Philly filmmaker dies 'suddenly in his sleep' at age 45 on Thanksgiving; Frank Tartaglia had been in 'good health,' family says

No, the government is making empty claims while not allowing any facts to come forward by legal malfesesnce and unconstitutional acts that defy the rule of law.

Yes the SC is just as corrupt by violating their oath of office. If you claim to support the rule of law you would know this. You have no fucking idea of what our Constitution really says.
Sure I do. I’ve read it. And all these claims you are now making about corrupt courts are baseless just like your stolen election claims and vaccine none sense. When pressed you fail time and time again to back up your statements and now you just default to saying it’s “obvious” which is a none argument
 
Sure I do. I’ve read it. And all these claims you are now making about corrupt courts are baseless just like your stolen election claims and vaccine none sense. When pressed you fail time and time again to back up your statements and now you just default to saying it’s “obvious” which is a none argument
Fuck you and your baseless. Only a trail with evidence can prove those things are baseless and that has not happened.
 
Fuck you and your baseless. Only a trail with evidence can prove those things are baseless and that has not happened.
Wrong. Cases need to meet certain standards/criteria to elevate to hearings and trials. Or else our courts would be gridlocked with thousands of whacko claims.

Your claims don’t elevate. That’s not proof of corruption that’s proof that your narrative is BS
 
Wrong. Cases need to meet certain standards/criteria to elevate to hearings and trials. Or else our courts would be gridlocked with thousands of whacko claims.

Your claims don’t elevate. That’s not proof of corruption that’s proof that your narrative is BS
No, you are wrong. Cases like this need resolution and that cannot be provided until those people claiming fraud get the chance to prove it. That did not happen. You have lost another argument and are way to fucking dumb to understand that.
 
No, you are wrong. Cases like this need resolution and that cannot be provided until those people claiming fraud get the chance to prove it. That did not happen. You have lost another argument and are way to fucking dumb to understand that.
Those cases got resolution when they got tossed out by judges. Maybe not in your mind but in a legal sense and for most of America it appears to be laid to rest.

You just spouting off and calling everything that counters your arguments fake and corrupt is meaningless with you not being able to back it up
 
Those cases got resolution when they got tossed out by judges. Maybe not in your mind but in a legal sense and for most of America it appears to be laid to rest.

You just spouting off and calling everything that counters your arguments fake and corrupt is meaningless with you not being able to back it up
This not even the topic and those cases were dismissed. How does that resolve anything? Judges do not have that power. You are really one dumb MF.
 
This not even the topic and those cases were dismissed. How does that resolve anything? Judges do not have that power. You are really one dumb MF.
Judges absolutely have that power. If a case doesn’t meet legal standards it is tossed. That resolves it
 
Judges absolutely have that power. If a case doesn’t meet legal standards it is tossed. That resolves it
Wrong again. The judge cannot do that because it is clearly unconstitutional. His or her decision is an opinion and opinions are not laws. Go away stupid.

Remember the Constitution was written to keep the government honest.
 
Wrong again. The judge cannot do that because it is clearly unconstitutional. His or her decision is an opinion and opinions are not laws. Go away stupid.

Remember the Constitution was written to keep the government honest.
His or her decision is based on the law. Can you show an example of a trump appointed judge making an illegal decision about a stolen election case? Let’s see how well you can back up your BS.
 
His or her decision is based on the law. Can you show an example of a trump appointed judge making an illegal decision about a stolen election case? Let’s see how well you can back up your BS.
I told you none of this is on topic and you still persist. Start a thread on it or just STFU.
 
I told you none of this is on topic and you still persist. Start a thread on it or just STFU.
You brought up all this nonsense about corrupt courts. I simply called you on your regular bullshit of making unfounded claims that you don’t even try to back up
 
There goes that SADS again but no mention of the V word!


"
"Frank Tartaglia, a filmmaker and beloved fixture in the south Philadelphia arts scene, died suddenly last week, the Philadelphia Inquirer reported.

Here's how writer Mike Newall described Tartaglia's passing:





So do you have any evidence that this death was caused by a COVID vaccines?

Or is this just random speculation based on what you read from a wordpress blog?
 
Apparently the intentional or accidental ingestion of fentanyl kills pretty quickly. Nobody in the media or the government seems overly concerned that twice as many healthy young Americans die from fentanyl poisoning every year than the entire Vietnam war.
 
Apparently the intentional or accidental ingestion of fentanyl kills pretty quickly. Nobody in the media or the government seems overly concerned that twice as many healthy young Americans die from fentanyl poisoning every year than the entire Vietnam war.
Are you sure those aren’t deaths from the poisonous vax shots?
 
You brought up all this nonsense about corrupt courts. I simply called you on your regular bullshit of making unfounded claims that you don’t even try to back up


Respondents were properly warned and were requested to
make an investigation into a highly covert swift and
powerful enemy, as stated below, seeking to destroy the
Constitution and the United States,
purposely thwarted all efforts to investigate this,
whereupon this enemy was not checked or investigated,
therefore the Respondents adhered to this enemy. Because
of Respondents intentional refusal to investigate this
enemy, Petitioner Raland J Brunson (“ Brunson ”) brought
this action against Respondents because he was seriously
personally damaged and violated by this action of
Respondents, and consequently this action unilaterally
violated the rights of every citizen of the U.S.A. and
perhaps the rights of every person living, and all courts of
law
file:///C:/Users/coldj/Downloads/20221027152243533_20221027-152110-95757954-00007015(2).pdf
 
Respondents were properly warned and were requested to
make an investigation into a highly covert swift and
powerful enemy, as stated below, seeking to destroy the
Constitution and the United States,
purposely thwarted all efforts to investigate this,
whereupon this enemy was not checked or investigated,
therefore the Respondents adhered to this enemy. Because
of Respondents intentional refusal to investigate this
enemy, Petitioner Raland J Brunson (“ Brunson ”) brought
this action against Respondents because he was seriously
personally damaged and violated by this action of
Respondents, and consequently this action unilaterally
violated the rights of every citizen of the U.S.A. and
perhaps the rights of every person living, and all courts of
law
file:///C:/Users/coldj/Downloads/20221027152243533_20221027-152110-95757954-00007015(2).pdf
Your point being?
 

Forum List

Back
Top