Pete Hegseth presser on Iran bombing live now

[Lisa558]

No. I have a job and don’t have time to listen, nor do I have much tolerance for a media performance.

Did Gen Caine give an assessment as to the status of the Iranian nuclear program?

If you didn’t listen, you have no standing to make a judgement.

 

[j-mac]

Jesus, you guys are defensive.

Why would I believe the Trump administration’s assessment?

I don't care what you believe....You're a hack, and a liar....GFY

 

[Marener]

If you didn’t listen, you have no standing to make a judgement.

NY Times said that Caine didn’t offer any damage assessments, that he just described the mission.

I wouldn’t waste my time listening to Hegseth.

I still don’t understand how you can claim to know the status of the Iranian nuclear program without the “anywhere anytime” inspections you wanted.

 

[j-mac]

NY Times said that Caine didn’t offer any damage assessments, that he just described the mission.

I wouldn’t waste my time listening to Hegseth.

I still don’t understand how you can claim to know the status of the Iranian nuclear program without the “anywhere anytime” inspections you wanted.

You won't waste your time with anything that promotes, or makes America look good, because you are a traitor, that hates this country....

 

[Marener]

You won't waste your time with anything that promotes, or makes America look good, because you are a traitor, that hates this country....

All you care about is what “looks” good?

I care about what is good.

I guess that’s the difference between us.

You really are in the cult.

 

[j-mac]

All you care about is what “looks” good?

I care about what is good.

I guess that’s the difference between us.

You really are in the cult.

Good for who? Our enemies no doubt.

 

[SeaMajor7]

The poster Marener is a subverted demoralized zombie.
No amount of verifiable information can sway it.
It is completely useless to even try.
It cannot process anything that goes against its programming.
Scroll ignore is recommended.

 

[Marener]

Good for who? Our enemies no doubt.

God, you’re pathetic.

All you seem to care about is making Trump look good.

 

[j-mac]

God, you’re pathetic.

All you seem to care about is making Trump look good.

Traitor

 

[Marener]

Traitor

You’re loyal to Trump. Not the country.

But you can’t tell the difference anymore.

 

[j-mac]

You’re loyal to Trump. Not the country.

But you can’t tell the difference anymore.

Traitor.

 

[Independent thinker]

Fascinating stuff!

And how horrible that the Dems are so anti-Trump that they tried to make it appear that this amazingly successful mission was a nothingburger.

Funny that before this the so called media and dems were trying to claim Iran had no nuclear program and then after the bombing the narrative changed to the attack only set their nuclear program back by a few months.

 

[Marener]

Traitor.

Pathetic.

 

[Marener]

Funny that before this the so called media and dems were trying to claim Iran had no nuclear program and then after the bombing the narrative changed to the attack only set their nuclear program back by a few months.

You’re confused. It’s complicated and you don’t know what you’re talking about.

 

[Independent thinker]

You’re confused. It’s complicated and you don’t know what you’re talking about.

I'm not the one flip flopping on whether Iran had a nuclear program or not.

 

[toobfreak]

OMG. Your twisted logic is giving me whiplash. Why do you believe an Islamic Terrorist instead of American military?

Lisa, you're talking to an idiot who does not understand that the actual damage at Fordow cannot be directly assessed right now without flying halfway around the world and spending weeks and months of digging down through about a tenth of a mile of pulverized rock, steel, and broken equipment with heavy equipment, in a hostile enemy country no less, some of the material which is radioactive, bodies, etc., before anyone can even begin to directly view the destruction, so all conclusions must be inferred by experts using external evidence, most of it taken from outer space, based on years of testing and simulation with the involved weapons systems added to tactical knowledge of how the places were constructed.

This is a person who if he watched Joe Biden shoved out of an airplane at 30,000 feet without a parachute, would still dispute his death even if someone scraped some of his remains off the sidewalk below and ran a DNA analysis of it.

 

[Marener]

I'm not the one flip flopping on whether Iran had a nuclear program or not.

Enriching uranium is not the same as weaponization.

Start there.

 

[JWBooth]

No, you're missing the point. The sites attacked, were devastated according to the CIA, Israel intel, and the Pentagon...

That may be true, yet the three named sources don't have the best history when it comes to veracity.

 

[struth]

Enriching uranium is not the same as weaponization.

Start there.

enriching it is part of the weaponization process.

 

[Marener]

Lisa, you're talking to an idiot who does not understand that the actual damage at Fordow cannot be directly assessed right now without flying halfway around the world and spending weeks and months of digging down through about a tenth of a mile of pulverized rock, steel, and broken equipment with heavy equipment, in a hostile enemy country no less, some of the material which is radioactive, bodies, etc., before anyone can even begin to directly view the destruction, so all conclusions must be inferred by experts using external evidence, most of it taken from outer space, based on years of testing and simulation with the involved weapons systems added to tactical knowledge of how the places were constructed.

This is a person who if he watched Joe Biden shoved out of an airplane at 30,000 feet without a parachute, would still dispute his death even if someone scraped some of his remains off the sidewalk below and ran a DNA analysis of it.

So we can’t know the damage but we m is the program is destroyed.

Seems like you want it both ways.