WHAT "international law" ? Does this so-called international law have a NAME ?Does it have a NUMBER ? Something to identify it by ?
At this point, after falling on your face about 5 consecutive times now, and repeatedly failing to identify this "international law", and these "war crimes", it is more than evident that you have no idea what you're talking about.
WHAT "war crime" ? NAME it. When was it created ? What are you talking about ?
I am not a legal expert , nor are you mostly likely but there is the basic principle of right and wrong . It is not wrong to kill an enemy who's fighting you. At the same time if you come across an enemy combatant that has been compromised and is more or less helpless that would be a crime to murder them by any standard of human decency. That's what separates civilized people from barbarians. We still have war but we' re civilized about it. The atrocities ( war crimes ) of the first and second world war taught US all what should and should not be tolerated. Stop the nonsense asking for specific regulations the UDMJ and the Geneva Convention which we abide by both have regulations regarding this. If you want to know the specific ones look them up yourself. Somewhere in these hundreds of posts Looked up them and told someone. They ignored it. But no matter they can't ignore the YRUztH.
Read the above post. If you're not satisfied with the truth then go **** yourself already. Because that's what you're doing anyway.WHAT "international law" ? Does this so-called international law have a NAME ?Does it have a NUMBER ? Something to identify it by ?
"agreed to" ? Yeah ? By whom ?
Was it agreed to by Trump, and the current US Congress & Supreme Court ?
I keep hearing about this mysterious "international law", yet all those talking about it, can't seem to locate it, or name it, or tell us anything about it.
I am familiar with the Geneva Convention, however it was ratified in 1949, before most Americans living today were even born. Whether the US needs to continue to be a party to this, is up to the current US government (Executive, Legislative, Judicial). As proceedings in war take place, this current government is free to exercise its discretion, and not necessarily be bound by the past.
Sorry about the typo , UCMJ the Uniform Code of Military Justice a code military personnel take an oath to uphold.That and the Constitution. ( Not the president ) It's not going to change and the Geneva Convention if we chose to not abide by those rules of engagement we may as well give up because the world will give up on US. You must be very naive . People who do not know history are doomed to repeat it.I am familiar with the Geneva Convention, however it was ratified in 1949, before most Americans living today were even born. Whether the US needs to continue to be a party to this, is up to the current US government (Executive, Legislative, Judicial). As proceedings in war take place, this current government is free to exercise its discretion, and not necessarily be bound by the past.
As for UDMJ, I googled that and it came up as University of Dentristry Medicine of New Jersey.
As for YRUztH, I did a search on that too. It came up as > all members of the Federal Republic of Nigeria aged 18-35.
AS I stated before, we as 2025 Americans, do what we do in OUR NATIONAL interest, not in the interest of international entities. If those outside our border are not comfortable with that, tough ass.
You just don't get it. Yes that makes some sense but not in this one case. They made an obvious mistake and now they are actively trying to cover it up and make it go away. They KNOW they did wrong. This goes against everything the US Military stands for. It's unforgivable. We cannot justify this.
Technically, yes. But if you do it in high seas or in other countries - other countries will see it as a violation of international law (signed by the USA, too) and will have their countermeasures. Including, of course, sending weapons and advisors to the victims of (what they say) "illegal and unprovoked aggression".
And Americans can kill Venezuela's citizens if they want a war with Venezuela and a proxy war with Venezuela's allies (like Russia and China).
But all actions have their consequences, as Yemen and Gaza and Iraq and many others found out.
Can he win this war? Do he really want to win this war? If he do - he should start with America itself and make at least Russia and China allies in this war. Or, may be, he just wants his own money-laundering conflict with potential ability to influence the oil market?
No one in their right mind wants these type of changes. You're not right if you do. Change always happens but not for the terrible future this would bring. The collapse of civilization is not anything anyone wants.
Wait… so we are not bound by any law written before we were born?I am familiar with the Geneva Convention, however it was ratified in 1949, before most Americans living today were even born. Whether the US needs to continue to be a party to this, is up to the current US government (Executive, Legislative, Judicial). As proceedings in war take place, this current government is free to exercise its discretion, and not necessarily be bound by the past.
As for UDMJ, I googled that and it came up as University of Dentristry Medicine of New Jersey.
As for YRUztH, I did a search on tht too. It came up as > all members of the Federal Republic of Nigeria aged 18-35..
It is quite clear that neither you or Lesh have a very sound focus on this scenario.
What is at least as important as any of this "international law" that you speak about, (and really much more so) is the right of 2025 Americans to do as we see fit to do, to fully exercise American sovereignty for our protection & national security, and not be told what to do by those outside of our national borders.
just like you, 99% of the national has never been in a war. We’re not at war now either.
You do know it was a terrorist group that was targeted that had killed hundred before and was an imminent threat.
If you were honest, this would be your response to almost everything.
