an ongoing investigation?

Because you like Trump so it's OK to obstruct justice only when you're cool with it?

I can see you are a wellspring of IT knowledge.
emails are packed with information.
The FBI already knows everything it needs to know.

I asked why obstructions is OK and your response is to talk about how much the FBI needs or has?

If there IS obstruction, it's to protect Hillary, as the FBI hates Trump.
Try better.

You keep mentioning everything except why obstruction of justice is ok. Seems you don't have an answer.

 

[Indeependent]

How does it benefit anyone besides Trump to influence an ongoing investigation?

Because you like Trump so it's OK to obstruct justice only when you're cool with it?

I can see you are a wellspring of IT knowledge.
emails are packed with information.
The FBI already knows everything it needs to know.

I asked why obstructions is OK and your response is to talk about how much the FBI needs or has?

If there IS obstruction, it's to protect Hillary, as the FBI hates Trump.
Try better.

You keep mentioning everything except why obstruction of justice is ok. Seems you don't have an answer.

What obstruction?
Given today's technology there's no reason the FBI needs more money for this specific investigation.
The only excuse is that Comey knows as much about technology as you do.

 

[ClosedCaption]

How does it benefit anyone besides Trump to influence an ongoing investigation?

Because you like Trump so it's OK to obstruct justice only when you're cool with it?

We all benefit when that faux investigation is shut down.

I've asked you how several times...is it a secret surprise?

 

[ClosedCaption]

How does it benefit anyone besides Trump to influence an ongoing investigation?

Because you like Trump so it's OK to obstruct justice only when you're cool with it?

I can see you are a wellspring of IT knowledge.
emails are packed with information.
The FBI already knows everything it needs to know.

I asked why obstructions is OK and your response is to talk about how much the FBI needs or has?

If there IS obstruction, it's to protect Hillary, as the FBI hates Trump.
Try better.

You keep mentioning everything except why obstruction of justice is ok. Seems you don't have an answer.

What obstruction?
Given today's technology there's no reason the FBI needs more money for this specific investigation.
The only excuse is that Comey knows as much about technology as you do.

If i used your own words then The obstruction you just said was to help Hillary.

Did you forget that fast or you didn't mean to say obstruction?

 

[Indeependent]

I can see you are a wellspring of IT knowledge.
emails are packed with information.
The FBI already knows everything it needs to know.

I asked why obstructions is OK and your response is to talk about how much the FBI needs or has?

If there IS obstruction, it's to protect Hillary, as the FBI hates Trump.
Try better.

You keep mentioning everything except why obstruction of justice is ok. Seems you don't have an answer.

What obstruction?
Given today's technology there's no reason the FBI needs more money for this specific investigation.
The only excuse is that Comey knows as much about technology as you do.

If i used your own words then The obstruction you just said was to help Hillary.

Did you forget that fast or you didn't mean to say obstruction?

Don't let me stop you from embarrassing yourself even further, Mr. Wellspring of IT Knowledge.
Why don't you give the unneeded money for the needless continuation of the investigation?

 

[Indeependent]

I can see you are a wellspring of IT knowledge.
emails are packed with information.
The FBI already knows everything it needs to know.

I asked why obstructions is OK and your response is to talk about how much the FBI needs or has?

If there IS obstruction, it's to protect Hillary, as the FBI hates Trump.
Try better.

You keep mentioning everything except why obstruction of justice is ok. Seems you don't have an answer.

What obstruction?
Given today's technology there's no reason the FBI needs more money for this specific investigation.
The only excuse is that Comey knows as much about technology as you do.

If i used your own words then The obstruction you just said was to help Hillary.

Did you forget that fast or you didn't mean to say obstruction?

I apologize if you are upset that the FBI is protecting Hillary.

 

[ClosedCaption]

I asked why obstructions is OK and your response is to talk about how much the FBI needs or has?

If there IS obstruction, it's to protect Hillary, as the FBI hates Trump.
Try better.

You keep mentioning everything except why obstruction of justice is ok. Seems you don't have an answer.

What obstruction?
Given today's technology there's no reason the FBI needs more money for this specific investigation.
The only excuse is that Comey knows as much about technology as you do.

If i used your own words then The obstruction you just said was to help Hillary.

Did you forget that fast or you didn't mean to say obstruction?

I apologize if you are upset that the FBI is protecting Hillary.

So obstruction is OK then? Or are you going to go between "what obstruction?" Followed by "they obstruct for Hilary"?

 

[Indeependent]

If there IS obstruction, it's to protect Hillary, as the FBI hates Trump.
Try better.

You keep mentioning everything except why obstruction of justice is ok. Seems you don't have an answer.

What obstruction?
Given today's technology there's no reason the FBI needs more money for this specific investigation.
The only excuse is that Comey knows as much about technology as you do.

If i used your own words then The obstruction you just said was to help Hillary.

Did you forget that fast or you didn't mean to say obstruction?

I apologize if you are upset that the FBI is protecting Hillary.

So obstruction is OK then? Or are you going to go between "what obstruction?" Followed by "they obstruct for Hilary"?

The only reason you want this completed investigation to continue is because you refuse to accept that the FBI is most probably protecting Hillary.
No one goes after Hillary and lives; that's a fact.

 

[ClosedCaption]

You keep mentioning everything except why obstruction of justice is ok. Seems you don't have an answer.

What obstruction?
Given today's technology there's no reason the FBI needs more money for this specific investigation.
The only excuse is that Comey knows as much about technology as you do.

If i used your own words then The obstruction you just said was to help Hillary.

Did you forget that fast or you didn't mean to say obstruction?

I apologize if you are upset that the FBI is protecting Hillary.

So obstruction is OK then? Or are you going to go between "what obstruction?" Followed by "they obstruct for Hilary"?

The only reason you want this completed investigation to continue is because you refuse to accept that the FBI is most probably protecting Hillary.
No one goes after Hillary and lives; that's a fact.

I want the investigation to continue because it protects Hilary? And you want it to stop to what? Stop protecting her? Lmao