People assume because you are GAY

[toobfreak]

You really do not think beyond your ignorance.
"To be a parent, you have to have given birth to the child."

Hey jackass--- I said to be a BIOLOGICAL parent, you have to give birth. For thousands (millions?) of years, when you said 'parent' it was assumed you meant YOUR child, your progeny carrying forth your biological coding. But now DEI jackasses like you have invented a new, broader, secondary meaning of a general, supervisory parent who merely takes custody of someone else's kid and raises it.

Sign of the times. I'm guessing you didn't have any parents which is why you are commenting.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Hey jackass--- I said to be a BIOLOGICAL parent, you have to give birth. For thousands (millions?) of years, when you said 'parent' it was assumed you meant YOUR child, your progeny carrying forth your biological coding. But now DEI jackasses like you have invented a new, broader, secondary meaning of a general, supervisory parent who merely takes custody of someone else's kid and raises it.

Sign of the times. I'm guessing you didn't have any parents which is why you are commenting.

Adoptive parents aren't parents? Did anyone tell the Romans? Did anyone tell Moses?

 

[BluesLegend]

Gay people do not need need constant public acceptance, nor do they " run around announcing I'm gay"

Gay people do, however, respond to the lies and ridicule by the bigots . Do you defend yourself when attacked?

Well let's see, wrong and wrong. Try again.

 

[braalian]

Straight or otherwise, how can you be the biological parents of a child if you didn't give birth to it?

Kind of seems like you’re moving the goalposts in order to backtrack here.

Your entire point was that adoptive parents aren’t biologically parents? Really? Does such an obvious statement even need to be said?

 

[toobfreak]

Kind of seems like you’re moving the goalposts in order to backtrack here.

I've moved nothing. Maybe your definition of being a "parent" is just a lot broader than mine--- I go by the strictly technical definition of the word. When you give birth, you are the parent. When you adopt, you are merely an adoptive, supervisory legal guardian.

Your entire point was that adoptive parents aren’t biologically parents? Does such an obvious statement even need to be said?

Apparently so as YOU are the one that brought it up.
Now you've brought it up TWICE.

 

[braalian]

When you adopt, you are merely an adoptive, supervisory legal guardian.

That’s a stupid way to look at it.

By the way, the law considers an adoptive parent legally a parent as much as a biological one

 

[Zincwarrior]

When you adopt, you are merely an adoptive, supervisory legal guardian.

So you're kind of a dick is what I am getting.

 

[Godboy]

People assume because you are GAY that you can't be conservative in areas. You have to be a hard core leftist!

Me, I dress fully and never would walk down the street in the way you stereo type us. I respect the children and believe in decency.
I believe in two parent families
I believe in standing by your family and children
I believe in marriage
I believe in the second and first amendments.
I believe in borders and that illegal immigration is wrong

Yeah, people get this issue wrong constantly. No one cares about gay men. What people hate are the over-the-top fem boys who essentially wear pornographic clown costumes and act like weirdos.

Sorry democrats, but weirdos of all sexual orientations are rightfully shunned. Weirdos ******* suck.

 

[toobfreak]

That’s a stupid way to look at it.

That is your stupid way. I look at it from a strictly logical, morally God-based historical POV.
Otherwise, show me where else in nature we see a regular example of a parent not having been the actual biological determent of the child progeny.

By the way, the law considers an adoptive parent legally a parent as much as a biological one

The law changes over time so is relative, but the question wasn't what the law DEFINED as the legal guardian (parent); again, I am speaking in the purely biological/historical/moral sense.

 

[Zincwarrior]

That is your stupid way. I look at it from a strictly logical, morally God-based historical POV.

What are you talking about? ? ? The Bible says that a man must marry his widowed brother's wife and adopt her children.
So James wasn't a parent to Jesus?

The level of bullshit you typing is unbelievable and definitely unChristian.

 

[braalian]

That is your stupid way. I look at it from a strictly logical, morally God-based historical POV.

Ok, I get it now. You’re just a terrible person. Got it.

 

[toobfreak]

Ok, I get it now. You’re just a terrible person. Got it.

If you need to believe that clear-thinking and morality as a compass to opinions is terrible, go for it.

 

[braalian]

If you need to believe that clear-thinking and morality as a compass to opinions is terrible, go for it.

If you believe adoptive parents “biblically” aren’t really parents to the children they adopt then you are a terrible person.

Objective fact

 

[toobfreak]

If you believe adoptive parents “biblically” aren’t really parents to the children they adopt then you are a terrible person.

If I believe that adoptive guardians raising the child aren't really the true, actual, original biological progenitors?

Terrible me, asshole?

 

[Zincwarrior]

If I believe that adoptive guardians raising the child aren't really the true, actual, original biological progenitors?

Terrible me, asshole?

View attachment 1083221

Yep

 

[boilermaker55]

No you did not you stupid shit eating magaturd.
Read your own post you assmunch!
LOL
Here is your original post you dumbfuck!

I believe in two parent families

To be a parent, you have to have given birth to the child.

I believe in marriage

Then you understand that the definition of a marriage as understood for thousands of years is a holy matrimony before God of a man and wife coming together to have children. A gay couple can only have a civil union, though in the past decade, DEI types have tried to blur the definitions.

Hey jackass--- I said to be a BIOLOGICAL parent, you have to give birth. For thousands (millions?) of years, when you said 'parent' it was assumed you meant YOUR child, your progeny carrying forth your biological coding. But now DEI jackasses like you have invented a new, broader, secondary meaning of a general, supervisory parent who merely takes custody of someone else's kid and raises it.

Sign of the times. I'm guessing you didn't have any parents which is why you are commenting.

 

[toobfreak]

No you did not you stupid shit eating magaturd.

Hey Boiling Mad:

Trump won.

PS: Reread post #42.

 

[BULLDOG]

I hope someone uses your daughter's naked pic as their avatar someday, I'm sure you'd be proud. Freak.

reported.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Well let's see, wrong and wrong. Try again.

YOU need to try again

 

[Zincwarrior]

Straight or otherwise, how can you be the biological parents of a child if you didn't give birth to it?

Also this means that no man can be a parent. Evidently there are no Dads in Toobfreak's world. Explains a lot.