Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Should he be allowed in the hall of fame? should he be allowed to manage again?
Since there's no proof that he bet against his team and it's only my gut instinct, I say let him in the HOF.
But not manage. He blew that one.
Hall of Fame=Yes
Manage=No, just because I don't think he would be very good at it now, after all this time away from the game.
if the reds choose to hire him as manager, should baseball allow it?
Hall of Fame=Yes
Manage=No, just because I don't think he would be very good at it now, after all this time away from the game.
if the reds choose to hire him as manager, should baseball allow it?
hmmmmmmmmmmmm,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,if they want to shoot themselves in the foot, I guess. I just don't think he would be very good. They let steroid users and criminals play professional sports, why not let Rose manage a team I guess.
Should he be allowed in the hall of fame? should he be allowed to manage again?
No hall for mr Bets.
In sports they are.No hall for mr Bets.
Well, as I pointed out in another thread, BETS are apparently much worse than DRUGS (including steroids)....
In sports they are.No hall for mr Bets.
Well, as I pointed out in another thread, BETS are apparently much worse than DRUGS (including steroids)....
People do drugs to play better.
Betters throw games to make money.
Understand the difference?
BTW, Rose admitted he bet on games he was managing, he claims he was betting on his team to win. Nobody will ever know if that is the truth, but it's clear it effects the integrity of the game.
In sports they are.No hall for mr Bets.
Well, as I pointed out in another thread, BETS are apparently much worse than DRUGS (including steroids)....
People do drugs to play better.
Betters throw games to make money.
Understand the difference?
BTW, Rose admitted he bet on games he was managing, he claims he was betting on his team to win. Nobody will ever know if that is the truth, but it's clear it effects the integrity of the game.
Five'll get you nine he doesn't get in.
You are arguing to no purpose, I have said before you started posting here they should have banned all the juicers.In sports they are.Well, as I pointed out in another thread, BETS are apparently much worse than DRUGS (including steroids)....
People do drugs to play better.
Betters throw games to make money.
Understand the difference?
BTW, Rose admitted he bet on games he was managing, he claims he was betting on his team to win. Nobody will ever know if that is the truth, but it's clear it effects the integrity of the game.
I see.... And drugs absolutely IMPROVE the integrity of the game.... Got it.... You've heard of Gooden and Strawberry, just to mention a couple, right? One can only imagine what Mantle's stats might have been if he hadn't partied so much every night, given what they were as a party animal....
Yes, I understand completely the difference....
Let's suppose, as someone pointed out to me, that Rose bet on his team to win on Tuesday, and in Monday's game he kept the starter in well beyond the point he reasonably should have in order to save his relievers for Tuesday's game. That would mean that he threw a game he didn't bet on in order to win a game he did bet on, but with no legal consequences for the Monday game and no one the wiser.
Now, you want to tell me again how different all this makes it?