- Aug 16, 2011
- 128,696
- 24,402
- 2,180
Their arguments are always couched in, "Well, he's just moderate enough to appeal to independents (despite the weird religion, etc.) to win."
You have NEVER heard me say that.
I support him because he is the right man for such fragile economic times. Just like I did in 2008 when the anti-Mormon hucksters threw their support to RINO McCain just to stop the more qualified and more conservative Romney from having a chance to win the nomination.
He was the right man then.
He is the right man now.
Now jump back on your lying bigoted train and do your best to submarine this election, but hopefully the rest of America is better than you are. If not, then yes we deserve 4 more years of Obama and worse.
ooooh, that's even a stupider line of reasoning.
Seriously, you're going with that?
Romney's economic history is fucking over working people to make rich people richer. As Huckabee said about him devastatingly, "He looks like the guy who lays you off!" Romney's America is one where we don't have a middle class.
Seriously, if I were Obama, I would LOVE to run against Romney on that basis. Let's do exactly what Ted Kennedy did in 1994, show some commercials with shuttered AmPad plants and ex-AmPad workers who lost good union wages.
Sadly, that is the mentality of the people in the GOP establishment, that this is just peachy, and if we can get a guy who can say "Jay-zus" convincingly, we can fool the stupids into voting against their own economic interests. The problem is, Mitt's version of Jay-zus isn't the one the rest of them worship, which is why they are never going to be able to foist this guy on the country.
Good to see that you have at least finally given up on the "I'm a Republican, really!" BS, mr. democrat.