Pete Hegseth Completely DESTROYED By Congressman Pat Ryan (D-NY) In Testimony To Congress Last Week. MUST WATCH!!

Kegseth is a bum......not qualified for his position.
Do you think Kegseth is qualified? I bet you do, simply because he's a (R).
Hmmm…you have ZERO credibility when speaking about who’s “qualified”. Ya’ll thought the crypt keeper/ bumbling Biden was ‘qualified, you said Obamala Harris was/is qualified because she’s a blackish Indian with a vagina, you ‘qualified’ a Justice for the color of her skin and she couldn’t define woman, you thought an obese tranny was ‘qualified’ to lead our health dept…Sorry, your opinion is shit.
IMG_0926.webp
 
Hmmm…you have ZERO credibility when speaking about who’s “qualified”. Ya’ll thought the crypt keeper/ bumbling Biden was ‘qualified, you said Obamala Harris was/is qualified because she’s a blackish Indian with a vagina, you ‘qualified’ a Justice for the color of her skin and she couldn’t define woman, you thought an obese tranny was ‘qualified’ to lead our health dept…Sorry, your opinion is shit. View attachment 1254347
Yup, the (D) and their wicked out stance on Trannies is weird.

Doesn't mean that Kegseth is qualified.
Exactly why is a disgraced drunken Major qualified to lead the Pentagon?


why or why not is Pete Hegseth qualified for his position?


Pete Hegseth has supporters who argue he is qualified for senior defense leadership because of his military service, combat experience, and public advocacy for veterans and military issues. Critics argue he lacks the high-level management, policy, and national-security administration experience traditionally expected for top Pentagon roles.

Here are the main arguments on both sides.

Arguments that he is qualified​

  • Military service and combat experience
    • Hegseth served in the U.S. Army National Guard.
    • He deployed to Iraq, Afghanistan, and Guantánamo Bay.
    • Supporters say firsthand operational experience gives him credibility with enlisted troops and combat veterans.
  • Leadership experience
    • He held officer roles in the military and worked with veterans’ organizations.
    • Supporters argue leadership under combat conditions matters more than bureaucratic experience.
  • Public communication skills
    • As a television host and commentator, he became skilled at explaining military and political issues to broad audiences.
    • Backers see this as useful for public-facing leadership and shaping defense messaging.
  • Alignment with Trump’s defense priorities
    • Supporters say he strongly supports military readiness, aggressive deterrence, and reducing what he calls political or ideological distractions within the armed forces.
    • Political alignment often matters in cabinet-level appointments.

Arguments that he is not qualified​

  • Limited executive management experience
    • Critics note he has never run a massive organization comparable to the Department of Defense, which has millions of personnel and a budget approaching a trillion dollars.
    • Previous defense secretaries often had backgrounds as generals, senior lawmakers, governors, or executives.
  • Lack of deep policy or procurement background
    • Critics argue modern defense leadership requires expertise in:
      • nuclear deterrence
      • alliance diplomacy
      • weapons procurement
      • intelligence coordination
      • global logistics
    • They say Hegseth’s résumé is lighter in these areas.
  • Partisan media profile
    • Opponents argue his years as a cable-news personality could make him appear more ideological than nonpartisan.
    • Some worry about politicization of the military.
  • Past controversies
    • Critics have raised concerns about statements he has made regarding the military, diversity policies, and foreign policy.
    • Opponents argue those controversies could complicate relationships inside the Pentagon and with allies.
Historically, qualifications for top defense jobs are partly subjective:

  • Some presidents prioritize bureaucratic and policy experience.
  • Others prioritize loyalty, communication ability, or outsider status.
Whether someone views Hegseth as qualified often depends heavily on what they think the role most requires:

  • battlefield experience and ideological reform,
    or
  • institutional management and policy expertise.
 
Yup, the (D) and their wicked out stance on Trannies is weird.

Doesn't mean that Kegseth is qualified.
Exactly why is a disgraced drunken Major qualified to lead the Pentagon?


why or why not is Pete Hegseth qualified for his position?


Pete Hegseth has supporters who argue he is qualified for senior defense leadership because of his military service, combat experience, and public advocacy for veterans and military issues. Critics argue he lacks the high-level management, policy, and national-security administration experience traditionally expected for top Pentagon roles.

Here are the main arguments on both sides.

Arguments that he is qualified​

  • Military service and combat experience
    • Hegseth served in the U.S. Army National Guard.
    • He deployed to Iraq, Afghanistan, and Guantánamo Bay.
    • Supporters say firsthand operational experience gives him credibility with enlisted troops and combat veterans.
  • Leadership experience
    • He held officer roles in the military and worked with veterans’ organizations.
    • Supporters argue leadership under combat conditions matters more than bureaucratic experience.
  • Public communication skills
    • As a television host and commentator, he became skilled at explaining military and political issues to broad audiences.
    • Backers see this as useful for public-facing leadership and shaping defense messaging.
  • Alignment with Trump’s defense priorities
    • Supporters say he strongly supports military readiness, aggressive deterrence, and reducing what he calls political or ideological distractions within the armed forces.
    • Political alignment often matters in cabinet-level appointments.

Arguments that he is not qualified​

  • Limited executive management experience
    • Critics note he has never run a massive organization comparable to the Department of Defense, which has millions of personnel and a budget approaching a trillion dollars.
    • Previous defense secretaries often had backgrounds as generals, senior lawmakers, governors, or executives.
  • Lack of deep policy or procurement background
    • Critics argue modern defense leadership requires expertise in:
      • nuclear deterrence
      • alliance diplomacy
      • weapons procurement
      • intelligence coordination
      • global logistics
    • They say Hegseth’s résumé is lighter in these areas.
  • Partisan media profile
    • Opponents argue his years as a cable-news personality could make him appear more ideological than nonpartisan.
    • Some worry about politicization of the military.
  • Past controversies
    • Critics have raised concerns about statements he has made regarding the military, diversity policies, and foreign policy.
    • Opponents argue those controversies could complicate relationships inside the Pentagon and with allies.
Historically, qualifications for top defense jobs are partly subjective:

  • Some presidents prioritize bureaucratic and policy experience.
  • Others prioritize loyalty, communication ability, or outsider status.
Whether someone views Hegseth as qualified often depends heavily on what they think the role most requires:

  • battlefield experience and ideological reform,
    or
  • institutional management and policy expertise.
A true word salad.
 
Hmmm…you have ZERO credibility when speaking about who’s “qualified”. Ya’ll thought the crypt keeper/ bumbling Biden was ‘qualified, you said Obamala Harris was/is qualified because she’s a blackish Indian with a vagina, you ‘qualified’ a Justice for the color of her skin and she couldn’t define woman, you thought an obese tranny was ‘qualified’ to lead our health dept…Sorry, your opinion is shit.
Get real. Failed Captains/Majors in the Army do not become Secretary of Defense. Ever.

Hegseth is easily the most unqualified imbecile to ever to be in that position. He got his job by being one of the biggest Trump cucks in the country and that is the only reason.
 
And none of them tried to steal a U.S. election, destroy the U.S. Capitol, or try to kill Mike Pence.

Next?
Alicia, investigations are going on right now that are proving that the 2020 election ballot funny business was/is real. It’s going to take time to expose, but we are seeing widespread election tampering such as in GA with 315,000 fraudulent ballots. And investigations into the voter roles in other states is ongoing. Now, I’m sure you’ll deny it, scoff at it, even mock it, but you can’t run from facts.
Spoken like a true "Christian"....excusing cold-blooder murder.
Another Alensky tactic. You think by mocking faith you can shut someone up. That’s false. And no one committed “cold blooded murder” except those on the left who went on a rampage in the summer of love.
Did you see the text messages of the deranged ICE agent bragging about shooting a teacher in her car 8 times? Miraculously, she survived.
Nope, sure didn’t … who are you talking about?..
 
Do you think Pete Kegseth is fit for this job?

A simple Yes or No is the required answer.

I think Pet Hegseth is 100% fit for the job!!!

Now your turn, did you think Biden's guy was fit for the job?
 
Pat Ryan quoted the soldiers and then Hegseth said the quotes were falsehoods.

You're dishonest, you're a moral and an intellectual coward, and you ain't worth my time.

Quote from transcript or video timestamp?
 
Get real. Failed Captains/Majors in the Army do not become Secretary of Defense. Ever.

Hegseth is easily the most unqualified imbecile to ever to be in that position. He got his job by being one of the biggest Trump cucks in the country and that is the only reason.
You people phucked our military us so bad that ANYBODY else was qualified to take it over.
Winco
I’ll just drop this shit right here.
IMG_3717.webp

IMG_3716.webp


 
hahaha…this is comical. Much of iCE is comprised of ex-soldiers…all of whom Alicia J and Winco want to see dead. Suddenly in this thread they believe all soldiers…hahahaha
 
Alicia, investigations are going on right now that are proving that the 2020 election ballot funny business was/is real. It’s going to take time to expose, but we are seeing widespread election tampering such as in GA with 315,000 fraudulent ballots. And investigations into the voter roles in other states is ongoing. Now, I’m sure you’ll deny it, scoff at it, even mock it, but you can’t run from facts.
Any facts that make Trump look bad are "fake". This is how all MAGA cry baby cowards "debate".

And yes....you are a total moral and intellectual coward.

Nope, sure didn’t … who are you talking about?..

You support nazis. --
DHS also sought to block the release of text messages sent by Border Patrol agent Charles Exum, who shot Martinez, to his wife, brother and co-workers, calling them “private.” But Alexakis ruled with Martinez, agreeing to allow the release of redacted versions of those text messages to protect the identity of Exum’s family members and co-workers.

“I fired 5 rounds and she had 7 holes. Put that in your book, boys,” Exum allegedly wrote in one of five messages made public in November.

 
You people phucked our military us so bad that ANYBODY else was qualified to take it over.
Winco
I’ll just drop this shit right here.




None of this has anything to do with Hegseth being totally unqualified for the job.

The main reason you like him is that he is a racist, just like Trump.
 
15th post
hahaha…this is comical. Much of iCE is comprised of ex-soldiers…all of whom Alicia J and Winco want to see dead. Suddenly in this thread they believe all soldiers…hahahaha
Making shit up because you've lost the argument.

Like all cowardly, cry baby MAGAs...
 
Any facts that make Trump look bad are "fake". This is how all MAGA cry baby cowards "debate".

And yes....you are a total moral and intellectual coward.
Seems that’s exactly what you’re doing.
You support nazis. --
lol …. No.
Seems Martinez was another trying to block, and harass agents…Not a good move. When will you people realize that can be deadly.
 
Seems that’s exactly what you’re doing.
You have no evidence that Trump won the 2020 election. Zero.

You are nothing but a giant MAGA cry baby.

lol …. No.

Seems Martinez was another trying to block, and harass agents…Not a good move. When will you people realize that can be deadly.
Clueless as always.

So you agree with an ICE agent bragging like this after shooting a U.S. citizen 7 times? What a nazi supporter.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom