People assume because you are GAY

Well, if gay is normal, then transgenderism is normal, then...
Patrician Parenting Produces Pansies

Don't forget "pedosexuality."

"As long as they do it in private" is the appeasement slogan. Conservatives are weak on this issue because many of their spoiled brats turn Gayist. Typical of these frauds is that ultra-Right Alan Keyes's daughtert is a dyke.
 
Patrician Parenting Produces Pansies

Don't forget "pedosexuality."

"As long as they do it in private" is the appeasement slogan. Conservatives are weak on this issue because many of their spoiled brats turn Gayist. Typical of these frauds is that ultra-Right Alan Keyes's daughtert is a dyke.
Just a short jump to being a bigot for being against that.
 
People assume because you are GAY that you can't be conservative in areas. You have to be a hard core leftist!

Me, I dress fully and never would walk down the street in the way you stereo type us. I respect the children and believe in decency.
I believe in two parent families
I believe in standing by your family and children
I believe in marriage
I believe in the second and first amendments.
I believe in borders and that illegal immigration is wrong
Say anything you want, you are still a degenerate in my eyes.
 
Just a short jump to being a bigot for being against that.
Proctophilia

"Homosexuality" is also a nonsense word. Sex is between male and female. The greedy Fairyphile shrinks made up this word about a neurosis so that they could use their undeserved medical authority to force the public into thinking, "They have their sexuality; we have ours. To each his own."
 
Proctophilia

"Homosexuality" is also a nonsense word. Sex is between male and female. The greedy Fairyphile shrinks made up this word about a neurosis so that they could use their undeserved medical authority to force the public into thinking, "They have their sexuality; we have ours. To each his own."
This is a good point. I really think homosexuality should be listed under paraphilia.
 
This is a good point. I really think homosexuality should be listed under paraphilia.
Yes, gayness is not normal. It's not typical of the human population and should never be promoted especially to our children. If a child exhibits gayness, they need to be treated to bring them back to acceptance of their natal sex.
 
Yes, gayness is not normal. It's not typical of the human population and should never be promoted especially to our children. If a child exhibits gayness, they need to be treated to bring them back to acceptance of their natal sex.
I guess my stance is a bit more liberal. I would not attempt to "cure" children of their homosexuality, because I do believe it is genetic to some extent. However, I believe that we should restrict children/families from attending pride parades. Those parades are purely for brainwashing young minds into accepting the gay lifestyle. It's irresponsible to let children see that stuff.
 
Proctophilia

"Homosexuality" is also a nonsense word. Sex is between male and female. The greedy Fairyphile shrinks made up this word about a neurosis so that they could use their undeserved medical authority to force the public into thinking, "They have their sexuality; we have ours. To each his own."
I agree. There is no sexual activity among gays. There simply cannot be.
 
To be a parent, you have to have given birth to the child.

I've been adopted since I was a year old does that make me an orphan?

Straight or otherwise, how can you be the biological parents of a child if you didn't give birth to it?

That's not what you said but frankly I'm a bit insulted right now because I have parents just like everybody else.

Hey jackass--- I said to be a BIOLOGICAL parent, you have to give birth.

No you didn't not at first.
 
I've been adopted since I was a year old does that make me an orphan?
You were an orphan before you were adopted, and that makes your adoptees your legal guardians and effective parents now due to court decree.

That's not what you said but frankly I'm a bit insulted right now because I have parents just like everybody else.
Sure they are parents. Like I keep saying, they are your legal guardian parents by court appointment, just not your /biological/ parents.

No you didn't not at first.
Shouldn't have to. The default technical scientific definition of one's TRUE parents are their progenitors whom have them birth.
 
and metric wrenches !
Actually 95% of the world uses metric because it's way easier than standard which is an old relict with inches and fractions

I have not used my SAE tools in decades and newer domestic vehicles use metric now too
 
You were an orphan before you were adopted, and that makes your adoptees your legal guardians and effective parents now due to court decree.


Sure they are parents. Like I keep saying, they are your legal guardian parents by court appointment, just not your /biological/ parents.


Shouldn't have to. The default technical scientific definition of one's TRUE parents are their progenitors whom have them birth.

Normally I like what you say but adoptive parents are people's TRUE parents.
 
15th post
Normally I like what you say but adoptive parents are people's TRUE parents.

That is rubbish. Do you have a reading comprehension problem? If they are /ADOPTIVE/ parents, how can they be your birth parents too? Apparently you do not understand that some words fall under context, the general and the specific:

For instance, a 1-star general is a /TYPE/ of general, a Brigadier General, as a subset of generals, but a true general, a FULL general, is known by no other name--- GENERAL, a four star general, yet they are goth generals.

Strictly speaking, your true parents are your birthing parents. That can never change. You are their offspring. A DNA test can prove it. But if for whatever reason, they had to give you up for adoption, then the people who adopted you became your surrogate parents, your adoptive parents. They became your legal guardians and raised you and are in every way now your new parents except one: they did not give birth to you, there is no DNA link to them, so there is always that distinction semantically with your true, original, biological parents.

This is not a matter of debate nor conjecture, but a semantical fact. Sorry if that rocks your world, but that is how it works.
 
For instance, a 1-star general is a /TYPE/ of general, a Brigadier General, as a subset of generals, but a true general, a FULL general, is known by no other name--- GENERAL, a four star general, yet they are goth generals.
Even Those with the Highest GPAs Have Been Dumbed Down

I was corrected in the same quibbling way when I pointed out that no pronoun uses apostrophe-s in the possessive; that's why using "it's" for "belonging to it" shows that someone's education is defective.

But that's only true of personal pronouns. There are 8 other types; so "someone's" in the above sentence does not reveal how brain-numbing our educational system is, from top to bottom.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom